书作文之意见书英文Word文档下载推荐.docx

书作文之意见书英文Word文档下载推荐.docx

《书作文之意见书英文Word文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《书作文之意见书英文Word文档下载推荐.docx（10页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

englisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.

2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.

3、对于研究设计的rationale:

also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.

4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：

theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshow

ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.

5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：

ahypothesisneedstobepresented。

6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：

whatwastherationaleforthefilm/sbfvolumeratio?

7、对研究问题的定义：

trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,

writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem

8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:

thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.

9、对claim,如a＞b的证明，verification:

thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.

10、严谨度问题：

mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.

11、格式（重视程度）：

inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.

beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheinstructionsandformsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.

12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：

有关语言的审稿人意见：

theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;

onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.

aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.

theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthat

youobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.

pleasehavesomeonecompetentintheenglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit?

thequalityofenglishneedsimprov

ing.

作为审稿人，本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开（冒风险啊），

但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意，

就贴出来吧，当然，有关审稿人的名字，email，文章题名信息等就都删除了，

以免造成不必要的麻烦！

希望朋友们多评价，其他有经验的审稿人能常来指点大家！

国人一篇文章投mater.类知名国际杂志，

被塞尔维亚一审稿人打25分！

个人认为文章还是有一些创新的，

所以作为审稿人我就给了66分，（这个分正常应该足以发表），提了一些修改意见，望作者修改后发表！

登录到编辑部网页一看，一个文章竟然有六个审稿人，

详细看了下打的分数，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但没有打分（另一国人审），最后一个没有回来！

两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的！

（括号斜体内容为我注解）

reviewer4

reviewerrecommendationterm:

reject

overallreviewermanuscriptrating:

25

commentstoeditor:

reviewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelow.pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.

title（prof./dr./mr./mrs.）:

prof.

name:

xxx

affiliation:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

manuscriptentitledsynthesisxxx。

。

ithasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsandinavarietyofforms.thismanuscriptdoesnotbringanynewknowledgeordataonmaterialspropertyandthereforeonlycontributionmaybeinnovelpreparationmethod,stillthispointisnotelaboratedproperly（seeremark1）.presentationandwritingisratherpoor;

thereareseveralstatementsnotsupportedwithdata（forsomeseeremarks2）andevensomeflaws（seeremark3）.forthesereasonsisuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentform.

1.thepaperdescribesanewmethodforpreparationofxxxx,but:

-thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsforpreparationofxxxxpowders

（introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion）,（通常的写作格式，审稿人实际上很在意的）

-ithastobedescribedwhythismethodisbetterordifferentfromothermethods,

（introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion）,

-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofxxxxxxbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone（introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion）,-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthismethod（abstract,resultsanddiscussion,conclusions）.

（很多人不会写这个地方，大家多学习啊）

2.whendiscussingxrddataxxxauthors

-statethatxxxxx

-statethatxxxx

-thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,particlesize?

（很多人用xrd，结果图放上去就什么都不管了，这是不应该的）

3.whendiscussingluminescencemeasurementsauthorswritexxxxxifthereissecond

harmonicinexcitationbeamitwillstaytherenomatterwhattypeofmaterialoneinvestigates!

!

（研究了什么？

？

）

4.英语写作要提高

（这条很多人的软肋，大家努力啊）

reviewer5

overallreviewermanuscriptrating:

n/a

title（prof./dr./mr./mrs.）rof.

（国人）

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

deareditor:

thankyouforinvitingmetoevaluatethearticletitledxxxx“.inthispaper,theauthorsinvestigatedtheinfluencesofsinteringconditiononthecrystalstructureandxxxxxx，however,itisdifficultforustounderstandthemanuscriptbecauseofpoorenglishbeingused.thetextisnotwellarrangedandthelogicisnotclear.exceptenglishwriting,therearemanymistakesinthemanuscriptandtheexperimentalresultsdontshowgoodandnewresults.soirecommendtoyouthatthismanuscriptcannotbeaccepted.thefollowingarethequestionsandsomemistakesinthismanuscript:

（看看总体评价，不达标，很多人被这样郁闷了，当然审稿人也有他的道理）

1.thexxxxxxx.however,thiskindmaterialhadbeeninvestigatedsince1997asmentionedintheauthorsmanuscript,andsimilarworkshadbeenpublishedinsimilarjournals.whatarethe

【篇二：

英文期刊审稿意见模板】

itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.

有关语言的审稿人意见：

theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.

thequalityofenglishneedsimproving.