英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:18790511 上传时间:2023-01-01 格式:DOCX 页数:11 大小:50.03KB
下载 相关 举报
英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共11页
英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共11页
英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共11页
英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共11页
英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共11页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx

《英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

英文稿The ThirdPerson Effect in CommunicationWord格式.docx

Insomecases,acommunicationleadstoactionnotbecauseofitsimpactonthosetowhomitisostensiblydirected,butbecauseothers(thirdpersons)thinkthatitwillhaveanimpactonitsaudience.Foursmallexperimentsthattendtosupportthishypothesisarepresented,anditscomplementaryrelationshiptoanumberofconceptsinthesocialsciencesisnoted.Thethird-personeffectmayhelptoexplainvariousaspectsofsocialbehavior,includingthefearofhereticalpropagandabyreligiousleadersandthefearofdissentbypoliticalrulers.Itappearstoberelatedtothephenomenonofcensorshipingeneral:

thecensorneveradmitstobeinginfluenced;

itisotherswith"

moreimpressionableminds"

whowillbeaffected.

W.PhillipsDavisonisProfessorofJournalismandSociologyatColumbiaUniversity.TheauthorwishestothankRobertL.Cohenandtwoanonymousrefereesforreadinganearlierversionofthisarticleandmakinghelpfulcomments.

In1949or1950,whilecombingthroughcartonsofU.S.MarineCorpsdocumentsfromWorldWarII,ayounghistorianatPrincetonUni-versitycameacrossaseriesthatpiquedhiscuriosity.Hesteppedacrossthecorridoranddescribedhisfindtoanevenyoungersociologist:

"

You'

resupposedtoknowsomethingaboutpublicopinion.Whatdoyoumakeofthis?

TherewasaserviceunitconsistingofNegrotroopswithwhiteofficersonIwoJimaIslandinthePacific.TheJapaneselearnedaboutthelocationofthisunitandsentplanesoverwithpropagandaleaflets.Theseleafletsstressedthethemethatthiswasawhiteman'

swarandthattheJapanesehadnoquarrelwithcoloredpeoples.Theysaid,moreorless,'

Don'

triskyourlifeforthewhiteman.Giveyourselfupatthefirstopportunity,orjustdesert.Don'

ttakechances.'

Thenextdaythatunitwaswithdrawn."

Whydoyoufindthissointeresting?

askedthesociologist.

BecauseIcan'

tfindanyevidencethatthepropagandahadaneffectonthetroopsatall.Butitsurehadaneffectonthewhiteofficers.Theleafletsseemtohavecausedasubstantialreshuffleofpersonnel."

Thesociologistmumbledsomethingaboutprobableguiltfeelingsonthepartofthewhiteofficersandatendencyofthemilitarytoprefersolutionsthatinvolvephysicalaction.Buthecouldn'

tescapethefeelingthatsomethingelsewasinvolved.

Afewyearslater,inthecourseofinvestigatingtheroleoftheWestGermanpressintheformationofBonn'

sforeignpolicy,thesociologisthadoccasiontoaskaseriesofjournalistshowmuchinfluencetheythoughtnewspapereditorialshadonthethinkingoftheirreaders(Davison,1957).Oneoftherepliesgivenfrequentlywasalongthefollowinglines:

Theeditorialshavelittleeffectonpeoplelikeyouandme,buttheordinaryreaderislikelytobeinfluencedquitealot."

Sinceevidencetosupportsuchajudgmentcouldnotbelocated,thislineofinquirywaseventuallyabandoned,buttheresearcherremainedimpressedwiththeextenttowhichmanyjournalistswereconvincedthateditorialshadaneffectonotherpeople'

sattitudes,whilediscountingtheeffectonpeoplelikethemselves.

Sometimeafterthat,thesociologistbecameinvolvedinthelocalphaseofanationalelection,servingasavolunteerforhispreferredcandidate'

sorganization.Twodaysbeforetheelectionaleafletsupportingtherivalcandidateappearedinhismailbox.Hewasimpressedwithitsquality.Itwouldundoubtedlyswingalotofvotes.Somecounteractionwouldhavetobetaken.Withoutthinkingfurther,heprocuredapileofpoliticalliteraturefromhisownparty'

slocalofficeandspenttherestofthedaydistributingitdoortodoor.

Informalpostelectionanalyses(nosystematicstudieswereconductedatthelocallevel)suggestedthatneithersetofpropagandamaterialshadexertedmuchinfluenceonthevoters.ItwasasthoughapagehadbeentakenoutofThePeople'

sChoice.Thesociologist(whoisidenticalwiththewriterofthisarticle)begantoaskhimselfwhyhehadassumedthattherivalcandidate'

sleafletwouldbesoeffective.

Thesepersonalexperiences,andprobablyothersthathavebeenforgotten,ledtotheformationofapropositionthat,forwantofabetterlabel,maybecalledthe"

third-personeffecthypothesis."

Initsbroadestformulation,thishypothesispredictsthatpeoplewilltendtooverestimatetheinfluencethatmasscommunicationshaveontheattitudesandbehaviorofothers.Morespecifically,individualswhoaremembersofanaudiencethatisexposedtoapersuasivecommunication(whetherornotthiscommunicationisintendedtobepersuasive)willexpectthecommunicationtohaveagreatereffectonothersthanonthemselves.Andwhetherornottheseindividualsareamongtheostensibleaudienceforthemessage,theimpactthattheyexpectthiscommunicationtohaveonothersmayleadthemtotakesomeaction.Anyeffectthatthecommunicationachievesmaythusbeduenottothereactionoftheostensibleaudiencebutrathertothebehaviorofthosewhoanticipate,orthinktheyperceive,somereactiononthepartofothers.

Thephenomenonunderconsiderationhasbeencalledthe"

third-personeffect"

becausethirdpersonsareinvolvedfromtwodifferentobservationalstandpoints.Intheviewofthosetryingtoevaluatetheeffectsofacommunication,itsgreatestimpactwillnotbeon"

me"

or"

you,"

buton"

them"

—thethirdpersons.Fromthestandpointofapropagandistorotherpersuasivecommunicator,ontheotherhand,thethirdpersonsarethosewhoareinsomewayconcernedwiththeattitudesandbehavioroftheostensibleaudience.Indeed,thepropagandistmaytrytomanipulatethebehaviorofthesethirdpersonsbyapparentlyseekingtoinfluencesomeoneelse.

Thisseconddefinitionofthe"

thirdperson"

mayhavebeeninthemindsoftheJapanesestrategistswhoarrangedtohaveleafletsdroppedovertheblackserviceunitsonIwoJima.Theymaynothaveexpectedtheleafletstohaveaneffectonthetroopsthemselves,butwereinsteadtryingtogoadthewhitemilitarycommandintotakingtheactionthatitapparentlydidtakeinfact—namely,towithdrawtheserviceunits.

ImputationofsuchreasoningtoJapanesemilitarypropagandistsissupportedbythefactthatBritishandAmericanpsychologicalwarfareinEuropemadeuseofaverysimilartactic.TheHistoryofthePsychologicalWarfareDivision,SupremeHeadquarters,AlliedExpeditionaryForce(BadHomburg,Germany,1945),tellsusaboutOperationHuguenot—aprojectforunderminingtheefficiencyoftheGermanAirForcebysuggestingthatGermanflyingpersonnelweredesertingintheirmachinestotheAlliedside.Plantingsuchsuggestionswasnotdifficult.

ItwasknownthatAlliedradiobroadcastsweresystematicallymonitoredbytheGermangovernmentandthatmonitoringreportsweredistributedtoallhighpoliticalandmilitaryofficials.HintsaboutdesertionsfromtheLuftwaffecouldinclude,forexample,a"

slip"

byanannouncerindicatingthataplaneofficiallyreportedasbeingshotdownhadinfactlandedsafelyinEngland.ItcouldbeassumedthatatleastsomeofthesehintswouldbepickedupbyalertradiomonitorsinBerlin.ThePsychologicalWarfareDivisionhistorytellsus:

ThedividendsfromthisoperationwereexpectednotsomuchintheactualnumberofdesertionsasintheeffectofthecountermeasureswhichtheGermanauthoritieswouldbeinducedtotakeagainstflyingpersonnel...sharpeningupofanti-desertionmeasuresandinstructionstofieldpolicetokeepasuspiciouseyeoneveryone—acoursewhichwouldhaveseriouseffectsonmorale.Also,thepromotionofofficersonaccountofreliabilityratherthanefficiency(p.53).

Itseemsprobablethatpracticalpersuadersthroughoutthecenturieshavebeenawareofthisuseofthethird-personeffect.Lovers,certainly,havefrequentlytriedtoinfluencethebehaviorofthelovedonebyseemingtodirecttheirattentionstosomeoneelse.

FourSmallExperiments

Duringthepastseveralyears,thewriterhasmadeaseriesofminoreffortstotestonevariantofthethird-personeffecthypothesis:

thatanindividualwhoisexposedtoapersuasivecommunicationviathemassmediawillseethiscommunicationashavingagreatereffectonotherpeoplethanonhimselforherself.Allthesetesthavebeenconductedwithsmallgroupsunderinformalconditions.Elegantexperimentstheywerenot.Nevertheless,carewastakentoinsurethatthegroupsdidnotcontaminateeachotherandthattheirmembersdidnotsuspectthataparticularhypothesiswasbeingtested.Eventhoughnosingleexperimentcanberegardedasparticularlyimpressiveinitself,theresultsalltendtoconfirmthehypothesis.Takentogether,theyarereasonablyconvincing,atleasttothiswriter.

Thefirsttrialwasconductedwiththehelpofagood-naturedgroupof33graduatestudentstakingacourseonmasscommunicationatColumbiaUniversityin1978.ItwasjustaftertheNewYorkStateelectionoftheyearandalsojustafterastrikethathadshutdownthethreemajorNewYorkCitynewspapers.Aquestionnaireincludeditemsaboutboththeelectionandthestrike,andwasdivideintotwosection,oneincluding”questionsaboutNewYorkersingeneral,”andtheother“afewquestionsaboutyourownexperiences.”Oneoftheitemsinthefirstsectionreadasfollows:

Asyouprobablyknow,GovernorCareyrepeatedlycalledonMr.Duryea[theRepublicanchallenger]tomakehi

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 医药卫生 > 基础医学

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1