RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx

上传人:b****6 文档编号:18757097 上传时间:2023-01-01 格式:DOCX 页数:7 大小:23.35KB
下载 相关 举报
RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx

《RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

RichardMNixonCheckers精选资料Word下载.docx

  IebeforeyoutonightasacandidatefortheVicePresidencyandasamanwhosehonestyandintegrityhasbeenquestioned.

  Now,theusualpoliticalthingtodowhenchargesaremadeagainstyouistoeitherignorethemortodenythemwithoutgivingdetails.Ibelievewe’vehadenoughofthatintheUnitedStates,particularlywiththepresentAdministrationinWashington,TometheofficeoftheVicePresidencyoftheUnitedStatesisagreatoffice,andIfeelthatthepeoplehavegottohaveconfidenceintheintegrityofthemenwhorunforthatofficeandwhomightobtainit.

  Ihaveatheory,too,thatthebestandonlyanswertoasmearortoanhonestmisunderstandingofthefactsistotellthetruth.Andthat’swhyIamheretonight.Iwanttotellyoumysideofthecase.I’msurethatyouhavereadthecharge,andyou’veheardit,thatI,SenatorNixon,took$18,000fromagroupofmysupporters.

  Now,wasthatwrong?

Andletmesaythatitwaswrong.Iamsayingit,incidentally,thatitwaswrong,justnotillegal,becauseitisn’taquestionofwhetheritwaslegalorillegal,thatisn’tenough.Thequestionis,wasitmorallywrong?

Isaythatitwasmorallywrong--ifanyofthat$18,000wenttoSenatorNixon,formypersonaluse.Isaythatitwasmorallywrongifitwassecretlygiven,andsecretlyhandled.AndIsaythatitwasmorallywrongifanyofthecontributorsgotspecialfavorsforthecontributionsthattheymade.

  Andnowtoanswerthosequestionsletmesaythis:

notonecentofthe$18,000oranyothermoneyofthattypeeverwenttomeformypersonaluse.EverypennyofitwasusedtopayforpoliticalexpensesthatIdidnotthinkshouldbechargedtothetaxpayersoftheUnitedStates.Itwasnotasecretfund.Asamatteroffact,whenIwason“MeetthePress”--someofyoumayhaveseenitlastSunday--PeterEdsoncameuptomeaftertheprogram,andhesaid,“Dick,whataboutisfundwehearabout?

”AndIsaid,“Well,thereisnosecretaboutit.GooutandseeDanaSmithwhowastheadministratorofthefund.”AndIgavehim[Edson]his[Smith’s]address.AndIsaidyouwillfindthatthepurposeofthefundsimplywastodefraypoliticalexpensesthatIdidnotfeelshouldbechargedtotheGovernment.Andthird,letmepointout--andIwanttomakethisparticularlyclear--thatnocontributortothisfund,nocontributortoanyofmycampaigns,haseverreceivedanyconsiderationthathewouldnothavereceivedasanordinaryconstituent.

  Ijustdon’tbelieveinthat,andIcansaythatnever,whileIhavebeenintheSenateoftheUnitedStates,asfarasthepeoplethatcontributedtothisfundareconcerned,haveImadeatelephonecallforthemtoanagency,orhaveIgonedowntoanagencyontheirbehalf.Andtherecordswillshowthat,therecordswhichareinthehandsoftheadministration.

  Well,then,someofyouwillsay,andrightly,“Well,whatdidyouusethefundfor,Senator?

Whydidyouhavetohaveit?

”LetmetellyouinjustawordhowaSenateofficeoperates.Firstofall,aSenatorgets$15,000ayearinsalary.Hegetsenoughmoneytopayforonetripayear,aroundtrip,thatis,forhimself,andhisfamilybetweenhishomeandWashington,Andthenhegetsanallowancetohandlethepeoplethatworkinhisofficetohandlehismail.AndtheallowanceformyStateofCalifornia,isenoughtohire13people.Andletmesay,incidentally,thatthatallowanceisnotpaidtotheSenator.ItispaiddirectlytotheindividualsthattheSenatorputsonhispayroll.Butallofthesepeopleandalloftheseallowancesareforstrictlyofficialbusiness;

business,forexample,whenaconstituentwritesinandwantsyoutogodowntotheVeteran’sAdministrationandgetsomeinformationabouthisGIpolicy--itemsofthattype,forexample.ButthereareotherexpensesthatarenotcoveredbytheGovernment.AndIthinkIcanbestdiscussthoseexpensesbyaskingyousomequestions.

  DoyouthinkthatwhenIoranyothersenatormakesapoliticalspeech,hasitprinted,shouldchargetheprintingofthatspeechandthemailingofthatspeechtothetaxpayers?

Doyouthink,forexample,whenIoranyotherSenatormakesatriptohishomeStatetomakeapurelypoliticalspeechthatthecostofthattripshouldbechargedtothetaxpayers?

DoyouthinkwhenaSenatormakespoliticalbroadcastsorpoliticaltelevisionbroadcasts,radioortelevision,thattheexpenseofthosebroadcastsshouldbechargedtothetaxpayers?

WellIknowwhatyouransweris.It’sthesameanswerthataudiencesgivemewheneverIdiscussthisparticularproblem:

Theanswerisno.Thetaxpayersshouldn’tberequiredtofinanceitemswhicharenotofficialbusinessbutwhichareprimarilypoliticalbusiness.

  Well,thenthequestionarises,yousay,“Well,howdoyoupayfortheseandhowcanyoudoitlegally?

”Andthereareseveralwaysthatitcanbedone,incidentally,anditisdonelegallyintheUnitedStatesSenateandintheCongress.Thefirstwayistobearichman.Idon’thappentobearichman,soIcouldn’tusethatone.Anotherwaythatisusedistoputyourwifeonthepayroll.Letmesay,incidentally,thatmyopponent,myoppositenumberfortheVicePresidencyontheDemocraticticket,doeshavehiswifeonthepayrollandhashadheronhispayrollforthepasttenyears.Nowletmejustsaythis:

That’hisbusiness,andI’mnotcriticalofhimfordoingthat.Youwillhavetopassjudgmentonthatparticularpoint.

  ButIhaveneverdonethatforthisreason:

IhavefoundthattherearesomanydeservingstenographersandsecretariesinWashingtonthatneededtheworkthatIjustdidn’tfeelitwasrighttoputmywifeonthepayroll.Mywife’ssittingoverhere.Sheisawonderfulstenographer.Sheusedtoteachstenographyandsheusedtoteachshorthandinhighschool.ThatwaswhenImether.AndIcantellyoufolksthatshe’sworkedmanyhoursatnightandmanyhoursonSaturdaysandSundaysinmyoffice,andshe’sdoneafinejob,andIamproudtosaytonightthatinthesixyearsIhavebeenintheHouseandtheSenateoftheUnitedStates,PatNixonhasneverbeenontheGovernmentpayroll.

  Whatareotherwaysthatthesefinancescanbetakencareof?

Somewhoarelawyers,andIhappentobealawyer,continuetopracticelaw,butIhaven’tbeenabletodothat.IamsofarawayfromCaliforniathatIhavebeensobusywithmysenatorialworkthatIhavenotengagedinanylegalpractice,and,also,asfaraslawpracticeisconcerned,itseemedtomethattherelationshipbetweenanattorneyandtheclientwassopersonalthatyoucouldn’tpossiblyrepresentamanasanattorneyandthenhaveanunbiasedviewwhenhepresentedhiscasetoyouintheeventthathehadonebeforeGovernment.

  AndsoIfeltthatthebestwaytohandlethesenecessarypoliticalexpensesofgettingmymessagetotheAmericanpeopleandthespeechesImade--thespeechesIhadprintedforthemostpartconcernedthisonemessageofexposingthisAdministration,themunisminit,thecorruptioninit--theonlywaythatIcoulddothatwastoaccepttheaidwhichpeopleinmyhomeStateofCalifornia,whocontributedtomycampaignandwhocontinuedtomakethesecontributionsafterIwaselected,weregladtomake.

  AndletmesayIamproudofthefactthatnotoneofthemhaseveraskedmeforaspecialfavor.Iamproudofthefactthatnotoneofthemhaseveraskedmetovoteonabillotherthanmyownconsciencewoulddictate.AndIamproudofthefactthatthetaxpayersbysubterfugeorotherwisehaveneverpaidonedimeforexpenseswhichIthoughtwerepoliticalandshouldn’tbechargedtothetaxpayers.

  Letmesay,incidentally,thatsomeofyoumaysay,“Well,thatisallright,Senator,that’syourexplanation,buthaveyougotanyproof?

”AndI’dliketotellyouthiseveningthatjustanhouragowereceivedanindependentauditofthisentirefund.IsuggestedtoGovernorShermanAdams,whoisthechiefofstaffoftheDwightEisenhowercampaign,thatanindependentauditandlegalreportbeobtained,andIhavethatauditinmyhands.It’sanauditmadebythePriceWaterhouse&

Co.firm,andthelegalopinionbyGibson,Dunn,&

Crutcher,lawyersinLosAngeles,thebiggestlawfirm,andincidentally,oneofthebestonesinLosAngeles.

  IamproudtobeabletoreporttoyoutonightthatthisauditandthislegalopinionisbeingforwardedtoGeneralEisenhower.AndI’dliketoreadtoyoutheopinionthatwaspreparedbyGibson,Dunn,&

Crutcher,andbasedonallthepertinentlawsandstatutes,togetherwiththeauditreportpreparedbythecertifiedpublicaccountants:

  ”ItisourconclusionthatSenatorNixondidnotobtainanyfinancialgainfromthecollectionanddisbursementofthefundbyDanaSmith;

thatSenatorNixondidnotviolateanyfederalorstatelawbyreasonoftheoperationofthefund;

andthatneithertheportionofthefundpaidbyDanaSmithdirectlytothirdpersons,northeportionpaidtoSenatorNixon,toreimbursehimfordesignatedofficeexpenses,constitutedinetotheSenatorwhichwaseitherreportableortaxableasineunderapplicabletaxlaws.”

  (signed)

  Gibson,Dunn,&

Crutcher,

  byElmoH.Conley

  Nowthat,myfriends,isnotNixonspeaking,butthat’sanindependentauditwhichwasrequested,becauseIwanttheAmericanpeopletoknowallthefacts,andIamnotafraidofhavingindependentpeoplegoinandcheckthefacts,andthatisexactlywhattheydid.ButthenIrealizedthattherearestillsomewhomaysay,andrightlyso--andletmesaythatIrecognizethatsomewillcontinuetosmearregardlessofwhatthetruthmaybe--buttha

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 解决方案 > 解决方案

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1