现代大学英语听力原文及答案Unit 11Word格式文档下载.docx
《现代大学英语听力原文及答案Unit 11Word格式文档下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《现代大学英语听力原文及答案Unit 11Word格式文档下载.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
IcanonlysaythatIwasstruckbytheresemblance."
2)Andtheotherstoryfromthatareaisaboutthenativewhonoticedtheepitaphonatombstone:
HereLiesaLawyerandanHonestMan."
Mightysmallgravefortwomen,"
commentedthenative.
3)ThisissupposedtohavehappenedinaWesterncourtroom.Onelawyerroseandshoutedthathisopponentwasacrook,ashysterandadisgracetothelegalprofession.Theopposingattorneyrespondedthatthefirstwasguiltierthanhisclientandshouldbetheoneontrial.
Thejudgecalmlynoted:
"
Nowthatbothofthelearnedcounselshaveidentifiedthemselves,letusproceedwiththiscase."
4)Astorythatlawyersandlawstudentsneverappreciateistheoneaboutthetwopickpocketswhowereworkinginthecrowdinfrontofadowntownofficebuilding.Theynoticedonemanwhotookafatwalletoutofhispocket,countedthecontentsandwentintotheelevator.
Theyfollowedhimintotheelevatorbutweren’tabletoreachhimbeforehegotoffandenteredalawyer'
soffice.
InfewminutestheysawthemancomeoutThenonepickpocketsaidtotheother"
What'
llwedonow?
theotherreplied,"
Youknowwhattodo.We'
llwaitforthelawyertocomeout."
5)"
Nodoubtaboutit,"
saidthelawyer."
ThisisoneofthestrongestcasesI'
veeverheard.Thereisn'
tachanceoflosingincourt."
Thanks,"
saidtheclient,grabbingforhishatandcoat."
IguessI'
llsettlethisoutofcourt."
ButIsaidyoucan'
tlose,"
criedthelawyer.
Iknow,butwhatItoldyouwastheotherman'
ssideofthecase."
Task2:
【答案】
MainIdea:
TheimportanceofjurytrialintheUSlegalsystemandthecontemporarychallengesitfaces
I.ThejurytrialisthecentralelementintheAmericanconceptionofjustice.
A.Therighttotrialbyanimpartialjury.isoneoftheoldestandleastcontroversialguaranteesintheConstitution.
B.Americaisdistinctiveamongallnationsforthecentralroleaccordedthejurytrialinitsjusticesystem.
C.ToAmericancitizens,participationingovernmentisrepresentedbyvotingandjuryservice.
II.ThefutureofjurytrialisuncertainduetotherapidchangesinAmericansociety.
A.Increasesinthevolumeofcivilandcriminaltrialshaveputgreatpressureonthejurysystem.
B.Therehavebeendramaticincreasesinthelengthandcomplexityoftrials.
C.Incivilcases,itsometimesseemsimpossibleforjurymemberstohavethespecialknowledgeneededduetotheadvanceinscienceandtechnology.
D.Changesintrialmethodandgreaterpublicaccesshavealteredthenatureofthetrialjury.
ThejurytrialisthecentralelementintheAmericanconceptionofjustice.Thefighttotrialbyanimpartialjury,insulatedfrominfluencebyoppressivepoliticalpowers,isoneoftheoldestandleastcontroversialguaranteesintheConstitution.Americaisdistinctiveamongallnationsforthecentralroleaccordedthejurytrialinitsjusticesystem.Themorethan300,000jurytrialsayearareofenormouspracticalandsymbolicsignificancetothosewhoareinvolvedinthemandtothosewhoseeorhearaboutthem.TothetypicalAmericancitizen,participationingovernmentisrepresentedbyvotingandjuryservice.
Despitethelonghistoryofthejurytrialanddespiteitscurrentsignificanceinthelegalsystem,itsfutureisuncertain.ChangesinAmericansocietyhavecreatednewdemandsforjusticewhichmaynotbemetbytraditionaljurytrials.Increasesinthevolumeofcivilandcriminaltrialshavecloggedthecourtsystemandplacedunprecedentedstrainsontheabilityofthejurysystemtodispensehighqualityjustice.Therehavebeendramaticincreasesinthelengthandcomplexityoftrials.Insomejurisdictions,juryselectionalonemaylastaslongasaweekinatypicalcriminalcase.Althoughnotcommon,civilandcriminalcaseslastingmonthsandevenyearsplaceaburdenonthesystem.Onthecivilside,advancesinscienceandengineeringhavecreatedcomplexitiesindisputesthatchallengetheexpertsinthefieldandwouldseemtorequireanunattainablelevelofsophisticationonthepartofjurymembers.Technologicaldevelopmentsarealsochangingsomeoftheconventionsofevidenceandprocedureattrialandprovidingopportunitiesforpublicaccessthroughmediareportage,whichhasalteredthenatureofthetrialjury.
Task3:
A.
1)T
2)F
3)T
4)F
5)T
6)T
7)F
8)F
B.
1)Everywitnessmustswearanoath,withhishandontheBible,"
Totellthetruth,thewholetruth,andnothingbutthetruth"
.
2)Cross-examinationistheexaminationofawitnessbyhisopponent.Forexample,everywitnesscalledbytheprosecutingcounselmaybeexaminedbythedefendingbarrister,andviceversa.
3)Itisaquestionthatsuggestssomethinginsteadofaskingforinformation.
4)“Hearsay”evidenceiswhatonehasheardotherssayaboutanevent.
Whileyouwerestayingwithusduringthesummer,Irememberyouaskedmealotofquestionsaboutlawinthiscountry.I'
mafraidIwasn'
tabletohelpyoumuch.Wereadinourpapersabouttrialsinthelawcourts,butfewlaw-abidingcitizensareexpertsonthesubject.
YouaskedmetotellyouhowcriminaltrialsinEnglanddifferfromcriminaltrialsinEurope,andIcouldn'
ttellyoumuch—except,Iremember,thatIsaidthatinEnglandapersonaccused26crimemustalwaysbesupposedinnocentuntilhehasbeenprovedguilty.Newspapersmustn'
tdescribetheaccusedas“themurderer;
he'
s“theaccused”or“theprisoner”.LastmonthIservedasamemberofthejuryatanimportantcriminaltrial,soIlearntquitealot.Ithoughtyou'
dbeinterested,andthat'
swhyI'
mwriting.
Theprisonerwasaccusedofrobbingabankandofwoundingthenightwatchmanwhotriedtostophim.Hepleaded"
NotGuilty"
sothetrialwasalongone.Wehadtolistentsomelo,speechesandalotofevidence.
I'
mover50andthiswasmyfirstexperienceofservingasajuror.We'
reliableforjuryservicebetween21and60,soyouseeImighthavebeencalledonmanyyearsago.Ofthe12membersofthejury,threewerewomen.Twoofthemenweresmallshopkeepers,onewasamotormechanic,andanotherwasaschoolteacher.Ididn'
tfindoutwhattheotherswere,butyoucanseewewereamixedlot.
Wehadthreestoriestolistento.Firsttherewasthestorytoldbythecounselfortheprosecution,thenthestorytoldbythedefendingcounsel,andlastlythestorytoldbythejudge,asummingupofwhatwassaidbycounselandwitnesses.By"
counsel"
1meanthebarristerorbarristersemployedoneitherside.
Theprosecutingcounselbeganbytellingthecourtwhatheintendedtoprovebyevidence.Thenhecalledhiswitnesses.Thesepeoplecansaywhattheyknowonlyinanswertoquestions,sotheexaminationofwitnessesisveryimportant.Everywitnessmaybeexaminedbythebarristerwhoisdefendingtheprisoner.Thisisthecross-examination.Thejudgecaninterfereifhethinksanyofthequestionsareunfair.Healwaysobjectstowhatarecalled"
leadingquestions"
questionsthatsuggestsomethinginsteadofaskingforinformation.(Perhapsyouknowtheoldexample:
Whendidyoustopbeatingyourwife?
)Leadingquestionsareallowed,however,incross-examination.
Thedefendingcounselthenhadhisturn.Hecallednewwitnesses,includingtheaccusedmanhimself.Thesewitnesseswerethencross-examinedbytheprosecutingcounsel.
Thelawofevidenceisverystrict.Everywitnessmust,beforehegoesintothewitnessbox,swearanoath,withhishandontheBible,"
.Awitnessmaytellonlywhathehimselfknowstobetrue."
Hearsay"
evidenceisnotallowed.If,forexample,Mr.Xsawamanforcingawayintoabuilding,hecandescribewhathesaw,andthisisevidence.Ifhetellshiswifeaboutit,adescriptionofwhathappened,givenbythewife,isnotevidence.Sheheardherhusband'
sstory,butsheherselfdidnotseewhathappened.
Whenalltheevidencehadbeengiven,andtheexaminationofthewitnesseswasfinished,counselforbothsidesmadefurtherspeeches.Counselfortheprosecutiontriedtoshowthat,fromtheevidencetheyhadheard,thejurycouldonlyfindtheaccusedpersonguilty.Counselforthedefencetriedtoshowthattheaccusedwasnotguilty.Thenthejudgesummedup.
Task4:
1)b
2)a
3)b
4)c
1)Thejudgesareresponsibleforsumminguptheevidence,andcallthejurymen'
sattentiontoalltheimportantpointsintheevidenceandinthespeechesmadebycounselforbothsides.
2)Thejudgeusuallygivesamoreseveresentencetotheaccused.
3)No.Thisisbasedontheprincipleofthedivisionbetweentheforcesofthelawwhokeeporder,andtheforceswhoconducttrials.
TherearequitealotofpeopleinEnglandwhothinkthat12ordinarymenandwomenarenotcapableofunderstandingproperlyalltheevidencegivenatcriminaltrials.IhaddoubtsaboutthismyselfuntilIservedasjurorlastmonth.Idon'
tfeelsodoubtfulnow.Ourjudgesareexpertinsumminguptheevidence.Theytakenotesduringthetrial.Thejudge,inthecaseI'
mwritingabout,calledourattentiontoalltheimportantpointsintheevidenceandinthespeechesmadebycounselforbothsides.Hefavoredneitherprosecutionnordefense.Hetolduswhatcrimetheaccusedwouldbeguiltyof,iftheevidencesuppliedbytheprosecutionwastrue.
Themembersofthejuryhavetodecideonlythequestionsoffact.Questionsoflawareforthejudge.S