A Study of Translationese in EnglishChinese TranslationWord文档下载推荐.docx

A Study of Translationese in EnglishChinese TranslationWord文档下载推荐.docx

《A Study of Translationese in EnglishChinese TranslationWord文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《A Study of Translationese in EnglishChinese TranslationWord文档下载推荐.docx（8页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

translatorshavedifferentpreferencesincertainwords,sentencestructures,andstyles;

andtranslator'

stranslatingproficiencymayindifferentlevels;

andthetargetreadersmayhavedifferentrequirementsoropinionsonthetranslations.Allthesefactorsleadtoproducedifferentlevelorstyletranslationworks.Thephenomenonoftranslationeseinthetranslatedtextshasbeendrawnmoreattentions.Translationesehasbeenquiteapopulartopicinthecircleoftranslationresearch,asitdirectlyaffectsthequalityandreadabilityofthetranslatedtexts.ThispapermainlydiscussesaboutthetranslationeseinEnglish-Chinesetranslation.Thispaperfirstgivesthedefinitionsandsomedistinctivefeaturesoftranslationese,thenanalyzesthecausesoftranslationeseandputsforwardseveralstrategiesforimprovingthequalityoftranslation.Attheendofthispaper,theacceptabilityoftranslationeseisdiscussed.

2.LiteratureReview

Thispartmainlyintroducesthedefinitionsoftranslationesegivenbysomescholarsandresearchersfromhomeandabroad,andsomedistinctivefeaturesoftranslationese.

2.1Definitionsoftranslationese

Whatistranslationese?

Manyscholarsandresearcheshavealreadyairedtheirownviewsonthedefinitionoftranslationese.Thefollowingaresomeofthem:

InTheTheoryandPracticeofTranslation,Eugene.A.NidaandCharlesR.Taberdefinethetranslationeseas“formalfidelity,withresultingunfaithfulnesstothecontentandtheimpactofthemessage.”（Nida&

Taber,2004:

13）.

Gellerstam（1986）holdsthatthetranslationesereferstothe“fingerprints”leftbythesourcelanguageinthetargetlanguageaftertranslation.

Newmark（2001:

75）describestranslationeseasinaccuratetranslation.Tobemoreprecise,translationeseisatranslationwordedinanabsurdhybridlanguageasaresultofatranslatinginwhichtheinterferenceofthesourcelanguageistoogreatonthetranslator.Actuallytranslationesehasbeenfoundthestyleofsometranslatingorientationssuchaswork-for-wordtranslationandliteraltranslation.

Puurtinen（2003）definestranslationeseas“atranslation-specificlanguage,whichreferstolinguisticfeaturesthatareeitherspecifictotranslationsoroccurwithasignificantlyhigherorlowerfrequencyintranslationsthanintargetlanguageoriginals.”

InDictionaryofTranslationStudies,amoreprecisedefinitionoftranslationeseispresented:

ageneralpejorativetermusedtorefertoTLusagewhichbecauseofitsobviousrelianceonfeaturesofSLisperceivedasunnatural,impenetrableorevencomical,becauseitisobviouslydifferentfromthefeaturesofTL.（Shuttleworth&

Cowie,2004）

InthebookofAnAppliedTheoryofTranslation,FanZhongying（1994）devotedawholechapter,ChapterNine,tothediscussionofthephenomenonthoughheemploysanothertermtranslationsyndrome.Hereishisdefinition:

“…Yetinfact,wecanoftendiscovermanyforeignizingexpressionswhichdonotconformtothehabitualuseoflanguageintranslations.Thisisacommonfaultexclusivetotranslation.”

AccordingtoLiuMiqing（1999）,translationesereferstoatranslationstylethatreadersdonotlovetoaccept.Itistheproductofmechanicaltranslationopinionsandmethodology.TheproduceroftranslationeseusuallyneglectsthedifferencesbetweentheSLandtheTLandregardstranslationasmechanicaltransferofsurfacestructures.

SunZhili（2003:

95-103）employsthewordtranslationesetoreferto“akindoftranslatedtextwhichisawkwardandextremelyhardfortheTLreaderstoaccept.”andWangZhikui（2004:

174-184）definestranslationeseas“theunidiomaticusageoflanguageexistingintranslatedtexts.”

FangMengzhi（2004）definestranslationeseas“unnatural,unsmoothandunpolishedsentencesorexpressionsintranslatedworkswhichareusuallydifficulttoreadandhardtounderstand.”

ChengXixu（2006:

104）alsogiveshisowndefinition:

Translationeseisanunnaturalformoflanguageintranslationwhichcarriesthefeaturesofthesourcelanguagestructures,thusviolatingthehabitualuseofthetargetlanguagewithinacertainperiodoftime.

Tosumup,translationesereferstohybrid,unnaturalexpressionsinthetranslatedworksthatdoesnotconformtothelinguisticconventionsoftheTL.Inthispaper,theEnglish-Chinesetranslationwastakenasexampletoanalyzethephenomenonoftranslationese.ManyscholarsalsocalledthiskindoflanguageasEuropeanizedlanguage.

2.2FeaturesofTranslationese

AccordingtoShuttleworthandCowie（2004:

178）,inappropriateSLmetaphorsandsyntax,unnaturalwordorderandahighconcentrationofunnatural-soundingterminologyarethesortoffeatureswhicharetypicaloftranslationese.

FanZhongying（1994:

98）discussesthisphenomenonoftranslationeseinthenameof"

translationsyndrome"

.Thecharacteristicsoftranslationsyndrome,inhisopinion,areasfollows:

（1）atranslationwithlighttranslationsyndromeisunnaturalinlanguagebutcanbeunderstood;

（2）thecollocationsdonotconformtoChineseusage;

（3）metaphorsintheoriginalaredirectlytransplantedand（4）thesurfacemeaningisconsideredwithoutbotheringthedeepmeaning.

LiuMiqing（1999:

245）aimsspecificallyattheEnglish-Chinesetranslationpractice,andhesumsupthefeaturesoftranslationeseasfollows:

（1）thetranslationviolatesthelinguisticusageofTL,especiallywordorder;

（2）thesentencepatternsandlexicalpreferenceofSL（especiallythepronounsinEnglish）arefoundinTL;

（3）therhetoricaldevicesofSLaredirectlytransplanted;

（4）theforeigncultureisblindlyintroducedwithoutconsiderationofthenationalandtheindividualpsychologyofthereceptors;

（5）SLisimitatedandthesocialfunctionandeffectsareignored.

SunZhili（2003）studiestranslationeseinthecontextofEnglish-Chinesetranslationpractice,astothefeaturesoftranslationese,hesummarizedtwoitems:

（1）unsmoothlanguagewhichnotonlyviolatesthenormofChinesebutruinsthereaders'

interestsand

（2）obscuremeaningwhichconfusesthereaders'

understanding.

104）liststhreemainfeaturesoftranslationese:

（1）beingunnatural;

（2）carryingthefeaturesofsourcelanguagestructuresand（3）beinginviolationofthehabitualuseoftargetlanguage.

Inaword,thephenomenonoftranslationeseischaracteristicofitsformalfidelityandignoranceofthelinguisticconventions,expressionsandsentencestructuresoftheTL.Translationswithtranslationeseareunnatural,andfromwhichtheshadowofSTcanbeseen.

3.CausesofTranslationeseandtheSuggestions

Asthedefinitionsandfeaturesoftranslationesehavebeengivenbymanyscholarsandresearchers,thecausesoftranslationesehasalsobeendiscussedbythem.

FanZhongying（1994）arguesthattherearethreemajorcauses:

firstly,thetranslator'

signoranceofdifferencesbetweenthetwolanguages;

secondly,thetranslator'

smisunderstandingof"

faithfulness"

;

thirdly,thetranslatordoesnotcomprehendthedeepmeaningofSLtext.

LiuMiqing（1999）holdsthattheproduceroftranslationeseusuallyneglectsthedifferencesbetweenSLandTLandregardstranslationasamechanicaltransferofsurfacestructures.Thetranslatordoesnotunderstandthedeepstructurethroughthesurfacestructureintheprocessofcomprehension.

AccordingtoFangMengzhi（2004:

26）,translationesedoesnotoccurbecauseofthetranslator'

slimitedtargetlanguagecompetenceorpoorwritingskills.Instead,itoccursbecause"

thetranslatorcannotgobeyondtheobligatoryrulesofgrammarandsurfacestructureofsyntaxinSL"

thatistosay,thetranslator"

keepstoorigidlytothesourcetext,andtriestoseekcompleteformalequivalenceinwording,figuresofspeechandsentencestructuresbetweenthetwolanguages,withoutknowingthatheisattemptingatsomethingimpossible,whichnodoubtwillendupinfailure.Thushistranslationwilljustcausepainforreaders"

.

Basedonthefindingsoftheseandotherresearchers,thecausesoftranslationesecanbesummarizedasfollows:

3.1NeglectingtheDifferencesbetweenChineseandEnglish

ChineseandEnglishbelongtotwodifferentlanguagefamilies:

ChinesebelongstoSino-Tibetanlanguagefamily,whileEnglishbelongstotheIndo-Europeanlanguagefamily.Thedifferencescanbedescribedas:

Chineseisdiffusiveandparatactic,whileEnglishiscompactandhypotactic.TherearenoconnectivesshowingtherelationbetweenChinesesentences.Incontrast,Englishsentencesarecomposedwithconnectivesindicatingtheirrelationship.Englishlaysstressonusinglogical-grammaticalconnectorsinconveying