在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译.docx
《在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译.docx(24页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外文翻译
在美国的医疗制度改制中整合公共健康和个人护理外
文翻译
本科毕业论文外文翻译
外文题目:
IntegratingPublicHealthandPersonalCareinaReformed
USHealthCareSystem
出处:
AmericanJournalofPublicHealth
作者:
Chernichovsky,Dov,Leibowitz,ArleenARigotti,NancyA
原文:
IntegratingPublicHealthandPersonalCareinaReformedUS
HealthCareSystem
THEUNITEDSTATESHASTHEmosttechnologicallyintensivemedical
practice
in
the
world.It
also
spendsmorethananyothernation
onmedical
care,buthealthoutcomesintheUnitedStatesareinferiortothosein
most
other
developed
nations.This
inefficiency
?
spending
more
with
poorerresults?
stemspartlyfromfailuretoprovideeffectiveaccess
tomedicalcaretoasubstantialshareofthepopulation.Lackofaccess
leads
to
wider
disparities
inhealth
intheUnited
States
than
are
experienced
bythepopulations
of
otherdevelopednations.
Thefragmented
delivery
systemalsoleadsto
cost
shifting
insurers'
attemptstotransfer
coststootherpayers,administrativewaste,andanimbalancebetween
spendingonmedicalcareandspendingonpopulationhealthinitiatives.
ThereisgeneralagreementthattheUShealthcaresystemshouldbe
moreefficient
aswellasmoreequitable.Most
comprehensiveproposals
for
reformingthesystemrecognizetheneedforuniversalcoveragethatis
independentofemploymentstatus,disabilitystatus,orage,although
somewouldcontinuetorelyonemployerstocollecthealthinsurance
payments.Althoughuniversalinsuranceisimportant,itisnottheonly
urgent
issue.
Areformed
systemshould
integrate
personal
preventive
and
therapeuticcarewithpublichealthandshouldincludepopulation-wide
healthinitiatives.Coordinatingpersonalmedicalcarewithpopulation
health
willrequire
amorestructured
systemthanhasever
existedin
the
UnitedStates.
Wearguethatareformedhealthcaresystemnotonlyshouldprovide
health
insurance
coveragefor
allbut
shouldalsobeorganized
andfunded
totakeadvantageofnewknowledge
about
medicaland
nonmedical
determinants
of
health.
This
healthtrust
systemHTSwould
1
assessthe
costofhealthinsuranceequitably,2promoteefficiencybyreducing
fragmentation
andrelying
oncompetitivemarkets,
3
allowcoordination
ofspending
on
population
health
and
personal
medical
care,
4
accommodateheterogeneouspreferences,
and
5build
onexisting
American
healthinsuranceandproviderinstitutions,informedbyinternational
experience.
UNDERINVESTMENTINPUBLICHEALTH
Underinvestment
inpreventive
careandpopulation
healthpersists
in
the
United
States
despite
thegrowing
evidencethat
suchinvestments
have
great
potential
to
improve
health.High
rates
of
return
have
been
demonstratedforcommunity-levelinterventionstoreducethehigh-risk
behaviors
that
promotechronic
diseases,
whichaccount
for
twothirds
of
alldeathsintheUnitedStatesandahigherpercentageofdeathsamong
themostdisadvantaged
groups.These
chronic
diseases
areoften
associated
with
high-risk
lifestyle
consumption
choicessmoking,
drinking,
andpoor
diet,whichmaybemoreeffectivelyavertedbypolicyinterventionsin
the
community
and
early
in
the
life
course
than
altered
by
later
interventionswithinthemedicalcaresector.Forexample,2structural
interventions
in
California
?
levying
acigarette
taxandbanning
indoor
smokinginpublicplaces?
resultedindramaticdeclinesinsmoking,
followedbydeclines
intherates
of
lung
cancer
andheart
disease
in
the
state.Disadvantaged
populations,
which
bear
the
greatest
burdenof
chronic
disease,
standto
benefit
mostfrom
public
andpopulation
health
interventions.
Thecurrent
financing
structure
andorganization
ofcarein
the
United
States
provide
strong
incentives
to
treat
illness
after
it
occurs
rather
thantoinvestinprevention.Healthinsurancepoliciesalsoencourage
asuboptimal
mixof
services,
relying
onexpensive,
andoftenredundant,
technology,
with
inadequatecoverage
forpreventive
care.
Thefragmented
health
care
financing
systemalso
wastesresourcesthrough
cost
shifting
andexcessiveadministrativcosts.
Tocreateamoreeffectiveandefficienthealthcaresystem,the
United
Statesshould
capitalize
oncurrent
health
reform