NATUREOFRELATIONSHIPMARKETING关系营销的本质大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word格式.docx
《NATUREOFRELATIONSHIPMARKETING关系营销的本质大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《NATUREOFRELATIONSHIPMARKETING关系营销的本质大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word格式.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![NATUREOFRELATIONSHIPMARKETING关系营销的本质大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word格式.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-10/10/b917c0ed-5b01-4a08-8c77-1ace53e9f8ee/b917c0ed-5b01-4a08-8c77-1ace53e9f8ee1.gif)
外文文献翻译
文献、资料中文题目:
关系营销的本质
文献、资料英文题目:
NATUREOFRELATIONSHIPMARKETING
文献、资料来源:
文献、资料发表(出版)日期:
院(部):
专业:
市场营销
班级:
姓名:
学号:
指导教师:
翻译日期:
2017.02.14
毕业设计(论文)外文翻译资料
论文题目:
A.O.史密斯的营销战略研究
译文题目:
RoleofRelationshipMarketing
inCompetitiveMarketingStrategy
关系营销在竞争中的营销策略
Atthecoreofrelationshipmarketingisexchange,thatisprofitabletopartiesinvolvedintheexchange.Theconceptofexchangesasitappliestorelationshipmarketingcanbeviewedatfromeitheratransactioncostanalysisapproachorasocialexchangetheoryapproach.
Transactionsaredistinguishedintodiscretetransactionsandrelationaltransactions.Relationalcontractlawgovernsrelationaltransactions.Inclassicalcontractlawthatgovernsdiscretetransactionsidentityofpartiesisnotrelevant;
howeverthisisnottrueinrelationshipmarketing.Inrelationalcontractingthereferencepointshiftsfromtheagreement(asinclassicalcontractlaw),totherelationitselfasithasdevelopedovertime.Theremightbeormightnotbeanoriginalagreementandifthereis,theremaynotbeanygreatdeferencetoit.Inarelationaltransaction,thecontractualgapsbetweenpartiesarereduced,astherelationbecomesstrongerandstronger.Thefrequencywithwhichtransactionsrecurinfluencethetermsofthetransaction(discountsasinfrequentflyer).Thedegreetowhichdurabletransactionspecificinvestmentsareincurreddeterminetherapidityofcommitmentgivenandreceived,thetimeperiodofcommitmentandtheintensityoftherelationbetweentwoparties.Transactionspecificinvestments(assetspecificityinphysicalcapitalandhumancapital)leadstorelationalexchangeswheretrustisaprimemoderator.Assuchnon-specificexchangesleadstotransactionmarketingandforexchangesthatarenotnon-specifictheconceptofRelationshipmarketingwillhold(Williamson,1979).TheWilliamsonianapproachtounderstandrelationalcontractinghasbeenaugmented(AndersonandWeitz,1992),bypostulatingthatwheneveridiosyncraticinvestmentsaremadebytheexchangingpartiesinoneanotherthenthereisastrongercommitmenttotherelationship.Inarelationshipthesetofunderstandingsthathasgrownupovertime(theimplicitcontract)ismoreinfluential.Exclusivitytotheotherpartyisalsoseenasasignalofcommitment.Furthertherelationshipdyadhasbeenexaminedfromperspectiveofastrongbuyerfacingalargenumberofsmallsuppliers(HeideandJohn,1992).Ithasbeenshownthatrelationalnormsdoplayaroleinservingasagovernancemechanismtosafeguardagainstopportunisticbehaviorinthepresenceoftransactionspecificassets.Ithasalsobeenshownthatincaseofarelationshipdyadbetweenastrongsupplierandalargenumberofsmallbuyersrelationalnormsdonotplayasignificantrole(Berthon,Pierreet.Al,2003)
GeorgeHomans(GeorgeHomans,1961)firstproposedsocialexchangetheory.Hesaidthatexchangesofgoodsandservicestakeplacebetweentwopartieswhoarerationalentitiesactingintheirownself-interestandwhowillperformsocialactionbasedonrewardsandcosts.Theexchangeofgoodsandservicestakeplacenotonlyformoneybutalsofornon-monetarybenefitssuchaslove,esteem,affectionandapproval.Suchexchangesaresocialexchanges.Socialexchangesalmostalwaysinvolveanelementofpower,allowingonepartytodoactivitiesthewayitwantstodo.Socialexchangesinvolvesinteraction;
interactionoccurswhenanactivity emittedbyonemanisrewarded(orpunished)byanactivityemittedbyanotherman.Socialexchangesrespectsentiment;
sentimentsaresignsoftheattitudesandfeelingsapartytakestowardsanotherparty.Thissocialexchangetheory(GeorgeHomans,1961)drawsonthedisciplinesofbehavioralpsychologyandelementaryeconomicsinproposingtheprinciplesofsocialexchange.Behavioralpsychologydecidesoncurrentactionsbasedonpasthistoryofbehavior/actions.Elementaryeconomicsdecidesoncurrentactionbasedonfuturestreamofprofits.Itisdifficulttobalancethesetwodirections.Furtherelementaryeconomicsassumeperfectmarkets.Relationshipmarketingsituationsarefarfromperfect.Alsorelationshipsarebuiltonfuturepromisesasmuchasonpastbehavior.Instudyingrelationshipmarketing,boththetransactioncostanalysisandsocialexchangetheoryconceptscanbeusedtoexplainand conceptualizerelationship-marketingparadigms.
Relationshipmarketingreferstoawiderangeof‘relationshiptypestrategies’thathavedevelopedoverthepastfewdecadesinproductaswellasservicemarketsandinconsumeraswellasbusinesstobusinesssectors.TheantecedentsofRMgotoIndustrialmarketingandServicesmarketing.RMfoundreadyacceptanceinamarketi