批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx

上传人:b****4 文档编号:11605428 上传时间:2023-03-20 格式:DOCX 页数:19 大小:26.20KB
下载 相关 举报
批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共19页
批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共19页
批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共19页
批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共19页
批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共19页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx

《批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx(19页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本.docx

批判性推理基础学习CriticalReasoningforbeginners全记录文本

CriticalReasoningforbeginners

byMarianneTalbotOxford

Lesson1HowtorecognizeargumentsandWhatisthenatureofarguments

Argumentsareasetofsentencessuchthatoneofthem(theconclusion)isbeingsaidtobetrue,andtheother(s)(thepremises)arebeingofferedasreasonsforbelievingthetruthoftheone.

Anargumentisn'tasetofcontradictions.

Partofthepointofanargumentistomoveusonfromwherewearetosomewhereabitfurther.

Argumentsleadtodeeperthoughts.(fromwherewearetowherewewant)

AnArgument:

(oneormore)PremisesConclusion(Function)

[toprove---reasons][supposetrue]

relationshipamongsentences

e.g.It'sFriday.

MariannealwayswearsjeansonFriday.

ThereforeMariannewillwearjeanstoday.

Playattentiontosuppressedpremises(隐藏前提).

context——allsentencesmaybeargument.

implication(实质蕴涵)

entailment(逻辑蕴涵)

Distinguishargumentsfrom

(a)setsofsentencesnotrelatedasarguments

(1)aren'trelatedatall

e.g.Theseaissalt.

SydneyisinAustralia.

(2)relatedbutnotanargument

e.g.Towardslunchtimecloudsformedandtheskyblackened.Thenthestormbroke.

(b)sentences(assertions)'if...then...'

e.g.Ifitissnowing,themailwillbelate.

(implicationnotentailment)

Anargumentisasetofsentences,oneofwhichisbeingasserted.

Anassertionisasinglesentence(possiblycomplex),thatisbeingexpressedinassertivemode.

'because'maybecausalorrational.

reasonandcause

causalrelations(因果关系)andrationalrelations(推理关系)

AandBentailCdoesn'tmeanAandBcauseC.

e.g.It'sFriday.(A)

MariannealwayswearsjeansonFriday.(B)

ThereforeMariannewillwearjeanstoday.(C)

explanation:

(1)causalexplanation(因果性解释):

e.g.Pawlfelldownbecausehewantedtoamusechildren.

(2)rationalexplanation(推理性解释):

e.g.PawlfelldownbecauseJellypushedhim.

Factsarewhatmakessentencestrueorfalse.Theyarenottrueorfalse,theyjustexistordon'texist.

Onlybeliefsorsentencesthatexpressbeliefsaretrueorfalse.

Belief(e.g.concept)..............theconcept'chair'

Language..................................thelanguage'c-h-a-i-r'

Reality.......................................theobject'chair'

Argumentscanonlybegoodorbad,theycanonlybevalidorinvalid,theycan'tbetrueorfalsebecausetheonlythingthatcanbetrueorfalseisbeliefsorthesentencesthatexpressbeliefs.

Agoodargumentisoneinwhich:

(1)theconclusionmustfollowthepremises

(2)thepremisesmustallbetrue.

Theconclusionmustbetrue.(truthpreserving)

逻辑学并不关心前提正确与否,而只关心前提与结论的关系。

Lesson2Differentsortsofarguments

twobasictypesofarguments:

deductionandinduction

Deductiveargument:

thetruthoftheirpremisesguaranteesthetruthoftheirconclusion.

e.g.It'sFriday.

MariannealwayswearsjeansonFriday.

ThereforeMariannewillwearjeanstoday.

Ifthepremisesaretrue,theconclusionwouldbetrue.

'truthguaranteeing''truthpreserving'

Deductionisan'eitheror'thing:

agooddeductiveargumentgivesusconditionalcertainty.

abadonetellsusnothing.

Inductiveargumentsaresuchthatthetruthoftheirpremisesmakestheconclusionmoreorlessprobable.(don'tguarantee)

Inductiveargumentscanbeeitherweakorstrong.

[strong]:

Thesunhasriseneverydayinthehistoryoftheuniverse.Thereforethesunwillrisetomorrow.

[weak]:

EverytimeImetMary,sheworeanecklace.

ThereforethenexttimeImeether,shewillwearanecklace.

逻辑学是中立性的,逻辑的形式可以适用于任何的内容。

Logiciansstudydeductionbystudyingvalidargumentsforms

Argumentsthatarevalidisinvirtueoftheirformsasopposedtotheircontents.

theformsofdeduction:

1、ModusPonens肯定前件取拒式

IfPthenQ,P,thereforeQ.(P,Qsentences)

wrong:

IfPthenQ,Q,thereforeP.

(Affirmingconsequent肯定后件式)

2、Modustollens否定后件式

IfPthenQ,not-Q,thereforenot-P.

3、Disjunctivesyllogism选言三段论

PorQ,not-P,thereforeQ.

(P或Q成立,P不成立,因此Q成立)

4、Leibniz'sLaw莱布尼兹律(相同者不可辨识)

aisF,a=b,thereforebisF.

e.g.Janeis(predication)tall.

Janeis(identity)thebankmanager.

Thereforethebankmanageris(predication)tall.

Note:

'is'canserveasapredication(论断)oridentity(同等).

The'is'saboveserveaspredications.

Andthe'='aboveservesasidentity.

5、Syllogism三段论

allFsareG.

aisanF.

ThereforeaisaG.

6、DeonticLogic道义逻辑

e.g.Lyingiswrong.

Thereforeweshouldn'tlie.

7、ModalLogic模态逻辑

(alogicaboutnecessityandpossibility)

e.g.Itisnecessarilythecasethattherearenosquarecircles.

Thereforeitisnotpossiblethattherearesquarecircles.

8、TemporalLogic时序逻辑(时态逻辑)

e.g.Itisrainingtoday.

Thereforetomorrowitwillhavebeenrainingyesterday.

Inductivearguments

Allinductiveargumentsrelyontheassumptionoftheuniformityofnature(theideathatthefuturewillbelikethepast)

哲学中的一个基本问题是,我们对未来的假设,会不会和过去的经验相一致?

Uniformity一致性,uniformityofnature(DavidHume)自然界是否具有一致性?

Withinthecategoryofinductiveargumentstherearemanydifferentsub-types:

1、argumentsfromanalogy类比推理

aislikeb,aisF,thereforebisF.

(小写字母:

particularthing特定的事物

大写字母:

性质或句子)

2、argumentsfromauthority诉诸权威的论证

e.g.Einsteinisabrilliantphysicist.

Einsteinsaysrelativismistrue.

Thereforerelativismistrue.

Causalarguments因果论证

Causalargumentscanbedeductiveorinductive,dependingonwhetherwearearguingfromacausalclaimortoacausalclaim.

deductive:

AscauseBs.

TherewasanA.

ThereforetherewillhavebeenaB.

inductive:

EveryobservedAhasbeenfollowedbyaB.

ThereforeAscauseBs.

negativeexistential否定存在判断句

e.g.飞马不存在。

Wecanknowthat

argumentsthataredeductivelyvalid

——invirtueoftheirforms

——invirtueoftheircontent

e.g.DeonticLogic,TemporalLogic

argumentsthatareinductivelyvalid

——theuniformityofnature

Lesson3'logic-book-style'逻辑书

thepoint:

(a)itenablesustoaddsuppressedpremises隐含前提

(b)itenablesustoeliminatecrossreferences,irrelevanciesandinconsistentterms排除交叉引用、无关和不一致词语

(c)itmakesiteasiertoevaluatearguments.

Asetofstepsforanalyzingarguments:

1.identifytheconclusionoftheargument

Lookfortheargumentindicators(so,therefore,then,if...then...,accordingly,hence,since,for,because,fromwhichweseethat,itfollowsthat,whichestablishesthat...)

2.identifyeachofthepremises

3.addsuppressedpremises

4.removeirrelevancies

5.removeinconsistentterms

6.removecross-references

Example1:

Socialismdidnotprovidetheincentivesneedforaprosperouseconomy.Thereforesocialismwasdoomedtofailure.

Premise1:

Incentivesareneededforaprosperouseconomy.

Premise2:

Socialismdidnotprovideincentives.

Conclusion:

Socialismwasdoomedtofailure.

Premisesandconclusionmustbesentences.

P,unlessQ.

IfQ,thenR.P

ButnotR.

Example2:

Sincemanynewlyemergingnationsdonothavethecapitalresourcesnecessaryforsustainedgrowth,theywillcontinuetoneedhelpfromindustrialnations.

Premise1:

Manynewlyemergingnationsdonothavecapitalresources

Premise2:

Capitalresourcesarenecessaryforsustainedgrowth.

Premise3:

Ifanewlyemergingnationistosustainitsgrowth,anditdoesnothavecapitalresources,itwillneedhelpfromindustrialnations.

Conclusion:

Manynewlyemergingnationswillneedhelpfromindustrialnations.

Example3:

Wellperhapsshedidn'twantyoutoticklehertummy,orshedidn'trealizethatwaswhatyouweregoingtodo.Ifshedidn'trealize,thenyouobviouslywentaboutitinthewrongway.Inthatcaseyoudeservedtogetscratchedunlessyoureadythoughtshewassuchaperceptivecatthatshe'dunderstand'woof-woof'meant'rollover'.Ifyouthoughtthatyou'reanidiot.Butyou'renotanidiotyou'rejusttwisted.Soifthepoorthingdidwantyoutoticklehertummyyoudeservetogetscratched.

1Identifypremisesandconclusion

Premise1:

Wellperhapsshedidn'twantyoutoticklehertummy,orshedidn'trealizethatwaswhatyouweregoingtodo

Premise2:

Ifshedidn'trealize,thenyouobviouslywentaboutitinthewrongway.

Premise3:

Inthatcaseyoudeservedtogetscratchedunlessyoureadythoughtshewassuchaperceptivecatthatshe'dunderstand'woof-woof'meant'rollover'.

Premise4:

Ifyouthoughtthat,you'reanidiot.Butyou'renotanidiotyou'rejusttwisted.

Conclusion:

Soifthepoorthingdidwantyoutoticklehertummyyoudeservetogetscratched.

2Addsuppressedpremises

(None)

3Removeirrelevancies

draft:

Premise1:

Wellperhapsshedidn'twantyoutoticklehertummy,orshedidn'trealizethatwaswhatyouweregoingtodo

Premise2:

Ifshedidn'trealize,thenyouobviouslywentaboutitinthewrongway.

Premise3:

Inthatcaseyoudeservedtogetscratchedunlessyoureadythoughtshewassuchaperceptivecatthatshe'dunderstand'woof-woof'meant'rollover'.

Premise4:

Ifyouthoughtthat,you'reanidiot.Butyou'renotanidiotyou'rejusttwisted.

Conclusion:

Soifthepoorthingdidwantyoutoticklehertummyyoudeservetogetscratched.

 

Premise1:

Shedidn'twantyoutotickleher,orshedidn'trealizethatwaswhatyouweregoingtodo

Premise2:

Ifshedidn'trealize,thenyouwentaboutitinthewrongway.

Premise3:

Inthatcaseyoudeservedtogetscratched.

Conclusion:

Soifthepoorthingdidwantyoutotickleheryoudeservetogetscratched.

4Removeinconsistenttermsandcrossreferences(simplify)

Premise1:

Shedidn'twantyoutotickleher,orshedidn'trealizeyouweregoingtotickleher

Premise2:

Ifshedidn'trealizeyouweregoingtotickleher,thenyouweregoingtotickleherinthewrongway.

Premise3:

Ifyouweregoingtotickleherinthewrongway,youdeservedto

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > IT计算机 > 电脑基础知识

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1