Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode An empirical analysis of the electronic.docx

Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode An empirical analysis of the electronic.docx

《Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode An empirical analysis of the electronic.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode An empirical analysis of the electronic.docx（18页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

FactorsaffectingthechoiceoftechnologyacquisitionmodeAnempiricalanalysisoftheelectronic

3

Measuringbusinessperformanceinthehigh-techmanufacturingindustry:

AcasestudyofTaiwan'slarge-sizedTFT-LCDpanelcompanies  OriginalResearchArticle

Omega,Volume37,Issue3,June2009,Pages686-697

Fang-MeiTseng,Yu-JingChiu,Ja-ShenChen

 Closepreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Abstract

Thenatureofcompetitioninthehigh-technologymanufacturingindustryhaschangeddramaticallyoverthelasttwodecades,andanyofthetraditionalindicatorsofbusinessperformanceareinsufficienttoday.Wehaveidentifiedanewsetoffinancialandnon-financialperformanceindicatorsthatcanbeusedbyhigh-techmanufacturingcompaniesandhavedevelopedabusinessperformanceevaluationmodel.Adataenvelopmentanalysis（DEA）,ananalytichierarchyprocess（AHP）,andafuzzymulti-criteriadecision-makingapproachareusedinthemodel.Datafromlarge-sizedthin-filmtransistorliquid-crystaldisplaypanelcompaniesinTaiwanwerecollectedviaafieldsurveyandfromvariouspublisheddatabasesandwerefedintothemodeltodeterminetherelativebusinessperformanceofthecompanies.Wehopethatourfindingswillhelphigh-techmanufacturingexecutivesdeterminetheircompanies’strengthsandweaknessesandleadtofutureimprovementsinbusinessoperations.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.Performanceevaluationmodeldevelopment

2.1.Identifyingperformancedimensionsandindicators

2.2.Determiningtherelativeweightofperformancedimensionsandindicators—theAHPmethod

2.3.Calculatingperformancescoresviatheevaluationmodel—afuzzymulti-criteriaapproach

2.4.Aggregatinganddeterminingtheperformancescoresforthesurveyedcompanies

3.BusinessperformanceevaluationofTaiwan'slarge-sizedTFT-LCDpanelcompanies

3.1.Datacollection

3.2.Weightsofperformancedimensionsandindicatorsforthesurveyedcompanies

3.3.Performancescoresandrankingsforthesurveyedcompanies

4.Discussion

4.1.Propositionsrelatedtoperformancedimensionsandindicators

4.2.Thecompanies’relativeadvantagesanddirectionsforimprovements

5.Conclusionsandfutureresearch

Acknowledgements

References

Purchase

4

Local“TestBed”MarketDemandintheTransitiontoLeadership:

TheCaseoftheKoreanMobileHandsetIndustry  OriginalResearchArticle

WorldDevelopment,InPress,CorrectedProof,Availableonline26February2011

Yun-kyungWhang,MichaelHobday

 Closepreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Summary

Thisarticleproposesthatapotentiallysignificantdimensionoftechnologicalcatching-upandthetransitiontoleadershipliesinthequalityanddynamicsofthelocalmarket,ratherthanintheexportmarketdemandastraditionallystressedincatchupstudies.BasedonanexploratoryanalysisoftheKoreanmobilehandsetindustryovertheperiodofthelate1980sto2005thepapershowsthatatransitiontoleadershipinhandsetswasshapedanddrivenbydomesticusers,localservicesuppliers（mobiletelecommunicationsoperators）,favorablegovernmentpolicies,andstrongproducer–userlinksforgedbymanufacturersandoperators.Traditionally,localdemandinlatecomereconomieshasbeenconsideredtoosmallandunsophisticatedtostimulateinnovationandtoenablecatchingup.However,inthiscase,localdemandevolvedandactedasanimportant“testbed”fornewproducts,services,andtechnologies,shapingtherateanddirectionofthetechnologicaldevelopmentofbothlocalsuppliersandoperators.Theconclusionarguesthatwhiledirectimplicationsforotherdevelopingcountriescannotbedrawnfromasinglecase,futureresearchcouldidentifywhether,undercertaincircumstances,theroleoflocaldemandandtestbedmarketscouldhavewiderrelevanceforotheradvanceddevelopingnationsandothersectorsapproachingthetechnologyfrontier.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.Studiesofinnovationprocessesincatch-upeconomies

（a）.Innovationcatchupstudies

（b）.Latecomerinnovationtransitionissues

（c）.Theroleofdomesticdemand

3.ThecaseofthemobilehandsetindustryinKorea2

（a）.ThedevelopmentofacommercializedCDMAsysteminKorea

（b）.Regulationofthemobileservicesector

（c）.Theroleofoperatorsinsuppliercapabilitydevelopment

（d）.Operatorsandtheinducementofhandsetinnovation

（i）.Customersegmentation

（ii）.Innovationinmobiledataservices

（iii）.Innovationinotherservices

（e）.ExportsofKoreansuppliers

（f）.ThedeclineofMNCsuppliersintheKoreanmarket

（g）.Testbedmarketdynamicsandinternationalcompetitiveness

4.Conclusion:

testbedmarketsinthetransitiontoleadership

Acknowledgements

References

Purchase

5

Industrialleadershipinscience-basedindustries:

Aco-evolutionmodel  OriginalResearchArticle

JournalofEconomicBehavior&Organization,Volume72,Issue1,October2009,Pages390-407

FranciscoFatas-Villafranca,GloriaJarne,JulioSanchez-Choliz

 Closepreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Abstract

Inthispaper,weseektoanalysetheroleofnationaluniversitysystemsincombinationwithtechnologicalandmarketfactorsassourcesofindustrialleadershipandindustrygrowthinscience-basedindustries.Weproposeamodelinwhichnationaluniversitysystemsandtheirrespectivenationalfirmsandindustriesareconsideredasco-evolving.Nationalfirmscompeteonaworldwidelevelandtheyrelyontheprogressofscienceandtheavailabilityofscientiststoinnovate.Astheglobalindustrydevelops,firmstrytomoldtheirnationaluniversitysystems,buttheyachievedifferentdegreesofsuccess.Apartfromhighlightingtheroleofinstitutionalresponsivenessasasourceofcompetitiveadvantage,ourmodelpointstotheaccesstoessentialinputsforproduction,thetechnologicalandstrategiccharacteristicsoffirms,theinternationaldiffusionofknowledge,andtheinitialdistributionofmarketdemandaskeysourcesofleadershipandindustrygrowth.Theinternationalmobilityofscientistsseemstofostertheemergenceofindustrialleadershipshifts.

ArticleOutline

Nomenclature

1.Introduction

2.Themodel

2.1.Production,growthanddemand

2.2.Innovationandtechnologicalchange

2.3.Institutions:

nationaluniversitysystems

2.4.Dynamicalequationsofthemodel

3.Themodel’sdynamics

3.1.Oneparticularcase:

themodelforoneisolatedindustry

3.2.Twonationalindustriescompetingonaworldwidelevel

3.3.Themodelwithnnationalindustriesinglobalcompetition

4.Simulations

4.1.Thesourcesofindustrialleadership

4.1.1.Analyzingtheinfluenceofeachfactorwithoutinternationaldiffusion

4.1.2.Analyzingtheinfluenceofeachfactorwithinternationaldiffusion

4.2.Estimatingtherelativeinfluenceofdifferentsourcesofindustrialleadership

4.3.Industrialleadershipshifts

5.Internationalmobilityofscientists

6.Conclusions

Acknowledgements

References

Purchase

6

Factorsaffectingthechoiceoftechnologyacquisitionmode:

AnempiricalanalysisoftheelectronicfirmsofJapan,KoreaandTaiwan  OriginalResearchArticle

Technovation,Volume28,Issue9,September2008,Pages551-563

Shiu-WanHung,Ruei-HungTang

 Closepreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Abstract

Intoday'sglobalizedeconomy,enterprisesarefacingeverincreasingcompetitivepressures.Acommonlyadoptedstrategyforgainingnewtechnologiesandremainingcompetitiveistoacquireneededtechnologyfromexternalsources.Thegoalofthispaperistoidentifyinfluentialfactorsandtheirimpactusingamulti-factorialanalysisofthechoiceoftechnologyacquisitionmode.TheeffectofvariousfactorsonthesemodeswasstudiedbyexaminingasamplingoftheelectronicindustriesofJapan,KoreaandTaiwan.ApatentanalysiscombinedwithLogitRegressionismadeandtestedusingdataoftheseelectronicfirms.Theresultsindicatethatamongthefactorsanalyzedinthisstudy,thetechnologicalcapability（includingtechnologicallevel,technologicalinnovationandresearchanddevelopment（R&D）activities）ofafirmisthemostsignificantfactorininfluencingthedeterminationofthemodeoftechnologyacquisition.Finally,wediscussthesignificanceofresultsbasedonresourcetheoryandpresentourconclusionsandtheirimplications.Byhighlightingtheimportantlinksbetweenafirm'stechnologicalcapability,size,previousexperienceandrelevanceofitscoretechnologytothemodeoftechnologyacquisitioninthesetechnology-basedfirms,wehopetocastlightonthecontributionofvariousinfluentialfactorsonthedecisionmakingofthesemodesforfirmsinthesecountries.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.Analyticframeworkandhypothesis

2.1.Technologicalcapabilityandtechnologyacquisitionmode

2.2.Firmsizeandtechnologyacquisitionmode

2.3.Experienceandtechnologyacquisitionmode

2.4.Technologicalrelevanceandacquisitionmode

3.Methods

3.1.Sample

3.2.Measurementitems

3.3.Modelingmethod

4.Results

4.1.Licensingvs.cooperativeR&D

4.2.CooperativeR&Dvs.jointventure

4.3.Licensingvs.jointventure

5.Discussion

5.1.Technologicalcapability

5.2.Firmsize

5.3.Previousexperience

5.4.Technologicalrelevance

6.Implica