CommonsINSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS.docx
《CommonsINSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《CommonsINSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![CommonsINSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2023-2/28/3e6bff43-9eb0-4aac-89ae-784e31913ae9/3e6bff43-9eb0-4aac-89ae-784e31913ae91.gif)
CommonsINSTITUTIONALECONOMICS
INSTITUTIONALECONOMICS
byJohnR.Commons
AmericanEconomicReview,vol.21(1931),pp.648-657.
Thedifficultyindefiningafieldfortheso-calledinstitutionaleconomicsistheuncertaintyofmeaningofaninstitution.Sometimesaninstitutionseemstomeanaframeworkoflawsornaturalrightswithinwhichindividualsactlikeinmates.Sometimesitseemstomeanthebehavioroftheinmatesthemselves.Sometimesanythingadditionaltoorcriticaloftheclassicalorhedoniceconomicsisdeemedtobeinstitutional.Sometimesanythingthatis"economicbehavior"isinstitutional.Sometimesanythingthatis"dynamic"insteadof"static,"ora"process"insteadofcommodities,oractivityinsteadoffeelings,ormassactioninsteadofindividualaction,ormanagementinsteadofequilibrium,orcontrolinsteadoflaissezfaire,seemstobeinstitutionaleconomics.
Allofthesenotionsaredoubtlessinvolvedininstitutionaleconomics,buttheymaybesaidtobemetaphorsordescriptions,whereas,ascienceofeconomicbehaviorrequiresanalysisintosimilaritiesofcause,effectorpurpose,andasynthesisinaunifiedsystemofprinciples.Andinstitutionaleconomics,furthermore,cannotseparateitselffromthemarvelousdiscoveriesandinsightoftheclassicalandpsychologicaleconomists.Itshouldincorporate,however,inaddition,theequallyimportantinsightofthecommunistic,anarchistic,syndicalistic,fascistic,co-operativeandunionisticeconomists.Doubtlessitistheefforttocoverbyenumerationalloftheseunco-ordinatedactivitiesofthevariousschoolswhichgivestothenameinstitutionaleconomicsthatreputationofamiscellaneous,nondescriptyetmerelydescriptive,characterofso-called"economicbehavior,"whichhaslongsincerelegatedthecrudeHistoricalSchool.
Ifweendeavortofindauniversalcircumstance,commontoallbehaviorknownasinstitutional,wemaydefineaninstitutionascollectiveactionincontrol,liberationandexpansionofindividualaction.
Collectiveactionrangesallthewayfromunorganizedcustomtothemanyorganizedgoingconcerns,suchasthefamily,thecorporation,thetradeassociation,thetradeunion,thereservesystem,thestate.Theprinciplecommontoallofthemisgreaterorlesscontrol,liberationandexpansionofindividualactionbycollectiveaction.
Thiscontroloftheactsofoneindividualalwaysresultsin,andisintendedtoresultin,againorlosstoanotherorotherindividuals.Ifitbetheenforcementofacontract,thenthedebtisexactlyequaltothecreditcreatedforthebenefitoftheotherperson.Adebtisadutyenforcedcollectively,whilethecreditisacorrespondingrightcreatedbycreatingtheduty.Theresultingsocialrelationisaneconomicstatus,consistingoftheexpectationstowardswhicheachpartyisdirectinghiseconomicbehavior.Onthedebtanddutysideitisthestatusofconformitytocollectiveaction.Onthecreditandrightsideitisastatusofsecuritycreatedbytheexpectationofthesaidconformity.Thisisknownas"incorporeal"property.
Or,thecollectivecontroltakestheformofatabuorprohibitionofcertainacts,suchasactsofinterference,infringement,trespass;andthisprohibitioncreatesaneconomicstatusoflibertyforthepersonthusmadeimmune.Butthelibertyofonepersonmaybeaccompaniedbyprospectivegainorlosstoacorrelativeperson,andtheeconomicstatusthuscreatedisexposuretothelibertyoftheother.Anemployerisexposedtothelibertyoftheemployeetoworkornottowork,andtheemployeeisexposedtothelibertyoftheemployertohireorfire.Thetypicalcaseoflibertyandexposureisthegoodwillofabusiness.Thisiscomingtobedistinguishedas"intangible"property.
Eitherthestate,oracorporation,oracartel,oraholdingcompany,oraco-operativeassociation,oratradeunion,oranemployers'association,oratradeassociation,orajointtradeagreementoftwoassociations,orastockexchange,oraboardoftrade,maylaydownandenforcetheruleswhichdetermineforindividualsthisbundleofcorrelativeandreciprocaleconomicrelationships.Indeed,thesecollectiveactsofeconomicorganizationsareattimesmorepowerfulthanthecollectiveactionofthepoliticalconcern,thestate.
Statedinthelanguageofethicsandlaw,tohedevelopedbelow,allcollectiveactsestablishrelationsofrights,duties,norightsandnoduties.Statedinthelanguageofindividualbehavior,whattheyrequireisperformance,avoidance,forbearancebyindividuals.Statedinthelanguageoftheresultingeconomicstatusofindividuals,whattheyprovideissecurity,conformity,libertyandexposure.Statedinlanguageofcause,effectorpurpose,thecommonprinciplesrunningthroughallofthemaretheprinciplesofscarcity,efficiency,futurity,theworkingrulesofcollectiveactionandthelimitingandcomplementaryfactorsofeconomictheory.Statedinlanguageoftheoperationofworkingrulesonindividualaction,theyareexpressedbytheauxiliaryverbsofwhattheindividualcan,cannot,must,mustnot,mayormaynotdo.He"can"or"cannot,"becausecollectiveactionwillorwillnotcometohisaid.He"must"or"mustnot,"becausecollectiveactionwillcompelhim.He"may,"becausecollectiveactionwillpermithimandprotecthim.He"maynot,"becausecollectiveactionwillpreventhim.
Itisbecauseofthesevolitionalauxiliaryverbsthatthefamiliarterm"workingrules"isappropriatetoindicatetheuniversalprincipleofcause,effectorpurpose,commontoallcollectiveaction.Workingrulesarecontinuallychanginginthehistoryofaninstitution,andtheydifferfordifferentinstitutions;but,whatevertheirdifferences,theyhavethissimilaritythattheyindicatewhatindividualscan,must,ormay,doornotdo,enforcedbycollectivesanctions.
Analysisofthesecollectivesanctionsfurnishesthatcorrelationofeconomics,jurisprudenceandethicswhichisprerequisitetoatheoryofinstitutionaleconomics.DavidHumefoundtheunityofthesetheesocialsciencesintheprincipleofscarcityandtheresultingconflictofinterests,contratoAdamSmithwhoisolatedeconomicsfromtheothersonassumptionsofdivineprovidence,earthlyabundanceandtheresultingharmonyofinterests.InstitutionaleconomicsgoesbacktoHume.TakingourcuefromHumeandthemodernuseofsuchatermas"businessethics,"ethicsdealswiththerulesofconductarisingfromconflictofinterests,arising,inturn,fromscarcityandenforcedbythemoralsanctionsofcollectiveopinion;buteconomicsdealswiththesamerulesofconductenforcedbythecollectiveeconomicsanctionsofprofitorlossincaseofobedienceordisobedience,whilejurisprudencedealswiththesamerulesenforcedbytheorganizedsanctionsofviolence.Institutionaleconomicsiscontinuallydealingwiththerelativemeritsandefficiencyofthesethreetypesofsanctions.
Fromthisuniversalprincipleofcollectiveactionincontrol,liberationandexpansionofindividualactionarisenotonlytheethicalconceptsofrightsanddutiesandtheeconomicconceptsofsecurity,conformity,libertyandexposure,butalsoofassetsandliabilities.Infact,itisfromthefieldofcorporationfinance,withitschangeableassetsandliabilities,ratherthanfromthefieldofwantsandlabor,orpainsandpleasures,orwealthandhappiness,orutilityanddisutility,thatinstitutionaleconomicsderivesalargepartofitsdataandmethodology.Institutionaleconomicsistheassetsandliabilitiesofconcerns,contrastedwithAdamSmith'sWealthofNations.
Butcollectiveactionisevenmoreuniversalintheunorganizedformofcustomthanitisintheorganizedformofconcerns.Customhasnotgivenwaytofreecontractandcompetition,aswasassertedbySirHenryMaine.Customshavemerelychangedwithchangesineconomicconditions,andtheymayto-daybeevenmoremandatorythanthedecreesofadictator,whoperforceiscompelledtoconformtothem.Thebusinessmanwhorefusesorisunabletomakeuseofthemoderncustomsofthecreditsystem,byrefusingtoacceptorissuechecksonsolventbanks,althoughtheyaremerelyprivatearrangementsandnotlegaltender,simplycannotcontinueinbusinessbycarryingontransactions.Theseinstrumentsarecustomarytender,insteadoflegaltender,backedbythepowerfulsanctionsofprofit,lossandcompetition,whichcompelconformity.Othermandatorycustomsmightbementioned,suchascomingtoworkatseveno'clockandquittingatsix.
Ifdisputesarise,thentheofficersofanorganizedconcern--acreditassociation,themanagerofacorporation,astockexchange,aboardoftrade,acommercialorlaborarbitrator,orfinallythecourtsoflawuptotheSupremeCourtoftheUnitedStates--reducethecustomtoprecisionbyaddinganorganizedsanction.
Thisisthecommon-lawmethodofmakinglawbythedecisionofdisputes.Thedecisions,bybecomingprecedents,becometheworkingrules,forthetimebeing,oftheparticularorganizedconcern.Thehistoric"commonlaw"ofAnglo-Americanjurisprudenceisonlyaspecialcaseoftheuniversalprinciplecommontoallconcernsthatsurvive,ofmakingnewlawbydecidingconflictsofinterest,andthusgivinggreaterprecisionandorganizedcompulsiontotheunorganizedworkingrulesofcustom.Thecommon-lawmethodisuniversalinallcollectiveaction,butthetechnical"commonlaw"ofthelawyersisabodyofdecisions.Inshort,thecommon-lawmethodisitselfacustom,withvariabilities,likeothercustoms.Itisthewaycollectiveactionactsonindividualactionintimeofconflict.
Thuscollectiveactionismorethancontrolofindividualaction--itis,bytheveryactof