外文翻译人民币在中国其价值其可调节汇率和其未来发展.docx
《外文翻译人民币在中国其价值其可调节汇率和其未来发展.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译人民币在中国其价值其可调节汇率和其未来发展.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
外文翻译人民币在中国其价值其可调节汇率和其未来发展
中文4430字
外文原文
TheChineseRMB:
ItsValue,ItsPeg,andItsFuture
--TRADEIMBALANCESHAVEMORETODOWITHTHEU.S.THANWITHCHINA
ThevaluationoftheChineserenminbi(RMB)hasdrawnlotsofattentionlatelyandagreatdealofpressureonthepartofdevelopednationsforrevaluation.Inaddressingtheissueofvaluation,thispaperdevelopsanewpurchasingpowerparity(PPP)indexofChina’sexchangerateandfindsthatthewhileundervalued,theundervaluationisneitherunusualnorbadpolicy.Moreover,China’soverallexternaltradebalancedoesnotseemtobethatfaroutofequilibrium.China’sdesiretojointheG-7clubislikelytoresultinabandoningitspeg,however,despitetheincreasedrisktoitseconomicdevelopment.
ThevaluationoftheChineserenminbi(RMB)hasdrawnlotsofattentionlately.TheIMF,theU.S.government,andtheG-7financeministersareurgingChinatorevalueitscurrency,whichiscurrentlypeggedat8.28tothedollar.TheargumentsforChinatoappreciateitscurrencyroughlyfollowtheselines:
•China’scurrencyisgrosslyundervalued;
•theundervaluedRMBisattractingafloodofhotmoneyintoChina,complicatingtheauthorities’effortstoengineerasoft-landingforanoverheatedeconomy;and
•theRMB’sundervaluationanditspegtothedollararepreventingotherAsiancountriesfromallowingcurrenciestoriseagainstthedollar,sinceappreciationwoulddamagecompetivenessrelativetoChina.
Thislastpointisofparticularconcernbecause,itisargued,U.S.externalimbalancescannotbeaddressedinthefaceofChina’sandotherAsiannations’historicallyunprecedentedaccumulationsofU.S.dollarreservesinrecentyears.TherehavebeenmanystudiesontheRMB’svaluationwithinconclusive,contradictoryresults(see,e.g.,Wang,2004).Toaddressthatdifficultvaluationquestion,thispaperdevelopsanewabsolutePPPindexthatmeasuresChina’sPPPagainsttheUnitedStatesandothercountries.ThenewindexshowstheRMBtobesubstantiallyundervaluedinthecontextof“conventionalwisdom.”However,theundervaluationisnotunusual,givenChina’slevelofeconomicdevelopment;andconventionalwisdomdoesnotapplytoChina,becausebyanymeasureitisanundevelopednationforwhichacurrencypegisusefultomaintaindomesticeconomicandpoliticalstability(Prasadetal.,2003).Intermsofmultilateralexternalbalances,wefindithardtoarguethatChina’scurrencyiscontributingmuchtoitstradeandbalanceofpaymentsurpluses,especiallyifonetakesthe1997perspectivewhentheRMBwasundertremendousdepreciationpressure.Indeed,thereisclearevidencethatifChina’stradebalancewasevenlydistributedamongitstradingpartners,therewouldbehardlyanypressureforChinatoappreciateitscurrency.Thus,thepressureispoliticalandstructuralinnature,originatingfromthelargeandgrowingmultilateraltradeimbalanceoftheUnitedStates.Unfortunately,itismucheasiertoblameChinathantoattacktheunderlyingstructuralcausesoftheU.S.tradedeficit.WeconcludethatthepoliticalpressureonChinatoabandontheRMB’spegtothedollarislikelytopersist,and—asthemostimportantgrowthmarketintheworldtoday—Chinaismorelikelytomovesoonerratherthanlatertodemonstratethat,inspiteoftheriskstoitsfragilefinancialsystem,itwillshareitsglobalresponsibilitiesasiteventuallyjoinstheG-7.Thepaperwrapsupbyplacingtheexchangeissueinthebroadercontextanddiscussingthelonger-termprospectsoftheRMB.
IstheRMBUndervalued?
TheRMBisundervaluedintheconventionalsensethatthereistoomuchdemandforitrelativetothesupply.Fundamentally,demandforforeigncurrencycomesfromthreesources:
•tobuygoodsorservices,
•toinvestinphysicalorfinancialassets,and
•tospeculateonmovesoftheexchangerateitself.
Withaclosedcapitalaccount,China’scurrencyislargely,butnotentirely,immunefromcurrencyspeculatorsandshort-termportfolioinvestors.RecentstudiesattheChinaNationalEconomicResearchInstitute(2003)indicatethatmuchoftheso-called“hotmoney”inflowsarenotaresultofforeignhedgefundactivities.Rather,theyareachangeinborrowinganddepositbehaviorsofdomesticfirmsandindividuals,takingadvantageoftheloopholesinthecurrentforeignexchangeregulations.Thus,wecanfocusourattentiononthetradeandlongterminvestmentflowsinChinaandlookatthestandardmeasures,suchaspurchasingpowerparity(PPP),tradebalance,currentaccountbalance,balanceofpayments,andforeignreserves.
PPPisanancienteconomicconcept,datingbackatleasttoDavidHume(1752),whichhasbeenexperiencingsomethingofarevivallately.TheEconomist(current)definesPPPas“theexchangeratethatequatesthepriceofabasketofidenticaltradedgoodsandservicesintwocountries.”ThetheoryisthatPPPexchangeratesrepresenttheequilibriumlevelsamongthenationsandthatanydeparturefromtheselevelscausespotentiallysignificantanddistortingtradeimbalances.TherearedifferentmeasuresofPPP:
astrongversionor“absolute”versionthatemphasizestheabsoluteequalityofprices(sometimescalled“theLawofOnePrice”)anda“relative”versionthatemphasizestheongoingmovementovertimetowardsthatequality.
ShouldChinaBowtothePressure?
Asidefrompoliticalconsiderations,whichwewilldiscusslater,thequestionofwhetherChinashouldmovenowisacomplexone,relatingtoseveralconsiderations.First,marketexpectationsoftheRMB’smovehavealreadycausedasignificantreversalofcapitalflightandincreasedupwardspeculativepressure.Second,cyclicalglobalmacroeconomicdevelopmentsarelikelytoreduceupwardpressureontheRMB.Third,Chinaisinthemidstofcriticalstructuralreforms,especiallyinthefinancialsector,thatrequirefocusedattention.Fourth,itisincreasinglyclearthatthecurrenteconomicoverheatingissectoralinnature,whichisinsharpcontrastwiththe1993-4episode.TheseconsiderationssuggestthatitisnotinChina’sinteresttorevaluethecurrencyatthistime.Let’stakeacloserlookateachoftheseissues.
Re-peggingtheRMB
Re-peggingtheRMBatavalue,say,15-20percenthigheragainsttheU.S.dollarwouldinstantlyvindicatethecurrencyspeculators,althoughtheyaremostlydomesticplayers.Overthelastcoupleofyears,theneterrorsandomissionscategoryinChina’sbalanceofpaymenthasshownalargeswingfrompersistentdeficitstoasurplusof$7.5billionin2003.Theneterrorsandemissionscategoryisbelievedtocaptureillegalcapitalmovements.Duringmuchofmid-tolate-90s,China’scapitalflight,asapercentageofGDP,wasthesecondworstintheworld(onlyRussiawasworse).Infact,itwasworsethanMexicoin1994andSouthKoreain1997duringtheheightoftheircurrencycrises.Recently,however,someofthiscapitalisfindingitswayback,asexpectationsofRMBappreciationhaveraised.Thereisalsostrongindicationthatbusinessesandindividualsareinvolvedincurrencyspeculation,whichhascontributedtotheoverheatingofrealestateinvestment.Revaluingnowwillencouragefuturespeculation,whichcouldexacerbatethebalanceofpaymentspressure.
MoreChineseInterestRateFlexibility
AstheFedcontinuestoboostU.S.interestrates,Chineseauthoritieshavemoreflexibilitytoraisedomesticinterestrateswithoutworryingaboutwideningtheinterestrategapandencouragingfurtherhotmoneyinflows.Withglobaleconomicgrowthonlymoderatingabitlately,demandforenergyandcommoditiesremainsstrong,whichislikelytokeepoilandcommoditypriceshighandtoincreasetheimportbillforChinaandotherAsiancountries—yetanothersourceofreducedpressureontheRMB.Indeed,aslongasoildemandremainsfirmandgeopoliticalriskspersist,thenegativeimpactonAsia’soilimportingcountriesandconcomitant,market-drivendownwardpressureonitscurrencieswillnotdissipate.
China’sShakyFundamentals
Perhapsmostimportant,thesharpcyclicalupswingsincetheendoftheSARScrisisismaskingChina’sshakyfundamentalstotheoutsideworld.Despitemodernfactories,spankingnewairports,highways,andshoppingmalls,China’ssocialandfinancialinstitutionsareperhapscomparabletothoseoftheU.S.inthelate19thcenturyperiodofthe“RobberBarons.”A2003pollconductedbyPekingUniversityofabout100ChinaexpertsshowsthatonethirdofthembelievetherewillbeamajorcrisisinChinabefore2010.Whatisthemostlikelysourceofcrisis?
Themostfrequentlymentionedaresocial(21percent),financial(19percent),economic(12percent),andemployment(10percent).Rapidgrowthoverthelasttwodecadeshasincreasedincomeandsocialinequality,environmentaldegradation,andregionaldisparity.Theincompletetransitionfromacentrally-plannedeconomytoamarketeconomyunderauthoritarianrulehasenrichedtheeliteandeconomicopportunistsatthecostofgeneratingalargeunderclassanderodingpublicwealth.AssomeChineseeconomistspointout,manyChineselocalgovernmentsareeffectivelybrokeandeventuallywillneedacentralgovernmentbail-out.
ReminiscentoftheageoftheU.S.“RobberBarons,”thewidespread,systematiccorruptionandabuseofpowerisestimatedtocostasmuchas14percentofChina’sGDPperyear.Thefinancialsystem—whichincludesthebanking,securities,andinsurancesectorsneedsanurgentoverhaultoimproveefficiencyandbereadyforforeigncompetitionunderChina’sWTOcommitment.Jobcreationremainsadauntingchallengegivencontinuedeffortsattransformingthestate-owned-enterprisesandimprovingproductivitygrowth.Thentherearelong