英语考研之19911998年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题.docx
《英语考研之19911998年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英语考研之19911998年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题.docx(86页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
英语考研之19911998年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题
英语考研之1991-1998年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题
————————————————————————————————作者:
————————————————————————————————日期:
1998年全国攻读硕士学位研究生入学考试英语试题
PartⅠClozeTest
Directions:
Foreachnumberedblankinthefollowingpassage,therearefourchoicesmarked\[A\],\[B\],\[C\]and\[D\].ChoosethebestoneandmarkyouransweronANSWERSHEET1byblackeningthecorrespondingletterinthebracketswithapencil.(10points)
UntilrecentlymosthistoriansspokeverycriticallyoftheIndustrialRevolution.They1thatinthelongrunindustrializationgreatlyraisedthestandardoflivingforthe2man.Buttheyinsistedthatits3resultsduringtheperiodfrom1750to1850werewidespreadpovertyandmiseryforthe4oftheEnglishpopulation.5contrast,theysawintheprecedinghundredyears,from1650to1750,whenEnglandwasstilla6agriculturalcountry,aperiodofgreatabundanceandprosperity.
Thisview,7,isgenerallythoughttobewrong.Specialists8historyandeconomics,have9twothings:
thattheperiodfrom1650to1750was10bygreatpoverty,andthatindustrializationcertainlydidnotworsenandmayhaveactuallyimprovedtheconditionsforthemajorityofthepopulace.
1.[A]admitted[B]believed[C]claimed[D]predicted
2.[A]plain[B]average[D]normal
3.[A]momentary[B]prompt[C]instant[D]immediate
4.[A]bulk[B]host[C]gross[D]magnitude
5.[A]On[B]With[C]For[D]By
6.[A]broadly[B]thoroughly[C]generally[D]completely
7.[A]however[B]meanwhile[C]therefore[D]moreover
8.[A]at[B]in[C]about[D]for
9.[A]manifested[B]approved[C]shown[D]speculated
10.[A]noted[B]impressed[C]labeled[D]marked
PartⅡReadingComprehension
Directions:
Eachofthepassagesbelowisfollowedbysomequestions.Foreachquestiontherearefouranswersmarked\[A\],\[B\],\[C\]and\[D\].Readthepassagescarefullyandchoosethebestanswertoeachofthequestions.ThenmarkyouransweronANSWERSHEET1byblackeningthecorrespondingletterinthebracketswithapencil.(40points)
Passage1
Fewcreationsofbigtechnologycapturetheimaginationlikegiantdams.Perhapsitishumankind'slongsufferingatthemercyoffloodanddroughtthatmakestheideaofforcingthewaterstodoourbiddingsofascinating.Buttobefascinatedisalso,sometimes,tobeblind.Severalgiantdamprojectsthreatentodomoreharmthangood.
Thelessonfromdamsisthatbigisnotalwaysbeautiful.Itdoesn'thelpthatbuildingabig,powerfuldamhasbecomeasymbolofachievementfornationsandpeoplestrivingtoassertthemselves.Egypt'sleadershipintheArabworldwascementedbytheAswanHighDam.Turkey'sbidforFirstWorldstatusincludesthegiantAtaturkDam.
Butbigdamstendnottoworkasintended.TheAswanDam,forexample,stoppedtheNilefloodingbutdeprivedEgyptofthefertilesiltthatfloodsleft-allinreturnforagiantreservoirofdiseasewhichisnowsofullofsiltthatitbarelygenerateselectricity.
Andyet,themythofcontrollingthewaterspersists.Thisweek,intheheartofcivilizedEurope,SlovaksandHungariansstoppedjustshortofsendinginthetroopsintheircontentionoveradamontheDanube.Thehugecomplexwillprobablyhavealltheusualproblemsofbigdams.ButSlovakiaisbiddingforindependencefromtheCzechs,andnowneedsadamtoproveitself.
Meanwhile,inIndia,theWorldBankhasgiventhego-aheadtotheevenmorewrong-headedNarmadaDam.Andthebankhasdonethiseventhoughitsadvisorssaythedamwillcausehardshipforthepowerlessandenvironmentaldestruction.Thebenefitsareforthepowerful,buttheyarefarfromguaranteed.
Proper,scientificstudyoftheimpactsofdamsandofthecostsandbenefitsofcontrollingwatercanhelptoresolvetheseconflicts.Hydroelectricpowerandfloodcontrolandirrigationarepossiblewithoutbuildingmonsterdams.Butwhenyouaredealingwithmyths,itishardtobeeitherproper,orscientific.ItistimethattheworldlearnedthelessonsofAswan.Youdon'tneedadamtobesaved.
11.Thethirdsentenceofparagraph1impliesthat.
\[A\]peoplewouldbehappyiftheyshuttheireyestoreality
\[B\]theblindcouldbehappierthanthesighted
\[C\]over-excitedpeopletendtoneglectvitalthings
\[D\]fascinationmakespeoplelosetheireyesight
12.Inparagraph5,"thepowerless"probablyrefersto.
\[A\]areasshortofelectricity
\[B\]damswithoutpowerstations
\[C\]poorcountriesaroundIndia
\[D\]commonpeopleintheNarmadaDamarea
13.Whatisthemythconcerninggiantdams?
\[A\]Theybringinmorefertilesoil.
\[B\]Theyhelpdefendthecountry.
\[C\]Theystrengtheninternationalties.
\[D\]Theyhaveuniversalcontrolofthewaters.
14.Whattheauthortriestosuggestmaybestbeinterpretedas.
\[A\]"It'snousecryingoverspiltmilk"
\[B\]"Morehaste,lessspeed"
\[C\]"Lookbeforeyouleap"
\[D\]"Hewholaughslastlaughsbest"
Passage2
Well,nogainwithoutpain,theysay.Butwhataboutpainwithoutgain?
EverywhereyougoinAmerica,youheartalesofcorporaterevival.Whatishardertoestablishiswhethertheproductivityrevolutionthatbusinessmenassumetheyarepresidingoverisforreal.
Theofficialstatisticsaremildlydiscouraging.Theyshowthat,ifyoulumpmanufacturingandservicestogether,productivityhasgrownonaverageby1.2%since1987.Thatissomewhatfasterthantheaverageduringthepreviousdecade.Andsince1991,productivityhasincreasedbyabout2%ayear,whichismorethantwicethe1978-1987averages.Thetroubleisthatpartoftherecentaccelerationisduetotheusualreboundthatoccursatthispointinabusinesscycle,andsoisnotconclusiveevidenceofarevivalintheunderlyingtrend.Thereis,asRobertRubin,thetreasurysecretary,says,a"disjunction"betweenthemassofbusinessanecdotethatpointstoaleapinproductivityandthepicturereflectedbythestatistics.
Someofthiscanbeeasilyexplained.Newwaysoforganizingtheworkplace-allthatreengineeringanddownsizing-areonlyonecontributiontotheoverallproductivityofaneconomy,whichisdrivenbymanyotherfactorssuchasjointinvestmentinequipmentandmachinery,newtechnology,andinvestmentineducationandtraining.Moreover,mostofthechangesthatcompaniesmakeareintendedtokeepthemprofitable,andthisneednotalwaysmeanincreasingproductivity:
switchingtonewmarketsorimprovingqualitycanmatterjustasmuch.
Twootherexplanationsaremorespeculative.First,someofthebusinessrestructuringofrecentyearsmayhavebeenineptlydone.Second,evenifitwaswelldone,itmayhavespreadmuchlesswidelythanpeoplesuppose.
LeonardSchlesinger,aHarvardacademicandformerchiefexecutiveofAuBonPain,arapidlygrowingchainofbakerycafes,saysthatmuch"reengineering"hasbeencrude.Inmanycases,hebelieves,thelossofrevenuehasbeengreaterthanthereductionsincost.Hiscolleagues,MichaelBeer,saysthatfartoomanycompanieshaveappliedre-engineeringinamechanisticfashion,choppingoutcostswithoutgivingsufficientthoughttolong-termprofitability.BBDO'sAlRosenshineisblunter.Hedismissesalotoftheworkofre-engineeringconsultantsasmererubbish-"theworstsortofambulance-chasing".
15.Accordingtotheauthor,theAmericaneconomicsituationis.
\[A\]notasgoodasitseems\[B\]atitsturningpoint
\[C\]muchbetterthanitseems\[D\]neartocompleterecovery
16.Theofficialstatisticsonproductivitygrowth.
\[A\]excludetheusualreboundinabusinesscycle
\[B\]fallshortofbusinessmen'santicipation
\[C\]meettheexpectationofbusinesspeople
\[D\]failtoreflectthetruestateofeconomy
17.Theauthorraisesthequestion"whataboutpainwithoutgain?
"because.
\[A\]hequestionsthetruthof"nogainwithoutpain"
\[B\]hedoesnotthinktheproductivityrevolutionworks
\[C\]hewondersiftheofficialstatisticsaremisleading
\[D\]hehasconclusiveevidencefortherevivalofbusinesses
18.WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTmentionedinthepassage?
\[A\]Radicalreformsareessentialfortheincreaseofproductivity.
\[B\]Newwaysoforganizingworkplacesmayhelptoincreaseproductivity.
\[C\]Thereductionofcostsisnotasurewaytogainlong-termprofitability.
\[D\]Theconsultantsareabunchofgood-for-nothings.
Passage3
Sciencehaslonghadanuneasyrelationshipwithotheraspectsofculture.ThinkofGallileo's17th-centurytrialforhisrebellingbeliefbeforetheCatholicChurchorpoetWilliamBlake'sharshremarksagainstthemechanisticworldviewofIsaacNewton.Theschismbetweenscienceandthehumanitieshas,ifanything,deepenedinthiscentury.
Untilrecently,thescientificcommunitywassopowerfulthatitcouldaffordtoignoreitscritics-butnolonger.Asfundingforsciencehasdeclined,scientistshaveattacked"antiscience"inseveralbooks,notablyHigherSuperstition,byPaulR.Gross,abiologistattheUniversityofVirginia,andNormanLevitt,amathematicianatRutgersUniversity;andTheDemon-HauntedWorld,byCarlSaganofCornellUniversity.
Defendersofsciencehavealsovoicedtheirconcernsatmeetingssuchas"theFlightfromScienceandReason,"heldinNewYorkCityin1995,and"ScienceintheAgeof(Mis)information,"whichassembledlastJunenearBuffalo.
Antiscienceclearlymeansdifferentthingstodifferentpeople.GrossandLevittfindfaultprimarilywithsociologists,philosophersandotheracademicswhohavequestionedscience'sobjectivity.Saganismoreconcernedwiththosewhobelieveinghosts,creationismandotherphenomenathatcontradictthescientificworldview.
Asurveyofnewsstoriesin1996revealsthattheantisciencetaghasbeenattachedtomanyother