College Entrance Examination New Curriculum volumes the past five years the characteristics of the t.docx

1、College Entrance Examination New Curriculum volumes the past five years the characteristics of the t College Entrance Examination New Curriculum volumes the past five years the characteristics of the test questions and reference analysisAfter a new round of curriculum reform, the national college en

2、trance examination of the eight provinces of Henan, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Ningxia, Shanxi, Xinjiang, Shaanxi, Hainan New Curriculum volume, Yunnan Province in 2012 will also use this set of questions. This paper attempts to contrast analysis for five consecutive years, Ningxia and Hainan volume (ie,

3、the National New Standard Volume, hereinafter referred to as the college entrance examination the New Curriculum volumes language questions, identify examine the key questions life system, in order to inspire teaching and pro forma. Analysis of the College Entrance Examination in the past five years

4、 new curriculum volume (A comparison between the the 2007-2009 Volume Ningxia and Hainan and the college entrance examination in 2010, two years new curriculum volume, can be seen, the 2011 general characteristics of language New Standard Volume: papers structural stability, exam contents calm, clos

5、e to reality ( The most prominent close to the reality of hotspots of essay questions, questions similar to the test points, still emphasized the ability of conception 2011 National New Curriculum volumes language questions, for example (see Table 1: paper structure , volume structure, 150 points ou

6、t. Volume 70 points on (A reading of 45 points and (b Select exam 25 points constitute essay volume for the expression of title 80, accounting for 60 points. objective and subjective questions of the full volume fraction ratio is 118:32. The 2007-2011 New Curriculum volume, the basic structure has n

7、ot changed. (Question of the individual questions 2011 Language questions the ability structure analysis as shown in Table 2. 2011 questions overall ability to examine individual title examines the ability to point and 2010 did not change I believe that, for five consecutive years, the from Ningxia

8、volume to the entrance class standard volume, item structure, examine the content and exam instructions examine the requirements of almost no change may be due to the steady progress of the new curriculum reform in order to speculate, the volume of papers in 2012, the new curriculum structure should

9、 remain relatively stable. (Two questions and new electoral test content, and can not really examine the students language literacy According to the provisions of the syllabus, the new curriculum exam points must be tested and should select the two categories. Selected exams content is divided into

10、“literary text reading” and “practical class text reading” literature class includes poetry, fiction, essays, drama and other sports utility classes including news, biography, reports, scientific sketches and other stylistic statistics for these two types of questions, questions for example in the 2

11、010. (The following data excerpts from Heilongjiang Province 2010 college entrance examination (teaching analysis and evaluation report >> , the Heilongjiang College Entrance Examination Board office compiled, March 2011 See from the statistics, the 2010 election A utility class text Candidate

12、s proportion is as high as 77.15%, accounting for the vast majority of the total number of candidates, nearly 80% of the science students could choose a utility class text reading, and liberal arts candidates up to 73.84%. 12 title (practical text reading average are higher than 11 (the literary tex

13、t read to each small problem, small problem the difficulty of the question 12 were lower than 11, except the small problem of the 11 questions, selected exam each small problem discrimination did not reach 0.2 The low discrimination .2011 broadly in line with 2010, a considerable. one of the reasons

14、, the current length of the papers (after nearly nine thousand Five Hundred Words do not allow students to two types of questions all the reading and thinking seriously make a choice only in the exam to make a decision. actual teaching, in order to improve the efficiency review of some schools and t

15、eachers on behalf of students choose A which questions the second reason, the actual award Points text disparities literature class read the questions to score low utility class, both in 2010 average difference of 4.72 points. candidates select literary text is difficult to get high marks, the reali

16、ty of the situation has prompted many students choose to score more insurance utility class the text read. questions reflects the desire of the students personality and interest in developing faileth largely proposition had hoped. New Standard Volume questions specific Comment and coping strategies

17、(A first question: modern reading title Five questions on such as in Table 3. Conclusion: examine similar fixed test sites, scores, questions are excerpts from the preparation of the literary and cultural articles. Largest test center is screening and integration of information and understanding of

18、the article content analysis summarized .2010 and 2011, more prominent . Review strategy: the subject of modern reading should select literary class, followed by the article more closely tied to the historical aspects of cultural traditions, again as education, economics, law, aesthetics, ethics and

19、 other social science articles like the same subject material more practice to change the attitude of students refuse such articles. Ability to review strategy: targeted problem-solving guidance in the training and instruction of the problem-solving approach, focusing on training students filtering

20、information, analysis of inductive understand the authors point of view attitude and grasp the thrust of the article for a certain type of questions to be comprehensive the questions ask the cited test sites involved, students saw the topic you know and be able to grasp the basic do question method.

21、 Review strategy: focus on the test center training. The expositions articles selected text characteristics must carefully review the screening information, the analysis summarized understand the authors point of view the attitude and grasp the thrust of the article “because the exposition articles

22、obviously there is an argument prove the reasoning process. questions require access to information at the same time, but also require candidates to have an accurate grasp of the argument within the selected articles logical relationship item analysis, analysis summarized understand the authors poin

23、t of view the attitude and grasp the thrust of the article, the score does not easy 2010 small questions answered correctly only 13.99% of the students master the test center to focus on in the review. (Question II: Ancient poetry reading 1. Classical reading (four for a total of 19 points, five que

24、stions contrast the following page table. Conclusion: The selected questions materials are biographies, are selected from the Twenty-Four Histories. Examine focus: able to accurately understand the meaning of the words in a specific locale, in the dredge the sentence on the basis of, accurately scre

25、ening the basic information in the article, summarized the main content, grasp the text written characters have done, summarized the main points, understanding of a text, the characters clear the outstanding qualities of the characters as well as others or of how the evaluation, the translation will

26、 be inaccurate. Review strategy: focus on familiar ancient prose biography. Material characteristics - the growth of the outstanding figures of ancient archives - to help students develop good reading and doing questions habit summarized do title master problem-solving skills. Review strategy: To de

27、velop students understanding of the segments ability to capture the overall review the not Sikou terms .2011 questions examined “grabbing” word in question 4, 120 content words not in the college entrance examination. “Convergence soldiers” The “convergence” when “stop”, the high school textbooks ha

28、ve not appeared in this issue examines the students ability to speculate meaning according to the context. candidates according to the context, Contact familiarize yourself with the meaning of a word, launched by the known unknown. 120 commonly used words in the syllabus within five years, only 2008

29、 test “promise” So, review to emphasize the overall reading comprehension, not to fall into the sea issues. Ancient poetry reading (two questions for a total of 11 points, five questions such as Table 5. Conclusion: The selected material into five poems more than words (four poems, one word, no Yuan

30、Qu. The Song Poem multi Tang Dynasty less famous masterpieces no comparative appreciation of the kinds of questions, test points set expressed in imagery, mood, skills and comprehensive test of the thoughts and feelings .2012 Poetry Appreciation selection range should not the Song Dynasty, Tang Dyna

31、sty and the word should be focused, Chairman Ming and Qing dynasties poetry. << Book of Songs >> Yuefu unlikely. selected poets may be less familiar. the questions see from the last two years, the focus of the questions examined in 2012 should also grasp of poetry keynote emotional. Revi

32、ew strategy: pay attention to the three techniques - question of the exact words, imagery mood questions, training performance practices and of the thoughts and feelings of the theme. Famous famous dictation (six points, five questions such as Table 6. Conclusion: five in the first two years of high

33、 school and junior high school textbooks have equal shares, each test two, after three years from the junior high school were more than from high school. Selected examine << high school language curriculum standards (experimental >> and are from << full-time compulsory education language curricu