ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOCX , 页数:16 ,大小:30.95KB ,
资源ID:9230746      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bdocx.com/down/9230746.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(整理考研英语一真题及答案.docx)为本站会员(b****8)主动上传,冰豆网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰豆网(发送邮件至service@bdocx.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

整理考研英语一真题及答案.docx

1、整理考研英语一真题及答案2010年考研英语一真题及答案 编辑整理:尊敬的读者朋友们:这里是精品文档编辑中心,本文档内容是由我和我的同事精心编辑整理后发布的,发布之前我们对文中内容进行仔细校对,但是难免会有疏漏的地方,但是任然希望(2010年考研英语一真题及答案)的内容能够给您的工作和学习带来便利。同时也真诚的希望收到您的建议和反馈,这将是我们进步的源泉,前进的动力。本文可编辑可修改,如果觉得对您有帮助请收藏以便随时查阅,最后祝您生活愉快 业绩进步,以下为2010年考研英语一真题及答案的全部内容。2010年考研英语一Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read

2、the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)In 1924 American National Research Council sent to engineers to supervise a series of industrial experiments at a large telephoneparts factory called the Hawthorne Plant near Chica

3、go。 It hoped they would learn how stop-floor lignting_1_workers productivity. Instead, the studies ended _2_giving their name to the “Hawthorne effect, the extremely influential idea that the very_3_to being experimented upon changed subjects behavior。The idea arose because of the _4_behavior of the

4、 women in the Hawthorne plant. According to _5_of the experiments, their hourly output rose when lighting was increased, but also when it was dimmed。 It did not _6_what was done in the experiment; _7_someting was changed ,productivity rose. A(n)_8_that they were being experimented upon seemed to be

5、_9_to alter workers behavior _10_itself。After several decades, the same data were _11_ to econometric the analysis。 Hawthorne experiments has another surprise store _12 _the descriptions on record, no systematic _13_ was found that levels of productivity were related to changes in lighting.It turns

6、out that peculiar way of conducting the experiments may be have let to_ 14_ interpretation of what happed._ 15_ , lighting was always changed on a Sunday 。When work started again on Monday, output _16_ rose compared with the previous Saturday and_ 17 _to rise for the next couple of days。_ 18_ , a co

7、mparison with data for weeks when there was no experimentation showed that output always went up on Monday, workers_ 19_ to be diligent for the first few days of the week in any case , before _20 _a plateau and then slackening off. This suggests that the alleged Hawthorne effect “ is hard to pin dow

8、n。1. A affected B achieved C extracted D restored2. A at Bup C with D off3。 Atruth Bsight C act D proof4。 A controversial B perplexing Cmischievous D ambiguous5。 Arequirements Bexplanations C accounts D assessments6。 A conclude B matter C indicate D work7. A as far as B for fear that C in case that

9、D so long as8。 A awareness B expectation C sentiment D illusion9。 A suitable B excessive C enough D abundant10。 A about B for C on D by11. A compared Bshown C subjected D conveyed12。 A contrary to B consistent with C parallel with D pealliar to13. A evidence Bguidance Cimplication Dsource14。 A dispu

10、table Benlightening Creliable Dmisleading15. A In contrast B For example C In consequence D As usual16。 A duly Baccidentally C unpredictably D suddenly17。 Afailed Bceased Cstarted Dcontinued20。 Abreaking Bclimbing Csurpassing Dhiting Section II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the followin

11、g four texts。 Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D。 Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)Text 1Of all the changes that have taken place in Englishlanguage newspapers during the past quartercentury, perhaps the m ost far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in

12、the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage。It is difficult to thepoint of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when highquality arts criticism could be found in most bigcity newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant c ollections of c

13、riticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of new spaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies。We are even farther rem oved from the unfocused newspaper revie

14、w spublished in England between the turn of t he 2 0th century and the eve of World War , at atime when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts crit icism was consi dered an ornament to the publications in which it appe ared。 In those faroff days, it was taken for granted tha t the cri tics ofmajo

15、r papers woul dwri te in detail and at length about the events they covered。 Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bern ard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trus ted to know what they were a bout. These men believed in journalism as a ca

16、lling, and were proud to be published in the daily press。 “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism, ”Newmanwrote, “ that Iam tempted to definejournalism as a term of cont empt appl ied by writers who arenot read to writers who are. ”Unfortunat

17、ely, these critics are virtually forgotten。 Neville Cardus, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays ont he game of cricket。 During his l ifetime, though, he was also one of Englands foremost classicalmusic crit

18、ics, and a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography(1947)became a bestseller。 He was knighted in 1967, the first music critic to be so ho nored。 Yet on ly one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.Is there any chance that Carduss

19、criticism will enjoy a revi val? The prospect seems remote. Jour nalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern reader shave little use for the ric hly upholstered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong ret

20、reat。21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 thatA arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers。B Englishlanguage newspapers used to carry more arts reviews。C highquality newspapers retain a large body of readers。D young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.22。 Newspape

21、r reviews in England before world warwere characterized byA free themes.B casual style.C elaborate layout.D radical viewpoints。23. which of the following would Shaw and Newman most probably agree on?A It is writers duty to fulfill journalistic goals。B It is contemptible for writers to be journalists

22、.C Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.D Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing。24。 What can be learned about Cardus according to the last two paragraphs?A His music criticism may not appeal to readers today。B His reputation as a music critic has long been in dispute。CHis s

23、tyle caters largely to modern specialists.DHis writings fail to follow the amateur tradition.25。 What would be the best title for the text?A Newspapers of the Good Old Days.B The lost Horizon in Newspapers。C Mournful Decline of Journalism。D Prominent Critics in Memory。Text 2Over the past decade, tho

24、usands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods. Amazon。com received one for its “oneclick” online payment system. Merrill Lynch got legal protection for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box。Now the nations top patent court appear

25、s completely ready to scale back on business-method patents, which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago. In a move that has intellectualproperty lawyers abuzz the U.S. court of Appeals for the federal circuit said it would use a particular case to conduct a broa

26、d review of businessmethod patents. In re Bilski , as the case is known , is “a very big deal, says DennisD。 Crouch of the University of Missouri School of law. It “has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents.”Curbs on businessmethod claims would be a dramatic about-face, because it wa

27、s the federal circuit itself that introduced such patents with is 1998 decision in the so-called state Street Bank case, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets。 That ruling produced an explosion in businessmethod patent filings, initially by emerging internet companies trying to s

28、take out exclusive pinhts to specific types of online transactions. Later, move established companies raced to add such patents to their files, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might beat them to the punch。 In 2005, IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 bus

29、inessmethod patents despite the fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Similarly, some Wall Street investment films armed themselves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice.The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on

30、a method for hedging risk in the energy market。 The Federal circuit issued an unusual order stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the courts judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should” reconsider its state street Bank ruling

31、。The Federal Circuits action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the supreme Count that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders。 Last April, for example the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for “inventions” that are obvious。 The judges on the Federal circuit are “reacting to the anti_ patent trend at the supreme court” ,says Harole C.wegner, a partend attorney and professor at aeorge Washington University Law School.26。 Businessmeth

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1