ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOCX , 页数:21 ,大小:48.09KB ,
资源ID:7412080      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bdocx.com/down/7412080.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(雅思作文社会类.docx)为本站会员(b****6)主动上传,冰豆网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰豆网(发送邮件至service@bdocx.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

雅思作文社会类.docx

1、雅思作文社会类社会类话题2014年7月12日 (社会话题)年轻人是否适合政府岗位题目:Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government,while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.?There is a debate about whether y

2、oung generation is qualified for important positions in the government. In this essay, I will discuss the viewpoints of both supporters and opponents and give my own opinion.It is generally believed that young people are immature and inexperienced. They tend to make decisions without enough consider

3、ation, which may lead to serious consequences if they are in charge of important department of the government. Many young people are spoilt by their parents in their childhood and adolescence. This young generation is less considerate and responsiblethan their parents and grandparents. As government

4、 positions concern the welfare of citizens and require serious commitment, young people seem to be unsuitable for these positions.On the other hand, some people argue that young people should be given more opportunities to do government work. They have more energy and enthusiasm for their jobs than

5、the older generation. What is more important is that young people are receptive to new ideas and technology. They are expected to bring innovative style to the government work, which is considered as rigid and conservative. For example, in some cities, young officials of the government use online so

6、cial networking to interact with local residents and enhance the ties of the government and the public.In my view, young people should be encouraged to take more responsibilities for government work. This is a good way to change the stereotype (老套的,一成不变的)of the government and improve its service. Co

7、nsidering their lack of experience, job training may be needed before people take on their positions. They are likely to make mistakes, but this is how they grow and become competent for their jobs.?反对方的理由:年轻人不成熟(immature),缺乏经验(inexperienced),还可以写年轻一代被父母宠爱,变得不够周到(inconsiderate)和不负责任(irresponsible),这

8、些都是教育话题里面反复使用的素材和词汇。最后提到政府的工作关系到人们的福利,需要认真的承诺(concern the welfare of citizens and require serious commitment),所以年轻人不适合支持方的写法:年轻人有活力,有热情(have energy and enthusiasm),易于接受新思想和新技术(are receptive to new ideas and new technology)。他们善于创新(innovative)能够改变政府的刻板和保守(rigid and conservative)。用到了一个举例论证,比如一些年轻的政府官员使

9、用社交网和民众交流,增进政府和人民的关系,这样就用到科技话题里面的一些例子了。?结论段,仍然是折中式的写法,支持年轻人做政府的工作,但是需要给他们一些job training,允许他们犯错误,并且在错误中成长2013年11月16日雅思写作范文 语言减少的利弊?题目:Across the world today, the use of many languages has been declining. Only a few languages have been increasingly used. Is this a positive or negative development?It i

10、s reported that every year several languages die out and only a few languages are expected to become dominant across the world in the future. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this trend.Undoubtedly, with the decreasing number of languages, communications between nations would be

11、come easier, which would promote the development of various sectors, such as tourism, trade, education, etc. Language barriers have long impeded international exchange and cooperation, causing a lot of inconveniences and frustrations. If people from different countries use the same language, they do

12、 not need to worry about communication problem when travelling, studying and doing business in another country. Another advantage of popularizing some universal languages is enormous. In many cases, incorrect translation leads to misunderstanding and embarrassment. With fewer languages spoken, these

13、 problems can be effectively solved.On the other hand, the extinction of languages also causes wide concerns. As language is the carrier of culture, the disappearance of the language spoken by a community often means the loss of some forms of culture, including songs, literature and local traditions

14、.For example, among some minority groups in China, people do not want to learn their local languages. As a result, the younger generations know little about the history and customs of their communities. Their lives are not different from those who live in big cities. This is a pity, as culture diver

15、sity is regarded as valuable assets of human beings. Overall, it is true that fewer languages would make life easier. However, from the perspective of preserving cultures, we should make an effort to save some languages from dying out.?这个题大家可能觉得也不是很难,因为语言减少带来了方便、效率,能够促进国际交流、商务、旅游的发展,减少误解。还有一个,能够减少翻译

16、费用,全世界每年由于语言不通而花费在翻译上的费用也是惊人的。弊端怎么写?语言减少会导致少数民族文化的消失,这一点估计大家都想到了,但是写来写去好像也就那么几个词。这时候你可以举例子。比如大家去外地旅游,发现每个地方都一样。问问那些少数民族地区的年轻人,很多都已经不会说当地的语言。这无疑是文化的损失。其实语言学习是很功利的,你为什么学英语,而不去学拉丁语、希腊语,不去学满文、蒙古文?所以文章结尾我们还是号召政府采取行动吧。健康类2014年7月19日?Some people think that the government has the duty to ensure that its citi

17、zens have a healthy diet, while others believe this is individuals responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.?从政府角度来说,确保人们吃得健康可以增强人们的身体素质和减少社会的医疗成本(enhance peoples physical quality and reduce the medical cost of the society)。我举了两个例子,一个是刚才讲的肥胖税,还一个就是学校的营养餐(nutritional food),这些都可以看作是政府干

18、预的例子。对于这样一个题目,不举例是不好写的。?另一方面,人们的饮食习惯(eating habit)其实是很难被政府改变的。又是大量的举例论证:比如有些人买垃圾食品主要是因为工作太忙,没时间做饭,所以政府的措施可能是无效的(futile)。如果政府强制实施某些法律法规(enforce some laws and regulations),那么人们可能会抱怨政府干涉了他们的生活(interfere in their lives)。?结论段,其实吃什么还是由每个人自己决定的,只不过政府应该采取一些措施去提倡健康饮食。比如做一些公益广告(public service advertisements),

19、提高人们的意识(raise the awareness of the importance of healthy eating)。这些都是雅思写作里常用的一些素材和词汇。Overweight had become a widespread problem in many countries and whether the government has the obligation to improve peoples dietary habit is a controversial issue.Eating is the most important part of peoples daily

20、 lives and it is directly related to their health. Unhealthy eating may lead to a series of health problems such as obesity, diabetes (?da?bi:ti:z), etc. As the administrator of the society, the government should take actions to promote the healthy diet. This would enhance peoples physical quality a

21、nd reduce the medical cost of the society. For instance, some countries levy fat tax to discourage people from eating food with high oil and calories. Another example is some programs of providing nutritional food for student, which are funded by the government.However, some people argue that health

22、 is an issue of individuals and the governments effort is futile (?fju:ta?l) and unjustified. People have their own lifestyles and these would not be easily changed by the governments campaigns. For example, some people choose to eat junk food because they are too busy with their work and have no ti

23、me to cook. If the government enforces some laws or regulations to promote the healthy diet, people may complain that the government is interfereing in their lives.In my opinion, what to eat is a personal choice and it is decided by the individual rather than the government. However, governments mea

24、sures are needed to promote healthy eating. A good way is for the government to produce some public service advisements to raise peoples awareness of the importance of healthy eating. 2013年2月2日题目:Some people think watching TV is bad for children, while others think that watching TV has more benefici

25、al effects on children. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.?Watching TV is a common way for many people to spend their leisure time. However, there is a debate about whether children should be allowed to watch TV or not.Those who advocate watching TV may give reasons as follow. To begin wi

26、th, children can broaden their horizons by watching various programs, particularly those informative and educational ones. They can view the magnificentscenery of grassland of Africa and explore the mysterious outer space on the screen. It is an effective and affordable way to know the nature and th

27、e world. Moreover, watching TV is beneficial for childrens relief of the stress arising from study. When they get tired of the complicated formulas and equations( ?kwe?n), they can take a break by watching interesting TV programs. On the other hand, there are many people who are opposed to childrens

28、 watching TV, arguing that it has many negative effects. The first one is that children tend get addicted to TV plays, which waste their precious time and distract them from study. Another drawback comes from some programs containing violence elements. As children lack self control and have difficul

29、ty in judging what is right and wrong, they are likely to imitate those heroes in the programs and display some improper behavior. For example, some children learn to smoke and drink after they watch action programs.In my point of view, TV is a double-edged sword for children. It is not wise to ban

30、them from watching TV, which is an important source of information for them. Meanwhile, teachers and parents should play an active role in this aspect, such as controlling the amount of time and giving them guidance in selecting suitable programs.2014年6月7日(犯罪类话题)?题目:Some people believe that if the p

31、olice force carries guns, it would encourage a higher level of violence in the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?2014-06-07警察带枪会增加暴力犯罪是否同意(犯罪话题)In some countries, policemen can carry guns when patrolling on thestreet, but in some other countries, this is not allowed. Whether the polic

32、e should be armed has long been a controversial issue.On the other hand, there is no doubt that armed police would have a deterrent (d?ter?nt制止的) effect on those who intend to commit crimes. Guns are powerful weapons in cracking down on crimes. When confronted with ruthless criminals, guns enable the policemen to better protect civilians and defend themselves. For example, in many large cities of China, policemen are required to carry guns to patrol on places with defense crowds. This has proved to be effective in curbing violent crimes.On the other hand, the

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1