新GRE argument 模板+漂亮句型+范文举例.docx

1、新GRE argument 模板+漂亮句型+范文举例开头实验结论In this argument, the arguer concludes that doingwill lead to To support the conclusion, the arguer points out thatIn addition, the arguer reasons thatThe argument suffers from several critical fallacies.自己应该干吗 根据观察和现象自己改正 根据因果In this argument, the arguer recommends t

2、hat should advise to To justify this claim, the arguer provides the evidence that Thus should follow the studys recommendation and in order to 自己尝试新方法 根据预测 和 假想The conclusion in this argument is that can expect to by doing In support of this prediction, the arguer claims that Moreover, the arguer as

3、sumes that this attempt has benefits:1) to; 2)to; 3)to; This argument is fraught with vague, oversimplified, and unwarranted assumptions.换一个供应商In this argument, the arguer advocates that should This recommendation is based on the observation that Meanwhile, the arguer assumes to be a better choice b

4、ecause This argument is problematic for reasons.自己应该干吗 根据其他州的情况In this analysis, the arguer claims that should To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of where In addition, the arguer assumes that This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.正文：The major problem with

5、 this argument is that Another flaw that weakens this argument is that. In addition, the arguer ignores several factors that might undermine the argument. the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that might influence For instance since whats more etc.样本的问题：When samples are used to

6、 make general claims about a particular group, the samples should be close enough in time to the generation they are used to support, so that historical changes will not invalidate the generalization调查survey 的问题：The sample of the survey conducted by the is vague.But we are told nothing about the way

7、 the poll was conducted and how well it represented the public opinions.（民意测验）How many people participated?The sample of the survey is not representative.数据的问题：（平均值）The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation between（实验的数据不可靠） the data of the research is unconvincing （样本太小）t

8、he sample is too small to. （光数字没比例）the ratio of four to sixthere is only figures but no proportion of the survey 还是ratio?Insufficient SampleIf the respondents only stand for a tiny proportion of the whole group, we should not be so sure about the conclusion that the whole groupThe arguer commits a f

9、allacy of hasty generalization.It was only carried out in Sun City, but the arguer applies its result to all the companys markets while doesnt show us whether Sun City is a representative market of the whole markets.实验组的人：性别，年龄，生理特征副作用 有的病人会对抗生素过敏错误的类比：But the problem is that the two situations are

10、not similar enough to justify the analogical deduction.错误的比较：The comparison in this argument is incomplete and selective. The arguer discovers that However, the arguer fails to provide any information regarding respectively 别的因素：Furthermore the arguer ignores the possibility that may Unless the argu

11、er also takes this factor into consideration, the comparison is unconvincing.It is very likely that and hence varies significantly.没有因果：Confusing causal relation with correlationthe arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result

12、 of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course, an unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that 就算怎样，也不怎样Finally, the arguer hints that but he fails to analyze the causes. Is it because or because ?-其他：The fact that does not necessarily imply that First of all, the argument is base

13、d on a hasty generalization. According to the cited studies which is understandable.It is very likely that and hence varies significantly.分析常用：the actual amount of time for doing respectively The survey is based on two isolated examples. The arguer should survey more hospitals of both types.How larg

14、e was the sampleHow many people participated?What extent do this participators improve their speed?The arguer fails to indicate the attitude of the residents to the ABCs performance.循环假设The arguer commits a fallacy of begging the question in assuming that -结尾：To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibil

15、ity because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the percentage of the affected families and their geographical distribution.In summary, the conclusion reach

16、ed in this argument is invalid and misleading.In conclusion, the arguer fails to establish a causal relationship between To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide evidence that To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about As it stands, the argument is not

17、well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that is the only condition that Additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to rule out other possible causes of the To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands.范文观摩呀！Argument 37 The following is a

18、memorandum from the director of personnel to the president of Get-Away Airlines.Since our mechanics are responsible for inspecting and maintaining our aircraft, Get-Away Airlines should pay to send them to the Quality-Care Seminar, a two-week seminar on proper maintenance procedures. I recommend thi

19、s seminar because it is likely to be a wise investment, given that the automobile racing industry recently reported that the performance of its maintenance crews improved markedly after their crews had attended the seminar. These maintenance crews perform many of the same functions as do our mechani

20、cs, including refueling and repairing engines. The money we spend on sending our staff to the seminar will inevitably lead to improved maintenance and thus to greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits for our airline.建议，看别人好自己也要In this argument, the arguer concludes that sending the m

21、echanics of Get-Away Airlines to a two-week Quality-Care Seminar on proper maintenance procedures will automatically lead to improved maintenance and to greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits for the airline. To support the conclusion, the arguer points out that the performance of

22、the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry improved markedly after their crews had attended the seminar. In addition, the arguer reasons that since the maintenance crews of the automobile racing industry and the mechanics of Get-Away Airlines perform many of the same functions, the airl

23、ines will gain similar benefits from the training program. This argument suffers from several critical fallacies.First, the argument Is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that airplane mechanics and automobile maintenance crews perform many similar functions, but he does not provide

24、 any evidence that their functions are indeed comparable. As we know, the structure, operation and function of airplanes and those of automobiles differ conspicuously. It is true that both the airplane and the automobile need refueling and engine maintenance, but even here there exist fundamental di

25、fferences: the structure and the building materials of each others engines are different, so is the oil they use. Therefore, even though the two-week Quality-Care Seminar proved effective in improving the performance of the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry, there is no guarantee t

26、hat it will work just as well for airplane mechanics.Second, the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course, an unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that the

27、re will be greater profits as well as greater customer satisfaction for the airline. As we know, customer satisfaction depends on several major factors other than good maintenance of the airplane. For instance, customers are generally concerned about the punctuality, the on-board service, the ticket

28、 price, the luggage handling procedure and even the discount, all of which are ignored by the arguer. Besides, the arguer does not provide any solid information concerning how the airplane can improve its profits. Unless Get-Away Airlines can significantly increase its customers or passengers and at

29、 the same time cut down its costs, both of which are unknown from this argument, there is no guarantee that it will inevitably harvest greater profits. Actually, the arguers recommendation of investing in this training program as the only way to increase customer satisfaction and profits would most

30、probably turn out to be ineffective and misleading.In conclusion, the arguer fails to establish a causal relationship between sending Get-A ways mechanics to the Quality-Care Seminar and improved maintenance, greater customer satisfaction and greater profits for the airline. To strengthen the argume

31、nt, the arguer would have to provide evidence that automobile maintenance and airplane maintenance are similar in every aspect. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the relationship between improved maintenance and greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits.Argument 47: The nation of Claria covers a vast physical area. But despite wide geographic differences, many citizens are experiencing