审稿意见模板.docx

1、审稿意见模板论文审稿Ms. Ref. No.: JSV-D-06-01203 Title: Fault diagnosis research based on time-frequency analysis method in rotor systems Journal of Sound and Vibration Dear student , We have now received comments on your manuscript from the reviewers (reports inc luded below). Please revise your manuscript a

2、ccording to the referees suggestions and detail all the changes which you have made. I hope you will be prepared to undertake this, and I will then be pleased to reconsider the manuscript For publication. Please note that due to the extensive revisions necessay on your manuscript, it will need to be

3、 sent out For re-review. If you do decide to revise the paper, we need to receive your new manuscript within the next six months. You are asked to submit the following items along with the manuscript: (1) A point-by-point reply that we can send to each reviewer; (2) A separate list of the revisions

4、made to the manuscript. It is important that you address all the issues raised by the referees, either by revision or reasoned rebuttal, before we make a decision on publication. When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF

5、 file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. To submit a revision, please go to Your username is: * Your password is: * On your Main Menu page is a

6、 folder entitled Submissions Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely, Richard Berryman Editorial Office (Australasia) Journal of Sound and Vibration Reviewers comments: Reviewer #1: Comments on JSV-D-06-01203 Title: Fault diagnosis research based on time-frequen

7、cy method in rotor systems By: , and _ The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed

8、 comments are as follows: 1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is a well-established method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without ne

9、w contribution in methodological research. 2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the Eng

10、lish writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area. 3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and time-frequency methods. Also, remove the word research. 4. On Section 1: This section

11、listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed. Review on the directly relevant refs will b

12、e more helpful For the reader. Also, time-frequency and wavelets are mainly for non-stationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and non-stationary components would appear in rotor system vibration. A few sentences on the organization of the paper

13、 will be helpful. 5. On Section 2: Since the major method used in the application is reassigned wavelet scalogram, it is not needed to give the details of three other methods (only give a few words and give the refs). Instead, the authors may discuss more on the relationship between traditional wave

14、let scalogram and the reassigned wavelet scalogram, and explain why the latter is better than the former. Eq (2): the right-hand-side is wrong and 2 is missed. The description after Eq (2) is not clear. See Cohens book for details about the cross-terms. 6. On Sections 3 and 4: The description needs

15、to be improved. The material in Section 3 should be organized in several paragraphs. 7. On Section 5: The authors did a good experiment and some of the phenomena presente d in the time-frequency planes are also very interesting. However, the observations should be described concisely, and the author

16、s should focus more on: 1) whether these phenomena are general characteristics, and 2) if possible, explain the reason of the p henomena and the advantages of reassigned wavelet scalogram over other time-frequency methods. In fact, it is possible to interpret most of the phenomena in the time-frequency planes using r