供应商评审报告清单.docx

1、供应商评审报告清单 供应商评估报告供应商名称品质负责人供货类别: 所在地址: 品质部人员:人生产人员:人工程人员:人总计:人评审结果:1. 现场评估:A级:86100很满意B级:7185满意C级:6070合格(待提高)D级:3059不合格E级:029没系统 Yes Item 评估分数 x 100% = x 100% = 分 Total Item 2. 安全性评估：依据安规认证机构如UL，CSA，BS,FCC,ETC等要求对产品进行安全评估，并需要在供应商现场抽样进行安全性评估,如安全性评估不合格,需要供应商改善后再进行重新评估.A级:81100很满意B级:6180满意C级:060不合格 Yes

2、 Item 评估分数 x 100% = x 100% = 分 Total Item 评审员 ： 陪审员 ： 发件人：审核：IQA 主管：QA经理： 分发: PU，IQA，SYS，R&D.提供首页和第二页COPY给供应商作为改善的依据,对提出的不符合项，供应商应该在10天内回复纠正及预防措施.3.计分方法： 3.1现场审核分为五个部分：.Q(Quality)品质；.D(Delivery)交货；.S(Service)服务；.C(Cost)成本；.T(Technical)技术。其中Q和S由IQA部负责评估，D和C由采购部负责评估，T由工程部负责评估,非负责部门需在评估现场提供参考意见。3.2年度工厂

3、现场评估由IQA主导,各部门委派代表参加评审并组成评审小组,各评审员依照评审清单进行现场审查并评分,最终结果由IQA汇总并发出评审报告.3.3现场审核时重点考察供应商的文件、文件的有效性及其记录、异常处理、处理的对策及其有效性等等直接影响或潜在影响的因素。安全性评估还必须从其作业现场随机抽查3-10件样品并对样品进行检查，对于供应商界定的关键工序和重点工序应该进行重点检查。各部门评审员依据实际审查结果在检查清单相应栏目内给出评分。4IQA根据评审小组的检查清单总结最终评审结果，呈QA部经理审核，对于需要改善事项则记录在下表内，追踪供应商在限期内改善，必要时可带领审核小组进行现场查验其改善效果。

4、5审核不合格为新供应商，将不采纳为合格供应商。如是属供应商年度审核的，可以视生产实际需要与否而限期供应商在三个月内整改，审核小组在6个月以内进行再次审查，同时采购部应该积极开发新的供应商替补，如果再次审核仍然不合格者，则IQA向上级申请取消此合格供应商的资格，采购部应该停止向此供应商购买任何材料，IQA应该停止验收不合格供应商的来料。6供应商工厂年度审核清单如附件。 要求改善项：1,供应商须加强对原材料、人工、管理等因素进行控制以有效降低产品成本.2, 来料检查记录和出货检查记录应做好归档记录！3，应有系统来确保工程变更之执行。4，应有系统对工程变更执行之有效性进行追踪评估。5，所用到的材料都

5、要在作业指导书中标明供应商评估清单Audit Checklist编号评 估 项 目YesNO备注1.0Q:Quality品质（IQA负责审查）Quality System/品质系统及其有效性、适切性1.1Has supplier established its corporate quality policy, objectives and commitments to quality.供应商是否有建立品质政策、品质目标和品质承诺？1.2Does supplier have the procedure to ensure the quality policy is implemented in

6、 all levels.供应商是否有程序来确保其品质政策在各阶层中被执行。1.3Has supplier appointed a management representative who has responsibility and authority for ensuring that a quality management system has been implemented and maintained? 供应商是否任命一个管理者代表来负责品质管理系统的执行和维护。1.4Does the supplier conduct management reviews of the suit

7、ability and effectiveness of the quality management system at appropriate intervals?(i.e. does the quality system meet customer requirements?)供应商是否定期召开管理评审会议来评估品质管理系统的稳定性和有效性(例如：系统是否符合客户要求？)1.5Do management reviews records maintained.管理评审会议是否有保持记录？1.6Do the internal quality audits verify compliance

8、with quality objectives, customer process requirements, and ISO elements? 内部品质审核有无查证品质目标、客户要求、制程控制、ISO条款之达成。1.7Are the internal audits and follow-up actions carried out in accordance with documented procedures? 内部审核、改善行动的执行是否符合程序？1.8Do the internal quality audits verify effectiveness of the quality

9、system?(e.g. review SPC data and CAR status)内部审核有否评估品质管理系统的有效性（参考SPC统计数据、CAR状态等）？1.9Does the management personnel responsible for the area take timely corrective action on the deficiencies found by the audit? 是否相关管理负责人对于内部审核中发现的问题采取及时有效的改善行动？1.10Is there a system that identifies training requirement

10、s for all personnel affecting the product? 对所有影响产品质量的人员是否有系统的培训？1.11Does a system exist for determining which personnel are qualified for a job function? 供应商是否有系统来确定各工作岗位之人员资格认定的要求？1.12Is there a system to disqualify and re-qualify personnel in a job function? 是否有系统对人员资格进行重新认定？1.13Are accurate train

11、ing records maintained? 教育训练记录是否保存完好？Document control/文件控制1.14Has supplier established procedures to ensure that pertinent documents are available to personnel at all locations? 供应商是否建立系统以确保所有人员在任何地方都可以利用到相关文件？1.15Do these procedures ensure that all obsolete documents are promptly removed from all p

12、oints of issue or use? 供应商是否有建立文件作废系统，以确保废旧文件及时地从各地回收报废？1.16Are quality documents reviewed and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel prior to issue? 文件发行以前是否有相关权威人士审核？Inspection and Testing/Status:检验和实验状态编号评 估 项 目YesNO备注1.17Has supplier established procedures for defining inspection and test

13、 methods? 供应商是否建立检验和测试程序？1.18Dose the supplier ensure that incoming product is not used or processed until it has been inspected and verified as conforming to specified requirements? 供应商是否能够确保进料经过检验符合明定的规格后才能被使用？1.19Dose the supplier inspect, test and identify product as required by the quality plan

14、 or documented procedures? 供应商是否能按照既定之计划、文件对产品进行检验、测试、辨识？1.20Dose the supplier have the Final Inspection and testing? 是否供应商有最终检验测试？1.21Dose the supplier utilize outgoing product inspection and testing such as Out of Box Audits? 是否供应商有出货检验？1.22Does the supplier have extend test? 供应商是否对其产品提供信赖性测试？1.23

15、Dose the inspection and test process assure outgoing products meet Giant LRR and DPPM goals? 供应商之检验和测试是否能确保出货达到嘉音公司之批退率和DPPM目标？1.24Are there procedures that address product inspection and test status？程序中有无界定检验、测试状态标签？1.25Are there records which give evidence that the product has passed inspection an

16、d/or test with defined acceptance criteria? 对于检验或测试过的产品是否保存有记录作为依据？1.26Has supplier established procedure for part qualification? 供应商是否对其材料建立承认书？1.27Are Fist Article Inspection conducted in a production environment to ensure requirements are met prior to mass production? 供应商是否在量产前进行首件检验？1.28Dose the

17、 Fist Article report include verification of:(a) Quality documents? 首件报告是否符以下确认：a.品质文件；1.29(b) Process control parameters/documents? b.制程管制参数或文件；1.30(c) Condition of manufacturing equipment and tooling? c.设备、工具使用条件、环境；1.31(d) Critical parameters/documents? d.标准规格参数；1.32(e) Trace ability of cavity #,

18、 tooling #, and manufacturing site? e.模号、设备、生产站点等追溯标记；1.33(f) Inspection/test yield? f.检验、测试地点；Control of nonconforming product/不合格品控制1.34Has supplier established procedures for control of nonconforming product? 供应商是否建立不良品管制程序？1.35Is failure analysis performed on product returned? 对退回品是否有不良分析？1.36Is

19、 there a system to feedback failure analysis and action items to relevant departments (including mfg site)? 是否有系统将不良分析和改善定做反馈到相关部门？1.37Are the Failure Analysis records kept according to the defined retention period? 不良分析记录是否在规定的期限内完整保存？编号评 估 项 目YesNO备注1.38Has supplier established procedure to review

20、 the disposition of nonconforming material? (e .g, “use as is”, RTV, scrap, sorting, rework) 供应商是否有程序来对不良品进行讨论处理？（例如：特采、退料、报废、挑选、重工）1.39Are the criteria/guidelines for materials disposition defined? 对于不良品的处理是否有明确的标准？1.40Is the responsibility and authority to review/approve disposition of nonconformi

21、ng materials defined? (e.g. MRB) 对于不良品的处理是否经过权威部门进行核准？（例如：MRB会议）1.41Is there a requirement to issue a CAR for MRB materials? 对于MRB材料是否发出CAR进行追踪？1.42Is action taken when progress/implementation of improvement actions is not satisfactory? 当分析改善动作不能达到预期效果，是否会采取进一步的改善行动？1.43Are all corrective actions an

22、d results documented? 是否所有的改善方案和改善结果都被记录保存？1.44Is a corrective action request issued in the event a unit fails reliability test? 当可靠性测试结果为失败时，是否有对此进行分析和改进？1.45Are all necessary details included in the corrective action request?(P/N, lot#, inspection date, lot size, sample size, reject qty, etc) 改善方案

23、中有无记录必要的细节内容（例如：料号、模号、检验日期、数量、抽验数量、不良数量等）？1.47Dose the corrective action request include short term/preventive action? 改善方案中是否包括短期/长期对策？1.48If defect is supplier related, is there any system to feedback to IQA for actions? 如果不良是因为原材料造成的，是否有系统将此情况反映给IQA以便做出相应的协作？1.49Is there a system to track status

24、of corrective action requests? 供应商是否对其改善进行跟踪以确认其效果?1.50Are the contents of the responses/corrective actions appropriate to prevent future occurrences? 在改善报告中是否包括适合的预防措施？1.51Is the corrective action report reviewed and approved by relevant authorities? 改善报告是否被相关权威人士审核？Quality records/品质记录1.52Has supp

25、lier established procedures for control of quality records? 供应商是否建立记录管制程序？1.53Are all quality records identified, indexed, filed, collected, stored, maintained, and disposed after stated period? 所有记录是否被分类、建立清单、归档、收集、保存、维护和定期的清理？1.54Are quality records maintained to demonstrate achievement of the req

26、uired quality and to demonstrate effective operation of the Quality System? 所有的记录能够证明活动的执行和有效？1.55Are quality records maintained in such a way that they are readily retrievable? 所有记录是否可以便捷的获得？1.56Have retention times of quality records been established and recorded? 是否制定记录保存时限？1.57Where agreed contr

27、actually, are quality records made available for evaluation by customers? 所有文件记录是否允许被客户查询？本项Q最终得分：评估分： / 标准分： X 100% =评审员： 编号评 估 项 目YesNO备注2.0S：Service/服务（IQA负责审查）2.1Has supplier established a special Service Team to deal with customers complaint? 供应商有否建立专门的客户服务小组？2.2If Service Team have enough expe

28、rience or skill of their products? 客户服务小组是否具有专业技能或对产品的专业知识？2.3Could supplier feedback their effective action within 4 hours and reply their CAR within three days?供应商可否在4小时以内回复有效对策及在三天内回复CAR？2.4Could supplier come to Giant within 2 hours to perform full check after they receive customers complaint? 供

29、应商可否在2小时之内赶到GIANT执行全检？2.5Has supplier performed the inquisition of customers satisfaction per year? 供应商有否对客户满意度进行过年度调查？2.6Has supplier analyzed and improved about customers satisfaction? 供应商有否对客户满意度调查进行分析并跟踪改善？本项S最终得分：评估分： YesItem/Total Item X 100%=评审员： 3.0D：Delivery/交货（采购负责审查）Sub-contractor verification3.1Has supplier established procedure to ensure that purchased product conforms to specified requirements? 供应商是否建立相关的采购程序来确保材料物品满足规定的要求？3.2Do review and evaluate sub.