届陕西省黄陵中学普通班高三上学期开学考试英语试题 听力.docx

1、届陕西省黄陵中学普通班高三上学期开学考试英语试题 听力2019届陕西省黄陵中学（普通班）高三上学期开学考试英语试题+听力第一部分：听力（共两节，满分30分）第一节（共5小题；每小题1.5分，满分7.5分）听下面5段对话。每段对话后有一个小题，从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置。听完每段对话后，你都有10秒钟的时间来回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。每段对话仅读一遍。例：How much is the shirt?A. 19.15. B. 9.18. C. 9.15.答案是C。1. Who is the woman probably?A. A technician. B

2、. A doctor. C. A chemist.2 How many people will come to the barbecue?A. 27. B. 34. C. 41.3. What does the woman mean?A. Jack knows the project well.B. Jack is not tough enough.C. Jack lacks patience.4. Where are the speakers?A. In a restaurant. B. In a supermarket. C. In the mans house5. What are th

3、e speakers mainly talking about?A. Where the man can buy a ticket.B. When the man can get his ticket.C. Whether the woman called the airline.第二节（共15小题；每小题1.5分，满分22.5分）听下面5段对话或独白。每段对话或独白后有几个小题，从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷相应位置。听每段对话或独白前，你将有时间阅读各个小题，每小题5秒钟；听完后，各小题将给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话或独白读两遍。听第6段材料，回答第6、7题。6

4、. What have the speakers left behind?A. The cups. B. The plates. C. The frying pan.7. What are the speakers doing?A. Camping. B. Shopping. C. Cooking.听第7段材料，回答第8、9题。8. What does the woman suggest the man do?A. Pay the electric bill first.B. Open a checking account.C. Go to the bank at once.9. How do

5、 most people pay the electric bill?A. By cheque. B. In cash. C. By credit card.听第8段材料，回答第10至12题。10. How long has Mr. Smith worked in the school?A. 12 years. B. 18 years. C. 26 years.11. How did Mr. Smith take an interest in education?A. He was inspired by an article.B. He saw a bright future in it.C

6、. He was influenced by his parents.12. What is Mr. Smiths special programme aimed at?A. Sending all his students to college.B. Spending more time with children.C. Teaching students to use their brain well.听第9段材料，回答第13至16题。13. Why did Sally leave the flat?A. She took a holiday.B. She moved to her par

7、ents house.C. She was bored with living with Cara.14. What is the relationship between Cara and Tony?A. Colleagues.B. Cousins.C. Sister and brother.15. How might Cara feel when Tony arrived?A. Happy. B. Angry. C. Nervous.16. What did Tony do when he was in the flat?A. He tried to please Cara.B. He h

8、ad a fight with Cara.C. He asked Cara to cook for him.听第10段材料，回答第17至20题。17. Where can the listeners find cash machines?A. On the first floor.B. On the second floor.C. On the third floor.18. When will the bus leave probably?A. At about 3:30 p.m.B. At about 4:00 p.m.C. At about 5:00 p.m.19. What advic

9、e docs the speaker give the listeners?A. Visiting some artists.B. Enjoying some paintings.C. Having a portrait painted.20. How docs the speaker suggest the listeners make phone calls?A. By borrowing the speakers mobile phone.B. By using the pay phone in the shopping center.C. By asking for special s

10、ervice at the Internet cafe.第二部分阅读(共两节，满分40分)第一节：阅读理解(共15小题；每小题2分，满分30分)阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C和D项中选出最佳选项。 AOn Christmas Day, 2003, a woman named Nancy Sue Brown took her daughter and grandchildren to see a movie at an AMC theater. When the movie was over, the crowd made for the exits. A theater employee

11、 had just finished mopping the hallway and dutifully placed the “wet floor” sign in the slippery area. No one slipped due to the wet conditions, but someone did manage to knock over the sign. And by the time Ms. Brown got to the area, the sign was lying on the floor. And shortly thereafter, so was s

12、he. Her foot got caught in the sign, in a bad way, and she fell. Unfortunately Ms. Brown had undergone a back operation, and the fall caused more damage than it otherwise would have. So she and her husband sued (提起诉讼)AMC argued that the entire point of the “wet floor” sign above was to warn of dange

13、r, and therefore, courts should encourage the use by not allowing Browns case to proceed (继续进行). AMC referred to a case about a December, 1998 incident, where a “wet floor” sign, not in use, fell to the floor causing another tripandfall. In that case, Georgias Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the

14、store, but didnt go so far as to say that “wet floor” signs couldnt give rise to legal liability (责任) in tripandfall accidents. In the Brown case, the Supreme Court therefore rejected AMCs argument that the former case applied.But the Browns argued something surprising that the “wet floor” sign was,

15、 itself, dangerous, because “using this type of sign in areas passed by lots of customers creates an unreasonable risk of foreseeable harm to the public in the form of tripping hazards (危险)” Thats right the safety sign, used in the way it was designed, was itself dangerous. The court thankfully didn

16、t accept that argument, at least not entirely. But it did conclude that Browns case could continue to a jury (陪审团) “a merchants selection and use of equipment designed to warn customers of one danger that has the potential to expose them to a different one” 21According to the text, Ms. Brown _.Aslip

17、ped on the wet floorBtripped over a warning signCknocked over warning signDwas knocked down by the crowd22AMC mentioned the 1998 case in order to _.Aaccept its legal liability for Ms. Browns lossBprove Ms. Brown had some physical problemsCstress that it had no legal liability for the accidentDprove

18、other customers were responsible for the accident23What can we learn about the Browns case from the last paragraph?AIt would be judged by jury.BIt would not be allowed to proceed.CThe court would rule in favor of AMC.DThe court accepted all the arguments of the Browns.B There once was a dad and his

19、son. In one holiday they went hunting one day at their deer shack in Spooner, WI. The son and the dad were on their way to their tree stands when the son saw a bobcat (美洲野猫). They saw it standing up on its hind legs looking for something to eat. The dad told his son to try to walk slowly around the

20、bobcat but they stepped on a branch when they saw the bobcat. When they stepped on the branch the bobcat saw them and started to charge(猛冲) after them. The bobcat took down the dad, so the son ran as fast as he could to get to his tree stand. The son grabbed his deer rifle, put a bullet in it, looke

21、d at the bobcat, and shot it in the heart. The son got out of his tree stand to go check on his dad. When he got over to his dad he removed the dead bobcat. Then he called the EMTs (急诊医士) because he thought his dad was really hurt from when the bobcat stomped on him and bit him. The EMTs told the so

22、n they were 10 minutes out. Before the EMTs got there the son took his dad into the hunting shack to clean out his cuts. After the EMTs arrived at the deer shack they looked at the sons dad. They said he will be in the hospital for 10 days. He had ten broken ribs and 5 broken neck bones, so after th

23、e son heard this he started crying. The EMTs said, We can take you to your grandmas house. The ten days were up now so the son went back to the hospital and the doctors explained that his dad would be paralyzed(瘫痪) from the waste down. Then the son asked the doctors, Can we could still go hunting an

24、d fishing together. They replied no, but you and your grandma can do those things together. The dad had to go into physical therapy treatment for 2 years. Then the dad got back home and the son and he did things together like they used to do. 24. Why did the bobcat find the son and his father?A. Bec

25、ause it had an excellent smell.B. Because they made a noise at that moment.C. Because they missed the first shot.D. Because it had a very good eyesight. 25. Why did the son phone the EMTs?A. Because the EMTs could help them hunting.B. Because the EMTs could deal with the dead bobcat.C. Because the E

26、MTs could send him home.D. Because the EMTs could cure his injured father. 26. It can be inferred that the father was .A. badly wounded B. slightly woundedC. not wounded at all D. already dead 27. What can you infer from the last paragraph?A. The dad completely got well after 10 days.B. The son and

27、the father did no hunting any more.C. The son and the father continued hunting as before.D. The doctor agreed to the sons hunting request. CTigers in Nepal seem to be taking night shifts in order to avoid their human neighbors, a study has shown. The big cats generally move around at all times of th

28、e day and night, to monitor territory, mate and hunt. But the study of tigers in Chitwan National Parkwhere humans and tigers walk the same pathsshowed a night shift in activity. The results challenge the traditional wisdom. Its traditionally thought that tigers need lots of people-free space. This

29、can lead to people removing to make way for tigers. Tigers need resources, people need the same resources. If we operate under the traditional wisdom that tigers only can survive with space devoted only for them, there would always be conflict. If your priority is people, tigers lose out. If your pr

30、iority is tigers, people lose out. Chitwan is home to about 121 tigers. People live on the parks borders, but rely on the forests for wood and grasses, venturing in on roads and narrow footpaths. Mr. Carter spent two seasons setting motion-detecting camera traps for tigers, their prey(猎物) and people

31、 who walk the roads and trails of Chitwan, both in and around the park. His analysis of the thousands of images show that people and tigers are walking the same paths, yet at different times of the day. The cameras documented a clear shift towards night activity in the tigers. People generally avoid the forests at night, so dusk would seem to provide a signal for tigers to come out and play. Mr. Carter said that conditions for tigers in Chitwan were good, with high prey numbers, low levels of poaching(偷猎), and forests that are spreading outside the boun