职称英语真题卫生Bword完整版Word文件下载.docx

1、A. about B. at C. with D. from4. She gets aggressive when she is drunk.A. worried B. offensive C. sleepy D. anxious5. He was tempted by the high salary offered by the company.A. taught B. kept C. changed D. attracted 6. As a politician, he knows how to manipulate public opinion. A. express B. divide

2、 C. voice D. influence7. These animals migrate south annually in search of food.A. explore B. travel C. inhabit D. prefer8. The rules are too rigid to allow for humane error.A. general B. inflexible C. complex D. direct9. There was something peculiar in the way he smiles.A. different B. strange C. w

3、rong D. funny10. Come out, or Ill bust the door down.A. shut B. set C. beat D. break11. The police will need to keep a wary eye on this area of town.A. cautious B. naked C. blind D. private12. She came across three children sleeping under a bridge.A. passed by B. took a notice ofC. woke up D. found

4、by chance13. Make sure the table is securely anchored.A. repaired B. cleared C. fixed D. booked14. He paused, waiting for her to digest the information.A. withhold B. understand C. exchange D. contact15. It seemed incredible that he had been there a week already.A. right B. obvious C. unclear D. unb

5、elievable 第2部分：阅读判断（第16-22题，每题1分，共7分）Promising Results from Cancer StudyA new experimental vaccine （疫苗） has shown promising results in the fight against lung cancer. In a small Texas-based study, a vaccine developed by scientists at Baylor University Medical Centre in Dallas, USA, cured lung cancer

6、in some patients and slowed the progress of the disease in others.Researchers have reported encouraging findings from this small study. Forty-three patients suffering from lung cancer were involved in these trials. Ten of these patients were in the early stages and thirty-three in the advanced stage

7、s of the disease. They were injected with the vaccine every two weeks for three months, and were carefully monitored for three years. In three of the patients in the advanced stages of cancer, the disease disappeared and in the others, it did not spread for five to twenty-four months. However, no gr

8、eat difference was seen in the patients in the early stages of the illness.This new vaccine uses the patients own immune system. It is made specifically for each patient and is injected into the arm or leg. It stimulates the bodys immune system, which then recognizes that the cancer cells are harmfu

9、l, and attacks and destroys them.The vaccine could be effective against other forms of cancer. It offers great hope for the treatment of cancer in general, although further studies are needed before such treatment can be widely used.16. The vaccine cured all the participants in the trial.A. Right B.

10、 Wrong C. Not mentioned17. Over forty people participated in the study.18. Patients in the early stages of the disease recovered more quickly in the trial.19. All the patients were from Dallas.20. Every patient was injected with the same vaccine.21. The vaccine activates the immune system.22. The va

11、ccine may be useful for treating other cancers.第3部分：概括大意与完成句子（第23-30题，每题1分，共8分）下面的短文后有2项测试任务：（1）第2326题要求从所给的6个选项中为指定段落每段选择1个最佳标题；（2）第2730题要求从所给的6个选项中为每个句子确定一个最佳选项。Organic Food: Why?1. Europe is now the biggest market for organic food in the world, expanding by 25 percent a year over the past 10 year

12、s. So what is the attraction of organic food for some people? The really important thing is that organic sounds more “natural”. Eating organic is a way of defining oneself as natural, good, caring, different from the junk-food-eating masses.2. Unlike conventional farming, the organic approach means

13、farming with natural rather than man-made, fertilisers and pesticides. Techniques such as crop rotation improve soil quality and help organic farmers compensate for the absence of man-made chemicals. As a method of food production, organic is, however, inefficient in its use of labour and land; ther

14、e are severe limits to how much food can be produced. Also, the environmental benefits of not using artificial fertiliser are tiny compared with the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by transporting food.3. Organic farming is often claimed to be safer than conventional farming. Yet studies into organ

15、ic farming worldwide continue to reject this claim. An extensive review by the UK Food Standards Agency found that there was no statistically significant difference between organic and conventional crops. Even where results indicated there was evidence of a difference, the reviewers found no sign th

16、at these differences would have any noticeable effect on health4. The simplistic claim that organic food is more nutritious than conventional food was always likely to be misleading. Food is a natural product, and the health value of different foods will vary for a number of reasons, including fresh

17、ness, the way the food is cooked, the type of soil it is grown in, the amount of sunlight and rain crops have received, and so on. Likewise, the flavour of a carrot has less to do with whether it was fertilised with manure or something out of a plastic sack than with the variety of carrot and how lo

18、ng ago it was dug up.5. The notion that organic food is safer than “normal” food is also contradicted by the fact that many of our most common foods are full of natural toxins. As one research expert says: “People think that the more natural something is, the better it is for them. That is simply no

19、t the case. In fact, it is the opposite that is true: the closer a plant is to its natural state, the more likely it is that it will poison you. Naturally many plants do not want to be eaten, so we have spent 10,000 years developing agriculture and breeding out harmful traits from crops.”A. Factors

20、that affect food health valueB. Main reason for the popularity of organic foodC. Testing the taste of organic foodD. Research into whether organic food is betterE. Necessity to remove hidden dangers from foodF. Description of organic farming23. Paragraph 1 24. Paragraph 2 25. Paragraph 3 26. Paragra

21、ph 4 27. Techniques of organic farming help .28. There is no convincing evidence to .29. The weather conditions during the growth of crops .30. The closer a plant is to its natural state, the less suitable it is to . A. affect their nutritional contentB. poison youC. improve soil qualityD. be eatenE

22、. show that organic crops are safer than conventional onesF. be specially trained大家网首发2013年全国职称英语考试教材-理工类电子版下载大家网首发2013年全国职称英语考试教材-卫生类电子版下载大家网首发2013年全国职称英语考试教材-综合类电子版下载大家论坛职称英语每日一练汇总2014年职称英语考试热点问题及备考方法（如教材、词典等问题）第4部分：阅读理解（第31-45题，每题3分，共45分）下面有3篇短文，每篇短文后有5道题。请根据短文内容，为每题确定1个最佳选项。第一篇“Dont Drink Alone”

23、 Gets New MeaningIn what may be bad news for bars and pubs, a European research group has found that people drinking alcohol outside of meals have a significantly higher risk of cancer in the mouth and neck than do those taking their libations with food. Luigino Dal Maso and his colleagues studied t

24、he drinking patterns of 1,500 patients from four cancer studies and another 3, 500 adults who had never had cancer.After the researchers accounted for the amount of alcohol consumed, they found that individuals who downed a significant share of their alcohol outside of meals faced at least a 50 to 8

25、0 percent risk of cancer in the oral cavity, pharynx, and esophagus, when compared with people who drank only at meals. Consuming alcohol without food also increased by at least 20 percent the likelihood of laryngeal cancer. “Roughly 95 percent of cancers at these four sites traced to smoking or dri

26、nking by the study volunteers,” Dal Maso says. The discouraging news, his team reports, is that drinking with meals didnt eliminate cancer risk at any of the sites.For their new analysis, the European scientists divided people in the study into four groups, based on how many drinks they reported hav

27、ing in an average week. The lowest-intake group included people who averaged up to 20 drinks a week. The highest group reported downing at least 56 servings of alcohol weekly for an average of eight or more per day. Cancer risks for the mouth and neck sites rose steadily with consumption even for pe

28、ople who reported drinking only with meals. For instance, compared with people in the lowest-consumption group, participants who drank 21 to 34 alcohol servings a week at least doubled their cancer risk for all sites other than the larynx. If people in these consumption groups took some of those dri

29、nks outside meals, those in the higher consumption group at least quadrupled their risk for oral cavity and esophageal cancers.People in the highest-consumption group who drank only with meals had 10 times the risk of oral cancer, 7 times the risk of pharyngeal cancer, and 16 times the risk of esoph

30、ageal cancer compared with those who averaged 20 or fewer drinks a week with meals. In contrast, laryngeal cancer risk in the high-intake, with-meals-only group was only triple that in the low-intake consumers who drank with meals.“Alcohol can inflame tissues. Over time, that inflammation can trigger cancer.” Dal Maso says. He suspects that food reduced cancer risk either by partially coating digestive-tract tissues or by scrubbing alcohol off those tissues. He speculates that the reason laryngeal risks were d