专8听力真题答案及讲座原文Word文档下载推荐.docx

1、 the audience is （6） in the arguments一 arguments must （7） the audienceTraits of the argument as warvery dominant: it can shape （8） strong arguments are needednegative effects include:一 （9） are emphasized一 winning is the only purpose一 this type of arguments prevent （10） the worst thing is （11） implic

2、ation from arguments as war: （12） 一 e.g, one providing reasons and the other raising （13）一 the other one is finally persuadedSuggestions on new ways to （14） of argumentsthink of new kinds of argumentschange roles in arguments （15） SECTION B INTERVIEWNow, listen to the Part One of the interview. Ques

3、tions 1 to 5 are based on Part One of the interview.1.What is the topic of the interview?A.Maggies university lifeB Her monf s life at Harvard.C. Maggies view on studying with Mom.D Maggies opinion on her monTs major.2.Which of the following indicates that they have the same study schedule?A.They ta

4、ke exams in the same weeks.They have similar lecture notes.C. They apply for the same internship.D They follow the same fashion.3.What do the mother and the daughter have in common as students?A Having roommates.Practicing court trails.C.Studying togetherD.Taking notes by hand.4.What is the biggest

5、advantage of studying with Mom?A.Protection.B.ImaginatioiieC.ExcitementD Encouragement5.What is the biggest disadvantage of studying with Mom?A.Thinking of ways to comfort Mom.B.Occasional interference from Mom.C.Ultimately calls when Maggie is busy. Frequent check on Maggies grades.Now, listen to t

6、he Part Two of the interview. Questions 6 to 10 are based on Part Two of the interview.6.Why is parent and kid studying together a common case?A.Because parents need to be ready for new jobs. Because parents love to return to college.C. Because kids require their parents to do so.D Because kids find

7、 it hard to adapt to college lifeB.How to make omelets.C.To accept what is taught. To plan a future career.10.How does Maggie describe the process of thinking out ones career path? UnsuccessfulB Gradual.C. Frustrating. Passionate.Keys:1.the dialectical modelmon and fixed3.premises4.opposition / argu

8、ing5.arguments as performances / the rhetorical model6.participatory / participating / the participant / taking part7.be tailored to / cater for8.how we argue / our actual conduct9.tactics / strategies10 achieve positive effects15 support oneself / yourselfCADDBACDCBScript:Good morning, everyone. My

9、 name is David and I am good at arguing* So welcome to our introductory lecture on argumentation. Why do we want to argue? Why do we try to convince other people to believe things that they dont want to believe? And is that even a nice thing to do? Is that a nice way to treat other human being, try

10、and make them think something they dont want to think? Well, my answer is going to make reference to three models for arguments（1） The first model lets call this the dialectical model is that we think of arguments as war. And you know what thafs like. There is a lot of screaming and shouting and win

11、ning and losing* （2） And thats not really a veiy helpful model arfiiinf，but ifs a pretty common and fixed one. I guess you must have seen that type of arguing many times in the street, on the bus or in the subwav.Lett move on to the second model. The second model for arguing regards arguments as pro

12、ofs. Think of a mathematician argument. Heres my argument* Does it work? Is it any good? （3） Are the premiss（前提）wairanted? Are the inferences （推论）valid? Does the conclusion follow the premises? （4） No opposition, no adversariality （对抗） 一not necessarily any aiuing in the adversarial sense.（5） And theres a third model to keep in mind that I think is oin to be very helpful, and that is arguments as performances, arguments as being inFront of an audience. We can think of a politician trying to present a position, trying to convince the audience of