1、 PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE CASE STUDYASSESSING PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE AND ENHANCING CONSISTENCY OF ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE SURVEYING PROFESSION Dr Tom Kennie Ranmore Consulting Group/Sheffield Hallam UniversityRanmore ManorRanmore, Nr Dorking, Surrey RH5 6SXTel: +44 (0) 7050 351649Email: *.uk andMike G
2、reenSheffield Hallam UniversitySchool of Environment & DevelopmentSheffield S1 1 WB +44 (0) 114 225 2016 *.ukMuch work has been undertaken in recent years on defining and assessing competence in an academic context. In comparison, much less research has focused on the definition and assessment of pr
3、ofessional competence. In this case study, the authors report on a study conducted for the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) to develop a framework which has helped clarify and made explicit the criteria and standards used by assessors when judging the construct of professional compete
4、nce. The case study provides information on the development of a model and associated materials which are now being used by over 500 assessors to evaluate candidates during their Assessment of Professional Competence (APC) interview.In addition to the development of the framework the case also revie
5、ws the process used to implement the change. The authors will contend that an understanding of how to effect change in the complex and often highly political world of the professions is critical to the success of this type of project.1. INTRODUCTIONIts all a bit of a lottery you knowits much easier
6、to pass if youre assessed at Heathrow/Harrogate.The quotes above are indicative of the types of concerns that are occasionally expressed by a small number of individuals and employers after a typical professional assessment centre for candidates desiring to become members of the Royal Institution of
7、 Chartered Surveyors (RICS). Their views reflect the concerns of some that the degree of consistency applied to assessing candidates during the final interview stage of the Assessment of Professional Competence (APC) is variable. This is not an issue unique to the surveying profession and candidates
8、 undergoing a similar process in other professions also express similar views. This paper deals with some of the steps taken to deal with these concerns. In particular, the paper summarises some recent research to make more explicit the criteria that may often be implicitly assessed in an interview
9、setting. The paper also summarises the processes that have been introduced by the RICS to make the APC more transparent and enhance the consistency of approach adopted by the assessing panels.2. THE SCALE OF THE ISSUEIt is useful to put the issue in a wider context. Last year (2001), nearly 3,000 ca
10、ndidates were interviewed by over 500 RICS assessors. With increasing options and routes to membership candidates may be assessed in some 17 specialist areas encompassing areas of practice ranging from management consultancy, facilities management and project management in addition to the more long
11、standing routes in commercial property, building surveying, quantity surveying and so on. Given the scale of the operation arranging nearly 700 panels per year, each involving 3 volunteers who may only participate in one or two interviews per annum it is perhaps reassuring to note that the number of
12、 formal appeals is less than 2% of the total number of candidates assessed.An issue that has, however, become of greater concern than the number of formal appeals relates to how consistently borderline candidates may be treated. Very seldom do interview panels make inappropriate judgements in relati
13、on to candidates who are clearly very competent, nor do they make serious errors in relation to those who are not yet fully competent. The difficult zone is often those who are in this borderline category. Those candidates who can lead interview panels to agonise for hours. Those where the decision
14、may be influenced one way or the other by relatively small differences of viewpoint. If we assume that typically some 60-70% of candidates pass at each assessment centre and perhaps 15-20% of candidates are clear referrals, this might leave a residual 15-20% of candidates who are potential borderlin
15、es. Even if only 1 in 4 of these led to a referral decision which could have been swayed in the opposite direction by another panel it is possible that between 100 and 130 candidates may have been treated inconsistently. 3. DEALING WITH THE ISSUE:PROGRESS PRIOR TO THE RESEARCH PROJECTEnhancing the consistency of APC assessment is not a new issue. It is also not an issue that can be resolved instantaneously. Improving the consistency of any professional judgement requires a number of issues to be examined in a holistic sense.
copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有
经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1