ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOCX , 页数:18 ,大小:220.92KB ,
资源ID:15734653      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bdocx.com/down/15734653.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(外文翻译澳大利亚高等教育的成本函数精品Word格式.docx)为本站会员(b****5)主动上传,冰豆网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰豆网(发送邮件至service@bdocx.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

外文翻译澳大利亚高等教育的成本函数精品Word格式.docx

1、外文翻译澳大利亚高等教育的成本函数精品#中文4160字#本科毕业论文(设计)#外 文 翻 译#原文:#A Cost Function for Higher Education in Australia#(extract)#1. Introduction#This study estimates a cost function for higher education in Australian universities. The estimated function is used to examine the cost of providing higher education to ove

2、rseas students. In the higher education sector, production functions are useful for evaluating the structure of the industry and can serve as guides for individual institutions on policies affecting their size and scope. Moreover, in view of the relaxation of provisions under which universities can

3、provide higher education to full-fee paying domestic students, information from cost functions can assist institutions to develop appropriate pricing strategies.#Cost functions also provide an opportunity to evaluate the cost of providing higher education to overseas students. Higher education costs

4、 for an individual university can be established from a detailed accounting exercise in which the explicit and implicit costs allocated to courses and levels are collected. However, in obtaining the costs of overseas students, there is still be a need for a cost function because it is necessary to e

5、xamine what the costs would be under alternative student numbers, that is, with and without overseas students. Some idea of the variation in costs with different numbers can be obtained by comparing universities at the same date but with different student profiles. Hence the use of cost functions pr

6、ovides a method for measuring the net benefits(or costs)of the providing education to overseas students.#The paper is organised as follows. Section 2 reviews some of the previous work done on the Australian higher education sector and discusses some relevant issues. Section 3 presents the basic cost

7、 function model, describes the data and presents empirical results. Section 4 presents results from the application of the cost function, including the costs predictions for the provision of higher education for overseas students. Section 5 draws policy implications and conclusions.#2. Previous Work

8、 and Some Issues#Throsby (1986)estimated the cost of providing higher education using data from 18 Australian universities for the period 1978 to 1982.This was followed by Lloyd et al.(1993) and Lloyd(1994),which defined the conditions under which the functional form of the cost function allows econ

9、omies of scale and scope in the production of multiple outputs, that is research and teaching in various disciplines and at different levels. Estimates from these studies were used to analyse the impact of the amalgamations that followed the 1987 reforms. In particular, the estimated equation was us

10、ed to evaluate the likely cost savings arising from the amalgamation of two or more institutions. The most recent cost function estimate for Australia is reported in Throsby and Heaton(1995).Using 1991 cross-sectional data on 42 institutions, Throsby and Heaton analysed the relationship between the

11、operating costs of institutions and the number of students in 10 broad subject areas and three levels of studies, using a quadratic function of the student numbers(implying constant marginal costs).Their cost function was used by Baker, Creedy and Johnson(1996)to evaluate the cost of overseas studen

12、ts.#A number of issues arise in deriving and using such a model. First, previous studies failed to account for unobserved differences between universities. Each institution has a particular structure that may make the provision of particular courses more cost efficient in one university than in othe

13、rs. In addition, the explanatory variables chosen may not adequately represent the characteristics of particular institutions;# for example, there may be variation of quality and the proportion of resources devoted to research. The implicit assumption that quality of teaching is independent of varia

14、tions in student numbers is also made. #Second, there are aggregation problems associated with the accurate specification of the variables. These occur because the choice of discipline or course level categories masks large differences between components of the aggregated discipline. For example, he

15、alth includes the training of both high-cost doctors and relatively low-cost nurses. At the aggregate level they may be combined into a single composite group, but individual universities may specialise in either the high-cost or the low-cost product. Accordingly, their total costs will be under-or

16、over-estimated by the use of an averaged set of parameters defined over the universities as a whole.#Third, the conventional cost minimisation assumption does not apply naturally to the higher education sector when government (to a large extent)determines both the funding and the output. In fact, many universities may use the same model as used by the government to determine the funding of domestic students (the Relative Funding Model)for setting fees for overseas students.#In gen

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1