动物实验利与弊Word文档格式.doc

1、 24 young dogs were given kidney failure by the removal of one kidney and the damaging of the other. All the dogs were killed after being fed an experimental diet and their kidneys analyzed.论点2：（正方）可有别的措施Many alternatives already exist, and there must be many more which are waiting to be found. The

2、day will surely come when not more experiments on animals will need to be done for human medicine. its hared to say there will always be alternatives for veterinary research, The most common alternatives that are used today are: in-vitro tests, computer software, and even human “clinical tests”. The

3、 use of animal cells, organs, and tissue cultures are also deemed as alternatives, （反驳正方）however animal lives are still sacrificed for the use of their parts. We can only talk about banning experimentation when the alternatives have been proved to be accurate, and safe. （反方反驳）As a medical student, I

4、ve realized that artificial means can never replace the incredible complexity of living animals. It may not be possible to ban all animal tests quite yet, but there should be a lot more money, time and efforts going into finding alternatives.新论点3：正方：动物也有权利Could anyone tell me why humans are more imp

5、ortant than any other animals? Could anyone please tell me the fundamental reason why human suffering is absolutely more important than animal suffering, why the intense agony experienced by a laboratory animal is inconsequential（不重要的，微不足道的） when view against the same or even lesser degree of suffer

6、ing within a human. Of course We see ourselves as more important than other species, as Im sure other self-realising species see themselves, but we cannot use this flimsy（轻而薄的）, subjective（主观上的） argument as an excuse to totally disregard the feelings of other species. You wouldnt like it if some ali

7、en race claiming to be the most important turned up and squirted alien cosmetics in your mothers eye, would you? So I think animals should have the same rights as us. You wouldnt like it if people were doing any kind of experiment on you. Humankind has absolutely no right to use animals for any reas

8、on whatsoever, especially for experimental use.新论点4正方类比种族We conduct such experiments simply because we have physical dominance over all other species and thus we can exploit them at our will. But then where lies the contradiction between this form exploitation and that shown within the human species

9、, such as the physical dominance that allowed Europeans to exploit Africans in the slave trade. Why should I be utterly indifferent to animal suffering because I stand to gain from it, yet I am morally obliged to be passionate about human suffering whether or not it could be for my personal betterme

10、nt.新论点5：正方动物实验有时候真的没有必要. I understand the concerns over medical testing and human needs over animal lives, but the testing obviously doesnt work because there is still AIDS, cancer and all the other diseases that these tests are supposed to be curing. If medical tests really are needed, why cant the

11、re be a more humane way to do it? Why not use peoples cells, skin etc. Human volunteers should be used for final testing rather than animals. 最后总结（正方）All in all, the animals can not tell the scientist that they dont want to be tested on, but humans can. We need to talk for the animals and help stop

12、this cruel and inhumane treatment. There are many other ways that products and medicine can be tested; the use of innocent animals is no longer needed. Let us turn down cures that have been tested on animals. Thank you.反方开场：For those opposed to all animal testing, please answer Yes or No to the foll

13、owing questions1. Are you vegetarian?2. Do you avoid buying leather shoes or clothes?3. Would you allow yourself or a loved one to suffer or even die because the necessary treatment had been developed using laboratory animals?If you answered to ALL of the above, then you are free from hypocrisy（伪善，虚伪） in your moral stance（l立场姿态）.我们需要动物实验Animals testing is really necessary.分论点（1）患者的需要First of all , all the