中英文对照辩论赛流程主持稿Word格式文档下载.doc

1、名字”now lets begin.开始Outline for BeginnersFollowing is a speech outline for （EFL） novice debaters. Too much reliance on this may make your speech inflexible; still, the expressions and the speech flow below are the basic which every （EFL） debater should keep in mind. 1. GreetingsLadies and gentlemenT

2、hank you Mr. （Madam） speaker.Mr./Madam chair, and members of this house. 2. Presenting the motion and caseToday, we are going to debate on./Today, we have the motion that./Todays motion is that.Background information to the motionUnder the current situation, there are some problems in/controversy ov

3、er.The issue behind the motion is that.So, in this round, we are going to talk about how to solve the problem.Defining the motion/Casing （Note: of course, this is mainly the task of the Prime Minister） However, this motion has some vague points（words）/is not clear. Therefore, I would like to define

4、the motion. In this round, we will define the word A as B/limit X to Y/focus on the case in . Therefore, our proposal is that I will explain the mechanism of our proposal.First, .Second, . We have some conditions to our proposal.First, . Second, 3. Showing the （government / opposition） “stance” （or

5、“team line”） for the round.We will propose you that because .Our team line is that /The government / opposition side strongly believe （insist） that . 4. Presenting your speech outline and team allocation.We have points to support our proposal （argument）. The first point is , the second point is , an

6、d the last point is .I will explain .And my partner will explain .I will mainly talk about . And my partner will talk about 5. RefutationTransition to refutation part（Before we go on to our arguments / points/ substantive matters）, let me refute back to the Government / Opposition side. I have one /

7、 two / refutation.Basics of refutation First / second / , they said . But, it is （1. not relevant / 2. ）. That is because .（e.g. their argument is based onwrong assumption / analysis /misunderstanding）1. not true 5. the opposite2. not always true3. not significant4. not relevant 6. Explaining points

8、. Sign post （i.e. “sign post”, or simple key phrases that summarize the point）.Our first （second / ） point is Summary in one sentenceIt means that / On this point, I will explain that . Reasoning （explanation on how one situation occurs, focusing on “cause and effect”）Let me explain how this will ha

9、ppen.First, . Then, . / Under the status quo, . After the plan adoption, . /As a result / Consequently / At the end of the day / Therefore . Examples and IllustrationFor example, . / Lets think about the case of . /Ladies and gentlemen, please imagine what could be happened if Significance / analysi

10、s / Relevancy to the stance, team line, or what you want to provewhy this is important? This is because .This point is important if we think about the nature / role / first priority / of .What is the nature of ?What is the role / top priority of ? 7. ConclusionSummary Spend approximately 30 seconds

11、to summarize your speech.In summary / Let me summarize what I have told you / In conclusion, we find that /Indication the end of your speechFor all these reasons, I beg to propose / oppose.Because of these reasons, we strongly believe .Therefore, we believe that .RefutationRefutation, which is to po

12、int out the weakness of the other sides arguments, can be formulated into six basic types as below: not true5. alternative play6. flip Not relevant: “What you said is not relevant with what you are trying to prove. “e.g. GOV Korean government should abolish death penalty because Canada abolished. OP

13、P It is not relevant because we are debating on Korea not on Canada. Not true: “You are a liar!”e.g. OPP Korean government should not abolish death penalty because it deters crimes. GOV It is not true because crime rate is increasing even though we have death penalty. Not always true: “What you said

14、 is not always true.”e.g. OPP Korean government should not abolish death penalty because of the victim families feeling. GOV It is not always true because peoples feelings are case by case. Not significant: “What you said is not important at all.”e.g. OPP Korean government should have death penalty because life in prison costs much more money. GOV It is not significant because those who are sentenced death p