Leech礼貌原则在大学英语教师话语中的应用英语论文Word格式.docx

1、1、 论文研究目标及主要任务本论文的研究目标是探讨Leech礼貌原则的重要作用及其在大学英语教师话语中的应用。其主要任务是通过分析礼貌原则六条细则指导大学英语教学。2、论文的主要内容 本论文分为五章，第一章介绍研究的背景、意义、目的以及本文整体结构，第二章分别介绍教师话语及Leech礼貌原则的先前研究成果，第三章讨论了礼貌原则在大学英语教师话语中的应用，第四章了概括大学英语话语中礼貌原则的特点，并介绍了一些礼貌策略，第五章得出了论文结论，列举了此论文的一些不足之处，并为以后研究提出了建议。3、论文的基础条件及研究路线 本论文的基础条件是不同的语言学家对教师话语及Leech对礼貌原则的研究结果。

2、 研究路线是对礼貌原则从不同的细则进行详细的阐述，并将其分别用在大学英语教学话语中。4、主要参考文献Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Richards, J. C. 1994. The context of Language Teaching. Cambridge:刘润清. 1999. 论大学英语教学. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社. 何自然.1997. 语用学与英语学习. 上海: 上海外

3、语教育出版社.5、计划进度阶段起止日期1确定初步论文题目3月16日前2与导师见面，确定大致范围，填开题报告和任务书，导师签字3月16日-3月23日3提交论文提纲3月23日-3月30日4交初稿和文献综述3月30日-4月20日5交终稿和评议书5月8日前指 导 教师： 年 月 日教研室主任：注：一式三份，学院（系）、指导教师、学生各一份XXXX大学本科生毕业论文开题报告书XXX 学院 英语教育 专业 XXX 届学生姓名XXXX论文题目Leech礼貌原则在大学英语教师话语中的应用指导教师XX专业职称XXX 所属教研室基础教研室研究方向语言学课题论证：从Leech礼貌原则的六条细则等方面论证礼貌原则在大

4、学英语教师话语中 的作用及其应用。方案设计：第一章介绍研究的背景、意义、目的以及本文整体结构，第二章分别介绍教师话语及Leech礼貌原则的先前研究成果，第三章讨论了礼貌原则在大学英语教师话语中的应用，第四章了概括大学英语话语中礼貌原则的特点，并介绍了一些礼貌策略，第五章得出了论文结论，列举了此论文的一些不足之处，并为以后研究提出了建议。进度计划：3月16日前确定初步论文题目 3月23日前写开题报告、任务书3月30日前提交论文提纲4月20日前提交初稿和文献综述5月8日前交终稿和评议书指导教师意见：指导教师签名： 年 月 日教研室意见：教研室主任签名：XXXX大学本科生毕业论文评议书姓 名学院XX

5、X学院英语教育年级（班）XXXX级英语教育X班论 文 题 目完成时间2013/5/8论文内容摘要作为一个具有道德意义的行为准则，礼貌不仅维持和谐的人际关系，而且承载了人类文明。Leech的礼貌原则是语用学中一个热点话题，在人们日常生活中有着重大的意义。在大学英语课堂中，教师话语发挥着非常大的作用，而礼貌原则也必不可少。很多学者从不同领域对礼貌原则与教师话语做了大量研究，但是很少有人将二者结合。因此，本论文以礼貌原则为理论基础探讨了礼貌原则在大学英语教师话语中的应用。在Brown &Levinson的面子理论的基础上并由Leech提出的礼貌原则包含六条细则，分别是得体准则、慷慨准则、赞扬准则、谦

6、虚准则、一致准则与同情准则。而教师话语在本论文中被定义为教师们用来进行教授英语知识，组织课堂活动并对学生表现给予反馈的语言。作者运用礼貌原则分别从六个准则的角度分析了大学英语教师话语。通过研究，作者得出了一个结论：在大学英语课堂，礼貌原则在教师话语中恰当得体的运用有助于师生互动，帮助他们建立良好的师生关系，并提高可以提高学生的学习效率。指导教师评语指 导 教 师初评成绩答辩小组教研室组长成员答辩记录：记录人签字：答辩小组意见：组长签字：学院意见： 评定成绩： 签章XXXX大学本科生毕业论文（设计）文献综述Literature ReviewPrevious studies on teacher

7、talk from both home and abroad roughly include the following aspects: amount of teacher talk, teachers questions, teachers feedback, and interactional modification. Based on the former researches, it can be found that different definitions of teacher talk have been reached from different perspective

8、s at home and abroad. One definition goes that teacher talk is the language in the classroom that takes up a major part of class time used to give classroom directions, explain classroom activities and check students understanding （Sinclair & Brazil, 1982）. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching &

9、Applied Linguistics （Richards, 1992） describes teacher talk as “that variety of language sometimes used by teachers when they are in the process of teaching. In trying to communicate with students, teachers often simplify their speech giving it many of the characteristics of the Foreigner Talk and o

10、ther simplified styles of speech addressed to language learners”. In Ellis opinion, teachers “make adjustments to both language form and language function in order to facilitate communication. These adjustments are referred to as teacher talk” （Ellis 1994:726） To be more specific, Song Deyun & Pan L

11、ongming （2000） define English teacher talk as follows: English teacher talk includes classroom English, instruction English, teacher-student interaction and teacher feedback English which is employed to instruct English knowledge, communicate and organize classroom activities.Politeness seems to be

12、a prevalent concept and an important element in human interaction. According to Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics （1996）, politeness is an “umbrella term for a combination of interpersonal considerations and linguistic choices affecting the form and function of linguistic interactions

13、”. In different cultures and different contexts, politeness refers to quite different things. It is known that every culture has its own customs and expectation, including the politeness involved in daily life. Different culture expects different behavior to meet their politeness system. In other wo

14、rds, people should conform to politeness principle in communication. Leechs Politeness Principle is not an entirely new notion since E. Goffman, P. Brown, S. Levinson and others had discussed politeness phenomena before him in the application of language, such as address forms in kinds of languages, like “你” and “您” in Chinese.E. Goffman poses the question of face from the sociological view of point in the early 1950s. In his opinion, communications betw