ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:46 ,大小:93.50KB ,
资源ID:13214090      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bdocx.com/down/13214090.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(Chapter-3-Critical-ThinkingPPT格式课件下载.ppt)为本站会员(b****1)主动上传,冰豆网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰豆网(发送邮件至service@bdocx.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

Chapter-3-Critical-ThinkingPPT格式课件下载.ppt

1、Tools and practice,Critical Thinking Thru Paul-Elder Model,PEM is an effective critical thinking tool for debate and also effective with any subject matter or situation.,Elements of ThinkingProvides aspects for your to analyze your argument.They are the different windows thru which to observe a hous

2、e.Each will give you a different view in the understanding of what the house looks like inside.Purpose,questions,information,inferences,concepts,assumptions,consequences,points of view.,Purposecompare pros and cons of a policy,weigh values,or develop a plan to solve a problem.QuestionsMajor issues i

3、nvolved in the purpose,problems or harms to be addressed,current system isnt taking care,basis of the values being debated,actions to be taken and benefits of the actions.,InformationInformation for or against the topic,specific experiences,helping or guiding facts or opinions,source of information,

4、accuracy and up-datedness and relevance of the information,quality of the information used by the other teamInferencesWhat conclusion to draw from the Qs and Information you hear,relation between prob and solution,connection between two pieces of evidence,consistency or controversy between two argum

5、ents,ConceptsPhilosophical ideas or theory to understand or argue about.Definitions to be provided.The need of justification of the criteria.AssumptionThings to be taken for granted on the topic,a change happened that would change the approach.,ConsequencesGood things and bad things that come from t

6、he arguments.Personal or societal level.What will happen if a plan is instituted?Advantages and disadvantages of the actions in discussion.,Points of viewTwo or more points of view.What type of language frames the arguments?Is the language or position objective or appropriate for the issue at hand?H

7、ow are the arguments phrased?Is the position accurate for the question at hand?,Intellectual Standards of ThinkingClarity.Are the arguments understandable?Is there a vagueness that does not allow for understanding of a specific element?For example,is the purpose clear?,Accuracy.Is the information be

8、ing unsed true and complete?Are the conclusions being drawn appropriate from the information avaible?,Precision.Are there enough details to satisfy the specific requirements?Does the action have sufficient conditions presented to solve the problem(i.e.enough money)?,Relevance.How much does the eleme

9、nt relate to the issue at hand?Does the opponents argument actually refute something you say?,Significance.How important is something?Can its significance be measured?There may also be several values involved in a debate.When looking to the quality of the values can you determine which are more impo

10、rtant and why?Is the significance you present greater than the significance the other team presents?,Depth.When evaluating an issue,is there a need for understanding other specifics within the issue?,Breadth.When evaluating an issue,are there other areas of interest necessary for understanding the c

11、omplete picture?,Logic.Does the argument make sense?Do the conclusions come from the analysis and evidence provided?,Fairness.Is an objective position being taken?Are there other points of view that need to be considered to minimize ethnocentrism or egocentrism?,With the eight elements and nine stan

12、dards,you actually have 72 ways to analyse and evaluate any issue.,Argument Construction Through the Toulmin Model,Claim:statements about facts,values,or policies.Data:in other words,ground,evidence,support,proof,documentation,or substance.warrant:the relevant link,or the analysis that puts the clai

13、m and data together and makes sense of the argument.,CLAIMOral communication skills increase employment opportunities.,DATAResearch on the Fortune 500 lists oral communication as the top applied skills.,WARRANTWhat is true for the Fortune 500 is probably true for most prospective employees.,Logical Argument Construction,CLAIMAir pollution is bad for human health.,DATAThere are over 500 McDonalds Restaurants in Beijing.,WARRANTThere is no obvious re

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1