EPAS CEF2 progs.docx

1、EPAS CEF2 progsEPAS CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM2 programme setsName of the Institution:Name of Programme set 1:Name of Programme set 2:Date of the evaluation:1. Institutional Context SECTION1.1 Institutional strategy and management1.1.1 Mission and strategy in its national & international context1.1.2

2、Availability of resources to implement the strategy1.1.3 Present positioning relative to its programme competitors1.1.4 Internal institutional governance & management1.1.5 Institutional culture re internationalisation1.1.6 Institutional culture re corporate focus1.1.7 Institutional culture re ERS1.2

3、 Physical resources and facilities for the programme(s)1.2.1 Learning environment, eg classrooms, study spaces, library1.2.2 IT: e-learning platform, databases, computer access, etc.1.3 Faculty for the programme(s)1.3.1 Adequacy of faculty: qualifications, size and subject profile1.3.2 Faculty intel

4、lectual contribution (eg research) to teaching1.3.3 Teaching ethos towards academic depth & rigour1.3.4 Internationalisation of the faculty1.3.5 Faculty engagement with the corporate world 1.3.6 Faculty engagement with ERS1.3.7 Faculty management, eg workload, performance, developmentPROGRAMME SET 1

5、: (add name of the programme)2. Programme Design SECTION2.1 Programme objectives and target markets2.1.1 Coherence of programme objectives & fit with institutional context2.1.2 Appropriateness of target markets & intended graduate profile2.1.3 Marketing/promotion of the programme (including institut

6、ional context)2.2 Curriculum design2.2.1 Clarity of programme rationale 2.2.2 Specification of Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)2.2.3 Programme structure and content/coverage2.2.4 Balance of academic and managerial dimensions 2.2.5 Inclusion of external guidelines (eg EQUAL, PRME)2.2.6 Up-to-date de

7、sign including opportunities for integrated learning 2.2.7 International focus of the programme 2.2.8 Responsiveness to corporate needs2.2.9 Coverage of ERS and other trends in society2.3 Design of delivery modes & assessment methods2.3.1 Appropriateness of delivery methods, eg FT, PT, modular, onli

8、ne2.3.2 Structure and balance of in- to out-of-class learning2.3.3 Quality of programme management & administration 2.3.4 Quality of student handbooks, etc. 2.3.5 Assessments methods explicitly designed to match ILOs2.3.6 Range of student assessment methods2.3.7 Focus on individual assessment3. Prog

9、ramme Delivery & Operations SECTION3.1 Student recruitment3.1.1 Appropriateness of entry criteria & their application in selection 3.1.2 Quality of incoming students qualifications & experience3.1.3 Internationalisation of the student body3.1.4 Enrolment and induction processes3.2 Pedagogy 3.2.1 Qua

10、lity of teaching & learning delivery3.2.2 Academic depth including expectations on academic reading3.2.3 Pedagogical innovation, eg use of e-learning platforms3.2.4 Quality of the teaching/learning materials3.2.5 Focus on student centred learning3.3 Personal development of students 3.3.1 Quality of

11、overall personal development3.3.2 Individualised learning support from faculty3.3.3 Development of transferable intellectual skills3.3.5 Quality of support services (eg counselling, international office)3.4 International aspects3.4.1 Quality of overall international learning experience3.4.2 Quality

12、of the international partners & exchanges3.4.3 Student take up of opportunities to study/work abroad3.4.4 Preparation as potential international managers3.5 Corporate interactions3.5.1 Quality of overall corporate learning experience3.5.2 Teaching input from practitioners 3.5.3 Other corporate invol

13、vement, eg provision of internships 3.5.4 Take up of opportunities for project-based work, internships3.6 Ethics, Responsibility & Sustainability3.6.1 Quality of the overall ERS learning experience3.6.2 Linkage of ERS to the students future roles as managers4. Programme Outcomes SECTION4.1 Quality o

14、f student/participant work 4.1.1 Objectivity & rigour in the assessment process4.1.2 Confirmed achievement of ILOs4.1.3 Standards of student exams/coursework 4.1.4 Standards of student theses/projects/dissertations4.1.5 Evidence of academic depth4.1.6 Progression and pass rates meet international no

15、rms4.2 Graduate quality4.2.1 Quality of graduates meets programme objectives4.2.2 Quality of career placement services4.3 Alumni 4.3.1 Support for and from the programmes alumni association4.4 Programme reputation 4.4.1 Evidence for programme reputationPROGRAMME SET 2: (add name of the programme)2.

16、Programme Design SECTION2.1 Programme objectives and target markets2.1.1 Coherence of programme objectives & fit with institutional context2.1.2 Appropriateness of target markets & intended graduate profile2.1.3 Marketing/promotion of the programme (including institutional context)2.2 Curriculum des

17、ign2.2.1 Clarity of programme rationale 2.2.2 Specification of Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)2.2.3 Programme structure and content/coverage2.2.4 Balance of academic and managerial dimensions 2.2.5 Inclusion of external guidelines (eg EQUAL, PRME)2.2.6 Up-to-date design including opportunities for

18、 integrated learning 2.2.7 International focus of the programme 2.2.8 Responsiveness to corporate needs2.2.9 Coverage of ERS and other trends in society2.3 Design of delivery modes & assessment methods2.3.1 Appropriateness of delivery methods, eg FT, PT, modular, online2.3.2 Structure and balance of

19、 in- to out-of-class learning2.3.3 Quality of programme management & administration 2.3.4 Quality of student handbooks, etc. 2.3.5 Assessments methods explicitly designed to match ILOs2.3.6 Range of student assessment methods2.3.7 Focus on individual assessment3. Programme Delivery & Operations SECT

20、ION3.1 Student recruitment3.1.1 Appropriateness of entry criteria & their application in selection 3.1.2 Quality of incoming students qualifications & experience3.1.3 Internationalisation of the student body3.1.4 Enrolment and induction processes3.2 Pedagogy 3.2.1 Quality of teaching & learning deli

21、very3.2.2 Academic depth including expectations on academic reading3.2.3 Pedagogical innovation, eg use of e-learning platforms3.2.4 Quality of the teaching/learning materials3.2.5 Focus on student centred learning3.3 Personal development of students 3.3.1 Quality of overall personal development3.3.

22、2 Individualised learning support from faculty3.3.3 Development of transferable intellectual skills3.3.5 Quality of support services (eg counselling, international office)3.4 International aspects3.4.1 Quality of overall international learning experience3.4.2 Quality of the international partners &

23、exchanges3.4.3 Student take up of opportunities to study/work abroad3.4.4 Preparation as potential international managers3.5 Corporate interactions3.5.1 Quality of overall corporate learning experience3.5.2 Teaching input from practitioners 3.5.3 Other corporate involvement, eg provision of internsh

24、ips 3.5.4 Take up of opportunities for project-based work, internships3.6 Ethics, Responsibility & Sustainability3.6.1 Quality of the overall ERS learning experience3.6.2 Linkage of ERS to the students future roles as managers4. Programme Outcomes SECTION4.1 Quality of student/participant work 4.1.1

25、 Objectivity & rigour in the assessment process4.1.2 Confirmed achievement of ILOs4.1.3 Standards of student exams/coursework 4.1.4 Standards of student theses/projects/dissertations4.1.5 Evidence of academic depth4.1.6 Progression and pass rates meet international norms4.2 Graduate quality4.2.1 Qua

26、lity of graduates meets programme objectives4.2.2 Quality of career placement services4.3 Alumni 4.3.1 Support for and from the programmes alumni association4.4 Programme reputation 4.4.1 Evidence for programme reputationINSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESSES5. Quality Assurance ProcessesSECTION5

27、.1 Design & review processes 5.1.1 Institutional QA systems 5.1.2 Programme design/review & approval process5.1.3 Inclusion of different stakeholder perspectives5.1.4 Internal annual programme review5.1.5 External periodic fundamental review processes 5.2 Quality assurance on operations 5.2.1 Student feedback on teaching & programme quality5.2.2 Monitoring of teaching quality by programme management5.2.3 Monitoring of the assessment regime for consistent standards5.2.4 Feedback to students on assessments