Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers.docx

Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers.docx

《Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers.docx（18页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

DeepSeaResearchPartIOceanographicResearchPapers

41

Trendsintechnology,tradeandconsumptionlikelytoimpactonmicrobialfoodsafety  OriginalResearchArticle

InternationalJournalofFoodMicrobiology,Volume139,Supplement1,30May2010,PagesS29-S42

T.E.Quested,P.E.Cook,L.G.M.Gorris,M.B.Cole

 Showpreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

Purchase

$31.50

42

PredictorsofComprehensionduringSurgicalInformedConsent  OriginalResearchArticle

JournaloftheAmericanCollegeofSurgeons,Volume210,Issue6,June2010,Pages919-926

AaronS.Fink,AllanV.Prochazka,WilliamG.Henderson,DebraBartenfeld,CarsieNyirenda,AlexandraWebb,DavidH.Berger,KamalItani,ThomasWhitehill,JamesEdwards,MarkWilson,CynthiaKarsonovich,PatriciaParmelee

 Showpreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

Purchase

$31.50

43

Integratedcareintheemergencydepartment:

Acomplexadaptivesystemsperspective  OriginalResearchArticle

SocialScience&Medicine,Volume71,Issue11,December2010,Pages1997-2004

PeterNugus,KatherineCarroll,DavidG.Hewett,AlisonShort,RobertoForero,JeffreyBraithwaite

 Showpreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

Purchase

$35.95

44

Leadershipatalllevels:

Leadingpublicsectororganisationsinanageofausterity  OriginalResearchArticle

EuropeanManagementJournal,Volume28,Issue4,August2010,Pages297-305

KeithLeslie,AdamCanwell

 Showpreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

Purchase

$31.50

45

PersonalityProfilingoftheModernSurgicalTrainee:

InsightsintoGenerationX  ReviewArticle

JournalofSurgicalEducation,Volume67,Issue6,November-December2010,Pages417-420

JenniferA.Swanson,MaraB.Antonoff,JonathanD'Cunha,MichaelA.Maddaus

 Showpreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

Purchase

$31.50

46

Usertestingandstakeholderfeedbackcontributedtothedevelopmentof understandableandusefulSummaryofFindingstablesforCochranereviews  OriginalResearchArticle

JournalofClinicalEpidemiology,Volume63,Issue6,June2010,Pages607-619

SarahE.Rosenbaum,ClaireGlenton,HildeKariNylund,AndrewD.Oxman

 Showpreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

Purchase

$31.50

47

Evaluationofintegratedhydrogensystems:

IEATask18  OriginalResearchArticle

InternationalJournalofHydrogenEnergy,Volume35,Issue18,September2010,Pages10031-10037

MariadelPilarArgumosa,EstherChacon,SusanM.Schoenung

 Closepreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Abstract

TheInternationalEnergyAgency（IEA）HydrogenImplementingAgreement（HIA）establishedin2004atask（Annex18）onthetopicof“IntegratedSystems:

EvaluationofHydrogenDemonstrationProjects”.During6years,dividedintwophases,thisannexhasbeenworkinginordertosearchandprovideinformationonprogressinthehydrogeneconomyaroundtheworld.Spainisoneofthe15membercountriessincethephase1.

Thetaskhasfollowedthreemaintargets:

Todevelopadatabasethatincludesnationaldocuments,nationalcapabilitiesandacompilationofdemonstrationprojectsofeachmembercountry.

Toevaluateseveralhydrogendemonstrationsystemsdeployedwithintheparticipatingcountries.Theseprojectshaveincommonthatmodelingtoolsareusedtohelpguide,assess,andevaluatetheoveralldesignandperformance.

Tofindbestpractices,trendsandlessonslearnedwithrespecttorealizationandoperationofintegratedhydrogensystems.

TheparticipationofINTAinthisAnnex,asanationalmemberandthecoordinationofacapabilityanalysisworkgroupinsidetheSpanishHydrogenandFuelcellPlatform（PEHFC）,hashelpedtocompleteandupdateadatabaseontheStateoftheartofhydrogenactivitiesinSpain.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.Task18activities

2.1.SubtaskA.Informationbasedevelopment

2.2.SubtaskB:

modellingandanalysisofintegrateddemonstrationsystems

2.3.SubtaskC:

synthesisandlessonslearned

3.Evaluationofstationaryintegratedsystems

3.1.PhaseI

3.2.PhaseII

4.SpanishH2andFCactivities

Acknowledgements

References

Purchase

$31.50

48

Acomparisonofthespeechrecognitionandpitchrankingabilitiesofchildrenusingaunilateralcochlearimplant,bimodalstimulationorbilateralhearingaids  OriginalResearchArticle

InternationalJournalofPediatricOtorhinolaryngology,InPress,CorrectedProof,Availableonline5February2011

ValerieLooi,ChristopherJohnRadford

 Closepreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Abstract

Objective

Thepresentstudycomparedthespeechrecognitionandpitchrankingabilitiesofnormallyhearingchildren（n = 15）tochildrenusingacochlearimplant（CI）alone（n = 8）,bilateralhearingaids（HAs）（n = 6）,orbimodalstimulation（BMS）（n = 9）.ItwashypothesisedthatusersofBMSwouldscorehigherontasksofspeechandpitchperceptionthanchildrenusingaCIalone,butnotchildrenusingHAs.

Methods

Participantswereassessedontasksofmonosyllabicwordrecognitioninquiet,sentencerecognitioninquietandnoise（10 dBsignal-to-noiseratio）,andapitchrankingtaskusingpairsofsungvowelsone,half,andaquarterofanoctaveapart.

Results

Therewerenosignificantdifferencesbetweenthemeanpercentage-correctscoresofthefourparticipantgroupsforeitherwordsinquietorsentencesinquietandnoise.However,theproportionofbimodaluserswhoscored>80%correct（80%）wassignificantlygreaterthantheproportionofhigh-scoringunilateralCI（25%）orbilateralHAusers（17%）.Contrarytoexpectations,therewasalsonosignificantdifferencebetweenthepitchrankingscoresofusersofBMSandusersofaCIaloneforallthreeintervalsizes（p < 0.05,RM-ANOVA）.Howeverparticipantsusingonlyacoustichearing（i.e.theNHandHAgroups）scoredsignificantlyhigherthanparticipantsusingelectricalstimulation（i.e.theCIandBMSgroups）onthepitchrankingtask（p < 0.05;RM-ANOVA）.

Conclusions

Contrarytofindingsinpostlinguallydeafenedadults,wefoundnosignificantbimodaladvantageforpitchperceptioninprelinguallydeafenedchildren.However,theperformanceofchildrenusingelectricalstimulationwassignificantlypoorerthanchildrenusingonlyacousticstimulation.Furtherresearchisrequiredtoinvestigatethecontributionofthenon-implantedearsofusersofBMStopitchperception,andtheeffectofhearinglossonthedevelopmentofpitchperceptioninchildren.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

1.1.Pitchperception

1.2.Speechrecognition

1.3.Existingbetween-groupcomparisons

2.Materialsandmethods

2.1.Participants

2.2.Materials

2.3.Procedure

3.Results

3.1.Participantvariables

3.2.Speechrecognition

3.3.Pitchrankingtask

3.4.Correlations

4.Discussion

4.1.Speechrecognition

4.2.Pitchperception

5.Conclusions

Conflictofinterest

Ethical

Acknowledgements

References

Purchase

$31.50

49

WASAN:

Thedevelopmentofafacilitatedmethodologyforstructuringawasteminimisationproblem  OriginalResearchArticle

EuropeanJournalofOperationalResearch,Volume207,Issue1,16November2010,Pages350-362

DuncanShaw,NeilBlundell

 Closepreview  |  Relatedarticles  |  Relatedreferenceworkarticles    

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Abstract

ThispapercontributesanewmethodologycalledWasteAndSource-matterANalyses（WASAN）whichsupportsagroupinbuildingagreeableactionsforsafelyminimisingavoidablewaste.WASANintegratesinfluencesfromtheOperationalResearch（OR）methodologies/philosophiesofProblemStructuringMethods,SystemsThinking,simulationmodellingandsensitivityanalysisaswellasindustryapproachesofWasteManagementHierarchy,HazardOperability（HAZOP）StudiesandAsLowAsReasonablyPracticable（ALARP）.Thepapershowshowtheseinfluencesarecompiledintofacilitativestructuresthatsupportmanagersindevelopingrecommendationsonhowtoreduceavoidablewasteproduction.WASANisbeingdesignedasHealthandSafetyExecutiveGuidanceonwhatconstitutesgooddecisionmakingpracticeforthecompaniesthatmanagenuclearsites.InthispaperwereportandreflectonitsuseintwosoftOR/problemstructuringworkshopsconductedonradioactivewasteinthenuclearindustry.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.Thecontexts

2.1.Theindustrialcontext

2.2.Thedevelopmentalcontext

3.IntroducingtheWASANmethodology

3.1.Stage1–Definesystemboundary:

WasteAndSource-matterIDentification（WASID）

3.2.Stage2–Analyseinternaloperations:

WasteAndSource-matterMAnagementHierarchy（WASMAH）

3.3.Stage3–Analyseexternaloperations:

WasteAndSource-matterOPerability（WASOP）

3.4.Stage4–Evaluateactions:

Waste‘AsLowAsReasonablyPracticable’（WALARP）

3.5.Stage5–Programmedeliverables:

WASP

3.6.WASAN’sgenericstructure

4.Casestudy

4.1.Stage1–WasteAndSource-matterIDentification（WASID）

4.2.Stage2–WasteAndSource-matterManagementHierarchy（WASMAH）

4.3.Stage3–WasteAndSource-matterOperabilityStudy（WASOP）

4.4.Stage4–WasteAsLowAsReasonablyPracticable（WALARP）

4.5.Stage5–WASP:

Programmingdeliverables

5.Di