3gpp协议.docx
《3gpp协议.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《3gpp协议.docx(100页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![3gpp协议.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2023-1/21/e4155ad5-1796-492b-8664-43876666b149/e4155ad5-1796-492b-8664-43876666b1491.gif)
3gpp协议
3GPPTR36.942V9.0.1(2010-04)
TechnicalReport
3rdGenerationPartnershipProject;
TechnicalSpecificationGroupRadioAccessNetwork;
EvolvedUniversalTerrestrialRadioAccess(E-UTRA);
RadioFrequency(RF)systemscenarios
(Release9)
Thepresentdocumenthasbeendevelopedwithinthe3rdGenerationPartnershipProject(3GPPTM)andmaybefurtherelaboratedforthepurposesof3GPP.
Thepresentdocumenthasnotbeensubjecttoanyapprovalprocessbythe3GPPOrganizationalPartnersandshallnotbeimplemented.
ThisSpecificationisprovidedforfuturedevelopmentworkwithin3GPPonly.TheOrganizationalPartnersacceptnoliabilityforanyuseofthisSpecification.
Specificationsandreportsforimplementationofthe3GPPTMsystemshouldbeobtainedviathe3GPPOrganizationalPartners'PublicationsOffices.
Keywords
LTE,Radio
3GPP
Postaladdress
3GPPsupportofficeaddress
650RoutedesLucioles-SophiaAntipolis
Valbonne-FRANCE
Tel.:
+33492944200Fax:
+33493654716
Internet
http:
//www.3gpp.org
CopyrightNotification
Nopartmaybereproducedexceptasauthorizedbywrittenpermission.
Thecopyrightandtheforegoingrestrictionextendtoreproductioninallmedia.
©2010,3GPPOrganizationalPartners(ARIB,ATIS,CCSA,ETSI,TTA,TTC).
Allrightsreserved.
UMTS™isaTradeMarkofETSIregisteredforthebenefitofitsmembers
3GPP™isaTradeMarkofETSIregisteredforthebenefitofitsMembersandofthe3GPPOrganizationalPartners
LTE™isaTradeMarkofETSIcurrentlybeingregisteredforthebenefitofitsMembersandofthe3GPPOrganizationalPartners
GSM®andtheGSMlogoareregisteredandownedbytheGSMAssociation
Contents
Foreword
ThisTechnicalReporthasbeenproducedbythe3rdGenerationPartnershipProject(3GPP).
ThecontentsofthepresentdocumentaresubjecttocontinuingworkwithintheTSGandmaychangefollowingformalTSGapproval.ShouldtheTSGmodifythecontentsofthepresentdocument,itwillbere-releasedbytheTSGwithanidentifyingchangeofreleasedateandanincreaseinversionnumberasfollows:
Versionx.y.z
where:
xthefirstdigit:
1presentedtoTSGforinformation;
2presentedtoTSGforapproval;
3orgreaterindicatesTSGapproveddocumentunderchangecontrol.
ytheseconddigitisincrementedforallchangesofsubstance,i.e.technicalenhancements,corrections,updates,etc.
zthethirddigitisincrementedwheneditorialonlychangeshavebeenincorporatedinthedocument.
1Scope
DuringtheE-UTRAstandardsdevelopment,thephysicallayerparameterswillbedecidedusingsystemscenarios,togetherwithimplementationissues,reflectingtheenvironmentsthatE-UTRAwillbedesignedtooperatein.
2References
Thefollowingdocumentscontainprovisionswhich,throughreferenceinthistext,constituteprovisionsofthepresentdocument.
∙Referencesareeitherspecific(identifiedbydateofpublication,editionnumber,versionnumber,etc.)ornonspecific.
∙Foraspecificreference,subsequentrevisionsdonotapply.
∙Foranon-specificreference,thelatestversionapplies.Inthecaseofareferencetoa3GPPdocument(includingaGSMdocument),anon-specificreferenceimplicitlyreferstothelatestversionofthatdocumentinthesameReleaseasthepresentdocument.
[1]3GPPTR25.896,“FeasibilityStudyforEnhancedUplinkforUTRAFDD”
[2]3GPPTR25.816,“UMTS900MHzWorkItemTechnicalReport”
[3]3GPPTR25.942,“RadioFrequency(RF)systemscenarios”
[4]3GPPTR25.814,“PhysicalLayerAspectsforEvolvedUTRA”
[5]3GPPTR30.03,“SelectionproceduresforthechoiceofradiotransmissiontechnologiesoftheUMTS”
[6]R4-051146,“Someoperators’requirementsforprioritizationofperformancerequirementsworkinRANWG4”,RAN4#37
[7]3GPPTR25.951,“FDDBaseStation(BS)classification”
[8]3GPPTR25.895,”AnalysisofhigherchipratesforUTRATDDevolution.”
[9]R4-070235,“Analysisofco-existencesimulationresults”,RAN4#42
[10]R4-070084,“CoexistenceSimulationResultsfor5MHzE-UTRA->UTRAFDDUplinkwithRevisedSimulationAssumptions”,RAN4#42
[11]R4-070034,“Additionalsimulationresultson5MHzLTEtoWCDMAFDDULco-existencestudies”,RAN4#42
[12]R4-070262,“Simulationresultson5MHzLTEtoWCDMAFDDULco-existencestudieswithrevisedsimulationassumptions”,RAN4#42
[13]R4-070263,“ProposalonLTEACLRrequirementsforUE”,RAN4#42
[14]R4-061288,“DownlinkLTE900(RuralMacro)withDownlinkGSM900(RuralMacro)Co-existenceSimulationResults”,RAN4#41
[15]R4-070391,“LTE900-GSM900DownlinkCoexistence”,RAN4#42bis
[16]R4-061304,“LTE900-GSM900UplinkSimulationResults”,RAN4#41
[17]R4-070390,“LTE900-GSM900UplinkSimulationResults”,RAN4#42bis
[18]R4-070392“LTE-LTECoexistencewithasymmetricalbandwidth”,RAN4#42bis
[19]3GPPTS36.104,”BaseStation(BS)radiotransmissionandreception”
[20]3GPPTS25.104,”BaseStation(BS)radiotransmissionandreception(FDD)”
[21]3GPPTS36.141,”BaseStation(BS)conformancetesting”
[22]RecommendationITU-RSM.329-10,“Unwantedemissionsinthespuriousdomain”
[23]“InternationalTelecommunicationsUnionRadioRegulations”,Edition2004,Volume1–Articles,ITU,December2004.
[24]“AdjacentBandCompatibilitybetweenUMTSandOtherServicesinthe2GHzBand”,ERCReport65,Menton,May1999,revisedinHelsinki,November1999.
[25]“Title47oftheCodeofFederalRegulations(CFR)”,FederalCommunicationsCommission.
[26]R4-070337,"ImpactofsecondadjacentchannelACLR/ACSonACIR"(NokiaSiemensNetworks).
[27]R4-070430,"UEACSandBSACLRs"(Fujitsu).
[28]R4-070264,"ProposalonLTEACLRrequirementsforNodeB"(NTTDoCoMo).
[29]RecommendationITU-RM.1580-1,“GenericunwantedemissioncharacteristicsofbasestationsusingtheterrestrialradiointerfacesofIMT-2000”.
[30]ReportITU-RM.2039,“CharacteristicsofterrestrialIMT-2000systemsforfrequencysharing/interferenceanalyses”.
[31]ETSIEN301908-3V2.2.1(2003-10),“ElectromagneticcompatibilityandRadiospectrumMatters(ERM);BaseStations(BS),RepeatersandUserEquipment(UE)forIMT-2000Third-Generationcellularnetworks;Part3:
HarmonizedENforIMT-2000,CDMADirectSpread(UTRAFDD)(BS)coveringessentialrequirementsofarticle3.2oftheR&TTEDirective”.
3Definitions,symbolsandabbreviations
3.1Definitions
3.2Symbols
3.3Abbreviations
Forthepurposesofthepresentdocument,thefollowingabbreviationsapply:
ACIRAdjacentChannelInterferenceRatio
ACLRAdjacentChannelLeakagepowerRatio
ACSAdjacentChannelSelectivity
AMCAdaptiveModulationandCoding
AWGNAdditiveWhiteGaussianNoise
BSBaseStation
CDFCumulativeDistributionFunction
DLDownlink
FDDFrequencyDivisionDuplex
MCMonte-Carlo
MCLMinimumCouplingLoss
MCSModulationandCodingScheme
PCPowerControl
PSDPowerSpectralDensity
RXReceiver
TDDTimeDivisionDuplex
TXTransmitter
UEUserEquipment
ULUplink
4Generalassumptions
ThepresentdocumentdiscussessystemscenariosforE-UTRAoperationprimarilywithrespecttotheradiotransmissionandreceptionincludingtheRRMaspects.TodeveloptheE-UTRAstandard,alltherelevantscenariosneedtobeconsideredforthevariousaspectsofoperationandthemostcriticalcasesidentified.Theprocessmaythenbeiteratedtoarriveatfinalparametersthatmeetbothserviceandimplementationrequirements.
TheE-UTRAsystemisintendedtobeoperatedinthesamefrequencybandsspecifiedforUTRA.Inordertolimitthenumberoffrequencybandstobesimulatedinthevarioussimulationscenariosamappingoffrequencybandstotwosimulationfrequencies(900MHzand2000MHz)isapplied.WhenusingthemacrocellpropagationmodelofTR25.942[3],thefrequencycontributestothepathlossby21*log10(f).Themaximumpathlossdifferencebetweenthelowest/highestfrequenciesperE-UTRAfrequencybandandcorrespondingsimulationfrequencyisshownintables4.1and4.2.
Table4.1:
SimulationfrequenciesforFDDmodeE-UTRAfrequencybands
E-UTRABand
ULfrequencies(MHz)
DLfrequencies(MHz)
Simulationfrequency
(MHz)
Pathlossdifference(dB)
lowest
highest
lowest
highest
lowestULfrequency
highestDLfrequency
1
1920
1980
2110
2170
2000
0.37
0.74
2
1850
1910
1930
1990
2000
0.71
0.05
3
1710
1785
1805
1880
2000
1.43
0.56
4
1710
1755
2110
2155
2000
1.43
0.68
5
824
849
869
894
900
0.80
0.06
6
830
840
875
885
900
0.74
0.15
7
2500
2570
2620
2690
2000
2.04
2.70
8
880
915
925
960
900
0.20
0.59
9
1749.9
1784.9
1844.9
1879.9
2000
1.22
0.56
10
1710
1770
2110
2170
2000
1.43
0.74
11
1427.9
1452.9
1475.9
1500.9
2000
3.07
2.62
Table4.2:
SimulationfrequenciesforTDDmodeE-UTRAfrequencybands
E-UTRAband
UL/DLfrequencies(MHz)
Simulationfrequency
(MHz)
Pathlossdifference(dB)
lowest
highest
lowestfrequency
highestfrequency
33
1900
1920
2000
0.47
0.37
34
2010
2025
2000
0.05
0.11
35
1850
1910
2000
0.71
0.42
36
1930
1990
2000
0.32
0.05
37
1910
1930
2000
0.42
0.32
38
2570
2620
2000
2.29
2.46
Itcanbeobservedthatthedifferenceofpathlossbetweensimulationfrequencyandoperatingfrequency(exceptbands7,11and38)isintheworstcaselessthan0.8dBforthedownlinkandlessthe1,5dBfortheuplink.Hencethemappingofoperatingfrequencytosimulationfrequencywillprovidevalidresults.
Thevalidityofsimulationsperformedat2GHzforthe2.6GHzbands7and38wasalreadyanalyzedinTR25.810.Consideringtheexpectedhigherantennagaininthe2.6GHzbandthedifferenceinpathlossisintheorderof1dBwhatiscomparabletotheotherfrequencybands.
4.1Interferencescen