网络团购外文翻译文献.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:7375849 上传时间:2023-01-23 格式:DOCX 页数:7 大小:24.32KB
下载 相关 举报
网络团购外文翻译文献.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共7页
网络团购外文翻译文献.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共7页
网络团购外文翻译文献.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共7页
网络团购外文翻译文献.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共7页
网络团购外文翻译文献.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共7页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

网络团购外文翻译文献.docx

《网络团购外文翻译文献.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《网络团购外文翻译文献.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

网络团购外文翻译文献.docx

网络团购外文翻译文献

网络团购外文翻译文献

(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译)

原文:

Segmentinguncertaindemandingroup-buyingauctions

Demanduncertaintyisakeyfactorinaseller’sdecision-makingprocessforproductssoldthroughonlineauctions.Weexploredemanduncertaintyingroup-buyingauctionsintermsoftheextentoflow-valuationdemandandhigh-valuationdemand.Wefocusontheanalysisofamonopolisticgroup-buyingretailerthatsellsproductstoconsumerswhoexpressdifferentproductvaluations.Wealsoexaminetheperformanceofagroup-buyingsellerwhofacescompetitiveposted-pricesellersinamarketforthesaleofthesameproducts,undersimilarassumptionsaboutuncertaindemand.BasedonaNashequilibriumanalysisofbidderstrategiesforbothoftheseseller-sidecompetitionstructures,weareabletocharacterizethegroupbuyingauctionbidders’dominantstrategies.Weobtainedanumberofinterestingfindings.Group-buyingislikelytobemoreeffectiveinsettingswherethereislargerlow-valuationdemandthanhigh-valuationdemand.Thestructureofdemandmatters.Thisfindinghasrelevancetothemarketplacefornewcameras,next-generationmicroprocessorsandcomputers,andotherhigh-valuationgoods,whichareunlikelytobeaseffectivelysoldingroup-buyingmarkets.Weobtainedadditionalresultsforthecaseofcontinuousdemand,andfindthatthereisabasisforthesellertoimproverevenuesviaeffectivegroup-buyingauctionpricecurvedesign.

Keywords:

Consumerbehavior,biddingstrategy,demanduncertainty,economicanalysis,electronicmarkets,group-buyingauctions,marketmechanism,posted-pricemechanism,simulation,uncertaintyrisk.

ThedevelopmentofadvancedITmakesitpossibletousenovelbusinessmodelstohandlebusinessproblemsinnewandinnovativeways.WiththegrowthoftheInternet,anumberofnewelectronicauctionmechanismshaveemerged,andauctionsaregenerallyknowntocreatehigherexpectedsellerrevenuethanposted-priceswhenthecostofrunninganauctionisminimalorcostless(Wang1993).SomeofthenewmechanismswehaveseenincludetheonlineYankeeandDutchauctions,andthe“name-yourown-price”and“buy-it-now”mechanisms.AnexampleiseBay’sDutchauctionforthesaleofmultipleitemsofthesamedescription.Anotherofthesenewelectronicmarketmechanismsthatwehaveobservedisthegroup-buyingauction,ahomogeneousmulti-unitauction(Mitchell2002,Lietal.2004).Internet-basedsellersanddigitalintermediarieshaveadoptedthismarketmechanismonsitessuchasLetsBuyItandeWinWin.Thesesitesoffertransaction-makingmechanismsthataredifferentfromtraditionalauctions.Intraditionalauctions,bidderscompeteagainstoneanothertobethewinner.Ingroup-buyingauctions,however,biddershaveanincentivetoaggregatetheirbidssothatthesellerordigitalintermediaryoffersalowerpriceatwhichtheyallcanbuythedesiredgoods(Hornetal.2000).McCabeetal.(1991)haveexploredmulti-unitVickreyauctionsinexperimentalresearch,however,theydidnotconsiderthepossibilityofstochasticbidderarrivalordemanduncertainty.

Thispaperisthefirsttoexaminetheimpactsofdemanduncertaintyontheperformanceononlinegroup-buyingauctions.BasedonaNashequilibriumanalysisofbidderstrategiesforamonopolistsellerandacompetitiveseller,weareabletocharacterizethegroup-buyingauctionbidders’symmetricanddominantstrategies.Wefindthatgroup-buyingislikelytobemoreeffectiveinsettingswherethereislargerlow-valuationdemandthanhigh-valuationdemand.Thus,thestructureofdemandatdifferentlevelofwillingness-to-paybyconsumersmatters.Thishasrelevancetothemarketplacefornewcameras,next-generationmicroprocessorsandcomputers,andotherhigh-valuationgoods.Weobtainedadditionalresultsforthecaseofcontinuousdemandvaluations,andfoundthatthereisabasisforthesellertoimproverevenuesbasedontheeffectivedesignofthegroup-buyingauctionpricecurvedesign.

THEORY

Themodelforthegroup-buyingauctionmechanismwithuncertainbidderarrivalthatwewilldevelopspansthreestreamsofliterature:

demanduncertainty,consumerbehaviorandrelatedmechanismdesignissues;auctioneconomicsandmechanismdesigntheory;andcurrenttheoreticalknowledgeabouttheoperationofgroup-buyingauctionsfromtheISandelectroniccommerceliterature.

DemandUncertainty,ConsumerBehaviorandMechanismDesign

Demanduncertaintiestypicallyarecomposedofconsumerdemandenvironmentuncertainty(oruncertaintyabouttheaggregatelevelofconsumerdemand)andrandomnessofdemandinthemarketplace(reflectedinbrieftemporalchangesanddemandshocksthatarenotexpectedtopersist).Consumeruncertaintyaboutdemandinthemarketplacecanoccurbasedonthevaluationofproducts,andwhetherconsumersarewillingtopayhigherorlowerprices.Itmayalsooccuronthebasisofdemandlevels,especiallythenumberoftheconsumersinthemarket.Finally,therearetemporalconsiderations,whichinvolvewhetheraconsumerwishestobuynow,orwhethertheymaybesamplingqualityandpricingwiththeintentionofbuyinglater.Wedistinguishbetweendifferentdemandlevelenvironments.Inaddition,itispossiblethattheseconsumerdemandenvironmentsmayco-exist,asisoftenthecasewhenfirmsmakestrategiesforpricediscrimination.Thispromptsasellertoconsidersettingmorethanonepricelevel,asweoftenseeinreal-worldretailing,aswellasgroup-buyingauctions.

Dana(2001)pointedoutthatwhenamonopolysellerfacesuncertaintyabouttheconsumerdemandenvironment,itusuallywillnotbeinhisbestinteresttosetuniformpricesforallconsumers.Theauthorstudiedascenarioinwhichthereweremorebuyersassociatedwithhighdemandandfewerbuyersassociatedwithlowdemand.Intheauthor’sproposedpricemechanism,thesellersetsapricecurveinsteadofasingleprice,soastobeabletoofferdifferentpricesdependingonthedifferentdemandconditionsthatappeartoobtaininthemarketplace.Itmaybeusefulinsuchsettingstoemployanautomatedpricesearchingmechanism,whichisdemonstratedtobemorerobusttotheuncertaindemandthanauniformpricemechanismwill,relativetoexpectedprofits.UnlikeDana’s(2001)workthough,wewillstudysettingsinwhichtherearefewerbuyerswhoexhibitdemandathigherpricesandmorebuyerswhoexhibitdemandatlowerprices.Thisisausefulwaytocharacterizegroup-buying,sincemostparticipatingconsumerstrulyareprice-sensitive,andthisiswhatmakesgroup-buyingauctioninterestingtothem.

NockeandPeitz(2007)havestudiedrationingasatoolthatamonopolisttooptimizeitssalespolicyinthepresenceofuncertaindemand.Theauthorsexaminedthreedifferentsellingpoliciesthattheyarguearepotentiallyoptimalintheirenvironment:

uniformpricing,clearancesales,andintroductoryoffers.Auniformpricingpolicyinvolvesnosellerpricediscrimination,thoughconsumersarelikelytoexhibitdifferentlevelsofwillingness-to-paywhentheyarepermittedtoexpressthemselvesthroughpurchasesatdifferentpricelevels.AcurrentexampleofuniformpricingpolicyisiTunes,whichhasbeenoffering99¢persongpricing.Theconsumerhastodealwithverylittleuncertaintyintheprocess,andthismaybeagoodapproachwhenthesellerwantsto“train”consumerstodevelopspecificbuyinghabits(asseemstohavebeenthecasewiththeonlinepurchaseofdigitalmusicinthepastfewyears).

NockeandPeitz(2007)characterizedaclearancesalespolicyaschargingahighpriceinitially,butthenloweringthepriceandofferingtheremaininggoodstolowvalueconsumers,asisoftenseenindepartmentstoresalespolicy.Consumerswithahighvaluationforthesalegoodsmaydecidetobuyatthehighprice,sincetheendogenousprobabilityofrationingbythesellerishigheratthelowerprice.Apropostothis,consumerswhobuylateatlowpricestypicallyfindthatitisdifficulttofindthestyles,colorsandsizesthattheywant,andtheymayhavemoredifficultytocoordinatethepurchaseofmatchingitems(e.g.,matchingcolorsandstylesofclothing).Introductoryoffersconsistofsellingalimitedquantityofitemsatalowpriceinitiallyinthemarket,andthenraisingprice.Avariantoccurswhentheselleroffersalowerpriceforthefirstpurchaseofgoodsorservicesthattypicallyinvolvemultiplepurchasesbytheconsumer(e.g.,bookclubmembershipsandcellphoneservices).Consumerswhoplaceahighvaluationonasaleitemrationedinitiallyatthelowerpricemayfinditoptimaltobuythegoodsatthehigherprice.Introductoryoffersmaydominateuniformpricing,butareneveroptimalifthesellerusesclearancesales.

Inuncertainmarkets,buyerswillhaveprivateinformation.CheandGale(2000)pointedoutthatwhenconsumershaveprivateinformationabouttheirbudgetconstraintsandtheirvaluationofsalesitems,soamonopolist’soptimalpricingstrategyistoofferamenuoflotteriesonthelikelihoodofconsumerpurchasesofitsproductsatdifferentprices.Anotherapproachisintertemporalpricediscrimination.Byofferingdifferentpriceswithdifferentprobabilitiesfortheconsumertoobtainthegood,themonopolistcanprofitablysegmentconsumerseventhoughvaluationsegmentsalonearenotprofitable.

Evenwhenthesellercaneffectivelyidentifytheconsumerdemandlevelinthemarketplace,duetostochasticfactorsinthemarketenvironment,itstillmaybedifficultforthesellertoeffectivelypredictdemand.Asaresult,thesellermaytrytoimproveitsdemandforecastbyutilizingmarketsignalsthatmaybeobservedwhensalesoccur.However,therearelikelytobesomestocha

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 工程科技 > 冶金矿山地质

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1