Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:6400588 上传时间:2023-01-06 格式:DOCX 页数:18 大小:27.80KB
下载 相关 举报
Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共18页
Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共18页
Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共18页
Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共18页
Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共18页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx

《Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx(18页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailands community health centers Ap.docx

FactorsinfluencinghealthinformationtechnologyadoptioninThailandscommunityhealthcentersAp

Attitudesofnursingstafftowardselectronicpatientrecords:

Aquestionnairesurvey  OriginalResearchArticle

InternationalJournalofNursingStudies

Background

Agrowingnumberofhealthcareorganizationsareimplementingasystemofelectronicpatientrecords(EPR).Thisimpliesachangeinworkroutinesfornursingstaff,butitcouldalsoberegardedasanopportunitytoimprovethequalityofcare.

Objective

TheobjectiveofthispaperistoobtainmoreinsightintotheusefulnessofEPRasperceivedbynursingstaffandtoclarifythedeterminantsofnursingstaff'sacceptanceofEPR.DeterminantsweretestedusinganextendedversionoftheTechnologyAcceptanceModel.

Design

Nursingstaffmembers(NAsandRNs)completedasurveyquestionnaireabouttheuseofEPRinhealthcare,andtheirexperiences,perceptionsandattitudesregardingEPR.

Settings

AllnursingstaffmemberswereworkinginDutchhospitals,psychiatricorganizations,careorganizationsformentallyretardedpeople,homecareorganizations,nursinghomesorhomesfortheelderly.

Participants

ThestudypopulationisanationallyrepresentativeDutchresearchsample,furtherreferredtoastheNursingStaffPanel.ThePanelconsistsofapermanentgroupofNursingAssistants(NAs)andRegisteredNurses(RNs),whoarepreparedtofillinapostalquestionnairetwiceayearonaverage.InJanuary2009,685participantscompletedthequestionnaire.

Results

NursingstaffmembersassociateEPRwithimprovedcare,especiallyqualitativelybetterandsafercare.Theyalsoexpectanincreaseincostsofcare,whileanticipatingonlyarelativelysmallriseinthenumberofpatientsthatcanbecaredfor.Ingeneral,theeffectsofEPRontheworkcircumstancesofnursingstaffareexpectedtobenegative.Job-relatedcharacteristicswerefoundtobedeterminantsofattitudestowardsusingEPR.ArelativelypositiveattitudetowardsEPRwasfoundinthreecategoriesofnursingstaffinparticular,i.e.staffworkingatleast30 hperweek,staffalreadyusingEPRandstaffworkinginhospitals.Nursingstaffinmanagementpositionsalsotendtohaveamorepositiveattitude.WhentheTechnologyAcceptanceModelwastested,attitudestowardsEPRwereprimarilyassociatedwithjob-relatedcharacteristicsandperceivedusefulnesswithrespecttoqualityofcare.

Conclusions

TheimplementationstrategiesforEPRneedtotakeaccountofthejobcharacteristicsoftheintendedfutureusers.Ifimplementationistobesuccessful,itisimportantthattheusersunderstandthebeneficialeffectsofEPRonthequalityofcare.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

1.1.Aimofthepaper

2.Methods

2.1.Participants

2.2.Questionnaire

2.3.Statisticalanalyses

3.Results

3.1.PerceivedusefulnessofEPR

4.Discussionandconclusion

4.1.Discussionoffindings

4.2.Methodologicalconsiderations

4.3.Theoreticalimplications

4.4.Practicalimplications

4.5.Conclusion

References

CapstoneExperience:

AnalysisofanEducationalConceptforNursing  OriginalResearchArticle

JournalofProfessionalNursing

theUnitedStates,nursingeducationpreparesregisterednursesforpracticethroughgenericprogramsofstudythatvaryinlengthfrom2to4years.Allhavedifferinggraduationrequirementsandpurportedstudentoutcomes.Often,baccalaureate-preparednurseswithaliberalartsfoundationarerequiredtocompleteacomprehensive“capstoneexperience,”whichmayfacilitatedegreedifferentiationupongraduation.However,thereislittleconsensusinhighereducationregardingthedefiningaspectsofsuchanexperience.Thepurposeofthisarticleistoanalyzeandclarifytheconceptofcapstoneexperienceinthecontextofbaccalaureatenursingeducation.Usingatraditionalapproachofconceptanalysis[Walker,L.O.,&Avant,K.C.(2004).Strategiesfortheoryconstructioninnursing(4thed.).UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:

Pearson],anextensivereviewofpertinentliteraturewascompleted.Asaresult,criticalordefiningattributes,antecedents,andconsequencesofcapstoneexperiencesweredetermined.Caseexamples,includingarealmodelcase,highlighttheseaspects,andadefinitionofcapstoneexperienceisoffered.Implicationsfornursingeducation,research,andpracticeareprovided,andausefullistofevaluativecriteriaforcapstoneexperiencesispresented.

ArticleOutline

Background

Approach

IdentificationofAllPossibleUsesoftheConcept

ReviewoftheLiterature

AntecedentsandConsequences

PresentationofCases

ModelCase

BorderlineCase

ContraryCase

EmpiricalReferents

ImplicationsforNursing

Education

Research

Practice

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

References

HealthITSuccessandFailure:

RecommendationsfromLiteratureandanAMIAWorkshop  OriginalResearchArticle

JournaloftheAmericanMedicalInformaticsAssociation

WiththeUnitedStatesjoiningothercountriesinnationaleffortstoreapthemanybenefitsthatuseofhealthinformationtechnologycanbringforhealthcarequalityandsavings,soberingreportsrecallthecomplexityanddifficultiesofimplementingevensmaller-scalesystems.Despitebestpracticeresearchthatidentifiedsuccessfactorsforhealthinformationtechnologyprojects,amajority,insomesense,stillfail.Similarproblemsplagueavarietyofdifferentkindsofapplications,andhavedonesoformanyyears.TenAMIAworkinggroupssponsoredaworkshopattheAMIAFall2006Symposium.Itwasentitled“AvoidingTheF-Word:

ITProjectMorbidity,Mortality,andImmortality”andfocusedonthisunder-addressedproblem.Participantsdiscussedcommunication,workflow,andquality;thecomplexityofinformationtechnologyundertakings;theneedtointegrateallaspectsofprojects,workenvironments,andregulatoryandpolicyrequirements;andthedifficultyofgettingallthepartsandparticipantsinharmony.Whilerecognizingthattherestillaretechnicalissuesrelatedtofunctionalityandinteroperability,discussionaffirmedtheemergingconsensusthatproblemsareduetosociological,cultural,andfinancialissues,andhencearemoremanagerialthantechnical.Participantsdrewonlessonsfromexperienceandresearchinidentifyingimportantissues,actionitems,andrecommendationstoaddressthefollowing:

what“success”and“failure”mean,whatcontributestomakingsuccessfulorunsuccessfulsystems,howtousefailureasanenhancedlearningopportunityforcontinuedimprovement,howsystemsuccessesorfailuresshouldbestudied,andwhatAMIAshoulddotoenhanceopportunitiesforsuccesses.Theworkshoplaidoutaresearchagendaandrecommendedactionitems,reflectingtheconvictionthatAMIAmembersandAMIAasanorganizationcantakealeadershiproletomakeprojectsmorepracticalandlikelytosucceedinhealthcaresettings.

ArticleOutline

Introduction

WorkshopDevelopment

WorkshopThemes

What“Success”Is

WhatMakesItSoHard—Communication,Workflow,andQuality

WhatWeKnow—LessonsfromExperience

AMIAActionRecommendations

ResearchandPublication

BestPractices

Advocacy

Education

Certification

DatabasesandKnowledgeIntegration

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

References

AssessmentofMedicalImagingandComputer-AssistSystems:

LessonsfromRecentExperience  OriginalResearchArticle

AcademicRadiology

Inthelast2decadesmajoradvanceshavebeenmadeinthefieldofassessmentmethodsformedicalimagingandcomputer–assistsystemsthroughtheuseoftheparadigmofthereceiveroperatingcharacteristic(ROC)curve.Inthemostrecentdecadethismethodologywasextendedtoembracethecomplicationofreadervariabilitythroughadvancesinthemultiple–reader,multiple–case(MRMC)ROCmeasurementandanalysisparadigm.Althoughthisapproachhasbeenwidelyadoptedbytheimagingresearchcommunity,someinvestigatorsappearaversetoit,possiblyfromconcernthatitcouldplaceagreaterburdenonthescarceresourcesofpatientcasesandreaderscomparedtotherequirementsofalternativemethods.Thepresentcommunicationargues,however,thattheMRMCROCapproachtoassessmentinthecontextofreadervariabilitymaybethemostresource–efficientapproachavailable.Moreover,alternativeapproachesmayalsobestatisticallyuninterpretablewithregardtoestimatedsummarymeasuresofperformanceandtheiruncertainties.TheauthorsproposethattheMRMCROCapproachbeconsideredevenmorewidelybythelargercommunitywithresponsibilitiesfortheintroductionanddisseminationofmedicalimagingtechnologiestosociety.Generalprinciplesofstudydesignarereviewed,andimportantcontemporaryclinicaltrialsareusedasexamples.

ArticleOutline

•Background

•Industry/FDAExperiencewithDigitalMammography

•ROCAnalysis

•MRMCROCMeasurementParadigm

•MRMCROCandDigitalMammography

•TheArrivalofSystemsforComputer–AssistedReading

•InBehalfoftheIndirectDesign

•LimitationsoftheIndirectDesign

•CADforDetectionofSolitaryPulmonaryNodulesonChestFilms

•ResourceRequirements:

IndirectDesignversusMRMCROC

•BackgroundforSizingMRMCROCStudies

•FromFundamentalEssentialstoBestPractices

•FundamentalEssentials

•SomeResourcesAvailableforIndustrySponsors

•Toward“BestPractices”

•AContemporaryBias

•TheLifeCycleandtheLargerPicture

•Conclusions

•References

Nursingstudent–patientrelationship:

Experiencesofstudentsandpatients  OriginalResearchArticle

NurseEducationToday

Thisstudydealtwithnursingstudents’andpatients’experiencesoftheirrelationship.Qualitativedatawerecollectedconductingsemi-structuredinterviewswith30nursingstudentsand30patientsonmedical

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高中教育 > 高中教育

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1