企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx

企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx

《企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx（8页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字

文献出处：

Han, S. W. "ERP—Enterprise Resource Planning:

 A cost-based business case and implementation assessment." Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 14.3 （2014）:

 239-256.

（声明：

本译文归XX文库所有，完整译文请到XX文库。

）

原文

ERP—EnterpriseResourcePlanning:

Acost-basedbusinesscaseandimplementationassessment

S.W.Han

Hi-TechConsultingCenter,LGCNSCo.,Ltd.,8F,PrimeTower

#10–1,Hoehyun-dong,2-ga,Jung-gu,Seoul,100–630,Korea

Abstract

Thisarticleprovidesthekeyfactorsthatarecriticaltothesuccessfulimplementationofenterpriseresourceplanning（ERP）.ItreportstheresultsofastudycarriedouttoassessanumberofdifferentERPimplementationsindifferentorganizations.Acasestudymethodofinvestigationwasused,andtheexperiencesoffivemanufacturingcompaniesweredocumented.Also,thisstudyexploresandproposesanERPsystemselectionprocessandacost-basedbusinesscaseapproach.ThecriticalfactorsintheadoptionofERPareidentifiedaslearningfromtheexperiencesofothers,appointingaprocessinnovator,establishingcommitteesandprojectteams,trainingandprovidingtechnicalsupportfortheusers,andimplementingappropriatechangestotheorganizationalstructureandmanagerialresponsibilities.FormoreeffectiveERPimplementations,weadvisebuildingasupportivecultureandenvironmentwithastrongemphasisonhumanandorganizationalaspects. 

1.INTRODUCTION

Throughoutthe1990s,mostlargeindustrialcompaniesinstalledenterpriseresourceplanning（ERP）systems;thatis,massivecomputerapplicationsallowingabusinesstomanageallofitsoperations（finance,requirementsplanning,humanresources,andorderfulfillment）onthebasisofasingle,integratedsetofcorporatedata.ERPpromisedhugeimprovementsinefficiency;forexample,shorterintervalsbetweenorderandpayments,lowerback-officestaffrequirements,reducedinventory,andimprovedcustomerservice.Encouragedbythesepossibilities,businessesaroundtheworldinvestedsome$300billioninERPduringthedecade（Dorien&Malcolm,2000）.

Whatmostattractedmanyachiefinformationofficerwastheopportunitytoreplaceatangleofcomplex,disparate,andobsolescentapplicationswithasingleY2K-compliantsystemfromareputableandstablevendor;oneKoreanmajoroilcompany,forexample,managedtoswitchoff70oldsystemswhenERPwentlive.ByenteringcustomerandsalesdatainanERPsystem,amanufacturercangeneratethenextcycle’sdemandforecast,whichinturngeneratesordersforrawmaterials,productionschedules,timetablesforshifts,andfinancialprojectionswhilekeepingclosetrackofinventory.

AstheadoptionofERPhasincreasedbymanufacturingfirms,sohastheresearchbyacademicsandresearchersintoallaspectsofusingtheseinformationtechnologies,coveringplanning,implementation,integration,management,andexploitation（Lee&Lee,2000;Parr&Shanks,2000;Sumner,2000）.Someexamplesofthesestudiesinclude:

astudyofERPin20BritishcompaniesbyCurrie（1996）,astudyof95informationsystemsbyJaikumar（1997）inNorthAmerica,andastudyofERPandotherinformationsystemsintheUnitedKingdombyBessantandHaywood（1999）.

PreviousfieldstudiesexaminingERPimplementationshavefoundthatexpectationsofERPwillnotbebroughttofruitionunlessaholisticapproachistakeninplanning,acquiring,implementing,andexploiting.Oneofthecriticalissuestobeconsideredinthedecisionmakingprocessisthatthelinkbetweentheinformationsystemandbusinessstrategymustrelatetothecompetitiveprioritiesandthepositioningoftheorganization.Thechoiceofinformationsystem,forwhichmanyoptionsexist,mustbedrivenby,andcloselyalignedwith,thebroaderframeworkofcompetitivepositioningdecisions.Thebasicquestion“Howdowecompete?

”mustbeansweredbeforeinformationsysteminvestmentdecisionsaremade.Therefore,thisarticlehasthreedistinctiveparts.ThefirstdescribesERPsystemselectionprocessinimplementation,thesecondaddressesacost-basedapproachtothebusinesscase,andthelastprovidesthekeyfactorsthatarecriticaltothesuccessfulimplementationofERP.Inthelastpart,theexperiencesoffiveKoreanorganizationsthataredoptedERPinrecentyearsareanalyzed.AcasestudyapproachwasusedtoexplorehereasonsforadoptingtheERP,planningandimplementationissues,benefitsachieved,andthelimitationsanddifficultiesassociatedwiththeERP.

2.ERPSYSTEMSELECTIONPROCESS

ERPsystemsofferpervasivebusinessfunctionality.Becauseofthispervasiveness,implementationshaverangedfromgreatsuccessestocompletefailures.Therefore,adviceisfrequentlysoughtinselectingsystems.However,wehaveconcludedthatthereisnosystemthatisbestforallcompanies,butratherthereisaprocessyoucangothroughtofindtherightsystemforyourcompany.Theprocessstartswithassemblingacompetentprojectteam,addressingbusinessneeds,exploringalternatives,developingcriteria,andmakinginformedjudgmentsthatleadtoasuccessfulsystem.

3.ACOST-BASEDBUSINESSCASEAPPROACH

ManycompaniesfindERPsystemshelpthemmakebetter-informeddecisions.Othersdiscovertoolatethattheirpurchasehasbeenbasedmoreonfaiththangoodjudgment,andrunuptensorevenhundredsofmillionsofdollarsinextracostsandscheduledelays（Sethi&King,1994）.How,then,canseniormanagersensurethattheircompaniesbuildasoundbusinesscasefordeployingERPsystems?

Andwhatcantheydotoguaranteethatthepromisedbenefitsarenoteclipsedbythecostsofintegration,processredesign,andtraining?

Oneansweristotakeacost-basedapproachtothebusinesscase.

Hardreturns,suchasreducedheadcountresultingfromstreamlinedoperations,aresimpletopredictandcontrolbutareonlypartofthepicture.Softreturns,suchasrevenueoremployeeproductivitygains,areneithereasytopredictnorunderacompany’sdirectcontrol（Gorry&Morton,1971）.TheproblemisacommononeinevaluatingITinvestments（Dempsey,Dvorak,Holen,Mark,&Meehan,1998）.

InthecaseofERPsystems,thelengthofthepaybackperiodandthesizeoftheinvestmentneeded—intermsofbothcashandhumanresources—makeitunwisetoassessaprojectonanythingbutahard-returnsbasis.ThisisnottosuggestthatanERPsystemcannothelpacompanyboostrevenue,orthatemployeescannotlearntobecomemoreproductivewiththeaidofasuperiormanagementinformationsystem.ButthedifficultyandexpenseofdeployingERPmeanthatmostcompaniesshouldappraisesuchaninvestmentpurelyintermsofitspotentialtocutcosts.

4.THEKEYFACTORSFORSUCCESSFULERPIMPLEMENTATION

4.1.OverviewofCaseStudy

Thefiveorganizationsinvolvedinthisstudywerechosenafterpreliminarydiscussionwiththecompanycontactconcerningtheaimsandobjectivesoftheresearchproject.Potentialcompaniesforparticipationinthestudywereinitiallyidentifiedthroughvarioussources;thatis,suggestionsbyfacultyandstaffmembers,existingongoingpersonalcontactswithlocalcompaniesmanagers,newcontactsmadewithcompanyrepresentativesparticipatinginconferencesandseminars,andpublicityofthecompany’snewlyacquiredinformationsysteminthemedia.

4.2.FieldInterviews

Basedontheauthor’spreviousresearchinERP（Park&Han,2002;Sohaletal.,2000）andtheliterature,aninterviewquestionnairewasdevelopedandusedinfieldinterviews.Theinterviewguide（questionnaire）focusestheinquiryproceduresandensuresreasonablyconsistentinquiryproceduresatallsites（Gosse,1993）.Severalvisitsweremadetoeachcompany.Duringtheinitialmeetingwithseniormanagement（typicallythemanagingdirector,generalmanager,orplanmanager）,theaimsandobjectivesoftheresearchprojectweredescribedanddiscussedinsomedetail.Discussionwithseniormanagementfocusedonissuessuchastheoverallstrategyoftheorganization,thebasisofcompetitiveadvantage,competition,thecompany’sperformanceinrelationtothedimensionsofcompetitiveness,reasonsforimplementingtheparticularinformationsystem,theirroleinplanningandimplementationoftheinformationsystem,andthebenefitoftheinformationsystemtotheorganization.

4.3.ResultandSummary

Thetapedinterviewsweretranscribedandwrittenupintheformofcasestudies.Thisprocesstookaconsiderableamountoftimeaseachcasestudywentthroughanumberofdrafts,sometimesgoingbacktothecompaniesforfurtherdetailsorreplayingthetapedinterviews.Thecasestudieswerethensenttothecompanycontactforverificationandpermissionforgeneraluseinpublications.

Thewrittencasestudieswerethenusedtounderstandthefollowing:

Competitiveprioritiesandcompanygoals;

Reasonsforadoptingthenewinformationsystem;

Planningandimplementationprocedures/issues;

BenefitsachievedfromtheERPinvestment;

ThedifficultiesandlimitationsassociatedwithadoptingtheERP.

Theresultsofthisanalysisarepresentedbelowundereachoftheaboveheadings.

5.LIMITATIONSOFTHESTUDY

ThisstudyisthefirstattempttodiscussanddescribeexperiencesofERPimplementationinKorea.ThefindingsandresultsarepracticalratherthantheoreticalbecausetheparticipantsofthesurveyareactuallyERPusers.Inspiteofthisstrength,thestudyhasweaknesses.Somelimitationsoriginatedfromtheapproachofourresearch.First,wehadtorelyontheretrospectiveexperiencesoftherespondents.Itmaybearguedthatrespondentviewsmightbebiased.Second,oursamplesarelimitedtoKorea.Therefore,generalconclusionsmustbemadewithcaution.Additionally,theimplementationo