英语论文评语大全.docx
《英语论文评语大全.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《英语论文评语大全.docx（9页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。
英语论文评语大全
英语论文评语大全
英语论文评语大全
【篇一：
英语作文评语大全】
英语作文激励性评语大全
一、宏观性评价
1.整体印象类评语
super！
excellent！
perfect！
wonderful！
fantastic！
marvelous！
采用整体印象类评语对于起始阶段的学生有较好的激励作用，但若千篇一律使用此类评语，就会使学生无法正确认识自己的写作水平，最终导致教师的评语失去应有的作用。
2.规范导知类评语
beautiful.clear.wonderful.goodhand-writing.
you’recarefulofusingpronunciation.
gladtoseeyourimprovementinhandwriting.
i’mexpectingclearer/morebeautifulhand-writingfromyounexttime.you’dbetterpaymoreattentiontowordorder.
betterbemorecarefulofyourspelling.
it’simportanttocomposeagraftbeforehand.
3.情感调控类评语
iappreciateyourhandwriting.
youhaveagoodknowledgeofenglishproverbs.
youarequiteawareofmakingmeaningfulsentences.
youarericherthanothersincollectingandusingtypicalsentencesandidioms.
i’mexpectinggreaterprogressfromyouinwriting.comeon.
ifyouneedmyhelp,neverhesitatetocometome.
警句：
hardworkleadstosuccess.
nottoadvanceistogoback.
nooneiswithoutfaults.
keepingisharderthanwinning.keepitup.
二、微观写作技能方面的评语
1.专项点拨类评语
it’spropertousetheproverbinpara.2quiteclever.
youaregoodatusingattributiveclausesinyourwriting.
the“struck”sentenceisperfectlyused.
you’dbetteruse“thirdperson”inthefirstpara.
it’sgoodtousethepasttenseinyourwriting.
2.佳句欣赏类评语
教师可以在句尾统一标注赞美性的符号（如e—excellent）或标识不同星级等。
whatawonderfulsentenceusing“cover”.
it’sreallycleverofyoutousethisbeautifulsentence.
theinvertedsentenceiswellwtitten.
3.谋篇布局类评语
agoodbeginning.
aperfectending.
well-organized.perfectly-expanded.
thefirstpara.makesagoodbeginning.
thelastpara.makesaperfectending.
allthepointshavebeencovered.
it’scleverofyoutouseatopicsentenceatthebeginningofapara.it’swonderfultouseproperconjunctionsbetweensentences.
youaregoodatdevelopingpara.
youhavemadegreatprogressindevelopingpassage.
iamgladtoseethesentenceconherenceinyourlastpara.
betterpaymoreattentiontotherelationshipbetweensentences.it’sreallywonderfultostart/endyoursentenceswithadverbials.
在起始年级应侧重对学生写作行为规范的引领，重在对学生进行词语方面的引导；对高年级学生则应侧重对文章的结构、行文的逻辑、句子的变化等方面的指点和引导。
虽然这些评语对我们大部分学生来说不太适合，以为他们连老师评他们什么都看不懂，但我们平时对作文的批改确实没做到这么仔细，有很大启发。
备注：
此文引自豆丁网！
【篇二：
英文论文审稿意见汇总】
英文论文审稿意见汇总
以下12点无轻重主次之分。
每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。
1、目标和结果不清晰。
itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
◆ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalme
thodsusedinthestudy.
◆furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：
theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshow
ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：
ahypothesisneedstobepresented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：
whatwastherationaleforthefilm/sbfvolumeratio?
7、对研究问题的定义：
trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,
writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:
thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.
9、对claim,如a＞b的证明，verification:
thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.
10、严谨度问题：
mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.
11、格式（重视程度）：
◆inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.◆beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedand
formatted.ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheinstructionsandformsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.
12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：
有关语言的审稿人意见：
◆itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.◆theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.
◆aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.therearepro
blemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.
◆theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedi
nenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.
◆pleasehavesomeonecompetentintheenglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit.?
◆thequalityofenglishneedsimproving.
来自编辑的鼓励：
encouragementfromreviewers:
◆iwouldbeverygladtore-reviewthepaperingreaterdepthonceithasbe
eneditedbecausethesubjectisinteresting.
◆thereiscontinuedinterestinyourmanuscripttitled……whichyousubm
ittedtothejournalofbiomedicalmaterialsresearch:
partb-appliedbiomat
erials.
◆thesubmissionhasbeengreatlyimprovedandisworthyofpublication.
老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见
ms.ref.no.:
******
title:
******
materialsscienceandengineering
deardr.******,
reviewershavenowcommentedonyourpaper.youwillseethattheyareadvisingthatyoureviseyourmanuscript.ifyouarepreparedtoundertaketheworkrequired,iwouldbepleasedtoreconsidermydecision.
foryourguidance,reviewerscommentsareappendedbelow.
reviewer#1:
thisworkproposesanextensivereviewonmicromulsion-basedmethodsforthesynthesisofagnanoparticles.assuch,thematterisofinterest,howeverthepapersuffersfortwoseriouslimits:
1）theoverallqualityoftheenglishlanguageisratherpoor;
2）somefiguresmustbeselectedfrompreviousliteraturetodiscussalsothesynthesisofanisotropicallyshapedagnanoparticles（thereareseveralexamplespublished）,whichhasbeenlargelyoverlookedthroughoutthepaper.;
oncetheaboveconcernsarefullyaddressed,themanuscriptcouldbeacceptedforpublicationinthisjournal
这是一篇全过程我均比较了解的投稿，稿件的内容我认为是相当不错的，中文版投稿于业内有较高影响的某核心期刊，并很快得到发表。
其时我作为审稿人之一，除了提出一些修改建议外，还特建议了5篇应增加的参考文献，该文正式发表时共计有参考文献25篇。
作者或许看到审稿意见还不错，因此决意尝试向美国某学会主办的一份英文刊投稿。
几经修改和补充后，请一位英文“功底较好的中国人翻译，投稿后约3周，便返回了三份审稿意见。
从英文刊的反馈意见看，这篇稿件中最严重的问题是文献综述和引用不够，其次是语言表达方面的欠缺，此外是论证过程和结果展示形式方面的不足。
感想：
一篇好的论文，从内容到形式都需要精雕细琢。
附1：
中译审稿意见
审稿意见—1
（1）英文表达太差，尽管意思大致能表达清楚，但文法错误太多。
（2）文献综述较差，观点或论断应有文献支持。
（3）论文读起来像是xxx的广告，不知道作者与xxx是否没有关联。
（4）该模式的创新性并非如作者所述，目前有许多xx采取此模式（如美国地球物理学会），作者应详加调查并分析xxx运作模式的创新点。
（5）该模式也不是作者所说的那样成功……（审稿人结合论文中的数据具体分析）
审稿意见—2
（1）缺少直接相关的文献引用（如…）。
（2）写作质量达不到美国学术期刊的标准。
审稿意见—3
（1）作者应着重指出指出本人的贡献。
（2）缺少支持作者发现的方法学分析。
（3）需要采用表格和图件形式展示（数据）材料。
附2：
英文审稿意见（略有删节）
reviewer:
1
therearemanythingswrongwiththispaper.
theenglishisverybad.althoughthemeaningisbyandlargeclear,nottoomanysentencesarecorrect.
theliteraturereviewispoor.thepaperisriddledwithassertionsandclaimsthatshouldbesupportedbyreferences.
thepaperreadsasanadvertisementforxxx.itisnotclearthattheauthorisindependentofxxx.
theaamodelofxxxisnotasinnovativeastheauthorclaims.therearenowmanyxxthatfollowthismodel（americangeophysicalunion,forexample）,andtheauthorshouldsurveythesemodeltoseewhichonefirstintroducedtheelementsofthexxxmodel.
themodelisalsonotassuccessfulastheauthorclaims.……
overall,thepresentationandthecontentsofthepapercanonlymeanthatirejectthatthepaperberejected.
reviewer:
2
thearetwomajorproblemswiththispaper:
（1）itismissingthecontextof（andcitationsto）whatisnowknowasthetwo-sidedmarketliteratureincludingthatdirectlyrelatedto…（e.g.braunstein,jasis1977;economideskatsanakas,mgt.sci.,2006;mccabesnyder,b.e.
jeconanalysis,2007）.
（2）thewritingqualityisnotuptothestandardofausscholarlyjournal.reviewer:
3
1.theauthorshouldaccentuatehiscontributionsinthismanuscript.
2.itlacksanalyticalmethodologiestosupportauthor’sdiscoveries.
3.descriptionstylemateriallikethismanuscriptrequiresstructuredtablesfiguresforbetterpresentations.
ourjpcapaperwerepeerreviewedbytworeviewers,andtheircommentsareasfollows:
thecommentsbythefirstreviewer
editor:
michaela.duncan
reviewer:
68
manuscriptnumber:
jp067440i
manuscripttitle:
restrictedgeometryoptimization,adifferentwaytoestimatestabilizationenergiesforaromaticmoleculesofvarioustypes
correspondingauthor:
yu
recommendation:
thepaperisprobablypublishable,butshouldbereviewedagaininrevisedformbeforeitisaccepted.
additionalcomments:
inthepresentworktheauthorsintroduceanewenergy-basedaromaticitymeasure.referredasrestrictedgeometryoptimization,theextra
stabilizationenergy（ese）iscalculatedbymeansofanenergyschemeinwhichthedifferentdoublebondsarelocalized.thismethodologyisappliedtodifferentsetsofaromaticsystems,andtheresultsarecomparedtopreviousalreadyexistingschemes.thisprocedureseemstoworkbetterthanpreviousones,howeveritmustbeunderlinedthatwithamuchgreatercomplexity.itavoids
升级会员 