Nike 海外剥削以及血汗工厂的探讨.docx
《Nike 海外剥削以及血汗工厂的探讨.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Nike 海外剥削以及血汗工厂的探讨.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![Nike 海外剥削以及血汗工厂的探讨.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-12/13/d20b7eba-2f67-4b7e-8c93-80ebe8181c3e/d20b7eba-2f67-4b7e-8c93-80ebe8181c3e1.gif)
Nike海外剥削以及血汗工厂的探讨
Nike’sOverseaExploitation
AndEthicDiscussion
EthicandLawPaper
Dr.SueMota
November15,2011
LinhuiLiu
Introduction
Withthedevelopmentofglobaleconomy,industriesandserviceswerehighlydiversifiedinlastcentury.BecausemoreandmorecompanieswereestablishedaftertheIndustrialRevolution,moreemployeeswereneededandtherelationshipbetweenemployeesandemployerswaschangedfrompersonal-relationshiptocontractualrelationship.Intheproductionprocess,employerspursuethemaximumprofitwhichiscausedbysellingmoreproductionandcuttingtheaveragecost.However,employeesseekmaximumpayment,safeworkingenvironment,appropriatepressure,andgoodwelfaresystemtoprotecttheirrightsinthefuture.Thisdifferenceofgoalsbetweentwopartiesarousesthecontradictionbetweenthetwoparties;andthechangetotheirrelationshipsharpenedit.Becauseofthis,exploitationappeared.Exploitationisthatcertainpersonsarebeingmistreatedorunfairlyusedforthebenefitofothers(Arneson1992,p350),andexistsinmanyfields.Inthispaper,Ifocusontheeconomicexploitationwhichcanbeconcludedastheactofusinganotherperson'slaborwithoutofferingthemanadequatecompensation.
Onemployers’aspect,theywanttopaytheleastsalariesandtoprovidethecheapestdietandtheshabbiestplanttotheiremployees,becausetheycanreducetheirexpensesinthisway.Thisisalsowhatemployersalwaysdo.Theyhavethesignificantamountofresourcestocontrolemployeesbyprovidingjobs.Inresult,regulationsandlegislationswereestablishedtoprotecttheweakbythefederalgovernment.
Inthispaper,IwillfocusonthelawissuesintheU.S.aboutprotectingemployees’rights,andintroducetheFairLaborStandardsAct(FLSA),theOccupationalSafetyandHealthAct(OSHA),andtheEmploymentRetirementIncomeSecurityAct(ERISA).ThefactofexploitationbytheNikeCompanywhichistheleadofthesportsproductsindustrywillbepresentedasanexampletoextendethicdiscussionbasedonthefederallaw.Moreover,IwillalsofocusontheInternationallawstoprotectoversealaborersthatareincompaniesofU.S.Today’slabormarketisbroaderthanitwasinpast1or2decades.Domesticlawissuesmustbecertaintoprotectallemployeeswhichincludestheyarefromothercountries.BasedonNike’sexploitationinAsia,IwillillustratetheimportanceoftheInternationalprotection,whatthegovernmentdidtoprotectoverseaemployees,andwhatothercompaniescanlearnfromthisexperience.
FederalLawstoProtectEmployees’Rights
Inthepast50years,thefederalgovernmentpassedtheseriesoflegislationsaffectingemployeerights.TheyareWorker’sCompensationLaws,SocialSecurityAct,FairLaborStandardsAct(FLSA),EqualPayAct,OccupationalSafetyandHealthAct(OSHA),EmploymentRetirementIncomeSecurityAct(ERISA),andFamilyandMedicalLeaveAct(Jennings,2006,p742).Inthispaper,IwillpaymoreattentiontotheFLSA,OSHA,andERISAandbrieflyintroducetheotherlawsandacts.
TheFairLaborStandardsAct(FLSA)isalwayscalledthe“WagesandHoursBill”.Inanotherwords,itestablishesaminimumwage,andalsoinvolveslawstoregulatechildlabor,overtimepayrequirements,andequalpayprovisions(Jennings,2006,p742).
AccordingtoTheFairLaborStandardsActof1938,asamended(2011),
(a)TheCongressfindsthattheexistence,inindustriesengagedincommerceorintheproductionofgoodsforcommerce,oflaborconditionsdetrimentaltothemaintenanceoftheminimumstandardoflivingnecessaryforhealth,efficiency,andgeneralwell-beingofworkers
(b)Itisdeclaredtobethepolicyofthischapter,throughtheexercisebyCongressofitspowertoregulatecommerceamongtheseveralStatesandwithforeignnations,tocorrectandasrapidlyaspracticabletoeliminatetheconditionsabovereferredtoinsuchindustrieswithoutsubstantiallycurtailingemploymentorearningpower.
ItillustratesthattheCongresshasthepowerandenforcementtoregulatecompaniesandinstitutionstogivetheiremployees’basicrightswhichareincludedintheFLSA.TheCongressalsoestablishestheminimumwage;anditisraisednotperiodically,dependingonthedevelopmentofeconomic.
AllemployeesinbusinessesthataffectinterstatecommercearecoveredbytheFLSAmustbepaidaminimumwage.However,therearesomeexemptions:
ØIndependentcontractors
ØAgriculture,fishing,anddomesticservice
ØWhite-collarmanagement
ØExecutive,administrative,andprofessionalpeople
BasedonexpressionsofJennings(2006),independentcontractorsarethosewhoworkonajobbasis,workirregularhours,andarenotsupervisedbytheemployer.Forexample,sometypistshiredandpaidonaper-jobbasis(perpaperorperhundredwords)areindependentcontractors.Theso-called“white-collar”employeesareconsideredwithsufficienttraining,knowledge,andexperiencetocountertheiremployerunfairness(p758).
TheFLSAalsoincludesregulationstoprotectcoveredemployees’workinghours.Itregulatesthattheworkinghoursforacoveredemployeeare40hoursperweek.Italsoregulatesthewageforthehourworkedabove40hoursperweekis1.5timesoftheregularwage.Althoughthepayperiodforcoveredemployeesisdifferentfromeachcompany,overtimeiscalculatedonthebasisof40hoursperweek.
IfacompanyorinstitutionviolatestheFLSA,thecorporationisliableandofficersofthecorporationcanbeheldindividuallyliableforthecorporation’sviolations.Thefinesofviolationareamaximum$10,000forthefirsttime;and$10,000fineandorsix-monthimprisonmentforthesecondtime.Employeescannotbefiredforreportingviolations.(Jennings,2006,p744)
AsanamendmenttotheFLSA,theEqualPayActof1963“makesitillegaltopaydifferentwagesbasedongendertomenandwomenwhoaredoingsubstantiallythesamework”(Jennings,2006,p745).Thisactprotectswomenfrombeingdiscriminatedinworkplaces.
Tokeepworkersworkinginasafeworkplace,theOccupationalSafetyandHealthAct(OSHA)waspassedbyCongressin1970.ItprotectsthoroughlyeveryemployeewhoseemployerhasoneormoreemployeesintheU.S.Therewerethreeagenciesestablishedtoenforcetheworkersafetystandards:
theOccupationalSafetyandHealthAdministration(OSHA),theOccupationalSafetyandHealthReviewCommission(OSHRC),andtheNationalInstituteforOccupationalSafetyandHealth(NIOSH).TheOSHAisapartoftheDepartmentofLabor,anditisresponsibletoimprovesafetystandardsandenforcethembyinspections,citations,andcourtactions.BothOSHAandOSHRCpaymoreattentiontothecommonissuesofequipmentuseandprotectivegear.NIOSHusuallyfocusesonworkplacesafetyissues(Jennings,2006,p745).
ThedutiesandresponsibilitiesofOHSAare:
ØPostemployeerightsandpromulgateworkplacesafetyregulations
ØRequireprotectivegear
ØKeeprecordsofinjuries
ØReportfatalitiesandhazardsmaycauseemployeesinjury
ØPostOSHAcitations
ØInspections
Forexample,underthewebsiteofOHSA(2011),theemployees’rightsarepresented:
Workers'rightsundertheOSHAct
Workersareentitledtoworkingconditionsthatdonotposeariskofseriousharm.Tohelpassureasafeandhealthfulworkplace,OSHAalsoprovidesworkerswiththerightto:
∙AskOSHAtoinspecttheirworkplace;
∙Usetheirrightsunderthelawwithoutretaliationanddiscrimination;
∙Receiveinformationandtrainingabouthazards,methodstopreventharm,andtheOSHAstandardsthatapplytotheirworkplace.Thetrainingmustbeinalanguageyoucanunderstand;
∙Getcopiesoftestresultsdonetofindhazardsintheworkplace;
∙Reviewrecordsofwork-relatedinjuriesandillnesses;
∙Getcopiesoftheirmedicalrecords;
AccordingtothewebsiteofOHSA’sstatistics(2011),the“establishedinjuryandillnessdata”and“theworkplaceinjury,illnessandfatalitiesstatistics”foreverystateintheU.S.canalsobefound.Forexamplethefollowingtableisthedataofthehighestincidenceratesoftotalnonfataloccupationalinjuryandillnesscases,2010:
Theincidentratefordifferentindustrycanbefiguredouteasily.
OSHAinspectionsareefficienttoolstoenforce.“Inspectorscanentertheworkplace‘withoutdelayandatareasonabletime’toinspect”(Jennings,2006,p747).Thefollowingaspectsaretheprioritiesoninspections:
ØHazardsorconditionsthatcouldcausedeath
ØEmployeecomplaints
ØInvestigationsoffatalaccidentsites
ØParticularlyhazardousindustries
ØRandominspectionsincorporatinganemphasisoncertaintypesofindustries(roofing,lumbering,meatpacking,transportation[car,truck]manufacturing,andlongshoring)(Jennings,2006,p747)
ThepenaltiesforvarioustypesofOSHAviolationsaredifferent,itisillustratedindetailbyJennings(2006,p747).ThesummaryofOSHApenaltiesisasfollows:
Typeofoffense
Description
Penalty
Willful
Employerawareofdangerorarepeatviolator
Upto$70,000(notlessthan$5,000)and/orsixmonthsimprisonment$7,000
Serious
Violationisathreattolifeorcouldcauseseriousinjury
$7,000
Nonserious
Nothreatofseriousinjury
Upto$7,000
Deminimis
Failuretopostrights
Upto$7,000perviolation
Failuretocorrect
Citationnotfollowed
$7,000perday
EmployeeimpairmentandtestingissueisanothercomponentoftheOccupationalSafetyandHealthAct.Thisissueisconcernedofthesafetyproblemcausedbyimpairedcoworkersintheworkplace.However,itisnotthemainaspectwhatwillbediscussedinthispaper.
Anotherproblemofworkersishowtheycangetmoneywhentheyretire.BasedontheFederalInsur