人民币国际化外文文献及文献综述.docx
《人民币国际化外文文献及文献综述.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《人民币国际化外文文献及文献综述.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
![人民币国际化外文文献及文献综述.docx](https://file1.bdocx.com/fileroot1/2022-12/7/be282540-4eb3-4b2a-8ecd-9919b2b3be52/be282540-4eb3-4b2a-8ecd-9919b2b3be521.gif)
人民币国际化外文文献及文献综述
本份文档包含:
关于该选题的外文文献、文献综述
一、外文文献
标题:
TheinternationalizationoftheRMB,capitalmarketopenness,andfinancialreformsinChina
作者:
Aizenman,Joshua
期刊:
BOFITDiscussionPapers
卷:
4;期:
1;页:
4-26;年份:
2015
TheinternationalizationoftheRMB,capitalmarketopenness,andfinancialreformsinChina
Abstract
ThispaperprovidesanoverviewofChinesefinancialandtradeintegrationinrecentdecades,andthechallengesfacingChinainthecomingyears.Chinahadbeenaprimeexampleofexport-ledgrowth,benefitingfromlearningbydoing,andbyadoptingforeignknow-how,supportedbyacomplexindustrialpolicy.Whiletheresultantgrowthhasbeenspectacular,itcomeswithhiddenbutgrowingcostsanddistortions.TheChineseexportedgrowthpathhasbeenchallengedbyitsownsuccess,andtheGlobalFinancialCrisisforcedChinatowardrebalancing,whichisaworkinprogress.ReflectingontheinternationalizationoftheCNY,oneexpectstherapidacceleratingofthecommercialinternationalizationoftheCNY.Incontrast,therearenoclear-cutreasonstorushwiththefullCNYfinancialinternationalization:
ThegainsfromCNYfinancialinternationalizationareoverrated.
Keywords:
exportledgrowth,CNYinternationalization,mercantilism,financialintegration,FDI.
ThispaperoverviewstheChinesefinancialandtradeintegrationinrecentdecades.WestartbyevaluatingthehistoryofChinesegrowth-cum-financialpolicies,arguingthattheexport-ledgrowthofChinawasahighlysuccessfulpolicy,ashasbeenvividlyillustratedbytheunprecedentedcatchingupofChinesesizewiththeU.S.[eitherincurrentdollaroradjustedforPPP].Yet,theremarkablesuccessofthisprocesssoweditsend,andtheneedforChinatorebalanceitseconomy.Looking
forward,wepointoutthelogicofsequencingfinancialreforms.WhileoneexpectstherapidaccelerationofcommercialinternationalizationoftheCNY,andthegrowinguseofCNYinthesphereofChinesecommercialandoutwardFDItransactions,therearenoclear-cutreasonstorushwiththefullCNYinternationalization.ChancesarethatthegainsfromarapidCNYfinancialinternationalizationareoverrated,andignoringthedownsidesofthisprocesswouldbetoChinese(andprobablyglobal)peril.
1Thebuoyant2000s
Chinahasbeenaprimeexampleofexport-ledgrowth,benefitingfromlearningbydoing,andbyadoptingforeignknow-how,supportedbyacomplexindustrialpolicy.Thispolicyhasbeencharacterizedbycontrolledopenness,andinternalfinancialrepression.Thefinancialrepressionhastaxedthesavinginterestrate,allowingprimeborrowers,includingtheChinesestate-ownedenterprise(SOE),elasticaccesstocheapandsustainablefunding.FDIhasbeenwelcome,subjecttoChina'srulesofthegame.TheserulesleveragedthecarrotofChinesemarketsizeandcheaplabor,inducingtheforeigninvestortooperateinChinainjointventurepartnershipwithChineseproducers(Holmesetal.2013).Theoutcomehasbeenrapidlearningbydoingandtransferofknow-howandtherapidclimbofChinaontheladderofindustrialsophistication,challengingforeignproducersintheChineseandthird-countrymarketsdowntheroad.1
Arguably,amodemversionofmercantilismhasbeenatwork(AizenmanandLee2007,2008).TherapidgrowthandthegrowingtradeandcurrentaccountsurplusesasafractionoftheGDPhasoccurredintandemwithmassivehoardingofinternationalreserves(IR)combinedwithmassivesterilizationofexpendingtradesurplusesandfinancialinflows.Thesepoliciesaimedatdelayingandslowingtherealappreciationassociatedwithsuccessfulrapidgrowth.Whiletheresultantgrowthhasbeenspectacular,itcomeswithhidden,butgrowing,costsanddistortions.Figure1,inthetoppanel,providesdiamondchartsnapshotsofChinesegeneralizedtrilemmaconfiguration:
Financialintegration(leftwardfromthediamond'scenter),Monetaryindependence(verticallyupwardfromthediamond'scenter),Exchangeratestability
(rightwardfromthediamond'scenter),andIR/GDP(verticallydownwardfromthediamond'scenter).ThefirstthreescalesarecapturingMundell'sopeneconomytrilemmaconfigurations,normalizedbetween0and1(Aizenman,Chinn,andIto2010).TheIR/GDPaimsatcapturingthegrowinguseofinternationalreservestobufferagainstfinancialinstability.ThechartexhibitstheremarkablestabilityoftheChineseexchangerateduringthe1990sandthe2000s,bufferedbyrapidincreasesinIR/GDP,whilemaintainingcontrolledfinancialintegrationandmonetaryindependence.Figure1alsoputsChineseexperienceinthecontextoftheaverageexperienceofemergingAsia[excludingChina]andemergingLatinAmericaduringthesamedecades(themiddleandthelowerpanel,respectively).ThechartsvalidatethegreaterfocusofChineseexperienceonexchangeratestabilityandIRhoarding,whileoverallmaintaininglimitedfinancialintegrationrelativetootheremergingmarkets.
Intherun-uptothefinancialcrisis,theworldeconomywascharacterizedbyenormouscurrent-accountimbalances(Figure2).China'ssurplusalonewas0.7%ofworldGDPin2008,whiletheUnitedStateshadadeficitofmorethan1%ofworldGDPthatyear.Thecurrentaccountbalancesoftheworld'ssurpluscountries(e.g.,China,Germany,Japan,oilexporters)exceeded2.5%ofglobalGDPin2008,co-fundingthecurrentaccountbalancesoftheworld'sdeficitcountries,mostlytheUnitedStates,non-Asianemergingmarkets,andtheEuroareaexcludingGermany.
Intheearly2000s,somesuggestedlargeimbalancescouldbesustainedfortheforeseeablefuture.Dooley,Folkerts-Landau,andGarber(2003,2005)arguedanAsianperiphery,primarilyChina,couldpursueadevelopmentstrategyofexport-ledgrowthsupportedbyundervaluedexchangeratesandcapitalcontrolsformanyyears.LargecurrentaccountsurplusesandofficialcapitaloutflowsintheformofaccumulatedreserveassetclaimsontheUnitedStateswouldcharacterizetheAsianperipheryforperhapsadecadeormore.Moreover,thestrategywasa"win"forthecenter(e.g.,theUnitedStates)aswell,sincevirtuallyunlimiteddemandforitsfinancialassetswouldallowittorunlargecurrentaccountdeficits,livingbeyonditsmeansforyears.
Atsomepoint,theAsianperipherywouldgrowsufficientlytograduatetothecenter.Itwouldthenundertakefinancialliberalizationandadoptgreaterexchange-rateflexibility.Butwhenthathappened,anothersetofdevelopingcountrieswouldstepforwardtobecomethenewperiphery,pursuingthesameexport-ledgrowthstrategyagainstthecenterashadChinaandtheAsianperiphery,andbeforethem,post-warEuropeandJapan.Asaresult,globalimbalances,withtheperipheryrunninglargecurrent-accountsurplusesandthecenterlargecurrent-accountdeficits,wouldbearegularfeatureoftheinternationalmonetarysystemforyearstocome.Dooleyetal.(2005)providedanassetmarketinterpretationofthewin-winviewofglobalimbalances:
U.S.deficitssuppliedinternationalcollateraltopoorercountriesontheperipheryeagertoundertakecapitalformation;thecollateralfreedthemfromarelianceoninefficientdomesticfinancialmarkets.2
Themodemmercantilistview,embracedbyAizenmanandLee(2007,2008)andothers,providedalesssanguineinterpretationforthepersistentglobalimbalancesthatemergedinthe2000s.WhileAizenmanandLee(2007)confirmedthatthehoardingofinternationalreservesthataccompaniedcurrent-accountsurpluseswasdominatedbyaprecautionarymotivepriorto2001,afindingconsistentwithAizenmanandMarion's(2003)earlierinterpretations,thereappearedtobearegimechangeafterward.AizenmanandLee(2008)pointedtothegrowingimportanceofmonetarymercantilismasthemainreasonfortheregimechange.Accordingly,followingtheAsiancrisisof1997-8,whichmitigatedChinesecompetitivenessinthelate1990s,andtheChineseaccessiontotheWTOinearly2000s,Chinaintensifieditsdrivetowardexport-ledgrowth.LikeearliermercantilisteffortstoexpandexportmarketsandaccumulategolddescribedbyAdamSmith(1776),aftertheyear2000,countriessuchasChinastartedpushingexportstopromotegrowth,rackingupcurrent-accountsurplusesandgrowingstockpilesofinternationalreserves.Thenumberswereimpressive.Ontheeveofthefinancialcrisis,China'srealGDPgrowthhadreachedabout14%(Fig.3),itscurrent-accountsurplushadgrownto10%ofGDP,anditsinternationalreserveshadreachedalmost45%ofGDPpriortothecrisis,peakingatabout50%in2010(Fig.3).However,unlikeDooley'setal.(2003,2005)win-win
viewofglobalimbalancesbufferedbyinternationalreservehoarding,AizenmanandLee(2008)notedthatmodemmercantilismcouldleadtounintendedadverseconsequences,suchascompetitivehoarding.ThisconcernisinlinewiththefindingsofCheungandQian(2009)andAizenmanetal.(2014)supportingregionalrivalryinhoardinginternationalreserves.
TheviewthatlargeEast-Westglobalimbalancescouldbesustainedforalongperiodwasnotsharedbyeveryone.Eichengreen(2007)andFeldstein(2008),forexample,arguedtheAsianperipherywasnotmonolithic;somememberoftheperipherymightabandonfixedexchangeratesagainstthedollarsoonerthanlater,eitherwillinglyorinresponsetospeculativepressures,therebyreducingEast-Westglobalimbalances.ObstfeldandRogoff(2005)alsosawlargeimbalancesasunsustainable,andworriedwhethertheywouldunwindgraduallyorabruptly.Alfaro,Kalemli-Ozcan,andVolosovych(2011)observedthatglobalimbalanceswherepoorercountriesfinancedricheronesweredrivenmainlybygovernmentdecisionsandofficialcapitalflows,sinceprivatefundstendedtomoveintheoppositedirection,attractedbyhighergrowthratesinpoorercountries.Theyraisedconcernsabouttheglobalefficiencyandsustainabilityofthesetrends.
AizenmanandSun(2010)alsoraiseddoubtsthatlargeglobalimbalancescouldbesustainable.TheyarguedthatwithChinagrowingattripletherateoftheUnitedStates,theU.S.current-accountdeficitsneededtoabsorbChina'ssurplusesincomingyears,intheabsenceofotherbigcountrieswillingtorunlargedeficits,wouldbeunrealisticallyhighandhenceself-limitinginthenot-too-distantfuture.
2TheglobalfinancialcrisisandChina'sadjustment
Theglobalfinancialcrisisofthelate2000sputanabruptendtothehappy-go-luckyattitudetoU.S.an