尼克松演讲.docx
《尼克松演讲.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《尼克松演讲.docx(13页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
尼克松演讲
6.RichardNixon-Checkers
MyFellowAmericans,
Icomebeforeyou
tonightasacandidatefortheVicePresidencyandasamanwhosehonesty
andintegrityhasbeenquestioned.
Now,theusualpoliticalthingtodowhen
chargesaremadeagainstyouistoeitherignore
themortodenythemwithoutgivingdetails.Ibelievewe'vehadenoughofthat
intheUnitedStates,particularlywiththepresent
AdministrationinWashington,D.C.Tometheofficeof
theVicePresidencyoftheUnitedStatesisagreatoffice,andIfeel
thatthepeoplehavegottohaveconfidencein
theintegrityofthemenwhorunforthatofficeandwhomightobtain
it.
Ihaveatheory,too,thatthebestandonlyanswertoasmearortoan
honestmisunderstandingofthefactsisto
tellthetruth.Andthat'swhyI'mheretonight.Iwanttotellyou
mysideofthecase.I'msurethatyou
havereadthecharge,andyou'veheardit,that
I,SenatorNixon,took18,000dollarsfromagroupofmysupporters.
Now,wasthatwrong?
Andletmesaythatitwaswrong.
I'msaying,incidentally,thatitwas
wrong,notjustillegal,becauseitisn'taquestionofwhetheritwaslegalorillegal,that
isn'tenough.Thequestionis,wasitmorallywrong?
Isaythatitwasmorallywrongif
anyofthat18,000dollarswenttoSenatorNixon,formypersonaluse.Isaythatitwasmorally
wrongifitwassecretlygivenandsecretlyhandled.AndIsaythatitwasmorallywrongifany
ofthecontributorsgotspecialfavorsforthecontributionsthattheymade.
Andnowtoanswerthosequestionslet
mesaythis:
Notonecentofthe18,000dollarsorany
othermoneyofthattypeeverwentto
meformypersonaluse.Everypennyofitwasusedto
payforpoliticalexpensesthatIdidnotthinkshouldbechargedto
thetaxpayersoftheUnitedStates.Itwasnotasecret
fund.
Asamatteroffact,when
Iwason"MeetthePress"some
ofyoumayhaveseenitlastSundayPeter
Edsoncameuptomeaftertheprogram,andhe
said,"Dick,whatabout
this"fund"wehearabout?
"AndIsaid,"Well,there'sno
secretabout
it.GooutandseeDanaSmithwhowastheadministratorofthefund."AndIgavehim
[Edson]his[Smith's]address.AndIsaidyouwill
findthatthepurposeofthefundsimplywastodefraypolitical
expensesthatIdidnotfeelshouldbechargedto
theGovernment.
Andthird,letmepointout
andIwanttomakethisparticularlyclearthat
nocontributortothisfund,
nocontributortoanyofmycampaigns,haseverreceivedanyconsideration
thathewouldnothavereceivedasanordinaryconstituent.Ijustdon'tbelieveinthat,andIcan
saythatnever,whileI
havebeenintheSenate
oftheUnitedStates,asfarasthepeoplethat
contributedtothisfundareconcerned,
haveImadeatelephonecallforthemtoanagency,
orhaveIgonedown
toanagencyintheirbehalf.Andtherecordswillshowthat,therecords
whichareinthehandsoftheadministration.
Well,then,someofyouwillsay,andrightly,"Well,whatdidyouusethefundfor,Senator?
"
"Whydidyouhavetohaveit?
"Let
metellyouinjustawordhowaSenateofficeoperates.Firstofall,a
Senatorgets15,000dollarsayear
insalary.Hegetsenoughmoneytopayfor
onetripayeararoundtrip,
thatisforhimselfandhisfamilybetweenhishomeand
Washington,D.C.Andthenhegetsanallowanceto
handlethepeoplethatworkinhisoffice
tohandlehismail.AndtheallowanceformyStateofCaliforniaisenoughto
hire13people.Andletmesay,incidentally,that
thatallowanceisnotpaidtotheSenator.It'spaiddirectlyto
theindividualsthattheSenatorputsonhispayroll.
Butallofthesepeopleandallofthese
allowancesareforstrictlyofficialbusiness.business,forexample,whenaconstituentwrites
inandwantsyoutogodowntotheVeteran'sAdministrationandget
someinformationabouthisGIpolicyitemsofthattype,forexample.
But
thereareotherexpenseswhicharenot
coveredbytheGovernment.AndIthinkIcanbestdiscussthoseexpensesbyaskingyou
somequestions.
DoyouthinkthatwhenIoranyotherSenatormakesapolitical
speech,hasitprinted,
shouldchargetheprintingofthatspeechandthemailingofthatspeechto
thetaxpayers?
Doyou
think,forexample,when
IoranyotherSenatormakesatriptohishomeStatetomakea
purelypoliticalspeechthatthecostofthat
tripshouldbechargedto
thetaxpayers?
Do
youthinkwhenaSenatormakespoliticalbroadcastsorpoliticaltelevisionbroadcasts,radioor
television,thattheexpenseofthosebroadcastsshouldbechargedto
thetaxpayers?
Well
Iknowwhatyouransweris.It'sthesameanswerthataudiencesgivemewheneverIdiscuss
thisparticularproblem:
Theanswerisno.Thetaxpayersshouldn'tberequiredtofinance
itemswhicharenotofficialbusinessbutwhichareprimarilypoliticalbusiness.
Well,thenthequestionarises,you
say,"Well,howdoyoupayfortheseandhow
canyoudoitlegally?
"Andthereareseveralwaysthatitcanbedone,
incidentally,andthatitisdone
legallyintheUnitedStatesSenateandintheCongress.Thefirstwayistobearichman.I
don'thappentobearichman,so
Icouldn'tusethatone.
Anotherwaythatisusedistoputyourwifeon
thepayroll.Let
mesay,incidentally,that
myopponent,myoppositenumberfortheVicePresidencyon
theDemocraticticket,doeshave
hiswifeon
thepayrollandhashaditheronhispayrollforthetenyearsfor
thepasttenyears.Nowjust
letmesaythis:
That'shisbusiness,andI'mnotcriticalofhimfordoing
that.Youwillhavetopassjudgmentonthatparticularpoint.
ButIhaveneverdonethat
forthisreason:
Ihavefoundthatthereareso
manydeserving
stenographersandsecretariesinWashingtonthatneededtheworkthatIjustdidn'tfeel
itwasrighttoput
mywifeonthepayroll.Mywife'ssittingoverhere.She'sawonderful
stenographer.Sheusedtoteachstenographyandsheusedtoteachshorthandinhighschool.
ThatwaswhenImether.AndIcan
tellyoufolksthatshe'sworkedmanyhoursatnightand
manyhoursonSaturdaysandSundaysinmyoffice,andshe'sdoneafinejob,andIam
proudtosaytonightthatinthesixyearsI'vebeen
intheHouseandtheSenateoftheUnited
States,PatNixonhasneverbeenontheGovernmentpayroll.
Whatareotherwaysthatthesefinancescanbetakencareof?
Somewhoarelawyers,andI
happentobealawyer,continuetopracticelaw,butIhaven'tbeenabletodothat.I'msofar
awayfromCaliforniathatI'vebeen
sobusywithmysenatorialworkthat
Ihavenotengaged
inanylegalpractice.And,also,asfaraslawpracticeisconcerned,itseemedtomethat
therelationshipbetweenanattorneyandtheclient
wassopersonalthatyoucouldn'tpossibly
representamanasanattorneyandthen
haveanunbiasedviewwhenhepresentedhiscase
toyouintheeventthathehadonebeforeGovernment.
AndsoIfeltthatthebestwaytohandlethesenecessarypolitical
expensesofgettingmymessagetotheAmerican
peopleandthespeechesImadethe
speechesthatIhadprinted
forthemostpartconcernedthisonemessageofexposingthisAdministration,the
Communisminit,thecorruptioninittheonlywaythat
Icoulddothatwastoacceptthe
aidwhichpeopleinmyhomeStateofCalifornia,whocontributedto
mycampaignandwhocontinuedto
makethesecontributionsafterIwaselected,weregladto
make.
AndletmesayI'mproudofthefact
thatnotoneofthemhaseveraskedmeforaspecial
favor.I'mproudofthefactthatnotoneofthemhaseveraskedmetovoteonabillother
thanofmyownconsciencewoulddictate.AndI
amproudofthefactthatthetaxpayers,by
subterfugeorotherwise,haveneverpaidonedimeforexpenseswhichI
thoughtwerepolitical
andshouldn'tbechargedto
thetaxpayers.
Letmesay,incidentally,thatsomeofyoumay
say,"Well,that'sallright,Senator,that'syour
explanation,but
haveyougotanyproof?
"AndI'dliketotellyou
thiseveningthatjustan
houragowereceivedan
independentauditofthisentirefund.Isuggestedto
GovernorSherman
Adams,whoistheChiefofStaffoftheDwight
Eisenhowercampaign,thatan
independentauditandlegalreportbeobtained,
andIhavethataudithereinmyhands.It's
anauditmadebythePriceWaterhouse&Company
firm,andthelegalopinionbyGibson,Dunn,&Crutcher,lawyersinLosAngeles,thebiggestlaw
firm,andincidentally,oneofthebestonesinLosAngeles.
Iamproudtobeabletoreport
toyoutonightthatthisauditandthislegalopinionisbeing
forwardedtoGeneral
Eisenhower.AndI'dliketoreadtoyoutheopinionthatwaspreparedby
Gibson,Dunn,&Crutcher,andbasedonallthepertinent
lawsandstatutes,togetherwiththeauditreport
preparedbythecertifiedpublicaccountants.Quote:
Itisourconclusionthat
SenatorNixondidnotobtainanyfinancialgainfromthecollection
anddisbursementofthefundbyDanaSmith.thatSenatorNixondidnotviolateanyfederal
orstatelawbyreasonoftheoperationofthefund.andthat
neithertheportionofthefund
paidbyDanaSmithdirectlytothirdpersons,northeportionpaidtoSenatorNixon,to
reimbursehimfordesignatedofficeexpenses,constitutedincometo
theSenatorwhichwas
eitherreportableortaxableasincomeunderapplicabletaxlaws.
(signed)
Gibson,Dunn,&Crutcher,
byElmo
H.Conley
Nowthat,myfriends,
isnotNixon
speaking,butthat'sanindependentau