英文科技专业论文写作与学术报告度秋作业任务答案解析.docx

英文科技专业论文写作与学术报告度秋作业任务答案解析.docx

《英文科技专业论文写作与学术报告度秋作业任务答案解析.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《英文科技专业论文写作与学术报告度秋作业任务答案解析.docx（26页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

英文科技专业论文写作与学术报告度秋作业任务答案解析

英文科技论文写作与学术报告（2019秋）作业答案

第一章

1.WhichoneisNOTincludedin“logicsinwritingpaper”?

ALogicalpresentationinwritingpaper

BGoodlanguageflow

CGoodstructureandclarityinthepaper

DGoodtheoreticalanalysis

2.WhichistheCORRECTstatementinthefollowing?

AIfthereaderwanttoknowtheresultofthepaper,theycanreadtheintroduction.

BIfthereaderwanttointuitivelyknowthekeyideasbehindthepaper,theyshouldreadtheintroduction.

CIt'soptionalthatwesummarizethecontributionofthepaperinthe"abstract".

DIfthereaderswanttoknowalltheglorydetails,theycanreadtheintroduction.

3.WhichofthefollowingpracticeweshouldfollowwhenwritingscientificpaperinEnglish?

AModestyisagoodcharacteristicinChineseculture.

BWhenwritingscientificpaper,weshouldpointouttheshortcomingsofourresearchusingaspecificsection.

CWeshouldconfidentlyshowthecontributionsofourresearch.

DTheEnglishcultureissosimilartoChinesethatChinesereaderscanjustfollowtheirculturewhenwritinganEnglishscientificpaper.

4.Whatdoes“delivery”meansinthecontextofwritinganEnglighscientificpaper?

AThemeaningof“delivery”issimilartotheconceptofthosedeliverycompanies.

B“Delivery”meansthecontributionsofyourresearch.

C“Delivery”meanshowmuchdothewritersknowthebackgroundofthereaders.

DThe“responsibilityofdelivery”isonthewriterratherthanonthereader.

5.WhichoneistheCORRECTexpressionof“博士后流动站”?

APostdoctoralprogram.

BPost-doctormobilestation.

CPost-doctorflowstation.

DPostdoctoralmovingstation.

6.Whichofthefollowingtranslationisauthentic?

A注意安全----takecare.

B第一教学楼----No.1teachingbuilding.

C小心落水----fallintowatercarefully.

D投诉电话----lawsuitphonenumber.

7.Whatshouldwedoinwritingascientificpaper?

AInordertoemphasizeourviews,weshouldputourstrongemotionsintothetext.

BSlightlypresentourpoliticalcommentsisallowed.

CWeshouldfollowthemainstreamideasofgeneralpublic.

DWeshouldpresentfacts,theories,proofs,experiments,testingresultsobjectively.

8.WhichofthefollowingisWRONGaboutthetitleofscientificpaper?

AItnormallyisnotasentence.

BItisbettertousethefewestpossiblewordstoadequatelydescribesthecontentsofthepaper.

CTheorderofthewordsinthetitleisveryimportant.

DItisbettertouseacompletesentence.

9.WhichofthefollowingisWRONGabouttheabstractofscientificpaper?

AItisthesummaryofthepaper.

BItisbettertouseabbreviationtomaketheabstractshorter.

CItdescribesthekeyideasofthepaper.

DItgivestheresultsofthepaper.

10.WhichisNOTadvisedintheintroductionsection?

AClearlyexplainthebackgroundofourresearch.

BClearlyexplaintheproblemwedo.

CExplaintheacademicand/orimpact.

DUsingmathematicalfunctionstoexplainourmodel.

11.WhichofthefollowingisRIGHTregardingtheliteraturereview?

AItisbettertocommentontheexistingworkpositively.

BItisbettertocommentontheexistingworkobjectively.

CItisbettertocommentontheexistingworknegatively.

DItisbettertocriticizetheresultsobtainedbyotherresearcherstohighlightourcontributions.

12.WhichofthefollowingisRIGHTaboutthereferencesofintroductionofscientificpaper?

AItisbettertociteasmanyforeignreferencesaspossible.

BItisbettertocitemanyyourownpreviouslypublishedpapers.

CItisbettertociteasmanydomesticreferencesaspossible.

DRecentreferencesshouldbecited

13.Whatmaythereviewerthinksifyoucitetoomanyyourownpublications?

AYoureallycontributealottothecommunity.

BOtherresearchersarenotinterestedinthesubject.

CYouhaveasayinthisresearcharea.

DTheywillthinkyouhavesufficientreferences.

14.Iftheareferencehas5authors,howmanyauthorsshouldyouincludeinthereferencelist?

AOnlythefirstauthor.

BOnlythefirstandsecondauthor.

COnlythefirstandcorrespondingauthor.

DAllfiveauthors.

15.Whatshouldyoudointhe“Problemdescriptionandformulation”?

AIfyouclearlyknowthemeaningofavariable,it’sokthatitisnotdefined.

BYoushouldpresenttheproblemyouaretryingtosolve.

CUsuallyyoushoulddescribeyoursystemconfiguration,environmentandsoon.

DYoushouldputtheorganizationofyourpaperhere.

16.WhichofthefollowingstatementisNOTcorrect?

AIfyouhaveatheorem,youshouldputtheproofinthesectionof“methodology.”

BInthesectionof“simulation/numericalresult”,youshouldpresentthedescriptionofthepracticalorexperimentsystem,descriptionofthedataandtheassociatedsystem.

CInthesectionof“simulation/numericalresult”,youcanusetables,figuresandgraphtobetterpresentyourcontribution.

DIntheconclusionremarkortheconclusion,youcanjustrepeatyourconclusionremarkastheabstract.

17.Whatyoucandoifyouwanttoshowacknowledgment?

AIt’snotappropriatetoputacknowledgmentinthefrontpage.

BYoucanputaseparatesectionofacknowledgmentinyourpaper.

CIfyouacknowledgeAlbertEinstein,youshouldthankhimbasedonthefact.

DThelengthofacknowledgmentshouldbestrictlyconstrained.

18.WhichisCORRECTwhenyoulistthereferences?

AIt’sokifyouputasmanyreferencesasyoucan.

BToenrichyourpaper,youshouldcanlistsomethingthatisnotreferredtoinyourpaper.

CEveryreferenceyoulistmustbereferredinthemaintext.

DIt’sproperforyoutolistmanyhomemadereferences.

19.Whatdoes“proofreading”mean?

A证明阅读.

B校对.

C证明读物.

D证明在读.

20.WhatisTRUEifattheproceduretosubmitapaper?

AUsuallywesubmittheentiremanuscripttoaconferenceorjournal.

BAllconferencesrequireyoutosubmittheabstractfirst,fromwhichtheorganizerwilldeterminewhetheryouneedtosubmitthewholetext.

CWeshouldsubmitahardcopytothepublisherwithyoursignature.

DThereviewers’commentsarenotveryimportantwhenyoumodifyyourpaper.

21.Ifthepublishersendstheprooftoyou,whenshouldyougiveareply?

AInabout2days.

BInabout2weeks.

CInabout2months.

DInabout2years.

22.Whichofthefollowingmaynotbethereasontorejectascientificpaper?

ATherearemanygrammaticalmistakesinthepaper.

BTherearemanysimplesentencesinthepaper.

CTherearemanydirecttranslationsinthepaper.

DTherearesomespellingmistakesofauthors'namesinreferences.

23.WhichofthefollowingisTRUE?

AFontsizeshouldkeepconsistencyonlyineachparagraph.

BFontsizeshouldkeepconsistencyonlyineachpartofthepaper.

CFontsizeshouldkeepconsistencyintheentirepaper.

DItdoesn'tmatterhowthefontsizeused.

24.WhichofthefollowingisTRUEaboutuseofmathematicalequations?

AItisbettertouseasmanyequationsaspossible.

BItisbettertouseasfewequationsaspossible.

CItisbetternottouseanyequationsatall.

DItisbettertohaveabalanceduseofequations.

25.WhichstatementisNOTtrue?

AYoushouldkeepconsistenceinequationsandreferenceformat.

BYoushouldkeepconsistenceinformatofauthorsofallreferences.

CTheformatbetweendifferentparagraphsshouldbekeptthesame.

DYoushouldnotusesynonymsinordertokeepconsistence.

26.WhatisNOTnecessarywhenyouwanttobetterwriteyourpaper?

AUsespellingchecktomakesureallthewordsarespelledcorrectly.

BUsegrammarchecktofindoutinconsistency.

CCarefullycheckthespellingsofthenamesinreferences.

DUsemanyhardandcomplicatedsentencestopolishyourexpressions.

27.WhichofthefollowingauthornamesmayNOTbetherightformatofthereference?

AX.Guan,S.Zhang,S.Li,W.Wang

BGuan,X.,Zhang,S.,Li,S.,Wang,W.

CXiaohongGuan,SanZhang,SiLi,WuWang

DGuanXiaohong,Zhang,S.,S.Li,W.Wang

28.WhichisNOTthegeneralstyleofthereviewers?

AFrank

BBrutal

CSarcastic

DImplicit

29.Ifthereviewergivesalotofcriticalcommentsandrequestsformodification,whatarethecorrectattitudesweshouldhave?

AThereviewersaregivingushardtimeonmypaper.

BThereviewerisincompetentbecausehecannotunderstandwhatIwrite.

CWeshouldmodifyourpaperaccordingtothereviewers’commentstogetourpaperpublished.

DThereviewerisbiasedonme.

30.WhichoneisNOTthegoodadvicesonrespondingtoreviewers?

AWeneedtoexaminecarefullyallthecommentsmadebythereviewersandtheAssociateEditor.

BWehavetodifferentiatethosecommentsthatmustbefullyaddressedfromthosethataredesirabletobeaddressed.

CWeonlyneedtoaddressthecommentsthattheyarecorrectaswebelieve.

DWeneedtorespondtoEACHandEVERYpointraisedbythereviewerandthereferee.

31.Inordertohelpthereviewerssavetime,weshould

AListouroriginalreviewsandtheresponsesidebyside.

BTellthereviewersthatwehavemodifiedthepapercarefully.

CSendbackapaperwithenoughmodificationtothereviewers.

DJustselectsomecriticalcommentstoresponse.

32.WhichistheWRONGresponsetoreviewersifwedon’tagreewiththeircomments?

AWehadbetternottoarguewiththereviewer.

BShowthereviewersthatthemaintextisrevisedaccordingtotheircomments.

CIfwemustdisagreewiththeircomments,weshoulddoitveryprofessionallywithnorancororsarcasm.

DIgnorethosecommentsorexplainwhatweoriginallymeant.

33.Whichoneisthegoodactioninrespondingtoreviewers?

AWeexplaintothereviewswhatwehaverevisedtoaddressedtheircomments.

BIfthecriticismofthereviewersmakesusuncomfortable,weshouldignoreandtrytofeelbette