城市计划三大宪章.docx
《城市计划三大宪章.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《城市计划三大宪章.docx(26页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
城市计划三大宪章
三大宪章
北京宪章(英文)BEIJINGCHARTERPresentedattheXXCongressoftheUIA,Beijing,23-26June1999ProfessorWuLiangyong Ontheeveofthenewmillennium,wearchitectsfromallnationsoftheworldgatherinBeijing,anancientcapitaloftheOrient,forthe20thCongresswhichcelebratestheyearofJubileefortheInternationalUnionofArchitects. Thepresentisbornofthepast,andyetthefuturerestswiththepresent.Weareheretoreflectonthepast,toaccountforthepresent,andultimatelytoformulateaconsciousplanofactionforabetterandliveablehumanhabitatofthe21stcentury. Theworld'sgeographicaldistanceshaveshrunk,althoughtheregionaldisparitiesaregrowing.Yetthisagehasendowedallofuswithacommonmission.Itrequiresustocometotermswiththepresent,facethechallenges,developaholisticthinkingandco-ordinateourefforts. 1 COMINGTOTERMSWITHOURCENTURIES The20thcentury:
unparalleledconstructionanddestruction The20thcenturyhasseenunprecedentedmagnificenceandprogress,andalsoincomparablecalamityandconfusion. The20thcenturyhasenrichedthehistoryofarchitectureinitsuniquemanner:
architectshaveplayedanadmirableroleinthereconstructionthatfollowedthetwoworldwars;technicalandartisticinnovationsonamassivescalehaveintroducedfineexamplesofdesigntothepopulouslikeneverbefore. But,thisisnottodenythatmuchofthebuiltenvironmentisstillinadeeplyunsatisfactorystate.Theverysurvivalofhumankindisunderthreatamidstsquanderingoftheworld'snaturalandculturalheritage.Inaffluentregions,redevelopmentwasoftentobecomedestructionbyconstruction;inthepoorerareas,pauperisedmassesarestrugglingtobuildtheirowncitiesoftomorrow. Overthepastcentury,theworldhasturnedintoaverydifferentplace.Yetonethingremainsthesame:
wearchitectsareagainatacrossroadsasaworldprofession. The21stcentury:
aturningpoint Thediversityandcomplexityoftheworldhascreatedmuchconfusion;yetitisbutpartoftheeternalprocessofchange.Thepresentcenturyhasseenremarkablereformanddevelopmentinpolitics,economics,technology,andsociety,andtheresurgenceofhumanideas.Inthecomingcentury,thepaceoftransformationisexpectedtoaccelerate,thoughitsdirectionmaybeevenhardertotell. Inthecomingcentury,thecoexistenceofglobalisationandpluralismwillbringtoaheadtheconflictsandthecontradictionsthatcharacteriseourage.Ontheonehand,modernmeansofcommunicationhavebroughtintoclosecontactdiverseculturesandtraditions;globalintegrationofproduction,financeandtechnologycontinuestodominatedecisionmaking.Ontheotherhand,thegapbetweentherichandthepooriswideningatanalarmingrate;regionalstrifeandfinancialuncertaintiescastasinistershadowuponthehumanhabitat. Whilstweshouldnottakeontasksoutsideourprofessionalremit,itwouldbebothirresponsibleandfoolishtoignorethetorrentofsocialandculturalchangethatisredefiningthescopeofthearchitecturalprofession.Aconsciousreconsiderationoftheroleof21stcenturyarchitecturecallsforourenthusiasm,strengthandcourage. 2 THECHALLENGESTHATWEFACE Interwovenquestions Nature'srevenge Theindustrialrevolutionunleashedtremendoushumanpower,yetmanyatriumphovernaturewasachievedataharrowingcost.Thepastcenturyhasseenpopulationexplosion,encroachmentoffarmlandanddeteriorationofwater,airandlandresources.Environmentalcrisesimpingeontheveryexistenceofhumankind. Wedonotknowenoughabouttheecosystem,yetecologicaldisastershaverevealeditsfragileconfines.Fromahistoricalpointofview,wedonotowntheworldthatwelivein:
wesimplyhaveitonloanfromourchildren.Inwhatstateshallwehandovertownandcountrytoourchildren?
Inwhatwaycananarchitectcontributetothefutureofhumancivilisationthroughplanninganddesign?
Overwhelmingurbanisation Tobettertheirlives,peoplecongregateinthecity,wherescience,technologyandculturehavebroughtaboutproductivitythathadneverbeenforeseen.The20thcenturyhasseenthebrightestlights,sofar,ofmetropolitanlife.Nevertheless,thecenturyaheadisthetrueurbaneraas,forthefirsttimeinhistory,urbandwellerswilloutnumberthosewholiveintraditionalruralways. Yet,hardlyhadtheslumsbeendemolished,didthecitiesseetheresurgenceofanunderclass.Segregationoftherichandthepoor,congestionoftrafficandlanduse,andpersistenceofnoiseandemissionshaveworsenedincitieslargeandsmall.Canourcitiessurvive?
Webuildthecities;yetwhydowefeelsopowerlesswhenweattempttomakeanychange?
Inwhatwaycanweshapetheurbanhabitat,asitshapesusatthesametime?
Willthetraditionalconceptssurviveinthecitiesofthenextcentury?
Technologyasadouble-edgedsword Inthepastcenturymoderntechnologyincreasedproductivitytoadegreeneverbeforeexperienced.Newmaterials,newstructuresandnewequipmenthaveprovideduniqueopportunitiesforthedesignersofthe20thcentury.Modernmeansofcommunicationhavebroughtthediverseculturesintoclosecontact. Technologyhasledmankindtoanewcrossroads,yetwearestillintheprocessofharnessingitspowerandpotential.Technologymodifiesthetraditionalrelationshipsbetweenmanandnature,andthusconstantlychallengestheexistingnormsoflifestylesandvalues.Inwhatwaycanhumankindderivebenefitsfromtechnology,whilstavoidingtheharmofwhichitisshowntobecapable?
Geniuslociindefault Thecultureofarchitecturecomesfromalocalaccumulationofhistory.Itmanifestsitselfamongthebuiltformsandinday-to-dayliving,exertingavoicelessinfluenceontheexperienceandbehaviouroftheinhabitants.Inasense,itisthesoulofourcities,townsandvillages. However,globalisationoftechnologyhasmadepeoplemoreandmoreseparatedfromtheirland.Standardisedcommercialproductioninterruptstheevolutionoflocalbuiltforms.Traditionaldesigntechniquesareconfronted.Localidentitiesfadeaway.Whatcontributioncananarchitectmaketobringbackthesoulofcitiesandtownswhichcharacterisedthemduringthepastcenturies?
Acommontheme,acommonfuture Thechallengeswefacearemultifacetedandoverwhelming.Theyareinfacttheembodimentofcomplexsocial,political,economicandculturalprocessesatlevelsbothlocalandglobal.Ourdiscussionmustnotstopatthemeremanifestationofsuchprocesses.Rather,aneffectivesolutiononlycomesfromathoroughunderstandingofthedialecticnatureoftheforceswhichareshapingourbuiltenvironmenttoday. Thesearchforeffectivesolutionsatagloballevelissupportedbyourcommonaspirationsforasustainablefutureonthisplanet.Ourworldisaninterdependentworld.Thefutureprospectsofonenationtoalargeextentrestonthefutureofothernations.Bythesametoken,thefutureofarchitecturedependsonanunderstandingandassimilationoftheachievementsofotherdisciplinesandprofessions.Itisthiscommonthemethatwillbringustogethertolayoutacommonfutureinthe21stcentury. 3 TOWARDSANINTEGRALARCHITECTURE Duringthepast50years,thearchitectsoftheworldhavemettodebateoveralargenumberofissues.Thesedebateshavemuchfurtheredourunderstandinginallbranchesofarchitecture.Itisthereforeappropriatetoreviewtheprogresssofarandredefinethelimits,thecontents,andtheorganisationofourdisciplineandprofession. Thetheoreticalpremises Overthecenturiestheroleofanarchitectisconstantlymodifiedtosuittheneedsandrequirementsofitstime.Wheretraditionalmethodsareshowntobeinadequate,newapproachesaredevelopedtotaketheirplace.Yetwithoutexception,eachredefinitionpushestheboundaryofarchitectureoutwardsforawidercoverage,aswellasinwardsforhigherdegreesofspecialisationinthecomponentparts.The20thcenturyisperhapsthemostexemplaryinthisregard. Awidercoverageofitscontentsandfinerdegreesofspecialisationhaveempoweredthe20thcenturyarchitectwithunprecedentedprofessionalopportunitiesandpotential,yetatapersonallevel,anexpandingprofessionwithgrowingspecialisationcanseemelephantine.Inasense,thearchitects'TowerofBabelappearstohavefallen:
itisincreasinglydifficultforonearchitecttograsptheexpertiseofafellowcolleague;althoughthebodyofknowledgehasgrowncollectively,theoutlookofanysingledesignertendstobecomeparadoxicallynarrowandfragmented.Thespecialistexpertiseisbroughttogetherthroughfinancialtiesandmanagerialskills,ratherthanacoherentintellectualframework.Asaresult,theroleofanarchitectcontinuestobemarginalisedinthedecisionmakingoverthehumanhabitattoday. Fromthepointofviewofanarchitect,hisorherabilitytoproposecreativedesignsolutionsdependscriticallyontheintellectualandprofessionalspheresheorshecommands.Narrowandfragmentedindividualoutlookscannotbemadetowork,howeverwonderfullytheindividualdesignersaremanagedexternally.Nevertheless,anygivenpersoncannotandshouldnotattempttomasterthewholebodyofknowledgeofourprofession.Quovadis?
ClassicalChinesephilosopherswenttogreatpainstopinpointthedifferencesbetweenmethodology(alternativelytranslatedasDaoorTao)whichconcernsanintellectualframework,andmethods(Fa)whic