外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx

上传人:b****3 文档编号:27364631 上传时间:2023-06-29 格式:DOCX 页数:15 大小:27.47KB
下载 相关 举报
外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共15页
外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共15页
外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共15页
外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共15页
外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共15页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx

《外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx(15页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变.docx

外文翻译校园网络多媒体的演变

一、英文原文:

TheEvolutionofCampusNetworksTowardsMultimedia

CiroA.NoronhaJr.FouadA.Tobagi

4TheBackbone

Thecampusbackbonecarriestheaggregatetrafficfromthesubnetworks.Fromatheoreticalpoint,ofview,thedesignofthebackboneisnodifferent,fromthedesignofthesubnetworksthemselves;thestepstakeninsection3canberepeatedhere,withthedifferencethatthenetworkbeingdesignedisthebackbone,andits"users"arethesubnetworks.Thedifferenceisoneofscale.Inthissection,wewillbrieflycommentontheeffectofthebackbonetrafficontheaggregatethroughputofthesubnetwork(whichwasignoredinsection3),andthencomputethebackbonetrafficunderavarietyofscenarios.

4.1ConnectingtheSubnetworktotheBackbone

Themaindifferencebetweenthetrafficto/fromthebackboneandtheinternalsubnetworktrafficisthefactthatformerisconcentratedinasinglepoint(thebackboneconnection);inotherwords,allthetrafficfromthethesubnetworktothebackboneisdirectedtothebackboneconnection,andallthetrafficfromthebackbonetothesubnetworkoriginatesinthesamelocation.Intheotherhand,thesourcesanddestinationsoftheintra-subnetworktrafficarespreadoverthesubnetwork.

Theeffectofaddingthebackboneconnectionintheaggregatesubnetworkbandwidth'dependsonitstopology.Insubnetworksorganizedastrees,thecongestioninthebranchesnearthelocationofthebackboneconnectionmightlimittheaggregatethroughputtoavaluelowerthanwhatisattainedwhennobackbonetrafficispresent.Inthestarconfiguration,however,thehigh-speedchannelistheideallocationforattachingthebackboneconnection,andtheaggregatethroughputinthiscaseisalwayshigherthanitsvaluewhenthereisnotrafficfromthebackbone.Thereasonforthisissimple:

theinternalsubnetworktrafficusesbandwidthbothatthesourceandatthedestinationsegments,butthetrafficto/fromthebackboneusesbandwidthonlyatthesource/destinationsegments,leadingtoahigheraggregatethroughput.

Theactualincreaseordecreaseintheaggregatebandwidthwillbeafunctionofa,thefractionofthetrafficthat,isintra-subnetwork,andA,theratiobetweenthetrafficfromthebackbonetothetrafficintothebackbone(definedinsection2.).Theincreaseishigherforsmallvaluesofa(mostofthetrafficisintersubnetwork).

4.2StructureoftheBackbone

Inthissection,wewillgiveanumberofscenariosthatillustratehowthestructureofthebackbonecanchangeasafunctionofthesizeofthecampusnetwork;wewillusefigure3todeterminetherequiredcapacity.Theresultsareshownintable1;notethatthesolutionsforthestructureofthebackbonearenotunique,andwehavelistedoneofsuchsolutionsforeachcase.

Infigure5weshowonepossiblebackbonetopologywhichhasallthemainelementswehavebeendiscussing.Inthefigureweshowthesubnetworksbeingservedbyswitchinghubs.TheswitchinghubsservingsubnetworkswithlittleexternaltrafficcanbegroupedbyanATMmultiplexerbeforereachingtheATMswitch;thismultiplexercanperformsomelocalswitchingorrelycompletelyinthecentralswitch.HubsgeneratinglargertrafficcanbeconnecteddirectlytotheATMswitch.Theswitchisalsothebestlocationtoconnectcentralizedsharedresources,suchasvideoservers.TheATMswitchesthemselvescanbearrangedinahierarchicalfashion,dependingonthetrafficrequirements.

5AddingmultimediatotheotherOSIlayers

InthissectionwediscusstheissuesraisedbytheadditionofmultimediaservicesontheotherlayersoftheOSImodel.

5.1TheMediumAccessControl(MAC)Layer

Thesynchronousnatureofaudioandvideotrafficdictatesthatdatabedeliveredtoitsdestinationwithinstricttimingconstraints.Failuretodeliverdataontimeresultsinadiscontinuityofthevideooradegradationinthequality.Thebustynatureofdatatraffic,ontheotherhand,meansthatastationtransmitsdatainanunpredictablefashion,andtheamountofdatathatthestationtransmitsinaburstisalsorandom.

Bothtypesoftrafficaretobesupportedbythesamelocalnetwork.Indeed,multimediaapplicationsnaturallyinvolvebothtypesoftrafficsimultaneously;existinglocalareanetworksareexpectedtocarryaudioandvideotrafficalongsideexistingdataapplications.Mixingthetwotypesoftrafficonthesamenetworkrequiresspecialattention,particularlywheresharedresourcesarecontendedtobybothtypes.Thebandwidthavailableonlocalareanetworksegmentsisonesuchsharedresource,andisthesubjectofthissection.Itissharedbyalltrafficoriginatingatallstations,andaccessedbymeansoftheMediaAccessControl(MAC)protocol.Ideally,onewouldliketheMACprotocoltoincludetechniqueswhichreservethebandwidthnecessaryforsynchronoustraffic,soastoremoveanyeffectofbustytraffic.

TheCSMA/CDprotocol(IEEE802.3)doesnotdifferentiateamongthedifferenttraffictypes.Inessence,itoperatesasfollows.Astationwithapacketreadyfortransmissiontransmitsthepacketassoonasthechannelissensedidle.Ifitcollideswithanotherpacket,thenitattemptsagainbutafterincurringarandomreschedulingdelay.Themeanreschedulingdelayisdoubledwitheachcollisionincurred.Thisisclearlyinadequateforreal-timetraffic.Notonlyisthedelayincurredbypacketsnondeterministic,butitsvarianceisquitelarge,owingtotheexponentialbackoffalgorithm.However,sinceatlowloadsthisprotocolworkswell,itcanstillbeusedifonesegmentsthenetworktoinsurethatthisconditionismet.

IEEE802.5isatokenprotocoldevisedforaringnetwork.Itusesasingletoken,inthesensethatastationthathascompletedtransmissionwillnotissueanewtokenuntilthebusytokenreturnstoit.Sinceinaringnetworktheconnectiontothemediumisactive,apriorityschemecanbeimplementedbyassigningdynamicallyapriorityvaluetothetoken,andbyrestrictingaccesstotheringtopacketsofpriorityequalorhigherthanthecurrentlyassignedvalue.Thisschemecanbeappropriatelyusedtointegratethetwotypesoftrafficonthesamechannelsimplybygivingsynchronoustraffichigherprioritythanthebustydatatraffic.

InFDDI(ANSIX3T9.5),anotherschemewithmultipleprioritylevelsisemployed,bytheuseofasetoftimers,thatregulateforhowlongthestationcantransmittrafficofeachpriority.

Insummary:

theassignmentofdifferenttypesofserviceforreal-timeanddatatrafficattheMAClayerisveryimportantwhencommunicatingmultimediainformation.ThisisnotofferedinthewidelydeployedIEEE802.3Othernetworks,suchastheIEEE802.5tokenringandFDDIcanprovidethisfunctionality,althoughmanyvendorshavechosennottoimplementit.Giventhelargebaseofdeployednetworks,itisnotreasonabletoexpectthatchangesintheMAClayertosupportmultimediawouldbeimplemented.Therefore,onemustseekotheroptions(suchasmakingsurethatthenetworkoperateswithlowenoughloadthattheproblemsdescribedinthissectionwillnotbeseen).

5.2TheNetworkLayer

Asthechangesdescribedbeforetakeplaceinthenetwork,theroutetousewhenmovinginformationfromsegmenttosegmentbecomesincreasinglyimportant.Insimpletopologies,suchasstarwiththeswitchingelementinthecenter,routingistrivialbecausethereisonlyoneroutefromthesourcetothedestination.However,inpracticemultipleroutesmightbeprovidedbetweenagivenpairofstations,forreliabilityand/orincreased.

Currently,thepathtakenbyapacketfromitssourcetoitsdestinationthroughthenetworkisdeterminedbythebridgesandroutersthatdefinethenetworktopology.Transparentbridgesusethespanningtreealgorithm,i.e.,thebridges,workingtogether,identifyasubsetofthenetworktopologythatconstitutesaspanningtree,anddirectalltrafficthroughthisspanningtree.Linksnotonthespanningtreearenotusedandkeptinreserve,tobeactivatedincaseoffailureofalinkinthespanningtree.Moreover,thespanningtreeidentifiedforatopologyisessentiallychosenatrandom,anditisnotoptimuminanysense.Thishastwoconsequences:

first,extracapacityontheredundantlinksisneverused;andsecond,bottlenecksmaydevelopduetotrafficconcentrationinsomesegments,asaresultoftheparticularspanningtreechosen.Wehavediscussedthistrafficconcentrationinsection3.

Routers,ontheotherhand,havetheabilitytousemultiplespanningtrees;asamatteroffact,eachrouterforwardsthepacketsoverthespanningtreehavingitselfastheroot.Manyalgorithmsexisttocomputethoseroutesinadistributedfashion(RIP,OSPF,IS-IS,etc),buttheyallemploythecostofthelinkasthemetricusedwhencomputingthespanningtree(thecostofalinkisanarbitraryfunction,inverselyproportionaltothelink’sbandwidth).Routerscanrecoverfromnetworkfailures,andcanmakeuseofthebandwidthofalllinksavailable.However,inmostcases,allthetrafficbetweenasourceandadestinationwillbesentoverthesameroute.Moreover,current,routershavenoprovisionfortakingintoaccountreal-timerequirements(suchasdelay)whencomputingroutes,andthesystemofprioritiesimplementedisclearlyinadequateformultimediacommunications.

Ofspecialimportanceistheroutingofmulticasttraffic(video-conferenceisanexampleofasituationwherethiskindoftrafficisgenerated).Formulticasttraffic,twokindsofroutescanbeidentified:

minimumdelayroutesandminimumcostroutes.Currentmulticastroutersusetheminimumdelaycriteriontocomputetheroutes,butthismightleadtou

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 工程科技

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1