外文翻译人民币升值对股价的影响.docx
《外文翻译人民币升值对股价的影响.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译人民币升值对股价的影响.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
外文翻译人民币升值对股价的影响
中文3300字
本科毕业论文外文原文
外文题目:
TheImpactofRenminbiAppreciationonStockPricesinChina
出处:
EmergingMarketsFinance&Trade
作者:
Chien-ChungNiehandHwey-YunYau
ABSTRACT:
SinceremovalofthepeginJuly2005,Chinahasenteredaneweraofamanagedfloatingexchangeratesystem.AlthoughmanyobservershaveraisedconcernsabouttheimpactofsuchapolicychangeonChina’stradesurplus,lessattentionhasbeenpaidtoitseffectsonfinancialmarkets.ThispaperinvestigatestheimpactofrecentrenminbiappreciationonstockpricesinChinasinceremovalofthepeg,usingthresholdcointegrationandmomentumthresholderror-correctionmodel(M-TECM).Theresultsclearlyillustratethatnoshort-runcausalrelationexists,andanasymmetriccausalrelationshiprunningfromtherenminbi/U.S.dollarexchangeratetoChineseShanghaiA-sharestockpricesinthelongrunisbasedonM-TECM.Policyandthebroaderimplicationsofthefindingsarediscussed.
KEYWORDS:
asymmetriccausality,exchangerates,momentumthresholderror-correctionmodel(M-TECM),stockprices.
China’scurrency,therenminbi(RMB),whichforthepreviousdecadewastightlypeggedatRMB8.28totheU.S.dollar,wasrevaluedtoRMB8.11perU.S.dollaronJuly21,2005.Followingremovalofthepeg,dueinparttopoliticalpressurefromtheUnitedStatesandtheUnitedKingdom,theChineseauthoritiesalsoannouncedthattherenminbiwouldbepeggedtoabasketofforeigncurrencies,ratherthanbeingstrictlytiedtotheU.S.dollar(USD),anditwouldbeallowedtofloatwithinanarrow0.3percentdailybandagainstthisbasket.
TherevaluationoftheRMB/USDexchangeratehasmarkedaneweraofamanagedfloatingexchangeratesystem.Thesignificanceofexchangeratesystemreformisthattheshifttoaflexibleexchangerateregime,especiallytheadoptionofacurrencybandthatreferstoabasketofcurrencies,providesthemonetaryauthoritieswithacertaindegreeoffreedominimplementingpolicies.Thenewsystemwouldmostlikelyactasacrawlingpeg,ratherthanbeingstrictlyfixed,allowingChinagreaterflexibilityeitherthroughadjustmentsinthecrawlingpegregimethathasinvolvedthebasketofcurrenciesorthroughreweightingofthebasket.Observershavefrequentlysuggestedthattheyuanisundervalued,oftenonthebasisofpurchasingpowerparityarguments(Cline2005;Goldstein2004;GoldsteinandLardy2006),contributingtogrowinglargetradesurplusesandportfoliocapitalinflows.Asinvestment(bothdomesticandforeign)boomedin2003–4andinflationaccelerated,somearguedthatrapidRMBappreciationwouldbehelpfulindealingwiththeincreasingpressureofdomesticinflationontheeconomy(Frankel2007;McKinnon2006).
However,itwasalsoarguedthatfurtherRMBappreciationmightbringasignificantdeclineinChina’sexports.Hence,Chinesepolicymakershavebeenfacingthedilemmaofchoosingbetweenthetwooptions(i.e.,RMBappreciationvs.depreciation).Credible,gradualRMBappreciationisrecommendedasanalternativestrategy(seeKutanandTsai2007).
Althoughmuchattentionhasbeenfocusedontradeflows,Chinesepolicymakersfaceasimilardilemmaintermsoftheimpactofexpectedrenminbiappreciationondomesticfinancialmarkets,inparticular,thestockmarket.Forinstance,iftheexchangerateappreciates,exportersarelikelytolosecompetitivenessoninternationalmarkets,causingadropinprofitsandhenceinstockprices.Ontheotherhand,depreciationoftherenminbiislikelytocauseimporterstolosecompetitivenessondomesticmarkets(consumersmaynotbeabletoafford“higherpriced”importedproducts),causingadeclineinprofitsandhenceinstockprices.
Duetothemutualeffectsofexchangeratesonstockprices,theimpactofrecent
changesintherenminbiondomesticstockpricesisanimportantconcerninpolicycirclesandamonginvestors.ThepurposeofthispaperistoaddresstheseissuesandexaminewhetheranasymmetriccausalrelationshipexistsbetweentheRMB/USDexchangerateandstockpricessinceremovalofthepeg.
LiteratureReview
Theissueofwhetherstockpricesandexchangeratesarerelatedhaslongbeenstudied.Twomajortheories,thetraditionalandportfolioapproaches,areappliedtotestthedynamicrelationshipbetweenexchangeratesandstockprices.Thetraditionalapproacharguesthatadepreciationofdomesticcurrencymakeslocalfirmsmorecompetitive,whichleadstoanincreaseinexports,andconsequentlyraisesstockprices.Thetraditionalapproachimpliesthatexchangeratesleadstockprices.Theportfolioapproach,onthecontrary,arguesthatanincreaseinstockpricesinducesinvestorstodemandmoredomesticassetsandtherebycausesappreciationofthedomesticcurrency,whichimpliesthatstockpricesleadexchangerates.The“stock-oriented”modelofexchangeratesbyBranson(1983)viewstheexchangerateasservingtoequatesupplyanddemandforassetssuchasstocksandbonds.
Empiricalevidenceusingbothapproacheshasyieldednoconsensusonthevalidityofeithertheory.Forexample,Mok(1993)foundweakbidirectionalcausalitybetweenstockpricesandexchangerates,whileBahmani-OskooeeandSohrabian(1992)andNiehandLee(2001)arguedforbidirectionalcausalitybetweenstockpricesandexchangeratesintheshortrun,butnotinthelongrun.Inaddition,somestudiesfoundaweakornoassociationbetweenstockpricesandexchangerates(e.g.,BartovandBodnar1994;Fernandez2006;FranckandYoung1972).
Morerecently,ithasbeensuggestedthatsomeofthemixedresultsmaybedrivenbyextensiveuseoflinearconventionaltime-seriesmethodologies,whichfailtoconsiderinformationacrossregions,andthusleadtoinefficientestimationsandlowertestingpower.Recentstudiesthereforeallowforanonlinearcausalrelationshipbetweenthetwovariablesandalsousethresholdcointegrationmethods,whichfurtherallowfornonlinearadjustmenttolong-runequilibrium(BalkeandFomby1997).
Methodology
ThispaperemploysthresholdcointegrationtechniquesaselaboratedbyEndersandGranger(1998)andEndersandSiklos(2001),whichextendtheresidual-based,two-stageestimationmethoddevelopedbyEngleandGranger(1987).Thedifferencebetweenthemliesintheformulationoflinearityandnonlinearityfromtheirsecondstageofunit-roottests.ThenonlinearmodelofEndersandGranger(1998)andEndersandSiklos(2001)canbeexpressedas
Δμt=Itρ1μt-1+(1-It)ρ2μt-1+ΣγiΔμt-1+εt
Equation
(1)isbasicallyaregime-switchingmodel—athresholdautoregressive(TAR)modelofthedisequilibriumerror,wherethetestforthethresholdofthedisequilibriumerroristermedathresholdcointegrationtest.Theresultofrejectionofthenullhypothesisofρ1=ρ2=0impliestheexistenceofacointegrationrelationshipbetweenthevariables.
Thisenablesustoproceedwithafurthertestforsymmetricadjustment(i.e.,H0:
ρ1=ρ2),usingastandardF-test.Whenthecoefficientsofregimeadjustmentareequal(symmetricadjustment),Equation
(1)convergestheprevalentaugmentedDickey-Fuller(ADF)test.Rejectingboththenullhypothesesofρ1=ρ2=0andρ1=ρ2impliestheexistenceofthresholdcointegrationwithasymmetricadjustment.InsteadofestimatingEquation
(1)withtheHeavisideindicatordependingonthelevelofμt–1,thedecaycouldalsobealloweddependingonthepreviousperiod’schangeinμt–1.TheHeavisideindicatorcouldthenbespecifiedasIt=1ifDμt–1≥τandIt=0ifDμt–1≤τ.AccordingtoEndersandGranger(1998),thismodelisespeciallyvaluablewhentheadjustmentisasymmetric,suchthattheseriesexhibitsmore“momentum”inonedirectionthantheother.Thismodelisthentermedamomentumthresholdautoregressive(M-TAR)model.TheTARmodelisusedtocaptureadeep-cycleprocessif,forexample,positivedeviationsaremoreprolongedthannegativedeviations.Ontheotherhand,theM-TARmodelallowsautoregressivedecaytodependonDμt–1.Assuch,M-TARrepresentationmaycapturesharpmovementsinasequence.AsthereisgenerallynopresumptionaswhethertousetheTARorM-TARmodel,therecommendationistoselecttheadjustmentmechanismbyamodelselectioncriterionsuchastheAkaikeinformationcriterion(AIC)ortheSchwarzBayesiancriterion(SBC).
GrangerCausalityTests
Giventhethresholdcointegrationresults,wenextapplytheGrangercausalitytestsusingtheadvancedmomentumthresholderror-correctionmodel(M-TECM).TheM-TECMisexpressedas
ΔYit=α+γ1Zt1+γ2Zt-t+ΣδiΔY1t-i+ΣθiΔY2t-i+νt
BasedonEquation
(2),GrangercausalitytestsareemployedtoexaminewhetherallcoefficientsofDY1,t–iorDY2,t–iarejointlystatisticallydifferentfromzerobasedonastandardF-testorwhethertheγjcoefficientsoftheerror-correctiontermaresignificant.BecauseGrangercausalitytestsaresensitivetotheselectionoflaglength,applyingtheAICcriteriontodeterminetheappropriatelaglengths,wefindempiricallythatthelaglengthsofk1andk2equaltwo(i.e.,k1=k2=2).Theresultsclearlyillustratethatnoshort-runcausalrelationshipexistsbetweenEXandCHStock(insignificanttorejectbothH0:
δ1=δ2=0andH0:
θ1=θ2=0).Besides,therealsoexistsaunidirectionalcausalityrunningfromEXtoCHStockinthelongrun,whenthedifferenceinthepreviousdisequilibriumtermisabovethethresholdvalueof0.0048.(H0:
θ1=θ2=γ1=0isrejectedatthe10percentsignificancelevel.)Ontheotherhand,thenullhypothesesofδ1=δ2=γ1=0,δ1=δ2=γ2=0andθ1=θ2=γ2=0cannotberejected.Furthermore,thesignificantfindingrejectingthenullhypothesisofγ1=γ2inCHStockisconsistentwiththefindingofourpreviousM-TARTestimationsandreconfirmstheexistenceof