SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word文件下载.docx
《SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word文件下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word文件下载.docx(14页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
commentsareasflowing:
Respondstothereviewer’scomments:
Reviewer#1:
1.Responsetocomment:
()Response:
×
×
2.Responsetocomment:
()
Response:
Weareverysorryforournegligenceof...
Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting...
ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat
WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.
Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion
AsReviewersuggestedthat
ConsideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave
Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.
Reviewer#2:
Reviewer#3:
Otherchanges:
1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“”werecorrectedas“”
2.Line107,“”wasadded
3.Line129,“”wasdeleted
Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthe
manuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthe
paper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.
WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewerswarm’workearnestly,andhopethatthe
correctionwillmeetwithapproval.
Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions
以下是審稿人意見和本人の回複。
與大家分享。
從中可以看出,這位審稿人認真讀了文章,提出很多寶貴の意見。
這些意見
分布在文章の各個地方。
我很詫異有人真正讀了我の文章。
看到這些意見,
我覺得很感激,不是因為接收文章の原因,而是這些意見能真正有助於提高
文章の質量。
從中還看出,回答審稿人問題の“技巧”。
對於回答問題,有の人就是一味反駁,卻不加改進。
記得ACSStyleGuide裏面說,當審稿人問到問題の,哪怕是他理解錯誤,
這
也說明作者這麼寫,其他讀者也會理解錯誤,引起歧義。
因此,作者就是要
修改句子,使表達不引起歧義。
因此:
有時間一味反駁,還不如指出具體改進在第幾頁、第幾段。
============================================
Reviewers'
comments:
Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshould
clearlyindicatetheaim&
scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobe
mentionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowing
arethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.
1.Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly.
2.Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?
3.Experimentalpart:
Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.
4.Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup(page4)canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup.
5.ReslutsPart(Page6):
"
COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages"
themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?
Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?
6.Page12,2ndpara:
ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?
Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig.7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn'
tappear,onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b.etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B.etc.tobecorrected.
7.Page14,1stpara:
'
contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo-ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy'
butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature.
8.Pages14through17:
theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbed
COonthePtsurface(figs3&
4)hastobediscussedmoreprecisely.Thisrevieweris
unabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallydue
totheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicals
oramixedeffect.Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperiment
performedwithCO/water?
CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail.
9.Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte.g.,page3para
1:
Itwasgeneralizedthat.........,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.
10.Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy.
===============================================
DearEditor,
Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer’insightful
comments.NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS-06-247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer’s
comments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful.Ihopethisrevisioncanmake
mypapermoreacceptable.Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.
[general]Theobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethird
paragraphofIntroduction.Howthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedat
theendofConclusionasoneparagraph.
[1]Ambiguousstatementi.e.,“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted.
[2]Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound(containingtwocarbonylgroups)todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow-coverageCO(comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy)attheliquid-solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid-phasechiralcatalysis,andslightdecompositionofEtPytoadsorbedCOwasreportedtoinfluencethecatalyticperformance.Inaddition,bystudyingthat,wecandirectlycompareourresultswithpreviousstudies.MoredetailsinthefirstparagraphofSection3.2.
[3]TheIRcellwasdesignedaccordingtotheIRcellsusedbymanyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswereadded.AphotowasgivenintheSupportingInformation.
[4]AflowdiagramoftheexperimentalsetupwasgiveninthenewFig.1.
[5]TheCOadsorptionexperimentswereperformedinthesameadsorptionmode,bybubblingCOthroughacleanPtsurfaceindifferentdaystoachievethesamesaturationcoverageofCO.InitialexperimentsindicatedthatgiventheCObubblingratewas0.85cm3/min,COcansaturateonPtafter30-45min.WebubbleCOfor60mintoguaranteethesameCOcoverage.IfwebubbleCOformoretime,orifweincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesn’tchange,indicating60minisalreadyenough.AfigureshowingtheCOuptakeasa
functionofbubblingtimewasgivenintheSupportingInformation.
[6]ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4wasconfirmedbytheremovingofEtPypeaks.ThementionofFig.7aand7betc.throughoutthetextwereallcorrected.
[7]ItisknownthatsomesolventssuchasacetonecancorrodetheVitono-ring.Wesawthedamageofo-ringafterusinghigh-concentrationEtPy.AreferencetotheVitono-ringinformationwasgiven.
[8]Theobservedreactivitytrendisduetoacombinationofbotheffects,withtheaccumulationoforganicmoietiesonPtsurfaceduringnumerousflushingcyclesthemoreimportantreason.Afewpropersentenceswereaddedtoclaritythispoint.
[9]TherepeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphinSection4.3weredeleted.
[10]Thetoo-longcaptionsweresignificantlyshortened.
Inall,Ifoundthereviewer’scommentsarequitehelpful,andIrevisedmypaper
point-by-point.Thankyouandthereviewagainforyourhelp!
==============================================
結果:
http:
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.005
歡迎瀏覽:
OrganicChemistryonSolidSurfaces(Review)
Z.Ma,F.Zaera*,SurfaceScenceReports61(2006)229-281.
ScienceDirectTOP25HottestArticlesinChemistry
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2006.03.001
CI
Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningour
redinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer
Wehaverewritten-thispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion
manuscript.Thesec