NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:22197359 上传时间:2023-02-03 格式:DOCX 页数:29 大小:31.73KB
下载 相关 举报
NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共29页
NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共29页
NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共29页
NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共29页
NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共29页
点击查看更多>>
下载资源
资源描述

NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx

《NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx(29页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。

NGOs and Health Policy in ChinaWord格式.docx

channellingfundingtoNGOstohelpwithHIV/AIDSrelated‘awarenesseducation,support,

andcare’(ThompsonandLu2006,p.32).3ButarehealthsectorNGOswidespread?

And

howmuchinfluencedotheyhaveoverpolicy?

RecentworkonChineseNGOsinotherpolicyareashasshownthemtobeincreasinglyactive

andinfluential.Maargues,forexample,thatNGO‘actionshave…startedtoinfluence

governmentalpolicymakingandimplementation’(Ma2006,p.121).Thisisespeciallysoin

relationtosocialandenvironmentalissueswherethecentralgovernmenthasencouraged

themtotakeonsomeworkformerlyhandledbythestate(Curley2002;

Howell2004;

Yang

2005).SincetherehasbeensimilarrecentstateencouragementofNGOsinthehealthsector

1IwouldliketothankTheLeverhulmeTrustforfundingtheprojectthroughaLeverhulmeResearch

Fellowship,2006-2007.IwouldalsoliketothankXuYing,WangGuohuiandDanielHammondfor

theirveryvaluableresearchassistanceatvariousstagesofthisprojectaswellasthoseNGOmembers

whokindlyagreedtobeinterviewedbutwhoseidentitiescannotberevealedinthispaper.

2AndThompsonandLu(2006,p.36)suggestthata‘thirdwave’mightinvolveNGOsinthesphereof

environmentalhealthproblems.

3ThompsonandLu(2006)reportthatbothWuYi(Vice-PremierandthenMinisterofHealth)in

Spring2005)andGaoQiang(MinisterofHealth)onWorldAIDSday2005,havecalledforNGO

involvementinthefightagainstHIV/AIDS.

(seeaboveandPeople’sDaily,25June2004),these,toomighthavebecomeactiveandbe

influencing(ortryingtoinfluence)policy.

Studiesofhealthpolicy-makinginadvancedindustrialiseddemocraciesusuallyseea

particulartypeofNGO,themedicalprofessionalorganisation,asapowerfulinfluence

(Moran1999;

Tuohy1999).Associationsofmedicalprofessionalsoftenhaveatradeunionlike

role,representingmembersinterestsandnegotiatingontheirbehalfwithgovernments,

butalsosometimesmaintainingautonomythroughastrongprofessionalself-disciplinaryrole.

ForexampleintheUKtheBritishMedicalAssociationiseffectivelythetradeunionfor

doctors,whiletheRoyalCollegesrepresenttheinterestsofspecifichealthsectoremployees

(forexamplesurgeonsandnurses).TheUK’sGeneralMedicalCouncilisanotherselfregulatory

bodyformedicalprofessionals.Itregistersdoctorsforpracticeandmaintainsits

owndisciplinaryproceduresformedicalmalpractice,includingstrikingpractitionersfromthe

medicalregister(Ham1992).AlthoughinChina,theinfluenceofsuchorganisationswaned

inthe1950saftertheChineseCommunistPartytookpower,itasmayhavebeguntowax

againalongwiththoseofotherNGOsoverthelastdecade.Theseorganisationsinparticular

arethereforeworthstudying.

ThepaperisbasedonareviewofChinese(notinternational)healthsectorNGOsandindepth

studyofonegrassrootsorganisationandonegovernment-organisedNGO(GONGO),

anorganisationofmedicalprofessionals.4Thecasestudiesuseacombinationofdocumentary

materials(policydocuments,organisations’constitutionsandotherdocuments),organisation

websites,andinterviewswithNGOmembersandscholarsinChina,allcarriedoutin2006

and2007.5Ofcourseconclusionsbasedononlytwocasestudiescanonlybeindicativeand

arenotgeneralisabletoallhealthsectorNGOs.Furtherresearchisneededtodemonstrate

theirwiderapplicability.

ThelargestandfastestgrowinggroupofgrassrootshealthNGOsinChinaisactiveinthe

HIV/AIDSissuearea,andtherearerelativelyfewothers.Acrossissueareas,however,these

NGOsarenotonlybeginningtofillgapsinpublicsectorprovisionforsomeisolatedand

vulnerablesocialgroups,butarealsolobbyingforpolicychangeontheirbehalf.Sincetheir

capacitiesandchannelsforinfluencingpolicyremainlimited,theyusearangeofinformal

4Theprojectonwhichthispaperisbasedisstudyinginsomedepthalargernumberoforganisations,

butdata-gatheringandanalysisofothersisnotyetcomplete.

5Interviewshavebeenanonymisedtoprotectinterviewees’identities

channels,includingpersonalconnectionstoCPPCCorNPCrepresentativesanddoctors,and

themedia,aswellaspersistinginusingformalchannelssuchaswritingtoMinistersand

localgovernmentofficials.However,theirpersonalconnectionsarepoor(whencompared

withGONGOs),theiruseofthemediacanleadtoproblemswiththeparty-state,andformal

channelsoftenelicitlittleresponse.Theythereforehavelimitedoptionsattheirdisposal.

Sincepersonalconnectionsarepotentiallythemosteffectivewayofreachingpolicymakers,

grassrootsNGOsperhapshavemorepolicyimpactatlocallevel.

ResearchinotherpolicyareashasindicatedthatsomeGONGOs(includingso-called‘mass

organisations’thathaveparticularlyclosetiestotheparty-state),havedevelopedindependent

policystances(Howell2000).Ifind,however,thatmanyhealthsectorGONGOsremain

closelyconnectedtotheMinistryofHealth,havefewdiscerniblydistinctpolicypositions,

andaremainlyvehiclesforpolicyimplementation.Notably,medicalprofessional

organisations—thosethatyoumightfromcomparativeexperienceexpecttodevelopsome

autonomy—haveapparentlyfailedtodevelopanindependentstanceevenoverthecritical

issueofprofessionalself-regulation.Overall,theroleofNGOsislimitedinhealthbya

powerfulMinistryofHealth,eventhoughitseemsunabletoregulateprofessionalsand

deliverawiderangeofserviceseffectively.

NGOsandtheirrolesinChina

BasedonMartens,IdefineNGOsas‘independentsocietalorganisationswhoseprimaryaim

istopromotecommongoalsatthenationalorinternationallevel’(Martens2002,p.285).Ido

not,however,include,asshedoes,therequirementthattheybe‘formal’,withanemployed

staff.AsIshalldiscussbelow,inChinamanygrassrootsNGOsthatfulfilotherpartsofher

definitionarenotabletooperateformallybecausetheparty-statelimitstheirdevelopment

preventingthemfromformallyregisteringandopeningcorporatebankaccounts.Following

otherswritingonNGOs,‘civilsocietyorganisations’or‘societalorganisations’(shehui

tuanti)inChina(Cooper2006;

Yang2005),IdoincludeGONGOs,thatissocietal

organisationswithclosetiestotheChineseparty-state,sincetheyareformallyindependent.

TheexistingliteratureonChineseNGOshasshownthemtohaveawiderangeofroles.6

Whilesomehaveonlyasinglemainactivity,forexample,servicedelivery,othersmay

simultaneouslysustainmultipleroles.AtleastsevenNGOpolicy-relatedrolesoractivity

typeshavebeenidentifiedintheexistingliterature.First,thereis‘selfhelp’orservice

delivery/provisionthatfillsagapinstatepolicyandprovision,forexamplerunningschools

formentallyhandicappedormigrantchildren(Kwong2004;

Leung1994),orservicedelivery

thatisundertakenforgovernmentandisaformofpolicyimplementation(Ma2006).Second,

someNGOsdisseminateorcoordinatepolicy(Howell2004).Third,theycanprovidetraining

forofficialsandothers—oftentoimprovepolicyimplementation(Cooper2006;

Howell

2004).Fourth,NGOssometimesdisseminateresearchornewmodelsforinterventionsthat

thenshapepolicy(Howell2004).Fifth,theycanrespondtogovernmentconsultationsor

othergovernmentinvitationsforpolicyinput(Howell2004).Sixth,theycanmediatedisputes

orprovidelegalassistanceforindividuals(Cooper2006).Seventh,theycandirectlylobbyor

conduct‘advocacy’activitiesthatrangefromtheuseofpersonalconnections,notablythose

withCPPCCmembers,writingreportsorletterstorelevantgovernmentofficessettingout

recommendations,and‘awareness-raising’,oftenthroughthemedia(ChenandLiao2005;

Cooper2006;

Ma2006).Thefirstfiverolesarenon-confrontationalandgenerally

unthreateningtothestateeventhoughtheymayinvolveindirectattemptstoinfluencepolicy.

Thelattertwocanbemorecontentiousandpotentiallychallengepolicydecisions,pointto

lackofpolicy,orhighlightproblemswithexistingpolicies.

HealthsectorNGOs:

thegrassroots-GONGOdistinction

Thispaperdistinguishesprimarilybetween‘grassroots’NGOsandGONGOs.Grassroots

NGOsarethosethathavebeenestablishedvoluntarilyandspontaneouslybyindividualsor

groupsofpeopleandwithouttheinvolvementofgovernment.Theyareusuallyrelatively

smallintermsofpersonnelandadministrationandhaverelativelyfewresources.Theymay

beregisteredas‘societalorganisations’(shehuituanti),andthereforebeformallynot-forprofit.

Butsomearenotregisteredatallbecausetheyhavefailedtosecureasponsoring

departmentwithintheparty-stateadministrationordonotfulfiltherequirementsfor

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 其它

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1