EG1109Report1024 tan yang 的冲突副本 1025Word文档下载推荐.docx
《EG1109Report1024 tan yang 的冲突副本 1025Word文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《EG1109Report1024 tan yang 的冲突副本 1025Word文档下载推荐.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
IshaanPakrasi(A0117853B)
INDEX
PageNo:
3-5
6
7
8
9
11-13
15
17
Introduction
Design
AdvantagesVSDisadvantages
Calculation:
TrafficLoad
DeckMass
TrussMembers
TableA:
CalculationofMaxForces
References
Task:
ToperformapreliminarydesignforatrussbridgespanningacrosstheSingaporeRiver.Thedistancebetweenthe2banksisgivenas20m,theheightofthebridgeisrestrictedtobelessthan5mabovethebankand2mbelowthebank.
Thebridgewillsupportvehiculartrafficflowthatconsistsof4lanes.Inourcalculations,weusedtheweightof12fullyladenclass4vehiclestoestimatethemaximumhighesttrafficloadingthebridgewillfaceinitslifetime.
Thebridgewillsupportedatbankbyapinsupportononeendandarollersupportattheother.ThedeckofourbridgewillbeconstructedusingreinforcedconcretebasedoffSingapore’sconstructionstandards.Thedeckwillalsoincludeasteelgridinthecenterofthedecktoreinforcetheconcretedeck.
ThedesignofourbridgeissimilartotheiconicHoweTrussBridgestyle,whichwasinventedin1840byWilliamHowe(Nakate,2013).TheHowetrussismadeupofdiagonalandverticalmembers.Inthisbridge,thediagonalmembersslopetowardsthecenterinanupwardmannerandthediagonalwebmembersareincompressionwhiletheverticalwebmembersareintension(Boon,2011).
AccordingtoCalvert(2004),comparedtoothertrussdesigns,theHoweTrusshastheadvantageofsimplicitywithstrength.Unlikeotherinventorsofthetime,whoaddedsuperfluouselementstotheirdesignsonthebasisoffaultyunderstanding,WilliamHowereducedthenumberofmemberstoaminimum.Ifanymemberfails,thewholebridgecollapses.Thisimpliesthattheforcesineachmembercanbeuniquelydetermined,andthemembercanbeproportionedtobearitsloadsafely,i.e.thestructureisstaticallydeterminateandtheforcesdonotdependonthedetailsofconstruction.IntheoriginalHoweTruss,allmemberswereofwoodexceptfortheverticalties,whichwereironrodsthreadedattheendsandsecuredbynuts.Thebridgewasverysuccessful.
PicturesofexamplestheHoweTrussinuseareshownbelow–
Above:
TheJayBridgeisawoodencoveredbridgethatspanstheeastbranchofthe
AusableRiverinJay,inEssexCounty,NewYork,USA.ItiseligibletobelistedintheNationalRegisterofHistoricPlaces.Ittheonlyoneofthe29coveredbridgesinNewYorkStatethatisintheAdirondacks.
BNHoquiamRiverSwingBridge
(BRIDGEHUNTER.COM,2013)
Advantages
Disadvantages
∙Simplebutstillefficientandstrong
∙Minimummembers
∙Lessmaterialusedascomparedtootherelaboratetrussdesigns
∙Memberscanbeeasilyreplacedastrussmembersarestraightandofrelativelyequallengths
∙Lessstableoverlongdistances(howeverforourbridgedistanceisrelativelyshort)
∙Noteconomicaltousesteelmemberstohandlecompressiveforces.
Calculations
TrafficLoad
Forthe4lanebridge,eachlanewillbe3mwideandtherewillbeasidelaneofwidth1.5mforpedestriansorbrokendownvehicles.Thelengthofthelaneswillbe20mlong.
Ourtrafficloadisbasedoneachlanebeingtakenupby3Class4Vehiclesofmaxladenweightoflessthan7250kg(ClassesofDrivingLicence,2013).
Massoftrafficload:
Mass=7250x12=87000kg
W=87000xg=853470N
Deck
Thedeckismadeupofconcreteslab0.25mthickwithreinforcedsteelgridinthecenterwithadiameterof32mm.
Concreteslab:
Volume=(0.25mX15mx20)–1m3=74m3(wetakeaway1m3asvolumeofrodisas1m3)
DensityofConcrete=2400kg/m3
Massofconcreteslab=2400x74=177600kg
SteelRod:
Length=(40x15)+(30x20)=1200m
Volume=(0.016)2xπx1200=0.965m3
Mass=0.965m3x7850kg/m3=7575kg(roundof)
Totalmassofdeck=177600+7575=185000kg
Weight=185000x9.81=1814850N
TotalWeightofTrafficLoadandDeck=1814850+853470=2668320N=2670000N(3sf)
TrussMembers:
Forthewholebridge,
Fx=0
Fy=0=>
Ay+Ey=Wtot
ForjointA
=>
Ey=
Ax=Ey=
ForjointF
ForjointE(sameasjointA),jointH(sameasjointF)
ForjointC,
ForjointG,
Fromthiscalculations,
MaximumTensileForcemembersareFBC,FCDandFCGandthemagnitudeisequaltoWtotwhichisthetotalweightofthebridge.
MaximumCompressiveForcemembersareFBGandFDGwiththemagnitudeof
.
TableA
AnalysisofTableA
TableAtakesinthedifferentrangesofdiameteroftrussandthethickness.Withthisvaluesweareabletocalculatetheweightofthetrussmembersandthustotalweightofthebridge,Wtot.WithWtotwecanthencalculatethemaximumcompressiveandtensileforcesinthetrussasshownabove.Next,wetookthoseforcesandmultiplieditwiththesafetyfactorof1.2andcalculatedthestressofthosemaximumforces.Wethencomparethisstressvalueswiththeacceptedyieldstressof0.85yieldstrengthfortensileforcesand0.7yieldstrengthforcompressiveforces.Ourgrouphaschosenthediameterof406.4mmandthicknessof16mmbecauseitproducesthesmallestdifferencebetweenmaximumcompressive/tensilestressesandacceptablestressasdefinedbytheyieldstrength.
Dimensions:
d=406.4mm
t=16mm
References:
Boon,G.(2011).ModelBridgeDesign.Retrievedfrom
BRIDGEHUNTER.COM.(2013).HoweTruss.Retrievedfrom
Calvert,J.B.(2004).EarlyEvolutionofTrusses.Retrievedfrom
http:
//mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/truss.htm
ClassesofDrivingLicence.(2013)Retirvedfrom
//driving-in-singapore.spf.gov.sg/services/driving_in_singapore/services/information.html
Nakate,S.(2013).TrussBridgeDesign.Retrievedfrom