Analysis of the Civil Procedure Law to modify the opportunities and challenges brought to the grassrWord文档下载推荐.docx
《Analysis of the Civil Procedure Law to modify the opportunities and challenges brought to the grassrWord文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Analysis of the Civil Procedure Law to modify the opportunities and challenges brought to the grassrWord文档下载推荐.docx(4页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Newlyrevised&
lt;
&
abstractCivilProcedureLaw&
gt;
involvingawiderangeofrichcontent,inparticulartostrengthenthesupervisionoftheprosecutionofcivilactionactivities,providegoodopportunitiesfordevelopmenttothegrassrootsofProsecutioninthisregard,andtheotheralsowithaseriouschallengefromthemodificationoftheCivilProcedureLawoftheopportunitiesbroughttothegrassrootsofProsecution,challengesandhowtodealwithotheraspectsdiscussed.
CivilProcedureLawofthethesisKeywordslegalsupervisionovertheimplementationofthesupervisionofpublicinterestlitigation
First,theopportunities
TherevisionoftheCodeofCivilProcedureinvolvingbroad,richincontent,thehighlightofmany,includingalargepartoftheamendmentistostrengthenandimprovethelegalsupervisionoftheprocuratorialorgans,whichcreatedaverygoodcondition,broughttothefoundationofProsecutionunprecedentedopportunities:
1.ToexpandthescopeoftheAttorneysupervisionprovidedforinArticle14oftheCivilProcedureLawbeforetheamendmentofthe“People’sProcuratorate,therighttoexerciselegalsupervisionovercivilproceedings”modifiedprovisionsinArticle14oftheCivilProcedureLawofthePeople’sProcuratorateshallhavetherighttocivilexpresslyauthorizedlitigationtoexerciselegalsupervision.“Althoughonlyafewwordchanges,butthechangeiscomprehensive.modifiedtheCivilProcedureLawclearlystipulatestheprocuratorialauthoritiesshallhavetherighttolegalsupervisionoftheCivilprocuratorialorgansrightsofthecivillitigationprocess(includingtrialactivitiesandthesubjectoflitigation(includingthejudges,andparticipantsintheproceedings,comprehensiveoversight.
2.Enrichingthemodeofsupervision.ProcuratorialorganstoimplementthelegalwayofsupervisionovercivilproceedingsbeforetheamendmentoftheCivilProcedureLawprovidesonlyprotesttheprosecutioninpracticeexploredvariousAttorneyrecommended“and”correctviolationsnoticeeffectivenessofprocuratorialorgansandothermethodsofsupervision,butnotalawexplicitlyauthorized“recommended”and“notice”Canthecourttoadoptandgivingandreceiving,andberejectedofhowtodisposeof,thelawsarenotrequired,suchthatsupervisionmeansdiscountedinthemodificationoftheCivilProcedureLaw,theincreaseintheExaminationandSupervisionofthewaysandmeans:
Section208oftheCivilProcedureLawmodifiednotonlyprovidesfortheprocuratorialorgansoftheentryintoforceofthecourtjudgment,ruledthatharmnationalinterests,socialpublicthemediationoftheinterestsoftheprotest,thethirdparagraphalsoprovidesthat“thePeople’sProcuratorateatalllevelstohavecommittedviolationsofthetrialotherthantrialproceedingsinthetrialsupervisionprocedure,therighttoberaisedtothesamelevelPeople’sCourtAttorneyrecommend”Inaddition,inordertostrengthentheProsecutorialSupervisionofrevisedtheCivilProcedureLawalsograntedprocuratorialorgansinvestigationpowers①.
3.Cleartherightoftheimplementationandsupervisionoftheprocuratorialorgans.Difficultyinenforcementandimplementationofchaos“haslongbeenplaguedthecourtsandinfavoroftheparties,withintheCourt,andeventheCentralPoliticalandLawCommissioninordertosolvetheproblemofexecutionofthecourthavemadealotofreformsandtry,buttheeffectisnotobvious.importantreasonistheimplementationandsupervisionofthecourthasbeenthelackofaneffectiveoversight,butalongtimefortheprosecutionofthesupervisionoftheimplementationofactivitieshavebeenheldnotmatcheventheattitudeofexclusion,andtheAttorneyauthoritiesforthiscourtrefusedtoevenrejectingattitudebutdonothing,ofwhichthemostimportantreasonisthattheCourthasbeentoperformactivitiesdonotbelongtoatrialactivitiesonthegrounds,exclusionprocuratorialorganstooverseetheimplementationofthecourt’sactivities.revisedhaslongbeenahaunt&
CivilProcedureLaw&
235provides:
“People’sProcuratoratehastherighttoexerciselegalsupervisionoftheCivilExecution”,theprosecutionexpresslygrantedtherighttoconductoversightontheimplementationofthecourt’scivilactivities,tosolvethepartiesrecoursetoredress,prosecutionauthoritiessupervisenodataproblem.
4.Clearpublicinterestlitigationsystem.Interestlitigationistohaveadirectinterestinthecasetoacertainlevelofeconomicdevelopment,socialdevelopmentinevitabledemandtoacertainextent,buttheplaintiff’squalifications“provisionsoftheCivilProcedureLawbasedonmodifiedbefore&
&
citizens,legalpersonsandotherorganizations.“publicinterestissuesthanthetraditionalcivillawbetweenindividualscontradictionsanddisputestobemuchmorecomplex,andareoftenunabletodeterminethespecificdirectinterestedparties,oradirectinterestinthepeoplecannotaffordtoprosecuteduetotheCivilProcedureLawrestrictionsontheeligibilityoftheplaintiff,sothatpublic-spiritedorganizations,institutionsandindividualsnotentitledtolitigation,thisemergingsocialissues(suchasenvironmentalpollution,consumerrightsprotectionissues,andsoheavilyinvolvedinthepublicinteresttobypasslegalchannels,triggeringmassincidents,isnotconducivetothebuildingofaharmonioussociety.&
newwiththeprovisionsofArticle55:
“pollutionoftheenvironment,thebehaviorofharmingthepublicinterestagainstthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofmanyconsumers,thelawauthoritiesandrelevantorganizationstothepeople’scourt“providesaclearinstitutionalbasisfortheprocuratorialorgansonbehalfofthestatetotheplaintiffinthePublicInterestLitigation.
Second,thechallengesandcoping
ModificationoftheCivilProcedureLawofopportunitiestothegrassrootsofProsecution,thegrassrootsofProsecutionpresentedagreaterchallenge:
1.Supervisionandexpansionofthescopeofthegrass-rootsofProsecutionteamhasputforwardhigherrequirements.BeforemodificationoftheCivilProcedureLaw,thesupervisionoftheChinasectorrangetolimitthescopetothejudgmentsandordersoftheentryintoforceofmatter,methodsofsupervisionisalsolimitedtotheprotest,accordingtotheCivilProcedureLawregulations,toprotestonlyabovetheleveloftheProsecution,grassrootsProcuratorateprotestrightcanonlybebasedontheprincipleofintegrationAttorney,handlingcasesassignedbythehigheroffices,onlyrecommendedthatthepowersoftheprotestbytheprocuratorialorgansathigherlevels,anditsrecommendationsprotesttonotproducelegaleffects,partiesandevendonotknowownappealcasesandundertakenbygrassrootsprocuratoratelegalinstrumentsmakingismadebythehigherprocuratorialorgans,procuratorialorgansathigherlevelsofstafftodealwiththeparties,thegrassrootspeoplelinenoworkpressureandpoweroftheprosecutionservice,coupledwiththeincreasingpressureofthecriminalcases,theleadershipofthegrass-rootsprocuratorialorgans,takingintoaccountthestatisticalpowerlimited,oftenyoungbusinessability,higherqualificationsprosecutorsarrangementstothepublicprosecution,investigationandsupervisionorself-surveillancedepartment,whilesomeoftheolderworkinitiativeandtheabilitytoworkrelativelyweakprosecutorsarrangementstotheChinalinedepartmentswork,inordertocopewiththecasesassignedbytheprocuratorialorgansathigherlevelsthegrassrootsofProsecutiondepartmenthandlingthecasecapacityisverylimited.CivilProcedureafterthelawchanges,theextentofthesurveillanceextendedtothewholeprocessoftheentirecivillitigation,includingtheentryintoforceoftheciviljudgment,ruling,alsoincludingdamagetonationalinterestsandpublicinterests,illegalmediation,bothciviltrialactivities,includingcivilianimplementationactivities,includingmanyfunctionsaregrass-rootsprocuratorialorganstheirownresponsibilities,isnolongerbehalfprocuratorialorgansathigherlevels“work”fortherole,itmadethedecision,theproductionoflegalinstruments,representthegrassrootsprocuratorialorgansaremadeoutofalotofworkthereisnolongerthe“gatekeeper”ofprocuratorialorgansathigherlevelsandguidanceforgrassrootsprocuratorialorgans,peoplelinedepartments,willnodoubtbeamajorchallengewillbefacingintheCivilProceduretomodify.civilactionadaptedtothegrassrootslevelofProsecutionmodificationofthelaw,theeffectiveprotectionofnationallegalsupervisionovertheBankofChinaatthegrass-rootsprocuratorialworktoimplement,muststrengthenthehumanresourcesdepartmentofthegrass-rootsprocuratorialorgans,peoplelineconfiguration,especiallytheintroductionofanumberofcivillegalprofessionlegaltalent,conditionalYoucanincreasetheintensityoftheintroductionofthejudicialofficersfromthecourt.
LinkstofreepapersDownloadCenter
2.Increasedoversighttoolstooverseethestrengtheningofgrass-rootsprocuratorialorgans,peoplelinepressureonthedepartment,butalsomakethesuddenincreaseinprocuratorialorgans,peoplelinetheeffectivesupervisionofthesectormeansthatonlyprotestbeforetheCivilProceduralLawRevisiongrassrootsprocuratorate,peoplelinedepartmentsdidnotprotest