written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文Word格式.docx

written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文Word格式.docx

《written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文Word格式.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《written in chinese english learners to explore the conjunction of the corpus analysis英语论文Word格式.docx（5页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

PaperNetwork:

PaperKeywords:

EnglishwrittenlanguagecorpusconjunctionAbstract:

buildingacoherentEnglishdiscourseconnectivesisanimportantmeansofthismethodtoexploretheuseofcorpuswrittenChineselearnersofEnglishusageinconjunctionresultsshowedthat:

First,thelearnersuseconnectivessignificantlymorethannativespeakerssecond,learnersandnativespeakersinthechoiceofwordstendtohavegreatersimilarity,thethreelearnersinconjunctionwiththeexistenceoftheconceptoffuzzysemantic,syntacticandstylisticknowledge,lackofawarenessisweak.interlanguagedevelopmentcharacteristics,andnegativetransferofmothertongueisthemaincauseoftheformationoftheaboveproblems.

Chapteristoachievesmoothconvergence,animportantwaytoclearlogicasacomponentofconvergence,themainfunctionistoconnectthewordsinthechaptersthatdominantlogicbyconnectingwordspeoplecanunderstandthesemanticlinksbetweensentences,orevenbylogicallybeexpectedfromtheprecedingsentenceafterthesentencesemantics.[1]（P92）scholarsgenerallybelievethatthecorrectandrationaluseofconjunctionscansignificantlyenhancethecoherenceandclarityofthearticle,thereadergrasptheauthor’seasywritingideastoimprovethereadertounderstandchapterefficiency,soastoachievethepurposeofeffectivecommunication,however,becausethelargenumberofEnglishconjunctions,usageandmorecomplexmeaningandbecomeoneofthemajordifficultiesoflearners.Inthispaper,comparativeinterlanguagecorpusresearchmethodstoinvestigateChineselearnersofEnglishwritteninconjunctionusage,analyzeproblems,lookforwardtoimprovingtheteachingofEnglishprovidesreferencedata.

I.Background

Sincethe1980s,sincetherapiddevelopmentofcomputercorporainordertobetterunderstandanddescribethelanguageoffersgreatpotentialandpossibilities.Alargenumberofdomesticresearchaboutconvergence,butthemethodusedtoconnectwordstocorporaspecialcontrast,quantitativestudiesarerare,researchershavemainlyLuoa,[2]（P59-62）,ZhaoWeiBin,[3]（P72-76）PanFan[4]（P157-162）andMoTsang.[5]（P45-50）viewoftheabovestudiescanbefound:

first,tosimilarorthesamegroupforthestudy,thefindingsdonotcoincide.Mostscholarsbelievethat,relativetothenativeauthor,theChineselearnersingeneralthereistoomuchtendencytoconnectwordswithEnglish,Chineselearnershavefoundthatthewordsusedinthemajorityofconnectionsshowedtoolittletousetrendsonthesecond,comparedtothematchingcorpustobefurtherimproved,asLuoYiOnthelimitationsoftheirstudytimesaid,‘shouldenhancethecorpusofthematching,comparativeanalysisofthecorpusofthematch,thehighertheresultswillspeakforthemselves.[2]corpusGrangerexpertshavepointedout,theinvestigationoftheparallelcorpususedtobeinthelearner’slearningphase,thetasktypeofdiscoursegenreandsocomparable,comparablecorpusisthebasisforcomparativeanalysis,otherwiseitwilldirectlyaffecttheconclusionsconvincing.[6]（P17-20）

Second,thestudydesign1.CorpuscollectionThecorpususedtoinvestigatethethree,byaBritishuniversitythesisMasterofAppliedLinguisticscompositioncourses,includingLanguagePlanning,LanguageTesting,SecondLanguageAcquisition,LanguageTeachingTheoryandPractice.Endofthecourse,teachersinaccordancewiththestandardrequirementsforallstudents（thesistopic,numberofwordstocompleteeachcourseandotherpapers.Gathererpapersclassifiedaccordingtothenationalityofthelearner,learnercorpusassembledinChina（98178words,nativespeakerscorpus（94231wordsandinternationallearnercorpus（97,183wordsInternationallearnerwhoisfromJapan,Korea,Pakistan,Norway,Denmark,Greece,Italyandothercountries,learnersshouldbesaid,morethaninthelearner’slearningcorpusstagewritingtask,discoursegenre,lengthofthearticlehaveahighlevelofmatching.

2.ResearchquestionsThisstudyattemptstoanswerare:

①Chineselearnersinthegeneraltendencytousewordstoconnectaresignificantlydifferentfromthenativespeakers;

②Chineselearnersofthemostfrequentlyusedconjunctionswhich;

③thannativespeakers,learningtendtoomuch,toolittleuseofwhatconjunctions;

④Chineselearnersuseinconjunctionwithwhatthemainproblems.

3.ConjunctionscaleHallidayandHasan’sclassificationofconnectedwordhasbeenrecognizedasahigherauthority.Celce-MurciaandLarsen-FreemanofHallidayandHasan’sclassificationhasbeensimplifiedinthisstudyusedCelce-MurciaandLarsen-Freeman’sclassification[7],minoradjustmentsonthisbasis,theformationofscaleinvestigationoftheconjunction.

4.ResearchproceduresUseofcorpusanalysissoftwareWordsmithTools4.0andSocialSciencesstatisticalsoftwareSPSSforcorpusprocessinganddataanalysis.Concretestepsareasfollows:

①theWordlistrunWordsmithTools4.0features,statistics,threecorpusofinformation,②therunWordsmithTools4.0Concordfunctiontoretrievetheconnectionofeachcorpusinthefrequencyofwordsandtheircontextinformation,andthenby-caseexaminationtoexcludeirrelevantevidence.tothen,forexample,itcontainsmorethanonemeaning,thentheuseofartificialmeanstoidentify,screening,③calculatethestandardconnectivesfrequencyper100,000wordsinthefrequencyappearstofacilitatethestatistics,contrast,④runSPSSinconjunctionChi-Squaretestcorpusindifferentfrequencydifferences.

Third,theresultsandanalysis1.Theresults（AgeneraltendencyWordsintheinvestigationofvarioustypesofconnections,thesamewithnativespeakers,mostChineselearnersuseconnectivestoindicatetherelationshipbetweenaddition,theuseofthewordstheproportionofnearlyhalfofthetotalconnections,theChi-Squaretest,x2=19.9709,p=0.000&

lt;

0.05,showslearnersandnativespeakersinconjunctionwiththeexistenceofsignificantdifferencesinfrequency,thenumberoflearnersconjunctionwithsignificantlymorethannativespeakers.

（2mostfrequentlyusedconjunctionsChineselearnersandnativespeakersofthetwocorporausedinconjunctionslightlydifferentorder,butthelearnersmostfrequentlyusedwordsinthetop10ineightnativespeakersusethewordinthefirst10,thatconnectlearnersandnativespeakersinthechoiceofwordshavegreatsimilarity,bothtendtousealso,forexample/instance,however,then,therefore,inaddition,first（ly）/firstofall,thusconnectingtheseeightwords,thissurveyatotalof68conjunctions,frequencyofuseamongthetop10wordsaboutone-seventhofthetotalsurvey,however,theirfrequencyofusewasashighastheactualtermsofthetotalsurveytwo-thirdsormore（65.6%and73.3%）,indicatingthatbothnativespeakers,ortheChineselearners,theyareverydependentonwritinginconnectionwithasmallpartofthepromptwordstothereadersbeforeandafterthestatement,betweenthecontentthelogicallink,inordertoguidethereaderinterprettheinformationcontentofthearticleandtheintentionofwritingwiththefindingsofLuoadifferenceisthatthisstudydatashowthatnativespeakerstendtousemorethanafewlearnerstoseveralconnectives,whichalsorankedfirstinthewordoftherelativefrequencyofuseisashighas26.7%,thereasontodoalittlelatertodiscuss.

（3highandlowfrequencyconjunctionsThepracticeofdrawingpaperQiufang[8]（P150-156）,with10millionwordsfortheunit,andthencompareseachconnectedwordsappearinthetwocorporastandardfrequencyifthefrequencydifferenceof10orless,thenignored.Thestatistics,first（ly）,second（ly）,third（ly）,fourth（ly）,thatis,inaddition,moreoverin10wordsintheChineselearnercorpusinthefrequencyhigherthannativespeakers,also,however,similarly,andinturn4expressions.frequencyofusethanthelatter.Whetheritisfromthenumberofwords,orfromtheuseofthefrequencypointofview,learnerstendtousethehighsideoftheconnectiontermslessthanthetendencyismoreobvious.

2.AnalysisandDiscussionCorpusretrievalanddatainterpretationshowsthattheChinesewrittenlanguagelearnerstoconnectthewordsusedsignificantlymorethannativespeakers.MorewhatistheChineselearnersusingconjunctionsuniquepersonalitytraits,orthesecondlanguagelearnerinterlanguagedevelopmentprocesstherecommonproblems?

Forthisreason,Ijointheinternationallearnercorpustobeincontrol,expecttobeabletohelpdescribetheproblem.Asnotedabove,thecorpusofthesampleoflearnersfromdifferentcountries,Masterthesiscomposition,fromacertainsense,theyarerepresentativesofmanysecondlanguagelearners.searchfoundinternationallearnersuseconnectivesstandardfrequencyisveryclosetoChineselearners（1370and1400,Chineselearnerstendtousemorewordsinthefirst10connections,9andconsistentwithinternationallearners,andbothmoreandlessuseofthewordintheaveragestandardrateisalsoverysimilar（62and67.Inviewofthis,thewholesituation,itcanbesaidisthetendencyofexcessiveuseofconjunctionssecondlanguagedevelopmentoflearnerinterlanguagecommon,itisdifficulttoavoidthenon-nativefeatures,thisdevelopmentisnotshownbecauseofthecommonalityoflanguagelearnersappearverydifferentbackgroundandthesametime,althoughbothexcessiveuseofconjunctionsalmostthesame,butsomespecificwords