Metaphor analysis.docx
《Metaphor analysis.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Metaphor analysis.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Metaphoranalysis
Title:
MetaphorAnalysis
Abstract:
Theanalysisofmetaphorsisaclassicalresearchthemeinlinguistics,buthasreceivedverylittleattentioninpsychologicalresearchsofar.Metaphoranalysis—asconceptualizedincognitivelinguistics—isproposedhereasaqualitativemethodforpsychologicalresearchforseveralreasons.Metaphorsareculturallyandsociallydefined,yettheyalsorepresentabasiccognitivestrategyofanalogicalproblemsolving.Metaphorsarecontext-sensitive,yetatthesametimetheyareabstractmodelsofrealitymuchinthesamewayasmentalmodelsandschemataincognitivepsychology.Themultifacetedpropertiesofmetaphorsallowforthestudyofmicro-interactionsbetweencognitionandcultureinopenandqualitativeresearchdesigns.Theyalsoenablethebridgingofthegapbetweenquantitative-experimentalandqualitativeapproachesinpsychology.Becausemetaphorsareofhighplausibilityineverydayexperience,metaphorsareavaluabletoolforinterventionsinappliedfieldsofresearchsuchasorganizationalandworkpsychology.
Keywords:
metaphoranalysis,analogy,cognitivelinguistics,context-sensitivity,mentalmodels,schemata,cognitiveanthropology,distributedrepresentation,tacitknowledge
Definitionof"Metaphor"
Metaphorsareanalogieswhichallowustomaponeexperienceintheterminologyofanotherexperienceandthustoacquireanunderstandingofcomplextopicsornewsituations(VOSNIADOU&ORTONY1989).Thedefinitionofthemetaphorusedherediffersfromoureverydayunderstandingofthemetaphor,whichreferstoitasalinguisticornamentwithexampleslike'Herculesisalion'.Inthefieldsofcognitivelinguistics,themetaphorisdefinedasananalogy(LAKOFF1987,LANGACKER1987):
Ametaphorconsistsoftheprojectionofoneschema(thesourcedomainofthemetaphor)ontoanotherschema(thetargetdomainofthemetaphor).Whatisprojectedisthecognitivetopologyofthesourcedomain,thatistheslotsinthesourcedomainaswellastheirrelationwitheachother(LAKOFF&JOHNSON1980,LAKOFF1993).
MetaphorAnalysisasaMultifacetedResearchPerspective
Forseveralreasons,metaphoranalysisallowsforamultifacetedresearchperspective:
(1)Metaphorsinfluenceinformationprocessing:
Metaphorsnotonlyenablethereflectionandcommunicationofcomplextopicsandtheanticipationofnewsituations,theuseofdifferentmetaphormodelsalsoaffectsfurtherperception,interpretationofexperiencesandpossiblyalsosubsequentactions(GENTNER&GENTNER1983).Metaphorsthushavenotonlyinstrumentalvalueforself-reflection,anticipationandcommunication,butalsoanimportantfunctionasmindsettings,whichinfluenceourcognitionoftheselfandtheworld(MOSER1998,p.65,OTTATI,RHOADS&GRAESSER1999).[11]
(2)Metaphorsareareliableandaccessibleoperationalizationoftacitknowledge:
Inresearchontacitknowledgeandtacitexpertise,notonlytherepresentationbutalsotheaccessibilityoftacitknowledgeisanimportantissue(NEUWEG1999,STERNBERG&HORVATH1999).Metaphorsarealinguisticmanifestationoftacitknowledge,whichiseasilyaccessiblebecausemetaphoricalexpressionscannotbeavoidedineverydayorprofessionallanguage.Accordingtothemethodologicalstandardsinpsychologicalreliabilitymeasures,metaphorscanbereliablyoperationalized(MOSER1998,p.79,OTTATI,RHOADS&GRAESSER1999).[12]
(3)Metaphorsareholisticrepresentationsofunderstandingandknowledge:
Metaphorsareanexampleofdistributedrepresentationofcomplexknowledgeandanalogicalproblem-solving.Comparedtopropositionalrepresentations,itisarguedthatmentalmodels,andthusalsometaphors,allowforamoreholisticrepresentationofunderstandingandknowledge(SCHNOTZ1988).Asthemetaphormodel'successisapath'(seeabove)shows,usingmetaphoricalexpressionssuchas'careersteps','tryingtofindtherightpath',etc.,notmerelydocumentshowsomeoneunderstandshisorherpresentsituation,butalsoindicatesamoregeneralunderstandingofsuccess,whichfavorscertainproblem-solvingskillsmorethanothers.[13]
(4)Conventionalmetaphorsareexamplesofautomatedaction:
Likelanguageingeneral,conventionalmetaphorshavebeenlearnedinsocialinteractionaspartofgenerallanguagecompetence.Oncelearned,conventionalmetaphorsbecomesubconsciousandareusedautomaticallyjustlikemostotherlinguisticfeatures.Onlyconsciouseffortandattentioncanchangeorhelpto'unlearn'automatedlanguagebehaviorliketheuseofconventionalmetaphors.Therefore,itcanbeassumedthattheuseofmetaphorsisrelativelyfreeofself-presentationstrategies,whichisanimportantaspectformanypsychologicalresearchquestions.Moreover,recentstudieshaveshownthatautomatedprocessesareveryimportantinactionregulationandresponsiblefortheautomatedandsubconsciousactivationofgoalsandmotives(BARGH&BARNDOLLAR1996,DWECK1996).Metaphoranalysiscanbeusedtoassessthestructureandcontentoftheimplicittheoriesresponsiblefortheseautomatedandsubconsciousprocesses.[14]
(5)Metaphorsreflectsocialandculturalprocessesofunderstanding:
Metaphorsrepresentgeneralcognitiveabilitiesofanalogicalreasoning,whichcanbeunderstoodinthetermsofschematheoryandthetheoryofmentalmodelsincognitivepsychology.Yetatthesametime,metaphorsarecontext-sensitiveandreflectsocialandculturalprocessesofunderstandingandself-definition.Asstudiesabouttheself-concepthaveshown(MOSER1998),metaphoricalexpressionsusedinnarrativeinterviewstodescribeoneselfcanbedifferentiatedondifferentlevels.Ontheonehand,themetaphorsourcedomainsusedtotalkabouttheselfseemtobeverylimited.Only22metaphorsourcedomainswerereliablyidentifiedtodescribealargecorpusof4,000metaphoricalexpressions,withthemostfrequenteightmetaphorsourcedomainsalreadydescribing68%ofallmetaphoricalexpressionsused.Themetaphorsidentifiedmostlikelyrepresentthesharedculturalunderstandingoftheself.Ontheotherhand,significantdifferencesinfrequencycouldbefoundwithinthese22metaphorsourcedomains,dependingongender,professionaleducationandpreferredlifestylesofthesubjectsinterviewed.Onathirdlevel,individualpreferencesinmetaphorusewerefound.Theseindividualdifferenceswereanalyzedquantitatively(frequencyofdifferentmetaphorsourcedomains)aswellasqualitativelyinsinglecasestudies(forfurtherdetails,seeMOSER1998).[15]
(6)Combiningquantitativeandqualitativeapproachestometaphoruse:
Withinalargetextcorpusofmetaphoricalexpressionsasdescribedabove(MOSER1998),typicalpatternsofmetaphoruseincombinationwithcertaintopicscanonlybedetectedthroughthequantitativeanalysisofthecategoricaldata.Statisticalproceduresusedbytheauthorincludepowerfultoolsfortheanalysisofcategoricaldatasuchasconfiguration-frequency-analysisandcorrespondenceanalysis.Bothprocedureswouldalsomeritmoreattentioninthecontextofqualitativeresearchthantheyreceivetodate.Whilethequantitativeanalysisofmetaphorsrevealsgeneraltendenciesinmetaphoruse,thefullpotentialofmetaphoranalysiscanonlybereachedwhencombiningitwithaqualitativeapproach.Thequalitativeapproachenablestheanalysisofmetaphoruseincontextandunderstandingthefunctionofmetaphoricalexpressionsinthecontextofanarrativetextorinthecontextofabiographicalreconstruction.Thecombinationofqualitativemetaphoranalysiswithcontentanalysisandnarrativetextanalysisprovedtobeespeciallyfruitfulfortheunderstandingofsituational,biographicalandsocialfunctionsofmetaphoruse(seeMOSER1998).Athirdmethodologicalapproachtothemetaphor,whichiscurrentlyusedbytheauthor,isthestudyofmetaphorsinexperimentallaboratoryresearch.[16]
FieldsofApplication
Asresearchabouttheselfshows(MOSER1998),itispossibletocombineacognitiveunderstandingofmetaphorwitharesearchscopeinindividual,socialandculturaldifferencesinmetaphoruseandmentalmodelsoftheself.Atthesametime,itprovedtobeveryusefultocombinequalitativeaswellasquantitativeapproachestometaphoranalysis.[17]
Likemanyotherkeyconceptsinpsychologicalresearch,theselfisa'classical'researchtopicformetaphoranalysis,becausepeoplecanonlyspeakmetaphoricallyaboutthecomplexandabstractmatterofthe'self'.Analyzingmetaphorsthusnotonlygivesaccesstothetacitknowledgeandmentalmodelswhichshapetheindividualunderstandingoftheself,butalsototheculturalmodelsprovidedbylanguagetoexpressindividuality,self-conceptandthe'innerworld'.Asdescribedabove,theanalysisofmetaphorsshowedthatonlyveryfewmetaphormodelswereusedaltogether,independentlyofthetopicspeopletalkedaboutandregardlessoftheself-conceptaspecttheyreferredto(MOSER1998,1999a,1999b).Apartfromthisculturallysharedlevelofunderstandingoftheself,therewerealsosignificantsocialdifferencesinmetaphoruse,suchasprofessionalexperience,futureorientation(careerplans,preferredrelationshipmodel),andgender.Ontheindividuallevel,certainhabitually-preferredmetaphormodelsoftheselfcouldbeassessed,aswellasdifferencesinmetaphorusefordifferentself-conceptaspects(idealvs.actual,ought,negative,socialself,selfchangeorgenderrole).Theseresultscouldonlybeobtainedthroughthetriangulationofquantitativeandqualitativemethods,whichallowedtheanalysisofstatisticallysignificantoveralltendenciesinalargedatasetaswellasqualitativedifferencesinsinglecasestudies.Forfurtherd