英语论文The Application of Schema Theory to English Reading Teaching in Senior High School.docx
《英语论文The Application of Schema Theory to English Reading Teaching in Senior High School.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英语论文The Application of Schema Theory to English Reading Teaching in Senior High School.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
英语论文TheApplicationofSchemaTheorytoEnglishReadingTeachinginSeniorHighSchool
TheApplicationofSchemaTheorytoEnglishReadingTeachinginSeniorHighSchool
Introduction1
1.TheoriesaboutEnglishReading3
1.1Theunderstandingofreadingprocess3
1.2Schemataandthereadingprocess4
2.Atheoreticalframework-schemaandschematheory4
2.1Thedefinitionofschema5
2.2Typesofschemata6
2.2.1Languageschemata6
2.2.2Formalschemata7
2.2.3Contentschemata8
2.3Thefunctionsofschema9
2.3.1Helpingreaderspredictthecontentoftexts9
2.3.2Helpingreadersselecttheinformation10
3.ThepresentstateofreadingteachinginSeniorHighSchool11
4.FactorsaffectingSeniorHighSchoolstudents’readingcomprehension12
5.Theapplicationofschematheory14
5.1Toenrichstudents’schemata15
5.2Toactivatestudents’schemata16
5.3Tobuildupstudents’schemata18
5.4Anexampleofapplyingschematheoryinthecourseofreadingteaching19
Conclusion22
References23
Introduction
Readingplaysanimportantroleinforeignlanguageteachingandlearning,foritisoneofthemostessentialwaystoacquireforeignlanguageknowledgeandskills.Formoststudents,especiallyforSeniorHighSchoolstudents,readingisbyfarthemostimportantoneofthefourskillsinEnglishlanguagelearning.Ineveryyear’sCollegeEntranceExamination,readingcomprehensioncoversalargeproportionofthetestpaper,therequirementforreadingabilityincreaseandthepositionofreadingcomprehensionismoreoutstanding.Therefore,howtoimprovestudents’readingcomprehensionabilityeffectivelybecomesthefocusinEnglishreadingteachinginHighSchool.However,agreatdealhasbeendoneinthisaspect,yetweareawarethatmanystudents,afterlearningEnglishforyears,oftenendinfailureabouttheircomprehensionwhenaskedtoreadapassage(TangAilian,2001:
4).Becausethetraditionalreadingteachingstressedstudents’linguisticknowledgeexcessively,neglectingbackgroundknowledgeandthestructureofthetext.TraditionalviewofEnglishreadingteachingregardsreadingcomprehensionasaBottom-upprocess.Englishteachingfocusoninterpretingwords,sentencesandgrammar.Thus,thetextisdividedintopartstoreadratherthantoreadasawhole,whichhaslittleeffectonimprovingreaders’readingability.Betweenourstudents’actualreadingabilityandtherequirementoftheHighSchoolEnglishSyllabus,thereisawidegap.Therefore,itishightimethatwereevaluatedourreadingteaching.TheauthorappliestheschematheorytoguideEnglishreadingteaching.Sincethistheoryholdsthatthereadingprocessisnotonlyaprocessofpolishinglanguageandconcepts,butalsomakinguseoftheoriginalbackgroundknowledge.Thus,inreadingclassesteachersshouldhelpstudentsactivatetheschematastoredintheirmindstoimprovestudents’readingability.
1.TheoriesaboutEnglishReading
1.1Theunderstandingofreadingprocess
Inalongperiod,manyresearcheshavebeencarriedonthenatureofreadingprocess.Untilnow,itisnoteasytodefinethenatureofreading.Readinghasdifferentmeanings.Itistraditionallybelievedthatreadingcomprehensionisabottom-upprocessinwhichthereadersdecodeprintedpagesfromletters,words,andsemanticgraphicunits.Ithasshortcomingswhichoveremphasizesthemeaninginthereadingprocess,neglectingthebackgroundknowledgeofthetext.Later,withthedevelopmentofpsychologicallinguistics,appliedlinguistics,anddiscoursetheory,moreandmoretheoriesaboutreadingcomprehensionwereputforwardbysomeforeignlinguists.ThemostimportantoneisGoodman’s(1967:
170)Investigationsoffirstlanguagecomprehension,whichcharacterizedreadingasa“psychologicalguessinggame,”emphasizingtheimportanceoftop-downprocessing.However,thepastdecadehaveseenaveryconsiderablegrowthofinterestinreadingcomprehensionandschematheory.Coady(1979:
59)thoughtthatreadingisaninteractivecomplexofabilitiesorskillsandknowledge.Thatis,readingisalsoregardedasacomplicatedprocessinwhichreadersworkoutthemeaningofthewrittentextwiththeprocessofinteractionbetweenunderstandinglinguisticfeaturesoftextandpriorbackgroundknowledgeofreaders.TheinteractiveprocessingalsocallSchemaTheoryModel.
1.2Schemataandthereadingprocess
Nomatterthereadingprocessis“Bottom-up,”“Top-Down”or“Interactive”process,readerscan’tarriveatcomprehensionwithouttheirschematicknowledge.Intheprocessofreading,“comprehensionofamessageentailsdrawinginformationfromboththemessageandtheinternalschemataunitsetsarereconciledasasingleschemaormessage”(Anderson,1982:
53).Readingcomprehensionisacomplexprocess,whichalsohasbeendescribedasaconstructiveprocess(Bartlett1932,Spiro1980).Inordertounderstandthetext,thereadermustuseinformation,whichisexplicitandimplicittoformaschema.Readersinterpretatextaccordingtotheirschemata.Schematheorybelievesthatknowledgeissystematicallyorganized(Rumelhart,1980).Aschemacanbedefinedashavingelementsorcomponentswhichcanbedelineatedandwhichareorderedinspecificways.Readersuseschematatoanticipatetextcontentandstructures.Thewayweinterpretdependontheschemataactivatedbythetext;andwhetherweinterpretsuccessfullydependsonwhetherourschemataaresufficientlysimilartothewriter’sschemata.
2.Atheoreticalframework-schemaandschematheory
Theimportanceofschematicknowledgeisnowwidelyacknowledgedinlanguageteachingtheoryandmanyresearchesintheschema-orientedrealmofEFLreadinghavebeendone.Theresultsoftheseresearcheshaveshownthatreadingcomprehensioncanbesignificantlyfacilitatedbyutilizingschematheoryinreadingprocess.Therefore,inthefollowingparts,sometheoreticalframeworksarediscussed.
2.1Thedefinitionofschema
Theterm“schema”wasfirstevolvedoutoftheGestaltpsychologyandBartlett’stheoryconcerninghumanmemory.Manyyearslater,itwasintroducedintoreadingbyRumelhart,CarrellandEisterhold.Schemaisconsideredasdatastructuresorworldknowledgeinthemindandthelinkbetweenourknowledgeoflinguisticformandourknowledgeoftheworldisextremelyclose.Themorepredictableasequenceoflinguisticelementsis,themoreeasilythetextwillbeprocessed.OnedefinitionisRumelhart’s:
“Aschematheoryisbasicallyatheoryaboutknowledge.Itisatheoryabouthowknowledgeisrepresentedandabouthowthatrepresentationfacilitatestheuseoftheknowledgeinparticularways.Accordingtoschematheory,allknowledgeispackagedintounits.Theseunitsaretheschemata.Embeddedinthesepacketsofknowledgeis,inadditiontotheknowledgeitself,informationabouthowthisknowledgeistobeused.”
CarrellandEisterholdfurtherdevelopedschematheory.“Theroleofbackgroundknowledgeinlanguagecomprehensionhasbeenformalizedasschematheory,whichhasasoneofitsfundamentaltenetsthattext,eitherspokenorwritten,doesnotbyitselfcarryingmeaning.”Thatis,accordingtoschematatheory,atextonlyprovidesdirectionsforreaderstoconstructmeaningfromtheirownpreviouslyacquiredknowledge.Schematheoryisbasedontheconceptthat“everyactofcomprehensioninvolvesone’sknowledgeofworldaswell”(CarrelandEisterhold1983:
73).Theunderstandingofthearticledependsonthedegreeoftherelatedschemaknowledgebeingactivated.Therefore,teachersshouldmakethemostuseoftheschematheorymodelinteachingreadingcomprehensioninhighschoolandtrainthestudents’abilityinordertoactivatetheirrelatedbackgroundknowledgetoassisttheminunderstandingthewholetext.
2.2Typesofschemata
Researchonthetheoryofschemahashadagreatimpactonourunderstandingofreadingcomprehension.Researchershaveidentifiedseveraltypesofschemata.Generallyspeaking,therearethreetypesofschemataaccordingtodifferentpartstheyaccountforintextcomprehension.Theyarelanguageschemata,formalschemataandcontentschemata,whicharecloselyrelatedtoreadingcomprehension.
2.2.1Languageschemata
Languageschematainreadingcomprehensionrefertosentencestructure,grammaticalinflections,spellingandpunctuation,vocabulary,andcohesivestructure.Languageschemataincludethedecodingfeaturesneededtorecognizewordsandhowtheyfittogetherinasentence,thatis,thebasicknowledgeoflanguage.Anyreadingstrategyorskillwouldbeuselessforreaderswholackbasicvocabularyandgrammarknowledge.Therefore,themorelanguageschematathereadershaveintheirminds,thefasterandnicertheyacquireinformation,andthebetterunderstandingtheymightachieve.Ontheotherhand,itisimpossibleforthemtodecodethelanguageinformation.Asaresult,theycouldnotactivatethestoredknowledgethroughthecluesfromthetext,letalongunderstandthemeaningofthetextquicklyandexactly.However,inthereadingprocess,weshouldavoidoveremphasizingtheisolatedwordsandneglectingthewholetext.Forexample
1.Herearesometipsforhelpingtobuildupone’sschema.
2.Someguideshavethehabitofaskingforeigntouristsfortips.
3.Finallywereachedthenortherntipoftheisland.
Inthefirstsentence,“tip”meanssuggestionsandadvices.Inthesecondsentence,“tip”meansasmallamountofextramoney.Inthethirdsentence,“tip”meansthethinpointedendofsomething.Ifreadersdonotunderstandthemeaningsoftiporknowtheisolatedmeaningsoftipandneglectingthewholesentences,theycannotcomprehendthesesentencescorrectly.Thatis:
readers’lackofenoughlanguageschemaw