英美文学论文.docx

1、英美文学论文AbstractDaniel Defoe is a great English novelist in the18th century. Robinson Crusoe, his masterpiece, is either a pioneering English adventure fiction or a typical colonial literature. It not only is a vivid narrative story about the surprising and adventuring life of Robinson, but also has t

2、he theme of colonism which is represented on a series of binary oppositional colonial discourses: the colonial country and the colony, master and slave, the white and the colored, central culture and marginal culture, civilization and savageness, Christianity and cannibals and all that. With post-co

3、lonial criticism as its visual angle, this thesis sets on the history of European colonialism, analyzes the description of characters, narrative words and the growing process of “Friday” who loses his national culture identity to deconstruct those colonial discourses, explores the strategies for col

4、onists cultural colonization to those people in the colonies and reveals the dilemma of losing their national culture identity. This analysis gives us a new perspective in appreciation this classical work and a typical case study of how the colonists exert the cultural rule on the people in the colo

5、nies.Key WordsRobinson Crusoe; colonialism; colonial discourses; cultural colonization摘要鲁滨逊漂流记是18世纪英国作家丹尼尔.笛福的代表作，是英国历险小说的源头，也是一部带有强烈殖民主义意识的文学作品。它不仅生动地讲述了小说主人公鲁滨逊开拓荒岛的详细过程，也描绘了他驯服改造原始部族人“星期五”的手段和策略。本课题着重以“后殖民主义批评”（易小斌，2004：64-68）为视角，拟从历史文化背景、人物刻画以及话语分析入手，对鲁滨逊漂流记中所建立起的宗主国/殖民地，奴隶主/奴隶，白种人/有色人，中心文化/边缘文化

6、，文明/野蛮，基督教/食人部族等二元对立的殖民话语体系进行解构，揭示蕴涵在作品中的殖民主义意识，并阐释鲁滨逊如何以枪炮为后盾，有计划地从语言和宗教信仰两方面对“星期五”进行赤裸裸的文化殖民，使其丧失了原有的民族文化身份，从而造成自我身份丧失的窘境。本课题为读者重读经典开辟了一个新的视角，也为读者审视殖民者的文化统治提供了一个典型个案。关键词鲁滨逊漂流记；殖民主义；殖民话语；文化殖民IntroductionColonialism is the consequence of western capital accumulation. It originates from the periods o

7、f Discovery and Exploration since 15th century. Some critics think that it breaks the separation of the Old World and the New World and also encourages the exchange of both cultures. (李伯庚, 2003) Actually, from 15th to19th century, it is a long history of exploitation and invasion among European powe

8、rs. They are motivated by the lure of wealth in Asia, the spice trade in India, the gold and silver in America, and the slaves of Africa after reading Marco Polo s Travels.（Spielvogel, 281）During this period, European countries get handsome profits and become great empires. Especially for Britain, t

9、ill the reign of Queen Victoria, she becomes “the Empire on Which the Sun Never Sets” and “the Mistress of the Seas”. (Clemen, 2003) On the contrary, what they bring to the people in the colonies is ravaging their land, mocking their gods, banishing their languages, decimating their population throu

10、gh disease, and subjugating their children to a subservient and dependent status. (Rogers, 461-519) However, in colonial literature, all the devil practices of those colonists have been erased, instead, we often find the messages conveyed everywhere that the whites are spreading “civilization” to no

11、n-westerners for they justifies that they are under the call of the God to “deliver the inferior races” and “civilize the savages”. Factually, it is one of popular colonial discourses for their cultural colonization or invasion. Daniel Defoe is a great English novelist in the18th century. Robinson C

12、rusoe, his masterpiece, is either a pioneering English adventure fiction or a typical colonial literature. It not only is a vivid narrative story about the surprising and adventuring life of Robinson, but also has the theme of colonism. With post-colonial criticism as its visual angle, this paper se

13、ts on the history of European colonialism, analyzes the description of characters, narrative words and the growing process of “Friday” who loses his national culture identity to deconstruct those binary oppositional colonial discourses: the colonial country and the colony, master and slave, the whit

14、e and the colored, central culture and marginal culture, civilization and savageness, Christianity and cannibals and the like, explores the strategies for colonists cultural colonization to those people in the colonies and reveals the dilemma of losing their national culture identity. I. Colonial Di

15、scoursesIn colonial literatures, the colonial discourses are prevailing. Especially during the period of colonialism and imperialism, those novelists preferred to produce a succession of powerful discourses as a useful approach to spreading colonism. The westerners were good at creating “the white m

16、ythology” and constructing imaginative “others”. In Orientalism, Edward Said pointed out, “the long-term images, stereotypes and general ideology about the the Orient as the Other, constructed by generations of Western scholars, which produce myths about the laziness, deceit and irrationality of Ori

17、entals, as well as the reproduction and rebuttal in current debates on the Arab-Islamic world and its exchanges, particularly, with the United States.”（Selden et al., 223）Robinson Crusoe is a typical colonial literature that has a theme of colonism which is represented on a series of binary oppositi

18、onal colonial discourses: the colonial country and the colony, master and slave, the white and non-white, central culture and marginal culture, civilization and savageness, Christianity and cannibals and other discourses. With the confidence of Britain Imperialism, Robinson, the representative of th

19、ose colonists continuously claimed himself as the civilized man, his culture as the central culture, thus he had the competence of enslaving “the other” and spreading “civilization” to “the inferior race”.A. Master and SlaveWe have learned from the European culture that the Renaissance derived from

20、and rose in Italy and then spread to other European countries. With the core of “Humanism”, it advocated “Human Right” and “Liberty”. Yet, it as well supported slavery system and the evil slave deal. Since the Renaissance was an age of economy revival, too. Those capitalists gained lucrative profits

21、 from the slave deal. Whats more, Karl Marx had ever classified slave deal as one essential factor of capital accumulation. (阿勃拉莫娃，1983：2) Thus, “Human Right” and “Liberty” were only confined to the West that was considered as “the Center of the World”. Master and slave was a common discourse in col

22、onial literature. Those scholars often constructed “the white mythology” and treated westerners as “the master” of “the other” in their works.For another, Daniel Defoe, the author of Robinson Crusoe, was originally a merchant who was concerned more about own interests. Daniel Defoe once said: “Trade

23、 is the wealth of the world. Trade made the difference between rich and poor, between one nation to another.”(Jackson, 82) In this short but significant statement Defoe expressed the main ideas of the mercantilistic system that Britain was developing at the end of the 17th century. The English merca

24、ntile spirit began during the Elizabethan Age when England realized that trade generated wealth. In his eyes, as well as in Robinsons eyes, slave deal was nothing devil but one terms of trade that could bring handsome profits.1. Selling Xury and Buying Black Slaves to Work for His PlantationIn Robin

25、son Crusoe, Defoe narrated that Robinson once became a slave himself of the Moors but later, when he was a free man, he sold a little boy and bought a slave for his plantation. Robinson also explained nonchalantly to his friends in Brazil that black slaves could easily be bought on the African coast

26、. As Xury once being enslaved with Robinson, later, the little boy was enslaved to Robinson again under the threat of being thrown into the sea when Robinson escaped from slavery. Some critics would argue that “asking him swear otherwise threw him into sea” had no vicious intention but for prudence.

27、 In addition, Robinson had ever promised that he would make Xury a great man if Xury would be true to him. Nonetheless, we had learned that the fate of Xury was once more sold to the captain who helped them out of trap. Defoe described that “Robinson was reluctant to give the boy to the captain at f

28、irst for he was loath to sell the boys liberty, but after being offered a medium, the captain had him because he would give the boy an obligation to set him free in ten years if he turned to be a Christian.”(Defoe, 26) It told that it was the civilized religious faithChristianity that delivered Xury

29、 and his liberty. Here was another expression of the whites mythology. Meanwhile, Xury was written to be willing to go to him, which reduced the devil practice of slavery system. As a matter of fact, at his times, he had no right to decide his fate and in colonial literature, “the other” was always

30、described as voiceless. Hence, it justified for the slavery system.2. Enslaving the SavageFridayWith the rising of Britain Empire, British people were confident in their race and culture. (陈兵, 2006: 71) They believed that they were superior to “the other”. They held the faith that God was on their s

31、ide and called them to deliver the savages and civilize them.Consequently, enslaving the savageFriday was one essential step in Robinsons plan to realize the task. Furthermore, the former part of the novel proved that owning a slave was reasonable. Friday lived in a primitive tribe with the nature o

32、f man-eating and also a victim of the bloody custom. Robinson represented the “Civilized Western Man”, who drove away the Indies with advanced armsgun and powder, and then he was just to deliver Friday from the cannibals. When he met Friday, he said Friday was meant to be his servant. He claimed tha

33、t he would make Friday lead a “happy” life. In order to thank for his deliverance, Friday became his servant. But from that moment, the liberty was deprived. Friday had left his hometown and his relatives forever. He was forced to suffer the extremely agony of homesick and missing relatives. As we know, Friday