ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOCX , 页数:10 ,大小:28.25KB ,
资源ID:6386490      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bdocx.com/down/6386490.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(外文翻译缓解湖泊富营养化放开氮控制并专注于磷的减排节选.docx)为本站会员(b****6)主动上传,冰豆网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰豆网(发送邮件至service@bdocx.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

外文翻译缓解湖泊富营养化放开氮控制并专注于磷的减排节选.docx

1、外文翻译缓解湖泊富营养化放开氮控制并专注于磷的减排节选中文4700字,2980单词,16700英文字符出处:Progress in Natural Science 19 (2009) 14451451原 文 Mitigation of Lake Eutrophication: Loosen Nitrogen Control and Focus On Phosphorus AbatementHaijun Wang, Hongzhu WangAbstractTraditionally, nitrogen control is generally considered an important co

2、mponent of reducing lake eutrophication and cyanobacteria blooms. However, this viewpoint is refuted recently by researchers in China and North America. In the present paper, the traditional viewpoint of nitrogen control is pointed out to lack a scientific basis: the N/P hypothesis is just a subject

3、ive assumption; bottle bioassay experiments fail to simulate the natural process of nitrogen fixation. Our multi-year comparative research in more than 40 Yangtze lakes indicates that phosphorus is the key factor determining phytoplankton growth regardless of nitrogen concentrations and that total p

4、hytoplankton biomass is determined by total phosphorus and not by total nitrogen concentrations. These results imply that, in the field, nitrogen control will not decrease phytoplankton biomass. This finding is supported by a long-term whole-lake experiment from North America. These outcomes can be

5、generalized in terms that a reduction in nitrogen loading may not decrease the biomass of total phytoplankton as it can stimulate blooms of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. To mitigate eutrophication, it is not nitrogen but phosphorus that should be reduced, unless nitrogen concentrations are too high

6、 to induce direct toxic impacts on human beings or other organisms. Finally, details are provided on how to reduce controls on nitrogen and how to mitigate eutrophication.Keywords Lake eutrophication; Cyanobacteria bloom 1. IntroductionEutrophication of waters is the phenomenon of an ecosystem becom

7、ing more productive by nutrient enrichment, stimulating primary producers. It is usually characterized by algal blooms, causing water quality deterioration and fish kills. It is becoming a global environmental crisis. In China, the problem of lake eutrophication is extremely severe, with frequent cy

8、anobacteria blooms threatening the ecology of waters, economic development and society stability. The most representative case is the cyanobacteria bloom that occurred in Lake Taihu in 2007, resulting in a shortage of drinking water and domestic water for 5 million citizens in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province

9、. Therefore, mitigation of lake eutrophication and cyanobacterial bloom is of great importance in China and the world.To mitigate eutrophication and cyanobacterial blooms, nutrient control is a fundamental process. Traditionally, besides phosphorus control, nitrogen control is generally considered a

10、 necessary practice. Abundant funds have been spent on nitrogen removal during wastewater treatment processes. However, recent researches in China and North America suggest a change to the traditional practice of nitrogen removal for inland waters: to mitigate eutrophication, it is not nitrogen but

11、phosphorus that should be reduced. This finding is of critical importance for the practice of lake restoration.In this paper, the traditional viewpoint of nitrogen control is pointed out first to lack a conclusive scientific basis. Then, new researches are introduced to elaborate a general rule: red

12、uction in nitrogen loading cannot decrease total phytoplankton biomass, but stimulates blooms of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. Further analyses proceeded to elaborate on the significance of this general rule for the strategy to control the source of nutrients. In the end, suggestions on lake restor

13、ation are proposed in detail.2. The traditional viewpoint of nitrogen control lacks conclusive scientific basesThe traditional viewpoint of limiting nutrient control on phytoplankton biomass is based mostly on considerations of N/P (ratio of total nitrogen to total phosphorus) and on bottle bioassay

14、 experiments. However, the following analyses indicate that both the hypothesis and the experiment are not conclusive.2.1. The N/P hypothesis is a subjective assumptionGenerally, lakes have been regarded as limited by phosphorus if TN/TP was relatively large (such as TN/TP 17), limited by nitrogen i

15、f TN/TP was relatively small (such as TN/TP 10) and colimited by nitrogen and phosphorus when TN/TP was intermediate (such as 10 TN/TP 17). However, the thresholds of TN/TP to indicate nutrient limitation vary greatly in the literature, being for instance 1017, 1030, and 715. The variation itself im

16、plies that this method is not reliable. Some limnologists have used the ratio C:N:P proposed by Redfield as a criterion to assess nutrient limitation. Again, the Redfield ratio is not a universal optimum ratio, but an average of species-specific ratios. The optimum N/P ratios vary greatly among vari

17、ous freshwater phytoplankton species, from 4.1 to 133.3. Obviously, it is almost impossible to set a specific “cut-off” ratio to identify a limiting nutrient(s) for a multi-species community.By analyzing the regressions and scatterplots of phytoplankton Chlaorophyll with nitrogen and phosphorus, Sak

18、amoto first proposed the N/P hypothesis. However, when probing into the evidence, we find that his conclusion is just a subjective judgment on the patterns of the scatterplots. In his analysis, he noted three points with a N/P ratio larger than 1517 deviating. He concluded that phosphorus became the

19、 critical limiting factor if the N/P ratio was larger than 1517. In fact, there are ten points with this level of N/P ratio and the left seven points fell exactly on the regression line. Obviously, such a reasoning based on minor points is not right. Similarly, he concluded that phytoplankton was li

20、mited by nitrogen when N/P was less than 910 based on two outlier points, when analyzing the regression relationship between log(TN) and log(Chla). Therefore, this earliest empirical evidence does not support the N/P hypothesis.Many researchers have followed the principles espoused by Sakamoto to an

21、alyze the limiting nutrient and variations under different N/P ratios. However, all the analyses have been performed without strict statistical tests, failing to prove that the dependence of phytoplankton on nitrogen and phosphorus are significantly different under different N/P ratios.In conclusion

22、, through logical reasoning and empirical analyses, the N/P hypothesis is found to be just a subjective assumption without conclusive evidence.2.2. Bottle bioassay experiments are too small in scale to simulate the natural process of nitrogen fixationBottle bioassay experiments have also long been u

23、sed to demonstrate the limiting nutrient of phytoplankton in a waterbody. The experiments are usually performed in an enclosed container to discriminate the limiting nutrient by observing the growth of phytoplankton after nutrient addition. They generally last a period between several hours to 1 wee

24、k. If growth of phytoplankton is stimulated by the addition of some nutrient, this nutrient is considered to be the limiting factor. Due to their small scale in time and space, these experiments fail to simulate some important processes in real open systems such as biological nitrogen fixation. Ther

25、efore, bottle bioassay experiments cannot prove the long-term existence of nitrogen limitation in the field.3. New researches find that nitrogen control fails to restrain total phytoplankton, but stimulates blooms of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteriaIn May 2008, our article disproved the N/P hypothesis

26、based on regional comparative studies. In August 2008, an article by researchers from North America indicated that nitrogen control might stimulate nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria based on a long-term whole-lake experiment. Accordingly, it appears that reduction in nitrogen loading cannot decrease the

27、 biomass of total phytoplankton. It is also logical when comparing the cycling characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus.3.1. Regional research in the Yangtze BasinTo test the N/P hypothesis on a large scale, we analyzed the relationships of Chlaorophyll a with total nitrogen and total phosphorus b

28、ased on multi-year investigations of more than 40 Yangtze lakes.Almost all the TP-Chla regressions had higher R2 values and lower percentage predictive error than those of TN-Chla regressions, indicating the superiority of TP over TN as a predictor.Because different thresholds of TN/TP ratios have b

29、een proposed in the literature, we further compared the differences of R2 values between TP-Chla and TN-Chla regressions over the complete TN/TP spectrum. The results showed that 28 R2 values of TP-Chla regressions were higher than those of TN-Chlaregressions over the entire TN/TP spectrum. Accordin

30、g to the traditional N/P hypothesis, these cases should be limited by phosphorus and have relatively high TN/TP ratios. However, they were not confined to any specific region of higher TN/TP ratios, but distributed evenly between 5 and 50. It further demonstrates the failure of TN/TP to indicate nut

31、rient limitation.For a given amount of TP, Chla varied regardless of the changes of TN. That is, within the TN/TP range of the present research, Chla/TP tends towards a specific value. However, for a given amount of TN, Chlaincreased rapidly with the increase in TP. Therefore, in the field, the tota

32、l phytoplankton biomass is not determined by TN but by TP.Our research disproved the traditional viewpoint of using N/P as an index to discriminate nutrient limiting phytoplankton. We are of the opinion that TP is the primary factor regulating phytoplankton Chla regardless of the concentration of TN

33、.3.2. Long-term whole-lake experiments in CanadaIn Lake 227, a small lake in the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) of Ontario, Canada, researchers from Canada and the USA have performed whole-lake fertilization experiments for 37 years. The lake has been fertilized with constant phosphorus and decreasing nitrogen addition. In t

copyright@ 2008-2022 冰豆网网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备2022015515号-1